Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T17:31:29.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Information Structure

from Part III - Spanish Morphosyntax and Meaning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2018

Kimberly L. Geeslin
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Get access

Summary

In this chapter I review the basics of a selected number of lines of inquiry into syntactic interfaces as viewed from a generative theoretical perspective. I have chosen to examine a series of particular challenges posed by the interface between the narrow syntactic module and different modules of the grammar, such as the lexicon, including subcategorization, theta-roles, lexical and compositional semantics, and the challenge posed by different meanings of the pronoun SE in Spanish. I also briefly review the syntax-morphology interface, in particular predicate-level (i.e., subject-verb) agreement, and noun phrase-internal (NP/DP) agreement processes. With respect to the syntax-pragmatics interface, I survey the distribution of overt and null subject pronouns as well as the interaction of subject position with focus structure, the latter of which has particular relevance for the syntax-information structure interface. Finally, I consider recent studies of the syntax-prosody interface, paying attention to recent proposals seeking to account for left-peripheral syntactic structures involving contrastive and topical constituents. Although research on these different syntactic interfaces is hardly uniform with respect to the precise model of the grammar proposed, they share a common thread of seeking to determine the descriptive and predictive limits of the syntactic module.
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexiadou, A. and Anagnostopoulou, E. (1998). Parametrizing AGR: Word Order, V-Movement and EPP-Checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 16 (3), 491539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, S. (1994). Using Large Corpora. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Beckman, M. E., Díaz-Campos, M., McGory, J. T., and Morgan, T. A. (2002). Intonation across Spanish in the Tones and Break Indices Framework. Probus, 14, 936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1972). Accent is Predictable (If You Are a Mind Reader). Lingua, 48, 633644.Google Scholar
Brunetti, L. (2004). A Unification of Focus (Doctoral dissertation). University of Florence.Google Scholar
Buitrago, N. (2013). Types of Focus in Spanish: Exploring the Connection between Function and Realization (Doctoral dissertation). Cornell University.Google Scholar
Büring, D. (1997). The Meaning of Topic and Focus: The 59th Street Bridge Accent. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Büring, D. and Gutiérrez-Bravo, R. (2001). Focus-Related Word Order Variation without the NSR: A Prosody Based Cross-Linguistic Analysis. In Bhloscaidh, Séamas Mac (ed.), Syntax and Semantics at Santa Cruz, Vol. 3. Santa Cruz, CA: Linguistics Research Center, University of California, pp. 4158.Google Scholar
Cabrera-Puche, M. J. (2008). Null Subject Patterns in Language Contact: The Case of Dominican Spanish (Doctoral dissertation). Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Casielles-Suárez, E. (2004). The Syntax–Information Structure Interface: Evidence from Spanish and English. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. L. (1976). Givenness, Contrastiveness, Definiteness, Subjects, Topics and Point of View In Li, Charles N. (ed.), Subject and Topic. New York Academic Press, pp. 2755.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1971). Deep Structure, Surface Structure, and Semantic Interpretation. In Steinberg, D. D. and Jakobovits, L. A. (eds.), Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics and Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 183216.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1982). Some Concepts and Consequences of Government and Binding Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1993). A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory. In Hale, K. and Keyser, S. J. (eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 152.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1998). Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 15, 156.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. and Halle, M. (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Chung, H. (2012). Two Types of Focus in Castilian Spanish (Doctoral dissertation). University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Cinque, G. (1993). A Null Theory of Phrase and Compound Stress. Linguistic Inquiry, 24, 239267.Google Scholar
Contreras, H. (1978). El orden de palabras en español. Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar
Contreras, H. (1980). Sentential Stress, Word Order, and the Notion of Subject in Spanish. In Waugh, L. R. and van Schooneveld, C. H. (eds.), The Melody of Language: Intonation and Prosody. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press, pp. 4553.Google Scholar
Contreras, H. (1991). On the Position of Subjects. In Rothstein, S. (ed.), Perspectives on Phrase Structure: Heads and Licensing. San Diego, CA and London: Academic Press, pp. 6379.Google Scholar
Costa, J. (2000). Focus In Situ: Evidence from Portuguese. Probus, 12, 187228.Google Scholar
