Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T17:59:38.964Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - The Persistence of Gender in Campaigns and Elections

from Part II - The Politics of Intergroup Attitudes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2022

By
Kathleen Rogers  and
Kira Sanbonmatsu
Edited by
Danny Osborne  and
Chris G. Sibley
Danny Osborne
Affiliation:
University of Auckland
Chris G. Sibley
Affiliation:
University of Auckland
Get access

Summary

This chapter covers two key areas in which gender shapes electoral politics from the perspective of political psychology: candidate evaluation and campaign strategy. The bulk of the chapter reviews scholarship about the role of gender stereotypes in candidate evaluations. This work includes stereotypes about traits and policy positions as well as the intersection of gender, partisan, racial, and ethnic stereotypes. The section on candidate evaluation also addresses the effects of sexism and voters’ affective responses to candidates. The section on campaign strategy summarises research about the ways in which candidates and their consultants tailor campaigns to compensate for or take advantage of voters’ gender stereotypes. Overall, the chapter argues that while the impact of gender is often context-dependent, gender remains a highly relevant factor in electoral politics.

Keywords

GenderCandidate evaluationCampaign strategyStereotypesIntersectionality
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Political Psychology , pp. 258 - 271
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkeson, L. R. (2003). Not all cues are created equal: The conditional impact of female candidates on political engagement. Journal of Politics, 65(4), 1040–1061. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.t01-1-00124Google Scholar
Barnes, T. D., & Beaulieu, E. (2014). Gender stereotypes and corruption: How candidates affect perceptions of election fraud. Politics and Gender, 10(3), 365–391. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X14000221Google Scholar
Bauer, N. (2017). The effects of counterstereotypic gender strategies on candidate evaluations. Political Psychology, 38(2), 279–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12351Google Scholar
Bauer, N. M. (2020). Shifting standards: How voters evaluate the qualifications of female and male candidates. The Journal of Politics, 82(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1086/705817Google Scholar
Bejarano, C. E. (2013). The Latina advantage: Gender, race, and political success. University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bejarano, C. E. (2017). New directions at the intersection of race, ethnicity, and gender. In Bos, A. L. & Schneider, M. C. (Eds.), The political psychology of women in U.S. politics (pp. 111–127). Routledge.Google Scholar
Bell, M. A., & Kaufmann, K. M. (2015). The electoral consequences of marriage and motherhood: How gender traits influence voter evaluations of female candidates. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 36(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2015.985150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88(4), 354–364. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.4.354Google Scholar
Biernat, M., & Manis, M. (1994). Shifting standards and stereotype-based judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.1.5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bittner, A., & Goodyear-Grant, E. (2017). Sex isn’t gender: Reforming concepts and measurements in the study of public opinion. Political Behavior, 39(4), 1019–1041. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-017-9391-yGoogle Scholar
Brooks, D. J. (2013). He runs, she runs: Why gender stereotypes do not harm women candidates. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Burns, N., Schlozman, K. L., & Verba, S. (2001). The private roots of public action: Gender, equality, and political participation. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. E., & Wolbrecht, C. (2006). See Jane run: Women politicians as role models for adolescents. Journal of Politics, 68(2), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00402.xGoogle Scholar
Campbell, R., & Heath, O. (2017). Do women vote for women candidates? Attitudes toward descriptive representation and voting behavior in the 2010 British Election. Politics and Gender, 13(2), 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X16000672Google Scholar
Carey, T. E. Jr., & Lizotte, M. (2019). Political experience and the intersection between race and gender. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 7(2), 243–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2017.1354036Google Scholar
Cargile, I. A. M. (2016). Latina issues: An analysis of the policy issue competencies of Latina candidates. In Brown, N. E. & Gershon, S. A. (Eds.), Distinct identities: Minority women in U.S. politics (pp. 134–150). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Carroll, S. J., & Sanbonmatsu, K. (2013). More women can run: Gender and pathways to the state legislatures. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cassese, E., & Holman, M. (2018). Party and gender stereotypes in campaign attacks. Political Behavior, 40(3), 785–807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-017-9423-7Google Scholar
Cassese, E., & Holman, M. (2019). Playing the ‘woman card’: Ambivalent sexism in the 2016 U.S. presidential race. Political Psychology, 40(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12492Google Scholar
Center for American Women and Politics (CAWP). (2020). Women in elective office 2020. Fact Sheet. Center for American Women and Politics, Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Cohen, C. J., Jones, K. B., & Tronto, J. C. (Eds.). (1997). Women transforming politics: An alternative reader. New York University Press.Google Scholar
Cowell-Meyers, K., Evans, E., & Shin, K. (2020). Women’s parties: A new party family. Politics & Gender, 16(1), 4–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X19000588Google Scholar
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 129, 139–167. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8Google Scholar
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deaux, K., & Lewis, L. L. (1984). Structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelationships among components and gender label. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(5), 991–1004. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.5.991Google Scholar
