Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T10:32:34.194Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - Knowledge Building and Knowledge Creation

from Part IV - Learning Together

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

By
Marlene Scardamalia  and
Carl Bereiter
Edited by
R. Keith Sawyer
R. Keith Sawyer
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Get access

Summary

This chapter describes a pedagogy whereby students learn how to engage in collaborative creative processes similar to professional knowledge workers. The five themes of knowledge building are (1) Community knowledge: students work together to advance the knowledge of the entire community; (2) Idea improvement: all ideas can be continually revised in an ongoing creative process; (3) Dialogue: community knowledge building involves public discourse along the lines of professional discourse in a scientific community; (4) Constructive use of authoritative information: students always need to work with authoritative information, even while they are creating new knowledge. New knowledge creation must be coherent with what is already known; (5) Epistemic artifacts: knowledge building is more effective if learners create externally sharable things. The chapter describes the authors’ influential Knowledge Forum application, one of the first networked collaborative idea-generation tools.

Keywords

knowledge buildingtheory buildingepistemic artifactsKnowledge Forumcollaborationdiscoursecommunity knowledge
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences , pp. 385 - 405
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alter, S. (2017). Nothing is more practical than a good conceptual artifact … which may be a theory, framework, model, metaphor, paradigm or perhaps some other abstraction. Information Systems Journal, 27(5), 671–693. doi:10.1111/isj.12116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andriessen, J., & Baker, M. (2014). Arguing to learn. In Sawyer, R. K.. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed., pp. 439–460). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bereiter, C. (2014). Principled practical knowledge: Not a bridge but a ladder. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(1), 4–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bereiter, C. (2016). Theory building and education for understanding. In Peters, M. A. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational philosophy and theory. Singapore: Springer Science+Business Media. doi:10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_370-1Google Scholar
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2003). Learning to work creatively with knowledge. In Corte, E. D., Verschaffel, L., Entwistle, N., & Merriënboer, J. V. (Eds.), Powerful learning environments: Unravelling basic components and dimensions (pp. 73–78). Oxford, England: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2010). Can children really create knowledge? Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 36(1). Retrieved from www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/26377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2014). Knowledge building and knowledge creation: One concept, two hills to climb. In Tan, S. C., So, H. J., & Yeo, J. (Eds.), Knowledge creation in education (pp. 35–52). Singapore: Springer Science+Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2016). “Good moves” in knowledge-creating dialogue. Qwerty – Open and Interdisciplinary Journal of Technology, Culture and Education, 11(2), 12–26. Retrieved from http://www.ckbg.org/qwerty/index.php/qwerty/article/view/242Google Scholar
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2018). Fixing Humpty-Dumpty: Putting higher-order skills and knowledge together again. In Kerslake, L. & Wegerif, R. (Eds.), Theory of teaching thinking: International perspectives (pp. 73–88). London; New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1996). Psychological theory and design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. In Schauble, L. & Glaser, R. (Eds.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education (pp. 289–325). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Brown, J. S. (2017). Sensemaking in our post-AlphaGo world. Retrieved from http://johnseelybrown.com/SensemakingStanford.pdfGoogle Scholar
Caswell, B., & Bielaczyc, K. (2001). Knowledge Forum: Altering the relationship between students and scientific knowledge. Education, Communication & Information, 1(3), 281–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, C. K. K. (2013). Collaborative knowledge building: Towards a knowledge creation perspective. In Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Chinn, C. A., Chan, C. K. K., & O’Donnell, A. (Eds.), The international handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 437–461). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chen, B., Chang, Y.-H., Groos, D., et al. (2019). IdeaMagnets: Bridging Knowledge Building in schools with public discourse. Institute for Knowledge Innovation and Technology. Retrieved June 13, 2020 from https://bodong.me/talk/2019-kbsi-ideamagnets/featured.pngGoogle Scholar
Chen, B., & Hong, H.-Y. (2016). Schools as knowledge-building organizations: Thirty years of design research. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 266–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, B., Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2015). Advancing knowledge building discourse through judgments of promising ideas. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(4), 345–366. doi:10.1007/s11412-015-9225-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, B., & Zhang, J. (2016). Analytics for knowledge creation: Towards epistemic agency and design-mode thinking. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(2), 139–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chuy, M., Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., et al. (2010). Understanding the nature of science and scientific progress: A theory-building approach. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 36(1). Retrieved from www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/26373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillenbourg, P., & Jermann, P. (2006). Designing integrative scripts. In Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Mandl, H., & Haake, J. (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported communication of knowledge: Cognitive, computational, and educational perspectives (pp. 259–288). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Drucker, P. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Dunbar, K. (1997). How scientists think: Online creativity and conceptual change in science. In Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M., & Vaid, S. (Eds.), Conceptual structures and processes: Emergence, discovery and change (pp. 461–493). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Goldman, S. R., & Brand-Gruwel, S. (2018). Learning from multiple sources in a digital society. In Fischer, F., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Goldman, S. R., & Reimann, P. (Eds.), International handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 86–95). New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakkarainen, K., & Sintonen, M. (2002). The interrogative model of inquiry and computer-supported collaborative learning. Science & Education, 11(1), 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, H. Y., & Sullivan, F. R. (2009). Towards an idea-centered, principle-based design approach to support learning as knowledge creation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(5), 613–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keefer, M. W., Seitz, C. L., & Resnick, L. B. (2000). Judging the quality of peer-led student dialogues. Cognition and Instruction, 18(1), 3–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khanlari, A., Zhu, G., & Scardamalia, M. (2019). Knowledge Building analytics to explore crossing disciplinary and grade-level boundaries. Journal of Learning Analytics, 6(3), 60–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimally guided instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laferrière, T., Law, N. W. Y., & Montané, M. (2012). An international knowledge building network for sustainable curriculum and pedagogical innovation. International Education Studies, 5(3), 148–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, P.-Y., Ma, L., Chang, Y.-H., Hong, H.-Y., & Lin, C. P. (2018). Improving elementary students’ literacy through knowledge building. In Kay, J. & Luckin, R. (Eds.), Rethinking learning in the digital age: Making the learning sciences count, 13th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2018, Vol. 3 (pp. 1527–1528). London, England: International Society of the Learning Sciences.Google Scholar
Liu, A. (2012). This is not a book: Transliteracies and long forms of digital attention. Paper presented at the Translittératies Conference, ENS Cachan, Paris, November 7, 2012. Retrieved from https://liu.english.ucsb.edu/this-is-not-a-book-translitteraties-conference-paris/Google Scholar
Liu, A. (2018). Friending the past: The sense of history in the digital age. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loo, S. (2017). Creative working in the knowledge economy. Abingdon, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ma, L., & Scardamalia, M. (in press). Teachers as designers in knowledge building innovation networks. In Shanahan, M.-C., Kim, B., Koh, K., Preciado-Babb, A. P., & Takeuchi, M. A. (Eds.), The learning sciences in conversation: Theories, methodologies, and boundary spaces. Routledge.Google Scholar
Ma, L., Tan, S., Teo, C., & Kamsan, M. (2017). Using rotating leadership to visualize students’ epistemic agency and collective responsibility for knowledge advancement. In Smith, B. K., Borge, M., Mercier, E., & Lim, K. Y. (Eds.), Making a difference: Prioritizing equity and access in CSCL, 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 2017, Vol. 1 (pp. 455–462). Philadelphia, PA: International Society of the Learning Sciences.Google Scholar
Martin, R. (2009). The design of business: Why design thinking is the next competitive advantage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
Matsuzawa, Y. (2019). Knowledge Forum video annotation to advance community knowledge. Institute for Knowledge Innovation and Technology. Retrieved September 9, 2019 from https://macc704.github.io/www/VideoAnnotaionTool.htmlGoogle Scholar
Mayfield, E., & Rosé, C. P. (2013). LightSIDE: Open source machine learning for text. In Shermis, M. D. & Burstein, J. (Eds.), Handbook of automated essay evaluation: Current applications and new directions (pp. 124–135). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mercer, N. (2000). The guided construction of knowledge: Talk amongst teachers and learners. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters Ltd. (Originally published in 1995).Google Scholar
Nonaka, I. (1991). The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review, 69(6), 96–104.Google Scholar
Oshima, J., Oshima, R., & Matsuzawa, Y. (2012). Knowledge Building Discourse Explorer: A social network analysis application for knowledge building discourse. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(5), 903–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resendes, M., Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., Chen, B., & Halewood, C. (2015). Group-level formative feedback and metadiscourse. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(3), 309–336. doi:10.1007/s11412-015-9219-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In Smith, B. (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 76–98). Chicago, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Scardamalia, M. (2003). Knowledge building environments: Extending the limits of the possible in education and knowledge work. In DiStefano, A., Rudestam, K. E., & Silverman, R. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of distributed learning (pp. 269–272). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1(1), 37–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2020). Will knowledge building remain uniquely human? Qwerty – Open and Interdisciplinary Journal of Technology, Culture and Education, 11(2), 12–26.Google Scholar