Costa, J. (2004). Subject Positions and Interfaces. The Case of European Portuguese. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Domínguez, L. (2004a). Mapping Focus: The Syntax and Prosody of Focus in Spanish (Doctoral dissertation). Boston University.Google Scholar
Domínguez, L. (2004b). The Effects of Phonological Cues on the Syntax of Focus Constructions in Spanish. In Bok-Bennema, R., Hollebrandse, B., Kampers-Manhe, B., and Sleeman, P. (eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2002. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 6981.Google Scholar
Domínguez, L. (2013). Understanding Interfaces: Second Language Acquisition and Native Language Attrition of Spanish Subject Realization and Word Order Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
É. Kiss, K. (1998). Identificational Focus versus Information Focus. Language, 74, 245273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etxepare, R. and Uribe-Etxebarria, M. (2008). On Negation and Focus in Spanish and Basque. In Artiagoitia Beaskoetxea, X. and Lakarra Andrinua, J. (eds.), Gramatika jaietan: Patxi Goenagaren omenez. Bilbao: Universidad del País Vasco, pp. 287310.Google Scholar
Face, T. (2002). Local Intonational Marking of Spanish Contrastive Focus. Probus, 14, 7192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fant, L. (1984). Estructura informativa en español. Estudio sintáctico y entonativo. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar
Feldhausen, I. (2016). The Relation between Prosody and Syntax: The Case of Different Types of Left-Dislocations in Spanish. In Armstrong, M. E., Hendriksen, N., and Vanrell, M. D. M. (eds.), Intonational Grammar in Ibero-Romance: Approaches across Linguistic Subfields. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 153180.Google Scholar
Fox, D. (2000). Economy and Semantic Interpretation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gabriel, C. (2006). Focal Pitch Accents and Subject Positions in Spanish: Comparing Close-to-Standard Varieties and Argentinean Porteño. In Hoffmann, R. and Mixdorff, H. (eds.), Speech Prosody 2006. Dresden: TUD Press. Available from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.387.6737&rep=rep1&type=pdf (last access January 10, 2018).Google Scholar
Gabriel, C. (2010). On Focus, Prosody, and Word Order in Argentinean Spanish: A Minimalist OT account. Revista Virtual de Estudos da Linguagem, 4, 183222.Google Scholar
Garrido, J. M., Llisterri, J., de la Mota, C., and Ríos, A. (1993). Prosodic Differences in Reading Style: Isolated vs. Contextualized Sentences. EUROSPEECH’ 93, pp. 573576. Available from www.isca-speech.org/archive/eurospeech_1993/e93_0573.html (last access January 8, 2018).Google Scholar
Gupton, T. and Leal Méndez, T. (2013). Experimental Methodologies: Two Case Studies Investigating the Syntax–Discourse Interface. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 6 (1), 139164.Google Scholar
Hoot, B. (2012). Narrow Focus on Pre-Nominal Modifiers in Spanish: An Optimality-Theoretic Analysis. In Geeslin, K. and Díaz-Campos, M. (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 14th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla, pp. 293307.Google Scholar
Hoot, B. (2016). Narrow Presentational Focus in Mexican Spanish: Experimental Evidence. Probus, 28 (2), 335365.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. S. (1972). Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kempchinsky, P. and Gupton, T. (2009). The Role of Quantitative Data Collection in Theoretical Syntax. Paper Presented at the 13th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, Universidad de Puerto Rico.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leal, T., Destruel, E., and Hoot, B. (2017). The Realization of Information Focus in Monolingual and Bilingual Native Spanish. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. doi: 10.1075/lab.16009.leaGoogle Scholar
López, L. (2009). A Derivational Syntax of Information Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López-Cortina, J. (2007). The Spanish Left Periphery: Questions and Answers (Doctoral dissertation). Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Martínez-Sanz, C. (2011). Null and Overt Subjects in a Variable System: The Case of Dominican Spanish (Doctoral dissertation). University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
Mayol, L. (2012). An Account of the Variation in the Rates of Overt Subject Pronouns in Romance. Spanish in Context, 9 (3), 420442.Google Scholar
Muntendam, A. (2009). Linguistic Transfer in Andean Spanish: Syntax or Pragmatics? (Doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Muntendam, A. and Torreira, F. (2016). Focus and Prosody in Spanish and Quechua: Insights from an Interactive Task. In Armstrong, M. E., Hendriksen, N., and Vanrell, M. D. M. (eds.), Intonational Grammar in Ibero-Romance: Approaches across Linguistic Subfields. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 6990.Google Scholar
Neeleman, A. and Reinhart, T. (1998). Scrambling and the PF Interface. In Butt, M. and Geuder, W. (eds.), The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 309–353.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, F. J. (2003). Grammar is Grammar and Usage is Usage. Language, 79 (4), 682707.Google Scholar
