Abbott, F. F. (1907) ‘The theatre as a factor in Roman politics under the Republic’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 38: 49–56.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. and Mayer, R. G. (1999) ‘Introduction’, in Adams and Mayer (1999) 1–18.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. and Mayer, R. eds. (1999) Aspects of the Language of Latin Poetry. London.Google Scholar

Ahl, F. (1989) ‘Homer, Vergil, and complex narrative structures in Roman poetry. An essay’, Illinois Classical Studies 14: 1–31.Google Scholar

Alexander, C. (2011) ‘Out of context’, New York Times, 6 April.Google Scholar

Allen, G. (2011) Intertextuality, 2nd edn. Abingdon and New York.Google Scholar

Alpers, P. (1979) The Singer of the Eclogues. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Alpers, P. (1996) What is Pastoral? Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, P. J. (2016) ‘Heracles’ choice: thoughts on the virtues of print and digital commentary’, in Kraus and Stray (2016) 483–93.Google Scholar

Anderson, R. D., Parsons, P. J., and Nisbet, R. G. M. (1979) ‘Elegiacs by Gallus from Qaṣr Ibrîm’, Journal of Roman Studies 69: 125–55.Google Scholar

Anderson, W. S. (1957) ‘Vergil’s Second Iliad’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 88: 17–30 = Harrison (1990) 239–52 = Hardie (1999) iii.74–86.Google Scholar

Ando, C. (2002) ‘Vergil’s Italy: ethnography and politics in first-century Rome’, in Levene and Nelis (2002) 123–42.Google Scholar

Apostol, R. (2015) ‘Urbanus es, Corydon: ecocritiquing town and country in Eclogue 2’, Vergilius 61: 3–28.Google Scholar

Arendt, H. (1954) ‘What is authority?’ in Arendt (1961) 91–141.Google Scholar

Arendt, H. (1961) Between Past and Future. New York.Google Scholar

Arendt, H. (1981) The Life of the Mind. London.Google Scholar

Argenio, R. (1961) ‘Retorica e politica nelle tragedie de Accio’, Rivista di studi classici 9: 198–212.Google Scholar

Armstrong, D., Fish, J., Johnston, P. A., and Skinner, M. B. eds. (2004) Virgil, Philodemus, and the Augustans. Austin.Google Scholar

Armstrong, R. (2019) Vergil’s Green Thoughts. Plants, Humans, and the Divine. Oxford.Google Scholar

Arnold, M. (1964) Essays in Criticism: First and Second Series. London and New York.Google Scholar

Arnould, C. and Assenmaker, P. (2018) ‘Vergilius in nummis: Virgilian quotations on medals and tokens issued in the low countries during the second half of the sixteenth century’, in Houghton and Sgarbi (2018) 63–83.Google Scholar

Ascham, R. (1989) Letters of Roger Ascham, ed. Vos, A.. New York.Google Scholar

Attridge, D. (1974) Well-Weighed Syllables. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Auden, W. H. (1962) The Dyer’s Hand and Other Essays. New York.Google Scholar

Austin, R. G. ed. (1927) ‘Virgil and the Sibyl’, Classical Quarterly 21: 100–5.Google Scholar

Austin, R. G. (1955) P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Quartus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Austin, R. G. (1964) P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Secundus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Austin, R. G. (1968) ‘Ille ego qui quondam’, Classical Quarterly 18: 107–15.Google Scholar

Austin, R. G. (1971) P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Primus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Austin, R. G. (1977) P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Sextus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Axelson, B. (1945) Unpoetische Wörter: Ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis der lateinischen Dichtersprache. Lund.Google Scholar

Bain, I., Chambers, D., and Wilton, A. (1977) The Wood Engravings of William Blake. Seventeen Subjects Commissioned by Dr Robert Thornton for his ‘Virgil’ of 1821. London.Google Scholar

Bakhtin, M. M. (1981) The Dialogic Imagination. Four Essays, trans. C. Emerson and M. Holquist. Austin.Google Scholar

Bakhtin, M. M. (1984) Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics, trans. C. Emerson. Minneapolis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakhtin, M. M. (1990) Art and Answerability. Early Philosophical Essays, ed. Holquist, M. and Liapunov, V.. Austin.Google Scholar

Bakker, E. (1997) ‘Storytelling in the future: truth, time and tense in Homeric epic’, in Bakker, E. and Kahane, A, eds., Written Voices, Spoken Signs: Tradition, Performance, and the Epic Text, 11–36. Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bal, M. (1985) Narratology: Introduction to the Theory of Narrative. Toronto and London.Google Scholar

Ball, R. (1991) ‘Theological semantics: Virgil’s Pietas and Dante’s Pietà’, in Jacoff and Schnapp (1991) 19–36.Google Scholar

Baraz, Y. (2009) ‘Euripides’ Corinthian princess in the Aeneid’, Classical Philology 104: 317–30.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1984) La traccia del modello: effetti omerici nella narrazione virgiliana. Pisa.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1993) ‘Future reflexive: two modes of allusion and Ovid’s Heroides’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 95: 333–65.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1994) ‘Rappresentazioni del dolore e interpretazione nell’Eneide’, Antike und Abendland 40: 109–24 = Barchiesi (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1997) The Poet and the Prince. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1999) ‘Representations of suffering and interpretation in the Aeneid’, in Hardie (1999) iii.324–44.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (2005) ‘Learned eyes’, in Galinsky (2005) 281–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (2006) ‘Le sofferenze dell’impero’, in Publio Virgilio Marone, Eneide, trans. and notes by Scarcia, R, v–xliv. Milan.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (2008) ‘Roman Callimachus’, in Acosta-Hughes, B., Lehnus, L., and Stephens, S., eds., Brill’s Companion to Callimachus, 511–30. Leiden and Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (2012) ‘Roma e l’Eneide: impero e cittadinanza’, Classici contro 1: 43–57.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (2015) Homeric Effects in Vergil’s Narrative, trans. I. Marchesi and M. Fox. Princeton and Oxford.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (forthcoming) The War for Italia. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. and Hardie, P. (2010) ‘The Ovidian career model: Ovid, Gallus, Apuleius, Boccaccio’, in Hardie and Moore (2010) 59–88.Google Scholar

Bardon, H. (1950) ‘L’Enéide et l’art des XVIe–XVIIIe siècles’, Gazette des beaux arts 37: 77–97.Google Scholar

Barnes, T. D. (1981) Constantine and Eusebius. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Barnes, W. R. (2000) ‘Virgil: the literary impact’, in Horsfall (2000b) 257–92.Google Scholar

Barolini, T. (1984) Dante’s Poets: Textuality and Truth in the Comedy. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barrell, J. and Bull, J. eds. (1974) The Penguin Book of English Pastoral Verse. London.Google Scholar

Barrett, A. (1970) ‘The authorship of the Culex: an evaluation of the evidence’, Latomus 29: 348–62.Google Scholar

Barrett, A. (1972) ‘Donatus and the date of the Culex’, Classical Philology 67: 280–7.Google Scholar

Barrow, R. (2001) ‘Painting Virgil: Victorian choices’, Proceedings of the Virgil Society 24: 81–101.Google Scholar

Bartsch, S. (1989) Decoding the Ancient Novel. Princeton.Google Scholar

Bartsch, S. (2006) The Mirror of the Self: Sexuality, Self-Knowledge and the Gaze in the Early Roman Empire. Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartsch, S. and Elsner, J. (2007) ‘Eight ways of looking at an ecphrasis’, Classical Philology 102: i–vi.Google Scholar

Basnett, S. (1991) Translation Studies, rev. edn. London and New York.Google Scholar

Baswell, C. (1995) Virgil in Medieval England. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Batstone, W. W. (1984) ‘Georgics I: studies in meaning and criticism’, diss. University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Batstone, W. W. (1988) ‘On the surface of the Georgics’, Arethusa 21: 227–45.Google Scholar

Batstone, W. W. (2003) Review of Gale (2000), Phoenix 57: 163–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumbach, M. (2010) ‘Aeneas’, in Grafton, A., Most, G. W. and Settis, S., eds., The Classical Tradition, 8–10. Cambridge, MA, and London.Google Scholar

Baxandall, M. (1985) Patterns of Intention. New Haven.Google Scholar

Bayer, A. ed. (2008) Art and Love in Renaissance Italy. New Haven and London.Google Scholar

Beaumont, J. (1629) Bosworth Field. London.Google Scholar

Beck, D. (2014) ‘The first simile of the Aeneid’, Vergilius 60: 67–83.Google Scholar

Beck, F. A. G. (1964) Greek Education, 450–350 bc. London.Google Scholar

Becker, A. (2004) ‘Non oculis sed auribus: the ancient schoolroom and learning to hear the Latin hexameter’, Classical Journal 99: 313–22.Google Scholar

Bellessort, A. (1920) Virgile, son œuvre et son temps. Paris.Google Scholar

Benjamin, W. (1970) Illuminations, trans. H. Zohn. London.Google Scholar

Benko, S. (1980) ‘Virgil’s fourth Eclogue in Christian interpretation’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 31: 646–705.Google Scholar

Bennett, C. (1988) ‘The conversion of Vergil: the Aeneid in Augustine’s Confessions’, Revue des études augustiniennes 34: 47–69.Google Scholar

Béranger, J. (1953) Recherches sur l’aspect idéologique du principat. Basel.Google Scholar

Bernard, J. D. ed. (1986) Vergil at 2000: Commemorative Essays on the Poet and his Influence. New York.Google Scholar

Bernstein, N. W., Gervais, K., and Lin, W. (2016) ‘Comparative rates of text reuse in classical Latin hexameter poetry’, Digital Humanities Quarterly 9.3, www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/9/3/000237/000237.html.Google Scholar

Bexley, E. M. (2016) ‘Recognition and the character of Seneca’s Medea’, Classical Journal 62: 31–51.Google Scholar

Bietenholz, P. G. (1994) Historia and Fabula: Myths and Legends in Historical Thought from Antiquity to the Modern Age. Leiden, New York, and Cologne.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biliński, B. (1958) Accio ed i Gracchi. Contributo alla storia della plebe e della tragedia romana. Rome.Google Scholar

Binder, G. (1971) Aeneas und Augustus: Interpretationen zum 8. Buch der Aeneis. Meisenheim.Google Scholar

Binder, G. (2010) ‘Goldene Zeiten: Immer wieder wird ein Messias geboren … Beispiele neuzeitlicher Aneignung der 4. Ekloge Vergils’, in Burkard et al. (2010) 51–72.Google Scholar

Bing, P. (1993) ‘Aratus and his audiences’, in Schiesaro et al. (1993) 99–129.Google Scholar

Bizer, M. (2011) Homer and the Politics of Authority. New York and Oxford.Google Scholar

Blanchot, M. (1971) Le livre à venir. Paris.Google Scholar

Blandford, D. W. (1993) Pentekontaetia: The Virgil Society 1943–1993. London.Google Scholar

Blänsdorf, J. (2011) Fragmenta Poetarum Latinorum, 4th edn. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar

Bloch, H. (1963) ‘The pagan revival in the west at the end of the fourth century’, in Momigliano, A., ed., The Conflict between Paganism and Christianity in the Fourth Century, 193–218. Oxford.Google Scholar

Bloom, H. (1973) The Anxiety of Influence: A Theory of Poetry. London.Google Scholar

Bloom, H. (1995) The Western Canon: The Books and School of the Ages. London.Google Scholar

Bocciolini Palagi, L. (2016) La musa e la furia: interpretazione del secondo proemio dell’Eneide. Bologna.Google Scholar

Bockmuehl, M. and Stroumsa, G. eds. (2010) Paradise in Antiquity: Jewish and Christian Views. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Bognini, F. (2005) ‘Per il commento virgiliano ascritto a Ilario di Orléans: a proposito delle “glose” al sesto libro dell’Eneide’, Acme 58: 129–73.Google Scholar

Bohlin, D. DeG. (1979) Prints and Related Drawings by the Carracci Family. A Catalogue Raisonné. Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Bök, C. (2015) The Xenotext: Book I. Toronto.Google Scholar

Bonfanti, M. (1985) Punto di vista e modi della narrazione nell’Eneide. Pisa.Google Scholar

Bosci, U. et al. eds. (1976) Enciclopedia dantesca, 6 vols. Rome.Google Scholar

Bouquet, M. and Méniel, B. eds. (2011) Servius et sa réception de l’Antiquité à la Renaissance. Rennes.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice, trans. R. Nice. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Bowen, C. (1887) Virgil in English Verse. Eclogues and Aeneid I-VI. London.Google Scholar

Bowersock, G. W. (1971) ‘A date in the eighth Eclogue’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 75: 73–80.Google Scholar

Bowra, C. M. (1933) ‘Aeneas and the Stoic ideal’, Greece & Rome 3: 8–21 = Harrison (1990) 363–77 = Hardie (1999) iii.204–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyle, A. J. (1975) Ancient Pastoral. Berwick, Victoria.Google Scholar

Boyle, A. J. (1979) Virgil’s Ascraean Song: Ramus Essays on the Georgics. Berwick, Victoria.Google Scholar

Boyle, A. J. (1986) The Chaonian Dove: Studies in the Eclogues, Georgics, and Aeneid of Virgil. Leiden.Google Scholar

Boyle, A. J. (1993) ‘The canonic text: Virgil’s Aeneid’, in Boyle, A. J., ed., Roman Epic. London and New York.Google Scholar

Boyle, A. J. (1999) ‘Images of Rome’, in Perkell (1999a) 148–61.Google Scholar

Boyle, A. J. (2006) An Introduction to Roman Tragedy. London.Google Scholar

Bradley, A. C. (1909) ‘Hegel’s theory of tragedy’, in Oxford Lectures on Poetry, 69–95. Oxford.Google Scholar

Braham, A. ed. (1978) Giovanni Battista Moroni: 400th Anniversary Exhibition. London.Google Scholar

Brammall, S. (2015) The English Aeneid: Translations of Virgil, 1555–1646. Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Brasillach, R. (1931) Présence de Virgile. Paris.Google Scholar

Braund, S. (forthcoming) A Cultural History of Translations of Virgil: From the Twelfth Century to the Present. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Braund, S. and Gill, C. eds. (1997) The Passions in Roman Thought and Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Braund, S. and Torlone, Z. M. eds. (2018) Virgil and his Translators. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Breed, B. W. (2000) ‘Imitations of originality: Theocritus and Lucretius at the start of the Eclogues’, Vergilius 46: 3–20.Google Scholar

Breed, B. W. (2006) Pastoral Inscriptions: Reading and Writing Virgil’s Eclogues. London.Google Scholar

Breed, B., Damon, C. and Rossi, A. eds. (2010) Citizens of Discord: Rome and Its Civil Wars. Oxford.Google Scholar

Bretzigheimer, G. (2005) ‘Poeta memor ludensque oder The Making of Ciris’, in Holzberg (2005) 142–224.Google Scholar

Briggs, W. W. (1980) Narrative and Simile from the Georgics in the Aeneid. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Briggs, W. W. (1981a) ‘Virgil and the Hellenistic epic’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt. ii.948–84. Berlin.Google Scholar

Briggs, W. W. (1981b) ‘A bibliography of Virgil’s “Eclogues” (1927–1977)’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II. 31.2, 1267–357. Berlin.Google Scholar

Broch, H. (1945) Der Tod des Vergil, trans. J. S. Untermeyer (1983) The Death of Virgil. Oxford.Google Scholar

Broch, H. (1983) The Death of Virgil, trans. J. S. Untermeyer. Oxford.Google Scholar

Brock, R. (2013) Greek Political Imagery from Homer to Aristotle. London.Google Scholar

Brooks, P. (1984) Reading for the Plot: Design and Intention in Narrative. New York and London.Google Scholar

Brooks, P. (1994) Psychoanalysis and Storytelling. Oxford.Google Scholar

Brooten, B. J. (1998) Love between Women: Early Christian Responses to Female Homoeroticism. Chicago.Google Scholar

Brown, D. B. (2010) ‘Empire and exile: Vergil in Romantic art’, in Farrell and Putnam (2010) 311–24.Google Scholar

Brown, P. (1967) Augustine of Hippo, rev. edn. 2000. London.Google Scholar

Brown, S., Methuen, C., and Spicer, A. eds. (2018) The Church and Empire. Studies in Church History 55. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Brownlee, M. S. (1990) The Severed Word. Ovid’s Heroides and the Novela Sentimental. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brugnoli, G. and Stok, F. eds. (1997) Vitae vergilianae antiquae. Rome.Google Scholar

Brumble, H. D. (1998) Classical Myths and Legends in the Middle Ages and Renaissance. A Dictionary of Allegorical Meanings. London and Chicago.Google Scholar

Buchheit, V. (1963) Vergil über die Sendung Roms. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Büchner, K. (1955) ‘P. Vergilius Maro’, Real-Encyclopädie der Classischen Altertumswissenschaft VIIIa.1021–486.Google Scholar

Buffière, F. (1956) Les mythes d’Homère et la pensée grecque. Paris.Google Scholar

Bühler, W. (1960) Die Europa des Moschos. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Bull, M. (2005) The Mirror of the Gods. Classical Mythology in Renaissance Art. London.Google Scholar

Bunting, B. (2000) Complete Poems. Newcastle upon Tyne.Google Scholar

Burbidge, J. (2009) ‘Dido, Anna and the Sirens (Vergil Aeneid 4, 437 ss.)’, Materiali e discussioni 62: 105–28.Google Scholar

Burck, E. (1929) ‘Die Komposition von Vergils Georgika’, Hermes 64: 279–321.Google Scholar

Burck, E. (1979) Das römische Epos. Darmstadt.Google Scholar

Burden, M. ed. (1998) A Woman Scorn’d: Responses to the Dido Myth. London.Google Scholar

Burkard, T., Schauer, M., and Wiener, C. eds. (2010) Vestigia Vergiliana: Vergil-Rezeption in der Neuzeit. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burrow, C. (1993) Epic Romance: Homer to Milton. Oxford.Google Scholar

