Book contents
- The Cambridge History of Ancient Christianity
- The Cambridge History of Ancient Christianity
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- List of Contributors
- Editors’ Preface
- Part I Contested Contexts
- Part II Contested Figures
- Part III Contested Heritage
- Part IV Contested Cultures
- Part V Contested Beliefs
- 19 Contesting Creator and Creation
- 20 The Trinity in the Making
- 21 Resurrection, Transformation, and Deification
- 22 The Eucharist in the First Three Centuries
- 23 Office, and Appointment to Office, in Early Christian Circles
- Part VI Contested Bodies
- Ancient Sources
- Modern Authors
- References
21 - Resurrection, Transformation, and Deification
from Part V - Contested Beliefs
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 August 2023
Book contents
- The Cambridge History of Ancient Christianity
- The Cambridge History of Ancient Christianity
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- List of Contributors
- Editors’ Preface
- Part I Contested Contexts
- Part II Contested Figures
- Part III Contested Heritage
- Part IV Contested Cultures
- Part V Contested Beliefs
- 19 Contesting Creator and Creation
- 20 The Trinity in the Making
- 21 Resurrection, Transformation, and Deification
- 22 The Eucharist in the First Three Centuries
- 23 Office, and Appointment to Office, in Early Christian Circles
- Part VI Contested Bodies
- Ancient Sources
- Modern Authors
- References
Summary
In the earliest period of the Christian movements, resurrection meant many things to many people. Claims that resurrection is unique to Christian discourse or unattested in Greco-Roman thought are based on overly determined understandings that respect neither the diversity of early Christian conceptions nor the breadth of Greco-Roman lore.1 The explosion of research on resurrection forbids a comprehensive survey. In this essay, the focus will be on ontology – what resurrection meant for the body, a body different from yet in continuity with the celestial and deathless body it becomes. From this discussion follows an inquiry as to what resurrection meant with regard to human identity: Do resurrected individuals remain human, or do they transcend humanity to become a higher entity?
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of Ancient Christianity , pp. 491 - 513Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Select Bibliography
Alexander, Philip “From son of Adam to second God: Transformations of the biblical Enoch.” Pages 87–122 in Biblical Figures Outside the Bible. Edited by Stone, Michael E. and Bergren, Theodore A. (Harrisburg, PA: Trinity, 1998).Google Scholar
Attridge, Harold W. (ed.) Nag Hammadi Codex I (The Jung Codex) Notes (Leiden: Brill, 1985).Google Scholar
Baker, Lynne Rudder. “Resurrecting material persons.” Pages 315–30 in The Palgrave Handbook of the Afterlife. Edited by Nagasawa, Yujin and Matheson, Benjamin (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017).Google Scholar
Bedard, Stephen J. “A nation of heroes: From apotheosis to resurrection.” Pages 453–60 in Resurrection of the Dead: Biblical Traditions in Dialogue. Edited by van Oyen, Geert and Shepherd, Tom (Leuven: Peeters, 2012).Google Scholar
Bucur, Bogdan Gabriel. Angelomorphic Pneumatology: Clement of Alexandria and Other Early Christian Witnesses (Leiden: Brill, 2009).Google Scholar
Bynum, Caroline Walker. The Resurrection of the Body in Western Christianity, 200–1336 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Cook, John Granger. Empty Tomb, Apotheosis, Resurrection (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2018).Google Scholar
Decock, Paul B. “The resurrection according to Origen of Alexandria.” Pages 497–516 in Resurrection of the Dead: Biblical Traditions in Dialogue. Edited by van Oyen, Geert and Shepherd, Tom (Leuven: Peeters, 2012).Google Scholar
Edwards, Mark. “The Epistle to Rheginus: Valentinianism in the fourth century,” Novum Testamentum 37.1 (1995), 76–91.Google Scholar
Edwards, Mark. “The naming of the Naassenes: Hippolytus, Refutatio V.6–10 as hieros logos,” Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 112 (1996), 74–80.Google Scholar