Olarrea, A. (2012). Word Order and Information Structure. In Hualde, J. I., Olarrea, A., and O’Rourke, E. (eds.), The Handbook of Hispanic Linguistics. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 603628.Google Scholar
Ordóñez, F. (1997). Word Order and Clause Structure in Spanish and other Romance Languages (Doctoral dissertation). CUNY.Google Scholar
Ordóñez, F. (1998). Postverbal Asymmetries in Spanish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 16 (2), 313346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ordóñez, F. (2000). The Clausal Structure of Spanish: A Comparative Perspective. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Ordóñez, F. and Treviño, E. (1999). Left Dislocated Subjects and the Pro-Drop Parameter: A Case Study of Spanish. Lingua, 107 (1), 3968.Google Scholar
Ortega-Santos, I. (2008). Projecting Subjects in Spanish and English (Doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Ortega-Santos, I. (2013). Corrective Focus at the Right Edge in Spanish. Lingua, 131, 112135.Google Scholar
Ortega-Santos, I. (2016). Focus-Related Operations at the Right Edge in Spanish: Subjects and Ellipsis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ortiz López, L. A. (2010). El español del Caribe: Orden de palabras a la luz de la interfaz léxico-sintáctica y sintácticopragmática. Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana, 14, 7593.Google Scholar
Parafita Couto, M. C. (2009). Rightwardho! Linguistic Analysis, 35 (1–4), 163196.Google Scholar
Penke, M. and Rosenbach, A. (2007). What Counts as Evidence in Linguistics: The Case of Innateness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Prieto, P., Chilin, S., and Nibert, H. (1995). Pitch Downtrend in Spanish. Journal of Phonetics, 24, 445473.Google Scholar
Reinhart, T. (1997). Interface Economy: Focus and Markedness. In Gärtner, H. M., Wilder, C., and Bierwisch, M. (eds.), The Role of Economy Principles in Linguistic Theory. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, pp. 146169.Google Scholar
Reinhart, T. (2006). Interface Strategies: Reference-Set Computation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rooth, M. (1985). Association with Focus (Doctoral dissertation). University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Rooth, M. (1992). A Theory of Focus Interpretation. Natural Language Semantics, 1, 75116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rooth, M. (1996). Focus. In Lappin, S. (ed.), The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 271297.Google Scholar
Sampson, G. (1996). From Central Embedding to Empirical Linguistics. In Thomas, J. and Short, M. (eds.), Using Corpora for Language Research: Studies in Honor of Geoffrey Leech. London: Longman, pp. 1426.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. (1986). On Derived Domains in Sentence Phonology. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 371405.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. (1995). Sentence Prosody: Intonation, Stress, and Phrasing. In Goldsmith, J. (ed.), The Handbook of Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 550569.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. (2005). Comments on Intonational Phrasing in English. In Frota, S., Vigario, M., and Freitas, M.-J. (eds.), Prosodies. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 1158.Google Scholar
Sheehan, M. (2006). The EPP and Null Subjects in Romance (Doctoral dissertation). University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne.Google Scholar
Sosa, J. M. (1995). Nuclear and Pre-Nuclear Tonal Inventories and the Phonology of Spanish Declarative Intonation. In Elenius, K. and Branderand, R. (eds.), Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Vol. 4. Stockholm: KTH and Stockholm University, pp. 646649.Google Scholar
Sosa, J. M. (1999). La entonación del español. Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar
Suñer, M. (1994). V-Movement and the Licensing of Argumental Wh-Phrases in Spanish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 12, 335372.Google Scholar
Szendrői, K. (2001). Focus and the Syntax–Phonology Interface (Doctoral dissertation). University College London.Google Scholar
Szendrői, K. (2003). A Stress-Based Approach to the Syntax of Hungarian Focus. The Linguistic Review, 20 (1), 3778.Google Scholar
Szendrői, K. (2004). Focus and the Interaction between Syntax and Pragmatics. Lingua, 114, 229254.Google Scholar
Ticio, M. E. (2004). On the Position of Subjects in Puerto Rican Spanish. In Rodríguez-Mondoñedo, M. and Ticio, M. E. (eds.), Cranberry Linguistics 2. University of Connecticut Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 12. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL, pp. 7892.Google Scholar
Toribio, A. J. (2000). Setting Parametric Limits on Dialectal Variation in Spanish. Lingua, 10, 315341.Google Scholar
Truckenbrodt, H. (1995). Phonological Phrases: Their Relation to Syntax, Focus and Prominence (Doctoral dissertation). MIT.Google Scholar
Vallduví, E. (1992). The Informational Component. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Vallduví, E. and Vilkuna, M. (1998). On Rheme and Kontrast. Syntax and Semantics, 29, 79108.Google Scholar
Wasow, T. (2002). Postverbal Behavior. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, M. L. (1998). Prosody, Focus, and Word Order. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×