Burrow, C. (2008) ‘English Renaissance readers and the Appendix Vergiliana’, Proceedings of the Virgil Society 26: 1–16.Google Scholar

Burrow, C. (2013) Shakespeare and Classical Antiquity. Oxford.Google Scholar

Burrow, C. (2016) ‘You’ve listened long enough’, Review of Seamus Heaney, Aeneid: Book VI, The London Review of Books, 21 April: 13–14.Google Scholar

Burzacchini, G. (2002) ‘Flectere si nequeo superos, Acheronta movebo (Verg. Aen. VII 312): Furores e guerra nel Lazio (con osservazioni sull’influsso di Euripide nel VII canto dell’Eneide’, Atti e memorie / Accademia Nazionale Virgiliana di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti. Mantova: Accademia Nazionale Virgiliana, n. s. 70: 19–61.Google Scholar

Cadili, L. ed. (2003) Scholia Bernensia in Vergilii Bucolica et Georgica, II 1, Georgica commentarii (Proemium-liber I 1–42). Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Cafritz, R. C., Gowing, L., and Rosand, D. (1988) Places of Delight: The Pastoral Landscape. London and Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Cairns, D. and Allan, W. (2011) ‘Conflict and community in the Iliad’, in Fisher, N. and van Wees, H., eds., Competition in the Ancient World, 113–46. Swansea.Google Scholar

Cairns, F. (1989) Virgil’s Augustan Epic. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Cairns, F. (2005) ‘Lavinia’s blush (Virgil Aeneid 12.64–70)’, in Cairns, D., ed., Body Language in the Greek and Roman Worlds, 195–213. Swansea.Google Scholar

Calabrese, O. (1992) Neo-Baroque: A Sign of the Times, trans. C. Lambert. Princeton.Google Scholar

Caldwell, C. (2017) Story Structure and Development: A Guide for Animators, VFX Artists, Game Designers, and Virtual Reality. Boca Raton.Google Scholar

Cameron, A. (1995) Callimachus and his Critics. Princeton.Google Scholar

Cameron, A. (2004) ‘Vergil illustrated between Pagans and Christians. Reconsidering “the late-4th c. Classical Revival”, the dates of the manuscripts, and the places of production of the Latin Classics’, Journal of Roman Archaeology 17: 502–25.Google Scholar

Cameron, A. (2011) The Last Pagans of Rome. Oxford.Google Scholar

Campbell, M. (1983) Studies in the Third Book of Apollonius Rhodius’ Argonautica. Hildesheim.Google Scholar

Camps, W. A. (1969) An Introduction to Virgil’s Aeneid. Oxford.Google Scholar

Camps, W. A. (1971) Literary Style: A Symposium. Oxford.Google Scholar

Carcopino, J. (1930) Virgile et le mystère de la IV Eglogue. Paris.Google Scholar

Carey, C. (2007) ‘Epic diffusion and identity’, in Nash, A. and Wilson, I., eds., Literary Cultures and the Material Book, 133–45. London.Google Scholar

Carlà-Uhink, F. (2017) ‘“Between the human and the divine”: cross-dressing and transgender dynamics in the Graeco-Roman world’, in Campanile, D., Carlà-Uhink, F., and Facella, M., eds., TransAntiquity. New York.Google Scholar

Cartault, A. (1926) L’art de Virgile dans l’Énéide, 2 vols. Paris.Google Scholar

Casali, S. (2004–5) ‘Further voices in Ovid Heroides 7’, Hermathena 177–8: 141–58.Google Scholar

Casali, S. (2006) ‘Other voices in Ovid’s Aeneid’, in Knox, P. E., ed., Oxford Readings in Ovid, 144–65. Oxford [originally published as ‘Altre voci nell’ Eneide di Ovidio’, Materiali e discussioni 35: 59–76].Google Scholar

Casali, S. (2008) ‘Agudezas virgiliane nel commento all’Eneide di Juan Luis de la Cerda’, in Santini and Stok (2008) 233–62.Google Scholar

Casali, S. (2010) ‘The development of the Aeneas legend’, in Farrell and Putnam (2010) 37–51.Google Scholar

Casali, S. (2011) ‘The Bellum Civile as an anti-Aeneid’, in Asso, P., ed., Brill’s Companion to Lucan, 81–109. Leiden and Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Casali, S. (2017) Virgilio, Eneide 2, introduzione, traduzione, e commento. Pisa.Google Scholar

Casali, S. and Stok, F. eds. (2008) Servius: Exegetical Stratifications and Cultural Models. Brussels.Google Scholar

Casalini, C. and Pavur, C. (2016) Jesuit Pedagogy, 1540–1616: A Reader. Chestnut Hill.Google Scholar

Casanova-Robin, H. ed. (2014) Virgile: Bucoliques. Paris.Google Scholar

Chadwick, H. trans. (1991) St Augustine. Confessions. Oxford.Google Scholar

Chalker, J. (1969) The English Georgic. London.Google Scholar

Champlin, E. J. (1978) ‘The life and times of Calpurnius Siculus’, Journal of Roman Studies 68: 95–110.Google Scholar

Chater, N. (2018) The Mind is Flat: The Illusion of Mental Depth and the Improvised Mind. London.Google Scholar

Chaucer, G. (1987) The Riverside Chaucer, ed. Benson, L. D. et al., 3rd edn. Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Chaudhuri, P., Dexter, J. P., and Katz, T. et al. (2017) ‘Quantitative criticism of literary relationships’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1611910114.Google Scholar

Cheney, P. and de Armas, F. A. eds. (2002) European Literary Careers: The Author from Antiquity to the Renaissance. Toronto.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chevallier, R. ed. (1978) Présence de Virgile. Paris.Google Scholar

Citroni, M. (2005) ‘The concept of the classical and the canons of model authors in Roman literature’, in Porter, J. I., ed., Classical Pasts: The Classical Traditions of Greece and Rome, 204–34. Princeton and Oxford.Google Scholar

Claassen, J.-M. (1999) ‘Classics for the next millennium: African options’, The Classical Outlook 76: 125–32.Google Scholar

Clark, G. (2010) ‘Paradise for pagans? Augustine on Virgil, Cicero and Plato’, in Bockmuehl and Stroumsa (2010) 166–78.Google Scholar

Clark, G. (2015) Monica: An Ordinary Saint. Oxford.Google Scholar

Clark, G. (2017) ‘In praise of the wax candle: Augustine the Poet and late Latin literature’, in Elsner and Hernández Lobato (2017) 424–46.Google Scholar

Clark, G. (2018) ‘Imperium and the City of God: Augustine on church and empire’, in Brown, Methuen, and Spicer (2018) 46–70.Google Scholar

Clark, R. J. (1978) Catabasis: Vergil and the Wisdom-Tradition. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Clausen, W. (1964) ‘An interpretation of the Aeneid’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 68: 139–47.Google Scholar

Clausen, W. (1972) ‘On the date of the First Eclogue’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 76: 201–6.Google Scholar

Clausen, W. (1986) ‘Cicero and the new poetry’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 90: 159–70.Google Scholar

Clausen, W. (1987) Virgil’s Aeneid and the Tradition of Hellenistic Poetry. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Clausen, W. (1994) Virgil, Eclogues. Oxford.Google Scholar

Clausen, W. (2000) ‘Appendix’, in Horsfall (2000b) 313–14.Google Scholar

Clausen, W. (2002) Virgil’s Aeneid: Decorum, Allusion, and Ideology. Munich and Leipzig.Google Scholar

Clausen, W. V., Goodyear, F. R. D., Kenney, E. J., and Richmond, J. A. eds. (1966) Appendix Vergiliana. Oxford.Google Scholar

Clauss, J. J. (1993) The Best of the Argonauts: The Redefinition of the Epic Hero in Book I of Apollonius’ Argonautica. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Clauss, J. J. (2016) ‘The Hercules and Cacus episode in Augustan literature: engaging the Homeric Hymn to Hermes in light of Callimachus’ and Apollonius’ reception’, in Faulkner, A., Vergados, A. and Schwab, A., eds. The Reception of the Homeric Hymns, 79–94. Oxford.Google Scholar

Clay, J. S. (1993) ‘The education of Perses’, in Schiesaro et al. (1993) 23–4.Google Scholar

Clift, E. H. (1945) Latin Pseudepigrapha: A Study in Attribution. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Codina Mir, J. (1968) Aux sources de la pédagogie des Jésuites. Le ‘modus Parisiensis’. Rome.Google Scholar

Coffee, N. and Bernstein, N. (2016) ‘Digital methods and classical studies’, Digital Humanities Quarterly 10.2. Available at: www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/10/2/index.html.Google Scholar

Coffee, N., Koenig, J.-P., Poornima, S., Ossewaarde, R., Forstall, C., and Jacobson, S. (2012) ‘Intertextuality in the digital age’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 142: 383–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coleman, R. ed. (1977) Vergil, Eclogues. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Coleman, R. (1982) ‘The gods in the Aeneid’, Greece & Rome 29: 143–68.Google Scholar

Coleman, R. (1999) ‘Poetic diction, poetic discourse and the poetic register’, in Adams and Mayer (1999) 21–93.Google Scholar

Collard, C. (1975) ‘Medea and Dido’, Prometheus 1: 131–51.Google Scholar

Commager, S. ed. (1966) Virgil: A Collection of Critical Essays. Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar

Commager, S (1981) ‘Fateful words: some conversations in Aeneid 4’, Arethusa 14: 10–14.Google Scholar

Comparetti, D. (1997) Vergil in the Middle Ages, trans. E. F. M. Benecke (1st edn 1895). Princeton.Google Scholar

Condon, P., Cohn, M. B., and Mongan, A. (1983) Ingres: In Pursuit of Perfection. The Art of J.-A.-D. Ingres. Bloomington.Google Scholar

Conington, J. ed. (1872) The Works of Virgil, with a Commentary, vol. ii. London.Google Scholar

Connolly, J. (2001) ‘Picture Arcadia: the politics of representation in Vergil’s Eclogues’, Vergilius 47: 89–116.Google Scholar

Connolly, J. (2010) ‘Vergil and the challenge of autocracy’, in Farrell and Putnam (2010) 404–17.Google Scholar

Conrad, C. (1965) ‘Traditional patterns of word-order in Latin epic from Ennius to Virgil’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 69: 195–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Consoli, D. and Ronconi, A. (1976) ‘Virgilio’ and ‘Echi Virgiliani’, in Bosci et al. (1976).Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1966) ‘Il proemio della Pharsalia’, Maia 18: 42–53.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1986) The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and Other Latin Poets. Ithaca, NY, and London.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1992) ‘Proems in the middle’, Yale Classical Studies 29: 147–59.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1993) Review of Harrison (1991), Journal of Roman Studies 83: 208–12.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1994a) Latin Literature. A History. Baltimore and London.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1994b) Genres and Readers: Lucretius, Love Elegy, Pliny’s Encyclopedia, trans. G. W. Most. Baltimore and London.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (2007) The Poetry of Pathos: Studies in Virgilian Epic, ed. Harrison, S. J.. Oxford.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (2016) Critical Notes on Virgil: Editing the Teubner Text of the Georgics and Aeneid. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar

Cooley, A. ed. (2010) Res Gestae Divi Augusti. Text, Translation and Commentary. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Cooper, H. (1977) Pastoral: Mediaeval into Renaissance. Ipswich.Google Scholar

Copeland, R. and Sluiter, I. eds. (2012) Medieval Grammar and Rhetoric: Language Arts and Literary Theory ad 300–1475. Oxford.Google Scholar

Corbeill, A. (2015) Sexing the World: Grammatical Gender and Biological Sex in Ancient Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar

Courcelle, J. (1984) Lecteurs païens et lecteurs chrétiens de l’Enéide. Mémoires de l’Académie des inscriptions et belles-lettres, n.s. 4, 2 vols. Rome.Google Scholar

Courcelle, P. (1957) ‘Les exégèses chrétiennes de la quatrième Eglogue’, Revue des études anciennes 59: 294–319.Google Scholar

Courcelle, P. and Courcelle, J. (1989) Lecteurs païens et lecteurs chrêtiens de l’Énéide, vol. ii: Les manuscrits illustrés de l’Énéide du Xe au XVe siècle. Paris.Google Scholar

Courtney, E. (1968) ‘The textual transmission of the Appendix Vergiliana’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 15: 133–41.Google Scholar

Courtney, E. (1993) The Fragmentary Latin Poets. Oxford.Google Scholar

Cowan, R. (2015) ‘On the weak king according to Vergil: Aeolus, Latinus, and political allegoresis in the Aeneid’, Vergilius 61: 97–124.Google Scholar

Cox, F. (1999) Aeneas Takes the Metro: The Presence of Virgil in Twentieth-Century French Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar

Cox, F. (2011) Sibylline Sisters. Virgil’s Presence in Contemporary Women’s Writing. Oxford.Google Scholar

Crusius, O. (1899) ‘Cento’, Real-Encyclopädie Der Classischen Altertumswissenschaft 3: 1929–32.Google Scholar

Cucchiarelli, A. ed. and Traina, A. trans. (2012) Publio Virgilio Marone. Le Bucoliche. Lingue e letterature Carocci, 141. Rome.Google Scholar

Cupaiuolo, G. ed. (1984) Il De rosis nascentibus: introduzione, testo critico, traduzione, e commento. Rome.Google Scholar

Curtius, E. R. (1953) European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages, trans. W. R. Trask. London, Henley, and New York.Google Scholar

Dahlmann, H. (1954) Der Bienenstaat in Vergils Georgica, Akad. der Wissen. und der Lit. Mainz 10: 547–62. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Daiches, D. and Thorlby, A. eds. (1972) Literature and Western Civilization, vol. i: The Classical World. London.Google Scholar

Dainotti, P. (2015) Word Order and Expressiveness in the Aeneid, trans. A. Campbell. Berlin and Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Daintree, D. (1990) ‘The Virgil commentary of Aelius Donatus – black hole or “éminence grise”?’, Greece & Rome 37: 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dal Pozzolo, E. M. (1998) Giovanni Bonconsiglio detto Marescalco: l’opera completa. Milan.Google Scholar

Damon, C. (2010) ‘Déjà vu or déjà lu? History as intertext’, in Cairns, F. and Griffin, M., eds. Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar, vol. xiv, ARCA 50, 375–88. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Alighieri, Dante (1970–5) The Divine Comedy, trans. C. S. Singleton, 3 vols. Princeton.Google Scholar

Davie, D. (2000) Two Ways out of Whitman: American Essays. Manchester.Google Scholar

Davie, D. (2006) Purity of Diction in English Verse and Articulate Energy. Manchester.Google Scholar

Davis, C. T. (1993) ‘Dante and the empire’, in Jacoff, R., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Dante, 67–79. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Davis, G. (2012) Parthenope: The Interplay of Ideas in Vergilian Bucolic. Leiden and Boston, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, P. (2008) Translation and the Poet’s Life. Oxford.Google Scholar

Day Lewis, C. trans. (1947) The Georgics of Virgil. New York.Google Scholar

Day Lewis, C. trans. (1966) The Eclogues, Georgics and Aeneid of Virgil. Oxford.Google Scholar

De Angelis, V. (1997) ‘I commenti medievali alla Tebaide di Stazio: Anselmo di Laon, Goffredo Babione, Ilario d’Orléans’, in Mann, N. and Munk Olsen, B., eds., Medieval and Renaissance Scholarship: Proceedings of the Second European Science Foundation Workshop on the Classical Tradition in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance. Leiden, New York, and Cologne.Google Scholar

De Jong, I. J. F. (1987 ) Narrators and Focalisers: The Presentation of the Story in the Iliad. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

De Jong, I. J. F. (2001) A Narratological Commentary on the Odyssey. Cambridge.Google Scholar

De Jong, I. J. F. (2014) Narratology and Classics. A Practical Guide. Oxford.Google Scholar

De Jong, I. J. F. (2017) I classici e la narratologia, ed. Cucchiarelli, A.. Rome.Google Scholar

De Jong, I. J. F. and Sullivan, J. P. eds. (1994) Modern Critical Theory and Classical Literature. Leiden.Google Scholar

de la Bédoyère, G. (1998) ‘Carausius and the marks RSR and INPCDA’, The Numismatic Chronicle 158: 79–88.Google Scholar

de Santis, G. and Ames, C. (2011) ‘La memoria historica de la diversidad étnica italiana en Eneida de Virgilio’, Circe 15: 41–54.Google Scholar

De Temmerman, K. ed. (2017) Characterization in Ancient Greek Literature. Leiden.Google Scholar

de Tervarent, G. (1967) Présence de Virgile dans l’art. Brussels.Google Scholar

de Vergnette, F. (1989) ‘Virgile lisant l’Enéide, thème néo-classique illustré par Ingres et quelques autres’, Bulletin du Musée Ingres 59–60: 79–95.Google Scholar

Dekel, E. (2012) Virgil’s Homeric Lens. New York and London.Google Scholar

Delacourcelle, D. (1954) ‘Germain Vaillant de Guélis, Abbot of Paimpont (1516–1587)’, Bibliothèque d’Humanisme et Renaissance 16: 336–61.Google Scholar

Delvigo, M. L. (2013) ‘Per transitum tangit historiam: intersecting developments of Roman identity in Vergil’, in Farrell and Nelis (2013) 19–39.Google Scholar

Denecke, W. (2013) Classical World Literatures: Sino-Japanese and Greco-Roman Comparisons. Oxford.Google Scholar

Deremetz, A. (2001) ‘Énée aède. Tradition auctoriale et (re)fondation d’un genre’, in Schmidt (2001) 143–81.Google Scholar

Deremetz, A. (2009) ‘The question of the marvellous in the Georgics of Virgil’, in Hardie (2009a) 113–25.Google Scholar

Deroux, C. ed. (1980) Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History. Brussels.Google Scholar