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2021). Knowledge building: Advancing the state of community knowledge. In Cress, U., Rosé, C., Wise, A., & Oshima, J. (Eds.), International handbook of computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 261–279). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., Brett, C., Burtis, P. J., Calhoun, C., & Smith Lea, N. (1992). Educational applications of a networked communal database. Interactive Learning Environments, 2(1), 45–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., & Lamon, M. (1994). The CSILE project: Trying to bring the classroom into World 3. In McGilley, K. (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 201–228). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Scardamalia, M., Bransford, J., Kozma, R., & Quellmalz, E. (2012). New assessments and environments for knowledge building. In Griffin, P., McGaw, B., & Care, E. (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 231–300). New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media B.V.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., Viilo, M., & Hakkarainen, K. (2010). Learning by collaborative designing: Technology-enhanced knowledge practices. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20(2), 109–136.Google Scholar
Slotta, J. D., & Acosta, A. (2017). Scripting and orchestrating learning communities: A role for learning analytics. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (Vol. 1, pp. 343–350). Philadelphia, PA: International Society of the Learning Sciences.Google Scholar
Sterelny, K. (2005). Externalism, epistemic artefacts and the extended mind. In Schantz, R. (Ed.), The externalist challenge: New studies on cognition and intentionality. Berlin, Germany: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sun, Y., Zhang, J., & Scardamalia, M. (2010). Developing deep understanding and literacy while addressing a gender-based literacy gap. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 35(1). Retrieved from www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/26369Google Scholar
Tan, Y. H., & Tan, S. C. (2020). Conceptions of knowledge creation, knowledge and knowing: A phenomenography of Singapore Chinese language teachers. Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, S. C., So, H. J., & Yeo, J. (2014). Knowledge creation in education. Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teo, C. L. (2019). Community-based design research to sustain classroom innovation with ICT. In Hung, D., Lee, S.-S., Toh, Y., Jamaludin, A., & Wu, L. (Eds.), Innovations in educational change: Cultivating ecologies for schools (pp. 103–118). Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thagard, P. (2000). Coherence in thought and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toth, P., & Ma, L. (2018). Fostering student voice and epistemic agency through knowledge building. In Knowledge building: A place for everyone in a knowledge society, Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Knowledge Building Summer Institute (pp. 96–104). Toronto, Canada: Knowledge Building International. www.researchgate.net/publication/329842125Google Scholar
Tsoukas, H. (2009). A dialogical approach to the creation of new knowledge in organizations. Organization Science, 20(6), 941–957.Google Scholar
van Aalst, J. (2009). Distinguishing knowledge-sharing, knowledge-construction, and knowledge-creation discourses. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(3), 259–287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Aalst, J., & Truong, M. S. (2011). Promoting knowledge creation discourse in an Asian primary five classroom: Results from an inquiry into life cycles. International Journal of Science Education, 33(4), 487–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Krogh, G., Ichijo, K., & Nonaka, I. (2000). Enabling knowledge creation: Unlocking the mystery of tacit knowledge. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Woodruff, E., & Meyer, K. (1997). Explanations from intra- and intergroup discourse: Students building knowledge in the science classroom. Research in Science Education, 27(1), 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeo, J., & Tan, S. C. (2010). Constructive use of authoritative sources in science meaning making. International Journal of Science Education, 32(13), 1739–1754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoon, S., & Hmelo-Silver, C. (2017). What do learning scientists do? A survey of the ISLS membership. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(2), 167–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, J., & Chen, M.-H. (2019). Idea Thread Mapper: Designs for sustaining student-driven knowledge building across classrooms. In Hmelo-Silver, C. et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL 2019). Lyon, France: International Society of the Learning Sciences.Google Scholar
Zhang, J., Chen, M.-H., Chen, J., & Mico, T. F. (2013). Computer-supported metadiscourse to foster collective progress in knowledge-building communities. In Proceedings of the International Conference of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL 2013). Madison, WI: International Society of the Learning Sciences.Google Scholar
Zhang, J., Hong, H.-Y., Scardamalia, M., Teo, C., & Morley, E. (2011). Sustaining knowledge building as a principle-based innovation at an elementary school. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(2), 262–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R., & Messina, R. (2009). Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 7–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, G., Teo, C. L., Scardamalia, M., et al. (2020). Emotional and cognitive affordances of collaborative learning environments. In Gresalfi, M. & Horn, I. S. (Eds.), The interdisciplinarity of the learning sciences, 14th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2020 (Vol. 1, pp. 382–389). Nashville, TN: International Society of the Learning Sciences.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×