Ditonto, T. (2017). A high bar or a double standard? Gender, competence, and information in political campaigns. Political Behavior, 39(2), 301–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-016-9357-5Google Scholar
Ditonto, T. M., Hamilton, A. J., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2014). Gender stereotypes, information search, and voting behavior in political campaigns. Political Behavior, 36(2), 335–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-013-9232-6Google Scholar
Dittmar, K. (2015). Navigating gendered terrain: Stereotypes and strategy in political campaigns. Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Dittmar, K. (2019). Unfinished business: Women running in 2018 and beyond. Center for American Women and Politics, Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University. https://womenrun.rutgers.eduGoogle Scholar
Doan, A. E., & Haider-Markel, D. P. (2010). The role of intersectional stereotypes on evaluations of gay and lesbian political candidates. Politics & Gender, 6(1), 63–91. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X09990511Google Scholar
Dolan, K. (2004). Voting for women: How the public evaluates women candidates. Westview Press.Google Scholar
Dolan, K. (2006). Symbolic mobilization? American Politics Research, 34(6), 687–704. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1532673X06289155Google Scholar
Dolan, K. (2008). Is there a ‘gender affinity effect’ in American politics? Information, affect, and candidate sex in U.S. House elections. Political Research Quarterly, 61(1), 79–89.Google Scholar
Dolan, K. (2014). When does gender matter? Women candidates and gender stereotypes in American elections. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203781906Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573Google Scholar
Fox, R. L. (1997). Gender dynamics in congressional elections. Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraga, L. R., Lopez, L., Martinez-Ebers, V., & Ramirez, R. (2008). Representing gender and ethnicity: Strategic intersectionality. In Reingold, B. (Ed.), Legislative women: Getting elected, getting ahead (pp. 157–174). Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Frasure-Yokley, L. (2018). Choosing the velvet glove: Women voters, ambivalent sexism, and vote choice in 2016. Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics, 3(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/rep.2017.35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fridkin, K. L., & Kenney, P. J. (2014). How the gender of U.S. senators influences people’s understanding and engagement in politics. Journal of Politics, 76(4), 1017–1031. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381614000589Google Scholar
Fulton, S. A. (2012). Running backwards and in high heels: The gendered quality gap and incumbent electoral success. Political Research Quarterly, 65(2), 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912911401419Google Scholar
Garcia Bedolla, L., Tate, K., & Wong, J. (2014). Indelible effects: The impact of women of color in the U.S. Congress. In Thomas, S. & Wilcox, C. (Eds.), Women and elective office: Past, present, and future (3rd ed., pp. 235–252). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ghavami, N., & Peplau, L. A. (2013). An intersectional analysis of gender and ethnic stereotypes: Testing three hypotheses. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(1), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684312464203Google Scholar
Giddings, P. (1996). When and where I enter: The impact of Black women on race and sex in America. William Morrow Paperbacks.Google Scholar
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.49Google Scholar
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1997). Hostile and benevolent sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(1), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1471-6402.1997.tb00104.xGoogle Scholar
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2011). Ambivalent sexism revisited. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35(3), 530–535. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0361684311414832Google Scholar
Golebiowska, E. A. (2001). Group stereotypes and political evaluation. American Politics Research, 29(6), 535–565. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X01029006001Google Scholar
Greenlee, J., Deason, G., & Langner, C. (2017). The impact of motherhood and maternal messages on political candidacies. In Bos, A. L. & Schneider, M. C. (Eds.), The political psychology of women in U.S. politics (pp. 184–201). Routledge.Google Scholar
Haider-Markel, D., Miller, P., Flores, A., Lewis, D. C., Tadlock, B., & Taylor, J. (2017). Bringing ‘T’ to the table: Understanding individual support of transgender candidates for public office. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 5(3), 399–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2016.1272472Google Scholar
Hardy-Fanta, C., Lien, P., Pinderhughes, D., & Sierra, C. M. (2016). Contested transformation: Race, gender and political leadership in 21st century America. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, D. (2011). When gender and party collide: Stereotyping in candidate trait attribution. Politics & Gender, 7(2), 133–165. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X11000055Google Scholar
Hayes, D., & Lawless, J. (2016). Women on the run: Gender, media, and political campaigns in a polarized era. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hill Collins, P. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Routledge.Google Scholar
Holman, M. R., Merolla, J. L., & Zechmeister, E. J. (2011). Sex, stereotypes, and security: A study of the effects of terrorist threat on assessments of female leadership. Journal of Women Politics & Policy, 32(3), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2011.589283Google Scholar
Holman, M. R., Merolla, J. L., & Zechmeister, E. J. (2016). Terrorist threat, male stereotypes, and candidate evaluations. Political Research Quarterly, 69(1), 134–147.Google Scholar
hooks, b. (1984). Feminist theory from margin to center. South End Press.Google Scholar
Huddy, L., & Terkildsen, N. (1993). Gender stereotypes and the perception of male and female candidates. American Journal of Political Science, 37(1), 119–147. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1065912915624018Google Scholar
Inter-Parliamentary Union. (2020). Monthly ranking of women in national parliaments. https://data.ipu.org/women-ranking?month=6&year=2020Google Scholar
Kahn, K. F. (1996). The political consequences of being a woman: How stereotypes influence the conduct and consequences of political campaigns. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