Derrida, J. (1981) ‘The law of genre’, Glyph 7: 176–229.Google Scholar

Dewald, C., Roberts, D. H., Dunn, F. M., and Fowler, D. (1997) Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature. Princeton.Google Scholar

Dewar, M. (1994) ‘Laying it on with a trowel: the proem to Lucan and related texts’, Classical Quarterly 44: 199–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dhanens, E. (1973) Van Eyck: The Ghent Altarpiece. London.Google Scholar

Dickey, E. and Chahoud, A. eds. (2010) Colloquial and Literary Latin. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Diels, H. A. and Kranz, W. (1951) Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Berlin.Google Scholar

Dietz, D. B. (1989) ‘Elementi di una poetica Serviana’, Studi italiani di filologia classica 82: 56–109, 240–60.Google Scholar

Dietz, D. B. (1995) ‘Historia in the commentary of Servius’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 125: 61–97.Google Scholar

Dominik, W. J. (2015) ‘Similes and their programmatic role in the Thebaid’, in Dominik et al. (2015) 266–90.Google Scholar

Dominik, W. J., Newlands, C. E., and Gervais, K. eds. (2015) Brill’s Companion to Statius. Leiden and Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Douglas, G. (1957–64) Virgil’s Aeneid Translated into Scottish Verse, ed. Coldwell, D. F. C., 4 vols. Edinburgh and London.Google Scholar

Douglas, G. (2011) The Aeneid (1513), ed. Kendal, G., 2 vols. London.Google Scholar

Dover, K. J. (1978) Greek Homosexuality. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Dow, S. (1968) ‘Latin calligraphy at Hawara. P. Hawara 24’, Journal of Roman Studies 58: 60–70.Google Scholar

Drabble, M. (2002) The Seven Sisters. London.Google Scholar

Dryden, J. trans. (1987) The Works of Virgil in English, vols. v and vi, ed. Frost, W and Dearing, V. A.. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London.Google Scholar

Duckworth, G. (1969) Vergil and Classical Hexameter Poetry: A Study in Metrical Variety. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Dunbabin, K. M. D. (1999) Mosaics of the Greek and Roman World. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Dunlap, D. W. (2014) ‘A memorial inscription’s grim origins’, New York Times, 2 April.Google Scholar

Dupont, F. (2011) Rome, la villa sans origine. L’Éneide: un grand récit du métissage. Paris.Google Scholar

DuQuesnay, I. M. Le M. (1979) ‘From Polyphemus to Corydon’, in West and Woodman (1979) 35–69.Google Scholar

DuQuesnay, I. M. Le M. (1981) ‘Vergil’s First Eclogue’, in Cairns, F., ed., Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar, iii.29–182. Liverpool.Google Scholar

Dyson, J. T. (2001) King of the Wood: The Sacrificial Victor in Virgil’s Aeneid. Norman.Google Scholar

Easterling, P. (1978) ‘Presentation of character in Aeschylus’, Greece & Rome 20: 3–19.Google Scholar

Eastin, K. (2016) ‘Visualizing Virgil: the pictorial agenda(s) of Sebastian Brant’, Mouseion 13: 85–129.Google Scholar

Eck, W. (2007) The Age of Augustus, 2nd edn. Malden, MA and Oxford.Google Scholar

Eco, E. (1989) The Open Work, trans. Cancogni, A. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Eden, P. T. ed. (1975) A Commentary on Virgil: Aeneid VIII. Leiden.Google Scholar

Edmunds, L. (2001) Intertextuality and the Reading of Roman Poetry. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Edwards, C. (1993) The Politics of Immorality in Ancient Rome. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, M. W. (2002) Sound, Sense, and Rhythm: Listening to Greek and Latin Poetry. Princeton.Google Scholar

Efstathiou, A. and Karamanou, I. eds. (2016) Homer Receptions across Generic and Cultural Contexts. Trends in Classics Suppl. vol. 37. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar

Egan, R. B. (1980) ‘Euryalus’ mother and Aeneid 9–12’, in Deroux (1980) vol. ii, 157–76.Google Scholar

Egginton, W. (2010) The Theater of Truth: The Ideology of (Neo)Baroque Aesthetics. Stanford.Google Scholar

Ehrman, B. D. (2013) Forgery and Counterforgery: The Use of Literary Deceit in Early Christian Polemics. Oxford.Google Scholar

Eliot, T. S. (1951) Selected Essays. London.Google Scholar

Eliot, T. S. (1957) On Poetry and Poets. London.Google Scholar

Elliott, J. (2008) ‘Ennian epic and Ennian tragedy in the language of the Aeneid: Aeneas’ generic wandering and the construction of the Latin literary past’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 104: 241–72.Google Scholar

Elliott, J. (2013) Ennius and the Architecture of the Annales. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Elmer, D. F. (2013) The Poetics of Consent. Collective Decision Making and the Iliad. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Elsner, J. ed. (1994) Art and Text in Roman Culture. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Elsner, J. (2007) Roman Eyes. Princeton.Google Scholar

Elsner, J. and Hernández Lobato, J. eds (2017) The Poetics of Late Latin Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar

Elsner, J. and Masters, J. eds. (1994) Reflections of Nero. London.Google Scholar

Emison, P. (2005) ‘Raphael’s multiples’, in Hall, M. B., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Raphael, 186–206. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Empson, W. (1935) Some Versions of Pastoral. London.Google Scholar

Enenkel, K. A. E. (2014) Transformations of the Classics via Early Modern Commentaries. Leiden and Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Enenkel, K. A. E. and Hellen, H. (2013) ‘Introduction: Neo-Latin commentaries and the management of knowledge’, in Enenkel, K. A. E. and Hellen, H., eds., (2013) Neo-Latin Commentaries and the Management of Knowledge in the Late Middle Ages and in the Early Modern Period (1400–1700). Leuven.Google Scholar

Fabre-Serris, J. (2013) ‘Le Culex et la construction du mythe augustéen: pratiques et enjeux d’un poème faussement adressé à Octave’, in Labate and Rosati (2013) 285–302.Google Scholar

Fagiolo, M. ed. (1981) Virgilio nell’arte e nella cultura europea. Rome.Google Scholar

Fairer, D. (2016) ‘Georgic’, in Lynch, J., ed., The Oxford Handbook of British Poetry, 1660–1800, 457–72. Oxford.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (2009) Latin Poets and Italian Gods. Toronto.Google Scholar

Fantuzzi, M. (1998) ‘Textual misadventures of Daphnis: the pseudo-Theocritean Idyll 8 and the origins of the bucolic “manner”’, in Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F., and Wakker, G. C., eds., Theocritus, 61–77. Groningen.Google Scholar

Fantuzzi, M. (2015) ‘The aesthetics of sequentiality and its discontents’, in Fantuzzi and Tsagalis (2015) 405–29.Google Scholar

Fantuzzi, M., Reitz, C., and Egelhaaf-Gaiser, U. (2017) ‘Ekphrasis’, Brill’s New Pauly. Leiden.Google Scholar

Fantuzzi, M. and Tsagalis, C. eds. (2015) The Greek Epic Cycle and its Ancient Reception: A Companion. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Faral, E. (1924) Les arts poétiques du XIIe et du XIIIe siècle. Paris.Google Scholar

Farinella, V. ed. (2011) Virgilio: volti e immagini del poeta. Milan.Google Scholar

Farrell, A. P. (1970) The Jesuit Ratio studiorum of 1599. Translated into English, with an Introduction and Explanatory Notes. Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. (1991) Vergil’s Georgics and the Tradition of Ancient Epic. New York and Oxford.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. (1997) ‘The Virgilian intertext’, in Martindale (1997) 222–38.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. (1999) ‘Aeneid V: poetry and parenthood’, in Perkell (1999a) 96–110.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. (2002) ‘Greek lives and Roman careers in the classical vita tradition’, in Cheney and de Armas (2002) 24–46.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. (2004) ‘Ovid’s Virgilian career’, Materiali e discussioni 52: 41–55.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. (2005) ‘Intention and intertext’, Phoenix 59: 98–111.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. (2008) ‘Servius and the Homeric scholia’, in Casali and Stok (2008) 112–31.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. (2010) ‘Vergil’s detractors’, in Farrell and Putnam (2010) 435–48.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. (2016) ‘Ancient commentaries on Theocritus’ Idylls and Vergil’s Eclogues’, in Kraus and Stray (2016) 397–418.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. and Nelis, D., eds. (2013) Augustan Poetry and the Roman Republic. Oxford.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. and Putnam, M. eds. (2010) A Companion to Vergil’s Aeneid and its Tradition. Malden, MA, and Oxford.Google Scholar

Farron, S. (1993) Vergil’s Aeneid: A Poem of Grief and Love. Leiden and New York.Google Scholar

