Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Global Work–Family Interface
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Global Work–Family Interface
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Part I Overview
- Part II Assessing Cultural and Structural Differences
- Part III Methodological Considerations
- Part IV Review of Research in Regions across the Globe
- Part V Cultures within Cultures
- Part VI Organizational Perspectives
- 27 The Work–Family Interface and Careers in the Global Workplace: Insights from Cross-National Research
- 28 Managing Work–Life Effectiveness in a Multinational Firm: An Organizational Case Study
- 29 Workplace Flexibility: Strategies to Help Organizations Navigate Global Expansion
- 30 Organizational Culture in the Context of National Culture
- 31 Family-Supportive Supervision around the Globe
- Part VII Family Perspectives
- Part VIII Individual Perspectives
- Part IX Conclusion
- Index
- References
27 - The Work–Family Interface and Careers in the Global Workplace: Insights from Cross-National Research
from Part VI - Organizational Perspectives
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 April 2018
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Global Work–Family Interface
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Global Work–Family Interface
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Part I Overview
- Part II Assessing Cultural and Structural Differences
- Part III Methodological Considerations
- Part IV Review of Research in Regions across the Globe
- Part V Cultures within Cultures
- Part VI Organizational Perspectives
- 27 The Work–Family Interface and Careers in the Global Workplace: Insights from Cross-National Research
- 28 Managing Work–Life Effectiveness in a Multinational Firm: An Organizational Case Study
- 29 Workplace Flexibility: Strategies to Help Organizations Navigate Global Expansion
- 30 Organizational Culture in the Context of National Culture
- 31 Family-Supportive Supervision around the Globe
- Part VII Family Perspectives
- Part VIII Individual Perspectives
- Part IX Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
This overview of cross-national research on work-family (WF) and career-related outcomes reveals considerable variation across countries, underscoring the need for comparative research. The review provides examples of studies at different levels of analysis to illustrate the variety of research designs and findings. Individual-level studies examine cross-national variations in various aspects of employees’ WF interface and career outcomes, and the findings suggest that country-level WF-related cultural values (e.g., gender egalitarianism) and structural characteristics (e.g., supportive public policies) help to explain country variations. Some studies include organizational characteristics as additional contextual factors and/or outcomes of country characteristics. Macro-level studies examine country variation in aggregated career outcomes, and findings identify country-level factors (e.g., parental leave or childcare provisions) that help explain country variations in outcomes, such as the nature and size of motherhood career penalties. The review concludes with a future research agenda that is grounded in past research and findings.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Global Work–Family Interface , pp. 497 - 516Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Abendroth, A.-K., Huffman, M. L., & Treas, J. (2014). The parity penalty in life course perspective: Motherhood and occupational status in 13 European countries. American Sociological Review, 79(5), 993–1014.Google Scholar
Arthur, M. B., Hall, D. T., & Lawrence, B. S. (Eds.). (1989). Handbook of Career Theory. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aryee, S., Srinivas, E. S., & Tan, H. H. (2005). Rhythms of life: Antecedents and outcomes of work–family balance in employed parents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 132–146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnett, R. C., & Hyde, J. S. (2001). Women, men, work, and family: An expansionist theory. American Psychologist, 56, 781–796.Google Scholar
Berg, P., Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., & Kalleberg, A. L. (2004). Contesting time: International comparisons of employee control of working time. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 57, 331–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (2013). Female labor supply: Why is the United States falling behind? American Economic Review, 103(3), 251–256.Google Scholar
Boeckmann, I., Misra, J., & Budig, M. J. (2015). Cultural and institutional factors shaping mothers’ employment and working hours in postindustrial countries. Social Forces, 93(4), 1301–1333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corrigall, E. A., & Konrad, A. M. (2006). The relationship of job attribute preferences to employment, hours of paid work, and family responsibilities: An analysis comparing women and men. Sex Roles, 54(1–2), 95–111.Google Scholar
Den Dulk, L., Groeneveld, S., Ollier-Malaterre, A., & Valcour, M. (2013). National context in work–life research: A multi-level cross-national analysis of the adoption of workplace work–life arrangements in Europe. European Management Journal, 31(5), 478–494.Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2012). Social role theory. In Van Lange, P. A. M., Kruglanski, A. W., & Higgins, E. T. (Eds.), Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology. (Vol. 2, pp. 458–476). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edlund, J., & Oun, I. (2016). Who should work and who should care? Attitudes towards the desirable division of labour between mothers and fathers in five European countries. Acta Sociologica, 59, 151–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emrich, C. G., Denmark, F. L., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2004). Cross-cultural differences in gender egalitarianism: Implications for societies, organizations, and leaders. In House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (Eds.), Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies (pp. 343–394). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gangl, M., & Ziefle, A. (2009). Motherhood, labor force behavior, and women’s careers: an empirical assessment of the wage penalty for motherhood in Britain, Germany, and the United States. Demography, 46(2), 341–369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goode, W. J. (1960). A theory of role strain. American Sociological Review, 25, 483–496.Google Scholar
