Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Intercultural Communication
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Intercultural Communication
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Introducing Intercultural Communication
- Part II Theoretical Approaches
- Part III Methods
- 12 Decolonizing Gender and Intercultural Communication in Transnational Contexts
- 13 Migration in the Digital Social Mediasphere
- 14 Linguistic Politeness
- 15 Contemporary Literature and Intercultural Understanding
- 16 Enhancing Intercultural Skills through Storytelling
- 17 Cinema as Intercultural Communication
- 18 Intercultural Memory and Violence in Jewish Literature
- 19 Intercultural Communication in Social Work Practice
- 20 Intercultural Education in Study Abroad Contexts
- 21 Intercultural Communication in the Courtroom
- Part IV Application
- Part V Assessment
- Index
- References
21 - Intercultural Communication in the Courtroom
The Doctrine of Public Policy
from Part III - Methods
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 February 2020
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Intercultural Communication
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Intercultural Communication
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Introducing Intercultural Communication
- Part II Theoretical Approaches
- Part III Methods
- 12 Decolonizing Gender and Intercultural Communication in Transnational Contexts
- 13 Migration in the Digital Social Mediasphere
- 14 Linguistic Politeness
- 15 Contemporary Literature and Intercultural Understanding
- 16 Enhancing Intercultural Skills through Storytelling
- 17 Cinema as Intercultural Communication
- 18 Intercultural Memory and Violence in Jewish Literature
- 19 Intercultural Communication in Social Work Practice
- 20 Intercultural Education in Study Abroad Contexts
- 21 Intercultural Communication in the Courtroom
- Part IV Application
- Part V Assessment
- Index
- References
Summary
Bertil Cottier’s chapter explores the doctrine of ordre public, which allows judges to block the ‘import’ of unacceptable foreign customs and traditions and which has received significant attention in the context of enhanced international relations at the personal and social level, including interethnic marriages and mass immigration. The ordre public doctrine is examined in respect of issues pertaining to family law and succession law, two domains where its impact is most significant since marriage, divorce, filiation and inheritance are deeply rooted in social and religious values. Special attention is paid to the clash, generated by increasing immigration from Muslim countries, between Islamic legal institutions such as polygamy and repudiation and Western principles of equality and non-discrimination.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Intercultural Communication , pp. 350 - 364Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Aldeeb, S. and Bonomi, A., eds. (1999). Le droit musulman de la famille et des successions à l’épreuve des ordres juridiques occidentaux. Zurich: Schulthess.Google Scholar
Berger, M. (2002). Conflicts law and public policy in Egyptian family law: Islamic law through the backdoor. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 50, 555–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bensedik, M. (2014). Quelques précisions sur l’ordre public en droit international privé. Village de la Justice. www.village-justice.com/articles/Quelques-precisions-sur-ordre,17449.html (last accessed 1 August 2018).Google Scholar
Bonomi, A. (2017). Diritto internazionale privato e diritto comparato: una coppia inseparabile. In Petrelli, I., Romano, G. P. and Rossi, T., eds., Tui Memores: La dimension culturelle du droit international privé. Geneva and Zurich: Schulthess, pp. 27–46.Google Scholar
Bucher, A. (1993). L’ordre public et le but social des lois en droit international privé. Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, 239, 9–116.Google Scholar
Carballo Piñeiro, L. and Kramer, X. (2014). The role of private international law in contemporary society: global governance as a challenge. Erasmus Law Review, 7, 109–12.Google Scholar
Davis, S. (2015). Conflicts of Law and the Mutual Recognition of Same-Sex Unions in the EU. PhD thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (2014). Addressing Forced Marriage in the EU: Legal Provisions and Promising Practices. Vienna: FRA.Google Scholar
Fresnedo de Aguirre, C. (2016). The incidence of human rights when determining public policy principles in international civil and family law matters. Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, 379, 73–396.Google Scholar
Fulchiron, H. (2010). The French family judge encounters cultural pluralism. In Foblets, M.-C., ed., Cultural Diversity and the Law: State Responses from Around the World. Brussels: Bruylant, pp. 613–33.Google Scholar
Gannagé, L. (2013). Les méthodes du droit international privé à l’épreuve du conflit des cultures. Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, 357, 233–490.Google Scholar
Gardina, J. (2010). Federal preemption: a roadmap for the application of tribal law in state courts. American Indian Law Review, 35(1), 1–37.Google Scholar
Gaudemet-Tallon, H. (2005). The pluralism in private international law: richness and weakness (The tightrope walker and the rainbow). Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, 312, 9–488.Google Scholar
Gebauer, M. (2007). Ordre public (public policy). In Wolfrum, R., ed., Max Planck Encyclopaedia of Public International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://opil.ouplaw.com (last accessed 12 August 2018).Google Scholar
Gover, K. (1980). Conflicts of law and the Indian reservation: solutions to problems in Indian civil jurisdiction. American Journal of Indian Law, 8(2), 361–85.Google Scholar
Kiestra, L. R. (2013). The Impact of the European Convention on Human Rights on Private International Law. PhD thesis, Amsterdam Center for International Law. http://hdl.handle.net/11245/1.395313 (last accessed 12 August 2018).Google Scholar
Kokott, J. (1998). Grund- und Menschenrechte als Inhalt eines internationalen ordre public. In: Coester-Waltjen, D., ed., Die Wirkungskraft der Grundrechte bei Fällen mit Auslandsbezug. Heidelberg: C. F. Müller, pp. 71–114.Google Scholar
Lagarde, P. (2010). Reference to public order (‘ordre public’) in French private international law. In Foblets, M.-C., ed., Cultural Diversity and the Law: State Responses from around the World. Brussels: Bruylant, pp. 521–46.Google Scholar
Lequette, Y. (2017). Les mutations du droit international privé: vers un changement de paradigme. Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, 387, 9–644.Google Scholar
Morris, J., McClean, D. and Ruiz Abou-Nigm, V. (2016). The Conflict of Laws, 9th ed. London: Sweet and Maxwell.Google Scholar
Nishitani, Y. (2014). Global citizens and family relations. Erasmus Law Review, 7, 131–46.Google Scholar
Parry, J. (2012). Oklahoma’s save our state amendment and the conflict of laws. Oklahoma Law Review, 65, 1–39.Google Scholar
Pollack, S. (2015). Full faith and conflict of law: the peculiar legacy of legal federalism. SSRN, 2 March. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2571934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De la Rosa, G. E. (2015a). Cultural diversity and European private international law. Journal of Civil & Legal Sciences, 4, 149.Google Scholar
De la Rosa, G. E. (2015b). Cultural diversity, European public policy exception and family law of Muslim countries. Beijing Law Review, 6, 147–58.Google Scholar
Schwander, I. (2000). Wie kann nationales IPR zu vermehrt internationaler Optik gelangen. In Basedow, J., Meier, I., Schnyder, A. K., Einhorn, T. and Girsberger, D., eds., Private Law in the International Arena – Liber Amicorum Kurt Siehr. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, pp. 673–84.Google Scholar
Tonolo, S. (2017). Religious values and conflict of laws. In Petrelli, I., Romano, G. P. and Rossi, T., eds., Tui Memores: La dimension culturelle du droit international privé. Geneva and Zurich: Schulthess, pp. 187–214.Google Scholar
Wardle, L. (2008). From slavery to same-sex marriage: comity versus public policy in inter-jurisdictional recognition of controversial domestic relations. Brigham Young University Law Review, 8(6), 1856–925.Google Scholar
Xiao, Y. and Huo, Z. (2005). Ordre Public in China’s private international law. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 53, 653–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar