Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T22:25:10.837Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

30 - Investors and global governance frameworks: broadening the multi-stakeholder paradigm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2014

Jane Ambachtsheer
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Ryan Pollice
Affiliation:
Responsible Investment, Mercer, Toronto
James P. Hawley
Affiliation:
St Mary's College, California
Andreas G. F. Hoepner
Affiliation:
ICMA Centre, Henley Business School, University of Reading
Keith L. Johnson
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Joakim Sandberg
Affiliation:
University of Gothenburg
Edward J. Waitzer
Affiliation:
York University, Toronto
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Companies play an increasingly important role in the global economy. With this growth has emerged a strong view that companies share in responsibilities traditionally assigned to governments – such as those relating to human rights and the environment (Ambachtsheer 2011). A wide range of norms, codes of conduct and conventions have emerged to translate this broadening acceptance of extended corporate responsibility into policy and practice (see Appendix 30.1).

Traditionally, conventions were developed by multilateral institutions and targeted for ratification by national governments. More recently, a broader range of stakeholders have become involved in developing and supporting conventions under the espoused benei ts of “multi-stakeholder processes” (Vallejo and Hauselmann 2004). This has resulted in a shift from legislative foundations towards the emergence of “soft law” approaches to regulating behavior, tending to take the form of nonbinding and voluntary codes of conduct. Multi-stakeholder processes have gained their standing as valid mechanisms to develop and implement codes of conduct in part because they include input from a broad range of stakeholders in their design, implementation and oversight. This chapter focuses on one stakeholder which is largely absent from the analysis of these processes – investors.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ambachtsheer, J. 2011. “The Missing Stakeholder: The Applicability of International Codes and Conventions to Institutional Investors,” Rotman International Journal of Pension Management 4 (2): 26–36.Google Scholar
Boer, R. and Vandenbroucke, E.. 2011. “Worldwide Investments in Cluster Munitions: A Shared Responsibility,” IKV Pax Christi and Netwerk Vlaanderen. .
Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I. and Serafeim, G.. 2012. “The Impact of a Corporate Culture of Sustainability on Corporate Behavior and Performance,” Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 12–035. .
Espinosa, D. and Pollice, R.. 2012. “Stewardship Codes: An Emerging Global Phenomenon,” Mercer Insights. .
El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C.Y., and Mishra, Dev R.. 2011. “Does Corporate Social Responsibility Affect the Cost of Capital?Journal of Banking & Finance 35 (9): 2388–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, S. 2010. “Companies Fail UN’s Global Compact,” Financial Times, February 14.Google Scholar
Jones, A., Allen, I., Silver, N., Cameron, C., Howarth, C. and Caldecott, B.. 2013. “Research Report – Resource Constraints: Sharing a Finite World. Implications of Limits to Growth for the Actuarial Profession.” .
Mercer. 2009. Shedding Light on Responsible Investment: Approaches, Returns and Impacts. .
United Nations Global Compact. 2008. Global Investors Urge 9000 CEOs to Join UN Global Compact. .Google Scholar
United Nations Global Compact 2009. Investors Give New Twist to Good COP/Bad COP. .Google Scholar
Urwin, R. 2011. “Pension Funds as Universal Owners: Opportunity Beckons and Leadership Calls,” Rotman International Journal of Pension Management 4 (1): 26–33.Google Scholar
Vallejo, N. and Hauselmann, P.. 2004. Governance and Multi-stakeholder Processes. New York: International Institute for Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
Wheelan, H. 2010. “UNPRI Coalition Targets 86 Major Companies on Global Compact Failure,” Responsible Investor, February 15. .Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×