Gornick, J. C., & Meyers, M. K (2003). Families that Work: Policies for Reconciling Parenthood and Employment. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10, 76–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work–family enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 31, 72–92.Google Scholar
Gregory, A., & Milner, S. (2011). Fathers and work–life balance in France and the UK: Policy and practice. International Journal of Sociology & Social Policy, 31(1/2), 34–52.Google Scholar
Hanges, P. J., & Dickson, M. W. (2004). The development and validation of the GLOBE culture and leadership scales. In House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (Eds.), Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies (pp. 122–151). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hegewisch, A., & Gornick, J. C. (2011). The impact of work–family policies on women’s employment: A review of research from OECD countries. Community, Work & Family, 14(2), 119–138. doi:10.1080/13668803.2011.571395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, R. J., & Javidan, M. (2004). Overview of GLOBE. In House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (Eds.), Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (Eds.). (2004). Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Kelly, E. L., Moen, P., & Tranby, E. (2011). Changing workplaces to reduce work–family conflict: Schedule control in a white-collar organization. American Sociological Review, 76(2), 265–290.Google Scholar
Kirchmeyer, C. (2000). Work–life initiatives: Greed or benevolence regarding workers’ time? In Cooper, C. L. & Rousseau, D. M. (Eds.), Trends in Organizational Behavior: Time in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 7, pp. 79–93). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Google Scholar
Larson, R., Verma, S., & Dworkin, J. (2001). Men’s work and family lives in India: The daily organization of time and emotion. Journal of Family Psychology, 15, 206–224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (2013). Social cognitive model of career self-management: Toward a unifying view of adaptive career behavior across the life span. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60(4), 557.Google Scholar
Lyness, K. S., Gornick, J. C., Stone, P., & Grotto, A. R. (2012). It’s all about control: Worker control over schedule and hours in cross-national context. American Sociological Review, 77, 1023–1049.Google Scholar
Lyness, K. S., & Judiesch, M. K. (2008). Can a manager have a life and a career? International and multisource perspectives on work–life balance and career advancement potential. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 789–805.Google Scholar
Lyness, K. S., & Judiesch, M. K. (2014). Gender egalitarianism and work–life balance for managers: Multisource perspectives in 36 countries. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 63(1), 96–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyness, K. S., & Kropf, M. B. (2005). The relationships of national gender equality and organizational support with work–family balance: A study of European managers. Human Relations, 58, 33–60.Google Scholar
Mandel, H., & Semyonov, M. (2005). Family policies, wage structures, and gender gaps: Sources of earnings inequality in 20 countries. American Sociological Review, 70(6), 949–967.Google Scholar
Mandel, H., & Semyonov, M. (2006). A welfare state paradox: State interventions and women’s employment opportunities in 22 countries. American Journal of Sociology, 111(6), 1910–1949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misra, J., & Murray-Close, M. (2014). The gender wage gap in the United States and cross nationally. Sociology Compass, 8(11), 1281–1295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ollier-Malaterre, A., & Foucreault, A. (2017). Cross-national work–life research. Journal of Management, 43(1), 111–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peus, C., & Traut-Mattausch, E. (2008). Manager and mommy? A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(5), 558–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seguino, S. (2007). Plus ça change? Evidence on global trends in gender norms and stereotypes. Feminist Economics, 13(2), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thein, H. H., Austen, S., Currie, J., & Lewin, E. (2010). The impact of cultural context on the perception of work/family balance by professional women in Singapore and Hong Kong. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 10(3), 303–320.Google Scholar
United Nations Development Programme. (2010). Human Development Report 2010: The Real Wealth of Nations: Pathways to Human Development. Retrieved from New York, NY.Google Scholar
van Steenbergen, E. F., Ellemers, N., & Mooijaart, A. (2007). How work and family can facilitate each other: Distinct types of work–family facilitation outcomes for women and men. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12, 279–300.Google Scholar
Wattis, L., Standing, K., & Yerkes, M. A. (2013). Mothers and work–life balance: exploring the contradictions and complexities involved in work–family negotiation. Community, Work & Family, 16(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 699–727.Google Scholar
World Values Survey Association. (2009). World Values Survey 1981–2008 official aggregate v. 20090901. ASEP/JDS, Madrid.Google Scholar
Yang, N., Chen, C. C., Choi, J., & Zou, Y. (2000). Sources of work–family conflict: A Sino–U.S. comparison of the effects of work and family demands. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 113–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 1
- Cited by