Book contents
- The Cambridge Companion to the International Court of Justice
- Cambridge Companions to Law
- The Cambridge Companion to The International Court of Justice
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part I The Role of the ICJ
- Part II The ICJ and International Dispute Settlement
- Part III The Impact of the ICJ’s Jurisprudence
- Index
- References
Part II - The ICJ and International Dispute Settlement
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 May 2023
Book contents
- The Cambridge Companion to the International Court of Justice
- Cambridge Companions to Law
- The Cambridge Companion to The International Court of Justice
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part I The Role of the ICJ
- Part II The ICJ and International Dispute Settlement
- Part III The Impact of the ICJ’s Jurisprudence
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Companion to the International Court of Justice , pp. 121 - 300Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Further Reading
Ago, Roberto, ‘Binding Advisory Opinions of the International Court of Justice’, 85 American Journal of International Law (1985) 439.Google Scholar
Oda, Shigeru, ‘The Compulsory Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice: A Myth? A Statistical Analysis of Contentious Cases’, 49 The International and Comparative Law Quarterly (2000) 251.Google Scholar
Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs FDFA, Directorate of International Law, Handbook on accepting the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice; Model clauses and templates (2014).Google Scholar
Tomka, Peter, ‘The Special Agreement’, in Nisuke, A., McWhinney, E., Rüdiger, W. (eds), Liber Amicorum, Judge Shigeru Oda, Vol. 1 (Brill, 2002) 553.Google Scholar
Further Reading
Daniele, L., Le misure cautelari nel processo dinanzi alla Corte internazionale di giustizia (Giuffrè, 1993).Google Scholar
Gemalmaz, M. S., Provisional Measures of Protection in International Law: 1907–2010 (Legal Kitapevi, 2011).Google Scholar
Miles, C., Provisional Measures Before International Courts and Tribunals (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Rosenne, S., Provisional Measures in International Law: The International Court of Justice and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Further Reading
d’Aspremont, J., ‘What Was Not Meant to Be: General Principles of Law As a Source of International Law’, in Pisillo Mazzeschi, R. and De Sena, P. (eds.), Global Justice, Human Rights, and the Modernization of International Law (Springer, 2018) 163.Google Scholar
d’Aspremont, J., ‘The Four Lives of Customary International Law’, 21 International Community Law Review (2019) 229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M., ‘The History of Article 38 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice: The Journey from the Past to the Present’, in Besson, S. and d’Aspremont, J., Oxford Handbook on the Sources of International Law (Oxford University Press, 2017), p. 179.Google Scholar
Tams, C., ‘Meta-Custom and the Court: A Study in Judicial Law-Making’ 14 The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals (2015) 51.Google Scholar
Tomka, P., ‘Custom and the International Court of Justice’, 12(2) The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals (2013) 195.Google Scholar
Further Reading
Benzing, M., ‘Evidentiary Issues’ in Zimmermann, A. et al. (eds.) The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary (Oxford University Press, 2019) 1377.Google Scholar
Devaney, J. G., Fact-Finding before the International Court of Justice (Cambridge University Press 2016).Google Scholar
Devaney, J. G. ‘Reappraising the Role of Experts in Recent Cases before the International Court of Justice’, Germ Yearrbook Intl L 62 (2019) 337.Google Scholar
Del Mar, K., ‘The International Court of Justice and Standards of Proof’, in Bannelier, et al. (eds.), The ICJ and the Evolution of International Law (Routledge, 2012) 99.Google Scholar
Kolb, R., ‘General Principles of Procedural Law’, in Zimmermann, A. et al. (ed.) The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary (3rd ed., Oxford University Press, 2019) 977.Google Scholar
Malintoppi, L., ‘Fact Finding and Evidence before the International Court of Justice (Notably in Scientific-Related Disputes)’ 9 JIDS (2018) 421.Google Scholar
Mbengue, M., ‘International Courts and Tribunals as Fact-Finders: The Case of Scientific Fact-Finding in International Adjudication’ 34 Loy. L. A. Int’l & Comp. L. Rev (2012) 53–80 at 53–54.Google Scholar
Parlett, K., ‘Parties’ Engagement with Experts in International Litigation’ 9 JIDS (2018) 440.Google Scholar
Peat, D., ‘The Use of Court: Appointed Experts by the International Court of Justice’ 84 BYBIL (2014) 271.Google Scholar
Plant, B., ‘Expert Evidence and the Challenge of Procedural Reform in International Dispute Settlement’ 9 JIDS (2018) 464.Google Scholar
Riddell, A. and Plant, B., Evidence before the International Court of Justice (British Institute of International and Comparative Law 2009).Google Scholar
Further Reading
Hernández, G., The International Court of Justice and the Judicial Function (Oxford University Press, 2014)Google Scholar
Mettraux, G., International Crimes: Law and Practice Volume I: Genocide (Oxford University Press, 2019)Google Scholar
Pulkowski, D., The Law and Politics of International Regime Conflict (Oxford University Press, 2014)Google Scholar
Stewart, D. P., ‘The Emergent Right to Consular Notification, Access and Assistance’ in Von Arnauld, A., Von der Decken, K., and Susi, M. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of New Human Rights: Recognition, Novelty, Rhetoric (Cambridge University Press, 2020), p. 439Google Scholar
Webb, P., International Integration and Fragmentation (Oxford University Press 2013, paperback 2015)Google Scholar
Further Reading
International Law Association Committee on the Procedure of International Courts and Tribunals, ‘Preliminary Report’, 17 January 2017, Section II.Google Scholar
Pinzauti, G. and Webb, P., ‘Litigation before the International Court of Justice during the Pandemic’ 34(4) LJIL (2021) 787.Google Scholar
Quintana, J. J., Litigation at the International Court of Justice: Practice and Procedure (Brill Nijhoff, 2015).Google Scholar
Ugalde, S. and Quintana, J. J., ‘Managing Litigation before the International Court of Justice’ 9(4) JIDS (2018) 691.Google Scholar
Further Reading
Higgins, R., ‘Respecting Sovereign States and Running a Tight Courtroom’ 50 ICLQ (2001) 121.Google Scholar
Miles, C., Provisional Measures before International Courts and Tribunals (Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Parlett, K. and Sander, A. ‘Into the void: a counsel perspective on the need to articulate rules concerning disclosure before the ICJ’, 113 AJIL Unbound (2019) 302.Google Scholar
Further Reading
Crawford, J., ‘Advocacy before International Tribunals in State-to-State cases’, in Bishop, D. and Kehoe, E. G. (eds), The Art of Advocacy in International Arbitration (2nd edn, Juris, 2010) 303.Google Scholar
Crawford, J. and Pellet, A., ‘Anglo Saxon and Continental Approaches to Pleading Before the ICJ; Aspects des modes continentaux et Anglo-Saxons de plaidoiries devant la C.I.J.’ in Buffard, I. et al. (eds.), International Law between Universalism and Fragmentation, Festschrift in Honour of Gerhard Hafner (Martinus Nijhoff, 2008) 831.Google Scholar
Landau, T., ‘Dysfunctional Deliberations and Effective Advocacy’, in Menaker, A. (ed.), International Arbitration and the Rule of Law: Contribution and Conformity, ICCA Congress Series, Volume 19 (Kluwer, 2017) 285.Google Scholar
Wood, M. and Sthoeger, E., ‘The International Bar’ in Romano, C. P. R., Alter, K. J. and Shany, Y. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (Oxford University Press, 2014) 639.Google Scholar