Fedeli, P. (2002) ‘L’immagine come interpretazione nei manoscritti latini’, Euphrosyne n.s. 30: 297–316.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (1983) ‘The taciturnity of Aeneas’, Classical Quarterly 33: 204–19 = Harrison (1990) 167–90 = Hardie (1999) iii.183–203.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (1984) ‘The reconciliations of Juno’, Classical Quarterly 34: 179–94 = Harrison (1990) 339–62 = Hardie (1999) iv.392–413.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (1986) ‘History and revelation in Vergil’s underworld’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 32: 1–24 = Hardie (1999) iii.221–43.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (1991) The Gods in Epic: Poets and Critics in the Classical Tradition. Oxford.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (1998) Literature and Religion at Rome: Cultures, Contexts, and Beliefs. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (2007) Caesar’s Calendar: Ancient Time and the Beginnings of History. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (2014) ‘First similes in epic’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 144: 189–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fenik, B. C. (1960) ‘The influence of Euripides on Vergil’s Aeneid’, diss. Princeton.Google Scholar

Fenzi, E. (2011) ‘Servio, Simone Martini, Petrarca: un percorso attraverso il Virgilio Ambrosiano’, in Bouquet and Méniel (2011) 409–41.Google Scholar

Fernandelli, M. (2002) ‘Come sulle scene. Eneide 4 e la tragedia’, Dipartimento di filologia linguistica e tradizione classica ‘Augusto Rostagni’. Quaderni 19, n. s. 1: 141–211.Google Scholar

Ferrary, J. L. (2009) ‘The powers of Augustus’, in Edmondson, J., ed., Augustus, 90–136. Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Ferri, R. (2011) ‘The language of Latin epic and lyric poetry’, in Clackson, J., ed., A Companion to the Latin Language, 344–66. Malden, MA, and Oxford.Google Scholar

Field, R. (2017) ‘The classics, African literature, and the critics’, English in Africa 44: 73–95.Google Scholar

Finglass, P. J. (2020) ‘Tegit rem inhonestam: Sophocles’ Tecmessa and Virgil’s Dido’, Proceedings of the Virgil Society 30.Google Scholar

Fiorini Galassi, M. G., Guerra, B., and Schiatti, S. (1981) Virgilio: alla ricerca del volto. Suzzara.Google Scholar

Fish, S. E. (1980) Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretative Communities. Cambridge, MA, and London.Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, R. trans. (1984) The Aeneid. Virgil. New York.Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, W. (2010) ‘Vergil in music’, in Putnam and Farrell (2010) 341–52.Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, W. (2016) ‘Resonance: the sonic environment of Vergil’s Eclogues’, Dictynna 13.Google Scholar

Fletcher, K. F. B. (2014) Finding Italy: Travel, Nation, and Colonization in Vergil’s Aeneid. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Flintoff, T. E. S. (1976) ‘Characterisation in Virgil’s Eclogues’, Proceedings of the Virgil Society 15: 16–26.Google Scholar

Floyd, E. D. (2014) ‘Dollar bill, American’, in Thomas and Ziolkowski (2014) i.377.Google Scholar

Fordyce, C. J. ed. (1977) P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Libri VII–VIII with a Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar

Forstall, C., Coffee, N., Buck, T. Roache, K., and Jacobson, S. (2015) ‘Modeling the scholars: detecting intertextuality through enhanced word-level n-gram matching’, Literary and Linguistic Computing 30: 503–15.Google Scholar

Foster, K. (1977) The Two Dantes and Other Studies. London.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1977) Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews, trans. P. Kamuf. New York and London.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. P. (1987) ‘Vergil on killing virgins’, in Whitby et al. (1987) 185–98.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. P. (1989) ‘First thoughts on closure: problems and prospects’, Materiali e discussioni 22: 75–122 = Fowler (2000a) 239–83.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. P. (1990) ‘Deviant focalisation in Virgil’s Aeneid’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 216: 42–63 = Fowler (2000a) 40–63.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. P. (1991) ‘Narrate and describe: the problem of ekphrasis’, Journal of Roman Studies 81: 25–35 = Fowler (2000a) 64–85.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. P. (1994) ‘Arts and the Mantuan’, review of Ziolkowski (1993), Times Literary Supplement 11 February: 25.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. P. (1995) ‘From epos to cosmos: Lucretius, Ovid, and the poetics of segmentation’, in Innes et al. (1995) 1–18.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. P. (1997) ‘Second thoughts on closure’, in Dewald et al. (1997) 3–22 = Fowler (2000a) 284–308.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. P. (2000a) Roman Constructions. Oxford.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. P. (2000b) ‘Epic in the middle of the wood’, in Sharrock and Morales (2000) 89–113.Google Scholar

Fowler, R. L. ed. (2004) The Cambridge Companion to Homer. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Fraenkel, E. (1945) ‘Some aspects of the structure of Aeneid 7’, Journal of Roman Studies 35: 1–14 = Harrison (1990) 253–76.Google Scholar

Fraenkel, E. (1952) ‘The Culex’, Journal of Roman Studies 42: 1–9.Google Scholar

Fraenkel, E. (1966) ‘The Dirae’, Journal of Roman Studies 56: 142–55.Google Scholar

Franklin, M. (2014) ‘Vergil and the femina furens: reading the Aeneid in Renaissance cassone paintings’, Vergilius 60: 127–44.Google Scholar

Fredericksen, E. (2015) ‘Finding another Alexis: pastoral tradition and the reception of Vergil’s eclogue’, Classical Receptions Journal 7: 422–41.Google Scholar

Fressura, M. (2017) Vergilius Latinograecus: corpus dei manoscritti bilingui dell’Eneide. Parte prima (1–8). Pisa and Rome.Google Scholar

Freyburger-Galland, M.-L. (2009) ‘Political and religious propaganda between 44 and 27 bc’, Vergilius 55: 17–30.Google Scholar

Friedlaender, P. ed. (1962 [1912]) Johannes von Gaza, Paulus Silentiarius und Prokopios von Gaza, 2nd edn. Hildesheim.Google Scholar

Frier, B. W. (1999) Review of C. A. Williams, Roman Homosexuality, Bryn Mawr Classical Review 11.05.Google Scholar

Frizzarin, A. (2017) ‘Counterfactuals in the Aeneid’, Proceedings of the Virgil Society 29: 75–102.Google Scholar

Frost, R. (1962) In the Clearing. New York.Google Scholar

Frost, W. (1982) ‘Translating Virgil, Douglas to Dryden: some general considerations’, in Mack and deForest Lord (1982) 271–86.Google Scholar

Fry, P. H. (2000) ‘Classical standards in the period’, in Brown, M., ed., The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, vol. v: Romanticism, 7–28. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Fuhrer, T. (1989) ‘Aeneas: a study in character development’, Greece & Rome 36: 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Funaioli, G. (1930) Esegesi virgiliana antica. Milan.Google Scholar

Gadamer, H.-G. (1975) Truth and Method, trans. W. Glen-Doepel. London.Google Scholar

Gagarin, M. (1990) ‘Ambiguity of Eris in the Works and Days’, in Griffith and Mastronarde (1990) 173–83.Google Scholar

Gagliardi, P. (2014) Commento alla decima ecloga di Virgilio, Spudasmata 161. Hildesheim, Zurich, and New York.Google Scholar

Gaisser, J. H. ed. (2007) Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Catullus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gale, M. R. (1991) ‘Man and beast in Lucretius and the Georgics’, Classical Quarterly 41: 414–26.Google Scholar

Gale, M. R. (2000) Virgil on the Nature of Things: The Georgics, Lucretius and the Didactic Tradition. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Galinsky, G. K. (1966) ‘The Hercules-Cacus episode in Aeneid VIII’, American Journal of Philology 87: 18–51 = Hardie (1999) iii.273–303.Google Scholar

Galinsky, G. K. (1968) ‘Aeneid V and the Aeneid’, American Journal of Philology 89: 157–85 = Hardie (1999) iii.182–206.Google Scholar

Galinsky, G. K. (1972) The Herakles Theme. Oxford.Google Scholar

Galinsky, G. K. (1981) ‘Vergil’s Romanitas and his adaptation of Greek heroes’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 31.2: 985–1010.Google Scholar

Galinsky, G. K. (1988) ‘The anger of Aeneas’, American Journal of Philology 109: 321–48 = Hardie (1999) iv.434–55.Google Scholar

Galinsky, G. K. (1994) ‘How to be philosophical about the end of the Aeneid’, Illinois Classical Studies 19: 191–201.Google Scholar

Galinsky, G. K. (1996) Augustan Culture: An Interpretive Introduction. Princeton.Google Scholar

Galinsky, G. K. (2003) ‘Greek and Roman drama and the Aeneid’, in Braund, D. and Gill, C. eds. Myth, History and Culture in Republican Rome. Studies in Honour of T. P. Wiseman, 275–94. Exeter.Google Scholar

Galinsky, G. K. (2005) The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Augustus. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Galinsky, G. K. (2015) ‘Augustus’ auctoritas and Res Gestae 34.3’, Hermes 143: 244–9.Google Scholar

Gall, D. (1999) Zur Technik von Anspielung und Zitat in der römischen Dichtung: Vergil, Gallus, und die Ciris. Munich.Google Scholar

