Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T16:49:25.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Integrating and liberalizing the market for network services: gas and electricity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

David M. Newbery
Affiliation:
Professor of Economics, Director Department of Applied Economics, Cambridge University
Jordi Gual
Affiliation:
IESE Business School, Barcelona
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The Single European Act mandated the European Commission to propose policies to bring about a single market in financial services, gas, electricity, transport and telecommunications. The Commission has been remarkably successful in issuing directives with that intent, and is now focused more on ensuring that the directives are implemented, and where necessary strengthened to achieve their purpose.

Different countries have embraced this reform programme with differing degrees of enthusiasm, with Britain, the Nordic countries and Spain in the vanguard but others more cautious. In the past, state-owned utilities were restricted to operating within their national frontiers. Part of the pressure for extending and accelerating market liberalization comes from newly privatized companies that are seeking to diversify out of their national markets. Some continental countries, notably France, have not restricted their still state-owned utilities from foreign ventures, and have undoubtedly benefited from a largely protected home market and access to cheaper, de facto state-guaranteed finance. The imbalance this creates for competition is a source of considerable tension within the EU, and a strong reason for further liberalization and harmonization, so that companies in the same industry face similar competitive conditions across the Union.

The underlying case for liberalizing network industries is that it allows competitive pressure to be put on sleepy monopolies, and restricts cross-subsidies that frequently take the form of a tax on competitive medium-sized industry to subsidize domestic consumers (and sometimes politically powerful large business).

Type
Chapter
Information
Building a Dynamic Europe
The Key Policy Debates
, pp. 70 - 99
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bergman, L., G. Brunekreeft, C. Doyle, B.-H. von der Fehr, D. M. Newbery, M. Pollitt and P. Regibeau (1999), A European market for electricity?, London: Centre for Economic Policy Research
Bogorad, C. S. and Penn, D. W. (2001), ‘Cost-of-service rates to market-based rates to price caps to?!#?#!?’, Electricity Journal, May: 61–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunekreeft, G. (2002), ‘Regulation and third-party discrimination in the German electricity supply industry’, European Journal of Law and Economics, 13: 203–220; also available at http://www.vwl.uni-freiburg.de/fakultaet/vw/lehrstuhl.htmlCrossRefGoogle Scholar
CEC [Commission of the European Communities] (2001), Completing the internal energy market, Staff Working Paper, Brussels: Commission of European Communities, SEC(2001) 438
Competition Commission (2001), AES and British Energy, Report 453, London: Competition Commission
DOE [US Department of Energy] (2000), Horizontal market power in restructured electricity markets, US Department of Energy, Office of Economic, Electricity and Natural Gas Analysis
Domah, P. and Pollitt, M. G. (2001), ‘The restructuring and privatisation of electricity distribution and supply businesses in England’, Fiscal Studies, 22 (1): 107–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DRI.WEFA (2001), Report for the European Commission Directorate General for transport and energy to determine changes after opening of the gas market in August 2000, vol. I: European overview, Brussels: European Commission, http://europa.eu.imt.com/energy/en/gassinglemarket/finalcor:vol1.pdf
Green, R. and McDaniel, T. (1998), ‘Competition in electricity supply: will “1998” be worth it?’, Fiscal Studies 19 (3): 273–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, R. and Newbery, D. M. (1992), ‘Competition in the British electricity spot market’, Journal of Political Economy, 100 (5) (October): 929–953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, J. and K. Stahl (1996), ‘Regulation of the market for electricity in the Federal Republic of Germany’, in R. J. Gilbert and E. P. Kahn (eds.), International comparisons of electricity regulation, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 277–311CrossRef
Newbery, D. M. (1995), ‘Power markets and market power’, Energy Journal, 16 (3): 41–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newbery, D. M. (1998), ‘Competition, contracts and entry in the electricity spot market’, Rand Journal of Economics, 29: 726–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newbery, D. M. (2000), Privatization, restructuring and regulation of network utilities, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Newbery, D. M. (2002), ‘Economic reform in Europe: integrating and liberalizing the market for services’, Utilities Policy, 10: 85–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newbery, D. M. and Pollitt, M. G. (1997), ‘The restructuring and privatisation of the CEGB – was it worth it?’, Journal of Industrial Economics, 45 (3): 269–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, Price C. (2001), ‘Heresy? The case against deregulation of electricity generation’, Electricity Journal, May: 19–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolak, F. A. (2001), ‘A comprehensive market power mitigation plan for the California electricity market’, California ISO Market Surveillance Committee, 24 April, available at http://www.stanford.edu/~wolak
Wolak, F. A. and R. Nordhaus (2001), ‘Comments on “Staff recommendations on prospective market monitoring and mitigation for the California wholesale electricity market”’, California ISO Market Surveillance Committee, 22 March, available at http://www.stanford.edu/~wolak

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×