King, D. C., & Matland, R. E. (2003). Sex and the Grand Old Party: An experimental investigation of the effect of candidate sex on support for a Republican candidate. American Politics Research, 31(6), 595–612. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1532673X03255286Google Scholar
Koch, J. W. (2000). Do citizens apply gender stereotypes to infer candidates’ ideological orientations? Journal of Politics, 62(2), 414–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-3816.00019Google Scholar
Krook, M., & Restrepo Sanín, J. (2019). The cost of doing politics? Analyzing violence and harassment against female politicians. Perspectives on Politics, 18(3), 740–755. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592719001397Google Scholar
Kuperberg, R. (2018). Intersectional violence against women in politics. Politics and Gender, 14(4), 685–690. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X18000612Google Scholar
Ladam, C., Harden, J. J., & Windett, J. H. (2018). Prominent role models: High-profile female politicians and the emergence of women as candidates for public office. American Journal of Political Science, 62(2), 369–381. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12351Google Scholar
Lawless, J. (2004). Politics of presence? Congresswomen and symbolic representation. Political Research Quarterly, 57(1), 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F106591290405700107Google Scholar
Lefkofridi, Z., Giger, N., & Holli, A. (2019). When all parties nominate women: The role of political gender stereotypes in voters’ choices. Politics & Gender, 15(4), 746–772. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X18000454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lien, P. (2001). The making of Asian America through political participation. Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Matland, R. E., & King, D. C. (2002). Women as candidates in congressional elections. In Rosenthal, C. S. (Ed.), Women transforming Congress (pp. 119–145). University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Matland, R. E., & Tezcür, G. M. (2011). Women as candidates: An experimental study in Turkey. Politics and Gender, 7(3), 365–390. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X11000262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, M. L. (2016). Masculinity, femininity, and American political behavior. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O’Brien, D. (2018). ‘Righting’ conventional wisdom: Women and right parties in established democracies. Politics & Gender, 14(1), 27–55. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X17000514Google Scholar
Oliver, S., & Conroy, M. (2020). Who runs? The masculine advantage in candidate emergence. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Reingold, B., & Harrell, J. (2010). The impact of descriptive representation on women’s political engagement: Does party matter? Political Research Quarterly, 63(2), 280–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912908330346Google Scholar
Roth, B. (2004). Separate roads to feminism: Black, Chicana, and White feminist movements in America’s second wave. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, K. (2002). Gender stereotypes and vote choice. American Journal of Political Science, 46(1), 20–44. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, K. (2003). Political knowledge and gender stereotypes. American Politics Research, 31(6), 575–594. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X03255167Google Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, K., & Dolan, K. (2009). Do gender stereotypes transcend party? Political Research Quarterly, 62(3), 485–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912908322416Google Scholar
Schneider, M. (2014). The effects of gender-bending on candidate evaluations. Journal of Women, Politics and Policy, 35(1), 55–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2014.863697Google Scholar
Schneider, M., & Bos, A. L. (2014). Measuring stereotypes of female politicians. Political Psychology, 35(2), 245–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12040Google Scholar
Schneider, M., & Bos, A. L. (2016). The interplay of candidate party and gender in evaluations of political candidates. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 37(3), 274–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2016.1188598Google Scholar
Schneider, M., & Bos, A. L. (2019). The application of social role theory to the study of gender in politics. Political Psychology: Supplement: Advances in Political Psychology, 40(S1), 173–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12573Google Scholar
Simien, E. M., & Hampson, S. C. (2017). Hillary Clinton and the women who supported her. Du Bois Review, 14(1), 93–116. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X16000382Google Scholar
Stalsburg, B. L. (2010). Voting for mom: The political consequences of being a parent for male and female candidates. Politics & Gender, 6(3), 373–404. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X10000309Google Scholar
Stangor, D., Lynch, L., Duan, C., & Glass, B. (1992). Categorization of individuals on the basis of multiple social features. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(2), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.207Google Scholar
Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(2), 199–214. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.199Google Scholar
Teele, D. L., Kalla, J., & Rosenbluth, F. (2018). The ties that double bind: Social roles and women’s underrepresentation in politics. American Political Science Review, 112(3), 525–541. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055418000217Google Scholar
Uhlaner, C. J., & Scola, B. (2016). Collective representation as a mobilizer: Race/ethnicity, gender, and their intersections at the state level. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 16(2), 227–263. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1532440015603576Google Scholar
Valentino, N. A., Wayne, C., & Oceno, M. (2018). Mobilizing sexism: The interaction of emotion and gender attitudes in the 2016 US presidential election. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(S1), 799–821. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfy003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, N. J. (2010). Masculine Republicans and feminine Democrats: Gender and Americans’ explicit and implicit images of the political parties. Political Behavior, 32(4), 587–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9131-zGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×