Ganiban, R. T. (2007) Statius and Virgil: The Thebaid and the Reinterpretation of the Aeneid. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Ganiban, R. T. (2010) ‘Virgil’s Dido and the heroism of Hannibal in Silius’ Punica’, in Augoustakis, A., ed., Brill’s Companion to Silius Italicus, 73–98. Leiden and Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Ganiban, R. T. (2014) ‘Virgilian prophecy and the reign of Jupiter in Valerius’ Argonautica’, in Heerink, M. and Manuwald, G., eds. Brill’s Companion to Valerius Flaccus, 252–68. Leiden and Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Garber, F. (1988) ‘Intertext and metatext in Blake’s illustrations to Thornton’s Virgil’, Centennial Review 32: 163–94.Google Scholar

Garcea, A., Lhommé, M.-K., and Vallat, D. eds. (2016) Fragments d’érudition. Servius et le savoir antique. Hildesheim.Google Scholar

Gärtner, U. (2015) ‘Virgil and the Epic Cycle’, in Fantuzzi and Tsagalis (2015) 543–64.Google Scholar

Gasti, H. (2010) ‘Narrative self-consciousness in Virgil’s Aeneid 3’, Dictynna 7.Google Scholar

Genette, G. (1980) Narrative Discourse, trans. C. Lewin. Cornell.Google Scholar

Genette, G. (1981) Palimpsestes: la littérature au second degré. Paris.Google Scholar

Genette, G. (1997) Paratexts. Thresholds of Interpretation. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Georgii, H. (1912) ‘Zur Bestimmung der Zeit des Servius’, Philologus 71: 518–26.Google Scholar

Gervais, K. (2017) ‘Odi(tque moras): abridging allusions to Vergil, Aeneid 12 in Statius, Thebaid 12’, American Journal of Philology 138: 305–29.Google Scholar

Geue, T. (2013) ‘Princeps, avant la lettre: the foundations of Augustus in pre-Augustan Poetry’, in Labate and Rosati (2013) 49–68.Google Scholar

Geue, T. (2018) ‘Soft hands, hard power: sponging off the empire of leisure (Virgil, Georgics 4)’, Journal of Roman Studies 108, www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-roman-studies/article/soft-hands-hard-power-sponging-off-the-empire-of-leisure-virgil-georgics-4/66E3F339681B42F68DC84FEB7453330F.Google Scholar

Geymonat, M. (1984) ‘Filargirio Gallo-Romano?’, in Atti del convegno nazionale di studio su Virgilio, 171–4. Turin.Google Scholar

Gibbons, E. (1853) The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. London.Google Scholar

Gibson, R. K. and Kraus, C. S. eds. (2002) The Classical Commentary: Histories, Practices, Theory. Leiden, Boston, MA, and Cologne.Google Scholar

Gigante, M. (2004) ‘Vergil in the shadow of Vesuvius’, in Armstrong et al. (2004) 85–99.Google Scholar

Gill, C. ed. (1991) The Person and the Human Mind: Essays in Ancient and Modern Philosophy. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gill, C. (1996) Personality in Greek Epic, Tragedy and Philosophy: The Self in Dialogue. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gill, C. (2004) ‘Character and passion in Virgil’s Aeneid’, Proceedings of the Virgil Society 25: 111–24.Google Scholar

Gill, C. (2006) The Structured Self in Hellenistic and Roman Thought. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gillis, D. (1983) Eros and Death in the Aeneid. Rome.Google Scholar

Giomini, R. (1996) ‘Appendix vergiliana’, in Enciclopedia virgiliana 1: 233–9. Rome.Google Scholar

Giusti, E. (2018) Carthage in Virgil’s Aeneid. Staging the Enemy under Augustus. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gladhill, C. W. (2012) ‘Sons, mothers, and sex’, Vergilius 58: 159–68.Google Scholar

Glei, R. (1997) Der Vater der Dinge: Interpretationen zur politischen, literarischen und kulturellen Dimension des Krieges bei Vergil. Trier.Google Scholar

Goldberg, J. (1992) Sodometries: Renaissance Texts/Modern Sexualities. Stanford.Google Scholar

Goldberg, S. M. (1995) Epic in Republican Rome. Oxford.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. (1991) The Poet’s Voice: Essays on Poetics and Greek Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. (1997) ‘Modern critical approaches to Greek tragedy’, in Easterling, P., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Greek Tragedy, 324–47. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. D. and Osborne, R. eds. (1994) Art and Text in Ancient Greek Culture. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Goldschmidt, N. (2013) Shaggy Crowns. Ennius’ Annales and Virgil’s Aeneid. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gombrich, E. H. (1955) ‘Apollonio di Giovanni: a Florentine cassone workshop seen through the eyes of a humanist poet’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 18: 16–34.Google Scholar

Goodyear, F. R. D. ed. (1965) Incerti auctoris Aetna. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Goodyear, F. R. D. (1977) ‘The Copa: a text and commentary’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 24: 117–31.Google Scholar

Goodyear, F. R. D. (1981) The Annals of Tacitus, vol. ii. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Goold, G. P. (1970) ‘Servius and the Helen episode’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 74: 101–68 = Harrison (1990), 60–126.Google Scholar

Goold, G. P. (1992) ‘The voice of Virgil: the pageant of Rome in Aeneid 6’, in Woodman, T. and Powell, J., eds., Author and Audience in Latin Literature, 110–23. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gorgemanns, H. and Schmidt, E. A. eds. (1976) Studien zum antiken Epos. Meisenheim.Google Scholar

Görler, W. (1985) ‘Eneide: la lingua’, in Enciclopedia virgiliana 2: 262–78. Rome.Google Scholar

Görler, W. (1999) ‘Rowing strokes: tentative considerations on “shifting” objects in Virgil and elsewhere’, in Adams and Mayer (1999) 269–86.Google Scholar

Gorrichon, M. (1979) ‘Sebastien Brant et l’illustration des œuvres de Virgile d’après l’édition strasbourgeoise de 1502’, in Tuynman, P. et al., eds., Acta Conventus Neo-Latini Amstelodamensis: Proceedings of the Second International Congress of Neo-Latin Studies, Amsterdam, 19–24 August 1973, 440–52. Munich.Google Scholar

Gow, A. S. F. ed. (1950) Theocritus Edited with a Translation and Commentary, 2 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gowing, A. (2005) Empire and Memory. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Grafton, A. (1990) Forgers and Critics: Creativity and Duplicity in Western Scholarship. Princeton.Google Scholar

Grafton, A. (2010) ‘Commentary’, in Grafton, A., Most, G. W., and Settis, S., eds., The Classical Tradition, 225–33. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Grafton, A., Most, G. W., and Settis, S. eds. (2010) The Classical Tradition. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Gransden, K. W. ed. (1976) Virgil, Aeneid Book VIII. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gransden, K. W. (1984) Virgil’s Iliad: An Essay on Epic Narrative. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gransden, K. W. (1991) Virgil, Aeneid Book XI. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gransden, K. W. (1996) Virgil in English. Harmondsworth.Google Scholar

Gransden, K. W. (2004) Virgil: The Aeneid, 2nd edn. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Graves, R. (1962) ‘The Virgil cult’, Virginia Quarterly Review 38: 13–47.Google Scholar

Graziosi, B. (2002) Inventing Homer: The Early Reception of Epic. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Graziosi, B. (2008) ‘The ancient reception of Homer’, in Hardwick and Stray (2007) 26–37.Google Scholar

Grebe, S. (2004) ‘Augustus’ divine authority and Vergil’s Aeneid’, Vergilius 50: 35–62.Google Scholar

Green, R. P. H. ed. (1991) The Works of Ausonius. Oxford.Google Scholar

Green, R. P. H. (1999) Decimi Magni Ausonii opera. Oxford.Google Scholar

Green, R. P. H. (2006) Latin Epics of the New Testament. Juvencus, Sedulius, Arator. Oxford.Google Scholar

Green, S. D. (2005) ‘A fifteenth-century Sienese fabula: the dynastic and patriotic significance of the Piccolomini Library’, in Jenkens, A. L., ed., Renaissance Siena: Art in Context, 155–72. Kirksville, MO.Google Scholar

Green, S. J. (2014) ‘Alternatives to Aeneas: meditations on leadership and military discipline in Virgil, Aeneid 9’, Proceedings of the Virgil Society 28: 99–122.Google Scholar

Griffin, J. (1979) ‘The Fourth Georgic, Virgil and Rome’, Greece & Rome 26: 61–80 = Hardie (1999) ii.268–88 = Volk (2008b) 225–48.Google Scholar

Griffin, J. (1984) ‘Augustus and the poets: “Caesar qui cogere posset”’, in Miller and Segal (1984) 189–218.Google Scholar

Griffin, J. (1985) Latin Poets and Roman Life. London.Google Scholar

Griffin, J. (1986) Virgil. Oxford and New York.Google Scholar

Griffin, J. (1992) ‘Virgil’, in Jenkyns (1992) 125–50.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. (1989) ‘Philosophy, politics, and politicians at Rome’, in Griffin and Barnes (1989) 1–37.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. and Barnes, W. R. eds. (1989) Philosophia Togata. Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society. Oxford.Google Scholar

Griffith, M. (1983) ‘Personality in Hesiod’, Classical Anthology 2: 37–65.Google Scholar

Griffith, M. and Mastronarde, D. J. eds. (1990) Cabinet of the Muses: Essays on Classical and Comparative Literature in Honor of Thomas G. Rosenmeyer. Atlanta.Google Scholar

Günther, H.-C. ed. (2015) Virgilian Studies. A Miscellany Dedicated to the Memory of Mario Geymonat. Nordhausen.Google Scholar

Gurval, R. A. (1995) Actium and Augustus: The Politics and Emotions of Civil War. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Haber, J. (1994) Pastoral and the Poetics of Self-Contradiction: Theocritus to Marvell. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Habinek, T. N. (1985) ‘Prose cola and poetic word-order: observations on adjectives and nouns in the Aeneid’, Helios 12: 51–66.Google Scholar

Habinek, T. N. (1997) ‘The invention of sexuality in the world-city of Rome’, in Habinek and Schiesaro (1997) 23–43.Google Scholar

Habinek, T. N. and Schiesaro, A., eds. (1997) The Roman Cultural Revolution. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hadas, D. (2013) ‘Christians, Sibyls and Eclogue 4’, Recherches augustiniennes et patristiques 37: 51–129.Google Scholar

Haecker, T. (1934) Virgil, Father of the West, trans. A. W. Wheen. London and New York.Google Scholar

Hagen, H. ed. (1867) Scholia Bernensia ad Vergili Bucolica atque Georgica. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Hagen, H. (1902) Appendix Serviana. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Hagendahl, H. (1958) The Latin Fathers and the Classics. Göteborg.Google Scholar

Hagendahl, H. (1967) Augustine and the Latin Classics. Göteburg.Google Scholar

Hahn, K.-H. and Schmid, I. eds. (1981) Briefe an Göethe, ii.1796–8. Weimar.Google Scholar

Hallett, J. P. and Skinner, M. B., eds. (1997) Roman Sexualities. Princeton.Google Scholar

Halliburton, D. (1981) Poetic Thinking: An Approach to Heidegger. Chicago.Google Scholar

Halperin, D. M. (1983) Before Pastoral: Theocritus and The Ancient Tradition of Bucolic Poetry. New Haven and London.Google Scholar

Hammer, D. (2009) ‘Homer and political thought’, in Salkever, S., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Greek Political Thought, 15–41. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hammer, D. (2014) Roman Political Thought: From Cicero to Augustine. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hamon, P. (1975) ‘Clausules’, Poétique 6: 496–526.Google Scholar

Hamon, P. (1993) Du descriptif. Paris.Google Scholar

Harder, M. A. ed. (2012) Callimachus: Aetia, 2 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar

Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F. and Walker, G. C. eds. (1993) Callimachus. Gronigen.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1986) Virgil’s Aeneid: Cosmos and Imperium. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1991) ‘The Aeneid and the Oresteia’, Proceedings of the Virgil Society 20: 29–45.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1993) The Epic Successors of Virgil. A Study in the Dynamics of the Tradition. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1994) Virgil, Aeneid Book IX. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1995) ‘Virgil’s epic techniques: Heinze ninety years on’, Classical Philology 90: 267–76.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1998) Virgil (Greece and Rome New Surveys in the Classics). Oxford.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1999) Critical Assessments of Classical Authors: Virgil, 4 vols. London.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (2002) ‘Another look at Virgil’s Ganymedes’, in Wiseman (2002) 333–62.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (2006) ‘Virgil’s Ptolemaic relations’, Journal of Roman Studies 96: 25–41.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (2009a) Paradox and the Marvellous in Augustan Literature and Culture. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (2009b) ‘Virgil: a paradoxical poet?’, in Hardie (2009a) 95–112.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (2012) Rumour and Renown: Representations of Fama in Western Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (2014) The Last Trojan Hero. A Cultural History of Virgil’s Aeneid. London and New York.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (forthcoming) Classicism and Christianity in Late Antique Latin Poetry. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. and Moore, H. eds. (2010) Classical Literary Careers and their Reception. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. and Powell, A. eds. (2017) The Ancient Lives of Virgil. Swansea.Google Scholar

Hardwick, L. and Stray, C. eds. (2007) A Companion to Classical Receptions. Malden, MA, and Oxford.Google Scholar

Harrison, E. L. (1972–3) ‘Why did Venus wear boots? Some reflections on Aeneid 1.314f.’, Proceedings of the Virgil Society 12: 10–25 = Hardie (1999) iv.59–75.Google Scholar

Harrison, E. L. (1989) ‘The tragedy of Dido’, Echos du monde classique 33: 1–21.Google Scholar

Harrison, S. J. ed. (1990) Oxford Readings in Vergil’s Aeneid. Oxford.Google Scholar

Harrison, S. J. (1991) Vergil: Aeneid 10. Oxford.Google Scholar

Harrison, S. J. (2007a) Generic Enrichment in Vergil and Horace. Oxford.Google Scholar

Harrison, S. J. (2007b) ‘The primal voyage and the ocean of epos’, Dictynna 4.Google Scholar

Harrison, S. J. (2010) ‘Sermones deorum: divine discourse in Virgil’s Aeneid’, in Dickey and Chahoud (2010) 266–78.Google Scholar

Harrison, T. W. (1967) ‘English Virgil: the Aeneid in the XVIII century’, Philologica Pragensia 10: 1–11, 80–91.Google Scholar

Haskell, Y. (2010) ‘Practicing what they preach? Vergil and the Jesuits’, in Farrell and Putnam (2010) 203–16.Google Scholar

Haskell, Y. (2014) ‘The passion(s) of Jesuit Latin’, in Ford, P., Bloemendal, J. and Fantazzi, C., eds., Brill’s Encyclopaedia of the Neo-Latin World, 775–88. Leiden and Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Haubold, J. (2000) Homer’s People. Epic Poetry and Social Formation. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hawkins, P. S. (1991) ‘Dido, Beatrice and the signs of ancient love’, in Jacoff and Schnapp (1991) 113–30.Google Scholar

Haynes, K. (2010) ‘Classic Vergil’, in Farrell and Putnam (2010) 421–34.Google Scholar

Heaney, S. (1991) Seeing Things. London.Google Scholar

Heaney, S. (1995) The Redress of Poetry: Oxford Lectures. London and Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Heaney, S. trans. (2016) Aeneid: Book VI. New York.Google Scholar

Heffernan, W. (1993) Museum of Words. Chicago.Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. (1968) What is Called Thinking, trans. J. Glenn. New York.Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. (1971) Poetry, Language, Thought, trans. A. Hofstadter. New York.Google Scholar

Heiden, B. (1987) ‘Laudes herculeae: suppressed savagery in the hymn to Hercules, Verg. A. 8.285–305’, American Journal of Philology 108: 661–71.Google Scholar

Heinze, R. (1903) Vergils epische Technik, (3rd edn 1915; 4th edn 1957, Stuttgart). Leipzig and Berlin.Google Scholar

Heinze, R. (1993) Vergil’s Epic Technique, trans. H. Harvey, D. Harvey, and F. Robertson. Bristol.Google Scholar

Hejduk, J. D. (2009) ‘Jupiter’s Aeneid: fama and imperium’, Classical Antiquity 28: 279–327.Google Scholar

Hejduk, J. D. (2017) ‘Happy Golden Anniversary, Harvard School!’, Classical World Special Issue 11: 1–137.Google Scholar

Helgerson, R. (1983) Self-Crowned Laureates: Spenser, Jonson, Milton and the Literary System. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Helgerson, R. (1992) Forms of Nationhood. Chicago and London.Google Scholar

Hellegouarc’h, J. (1984) ‘Auctoritas’, in Enciclopedia virgiliana 1: 392–4. Rome.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (1987) ‘Lucan/The word at war’, Ramus 16: 122–65.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (2002) ‘Corny Copa: the motel muse’, in Spentzou and Fowler (2002) 253–78.Google Scholar

Henry, J. (1873–92) Aeneidea, or Critical, Exegetical, and Aesthetical Remarks on the Aeneid, 5 vols. London, Dublin, and Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Heraeus, W. (1930) ‘Drei Fragmente eines Grammatikers Ovidius Naso’, Rheinisches Museum 79: 391–405.Google Scholar

Hershkowitz, D. (1991) ‘The Aeneid in Aeneid 3’ Vergilius 37: 69–76.Google Scholar

Hershkowitz, D. (1998) The Madness of Epic. Oxford.Google Scholar

Heslin, P. (2015) The Museum of Augustus. Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Heslin, P. (2016) ‘The dream of a universal variorum: digitizing the commentary tradition’, in Kraus and Stray (2016) 494–511.Google Scholar

Hexter, R. (2010) ‘On first looking into Vergil’s Homer’, in Farrell and Putnam (2010) 26–36.Google Scholar

Heyne, C. G. (1767–75) Publii Vergilii Maronis Opera varietate lectionis et perpetua adnotatione illustrata a C. G. Heyne, 4 vols. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Heyne, C. G. and Wagner, G. P. E. (1830–41) P. Vergilius Maro varietate lectionis et perpetua adnotatione illustratus a C. G. Heyne. Editio quarta curavit G. P. E. Wagner, 4 vols. Leipzig and London.Google Scholar