Elledge, C. D. Resurrection of the Dead in Early Judaism, 200 bce–ce 200 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Troels. Cosmology and Self in the Apostle Paul: The Material Spirit (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Troels. John and Philosophy: A New Reading of the Fourth Gospel (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Troels. “Philosophy of the self in the Apostle Paul.” Pages 179–94 in Ancient Philosophy of the Self. Edited by Remes, Pauliina and Sihvola, Juha (London: Springer, 2008).Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Troels. “A Stoic concept of the person in Paul? From Galatians 5:17 to Romans 7:14–25.” Pages 85–112 in Christian Body, Christian Self: Concepts of Early Christian Personhood. Edited by Rothschild, Clare K. and Thompson, Trevor W. (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2011).Google Scholar
Finney, Mark T. Resurrection, Hell and the Afterlife: Body and Soul in Antiquity, Judaism and Christianity (London: Routledge, 2016).Google Scholar
Hennessey, Lawrence R. “A philosophical issue in Origen’s eschatology: The three senses of incorporeality.” Pages 373–80 in Origeniana Quinta. Edited by Daly, Robert J. (Leuven: Peeters, 1992).Google Scholar
Irenaeus, . Contre les Hérésies. Edited by Rousseau, Adelin and Doutreleau, Louis, 5 vols. (Paris: Cerf, 2008).Google Scholar
Jacobi, Christine. “‘Dies ist die geistige Auferstehung’: Paulusrezeption im Rheginusbrief und im Philippusevangelium.” Pages 355–75 in Receptions of Paul in Early Christianity: The Person of Paul and His Writings Through the Eyes of His Early Interpreters. Edited by Schröter, Jens, Butticaz, Simon, and Dettwiler, Andreas (Berlin, De Gruyter, 2018).Google Scholar
Kiel, Nikolai. “Auferstehung des Fleisches in der Epistula Apostolorum,” Vigiliae Christianae 74 (2020), 165–98.Google Scholar
Lancellotti, Maria Grazia. The Naassenes: A Gnostic Identity Among Judaism, Christianity, Classical and Ancient Near Eastern Traditions (Münster: Ugarit-Verlag, 2000).Google Scholar
Lehtipuu, Outi. Debates over the Resurrection of the Dead: Constructing Early Christian Identity (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Litwa, M. David. Becoming Divine: An Introduction to Deification in Western Culture (Eugene, OR: Cascade Books, 2013).Google Scholar
Litwa, M. David. Iesus Deus: The Early Christian Depiction of Jesus as a Mediterranean God (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Litwa, M. David. Posthuman Transformation in Ancient Mediterranean Thought: Becoming Angels and Demons (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021).Google Scholar
Litwa, M. David (ed. and trans.) Refutation of All Heresies Translated with an Introduction and Notes (Atlanta: SBL Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Litwa, M. David. We Are Being Transformed: Deification in Paul’s Soteriology (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2012).Google Scholar
Litwa, M. David. “‘You are gods’: Deification in the Naassene writer and Clement of Alexandria,” Harvard Theological Review 110.1 (2017), 125–48.Google Scholar
Luijendijk, AnneMarie. “Buried and raised: Gospel of Thomas Logion 5 and resurrection.” Pages 272–96 in Beyond the Gnostic Gospels: Studies Building on the Work of Elaine Pagels. Edited by Iricinschi, Eduard, Jenott, Lance, Denzey Lewis, Nicola, and Townsend, Philippa (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2013).Google Scholar
Lundhaug, Hugo. “Begotten, not made, to arise in this flesh: The post-Nicene soteriology of the Gospel of Philip.” Pages 235–71 in Beyond the Gnostic Gospels: Studies Building on the Work of Elaine Pagels. Edited by Iricinschi, Eduard, Jenott, Lance, Denzey Lewis, Nicola, and Townsend, Philippa (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2013).Google Scholar
Lundhaug, Hugo. Images of Rebirth: Cognitive Poetics and Transformational Soteriology in the Gospel of Philip and the Exegesis of the Soul (Leiden: Brill, 2010).Google Scholar
Lundhaug, Hugo. “‘These are the symbols and likenesses of the resurrection’: Conceptualizations of death and transformation in the treatise on the resurrection (NHC 1,4).” Pages 187–205 in Metamorphoses: Resurrection, Body and Transformative Practices in Early Christianity. Edited by Karlsen Seim, Turid and Økland, Jorunn (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2009).Google Scholar
Lundhaug, Hugo and Jenott, Lance, The Monastic Origins of the Nag Hammadi Codices (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2015).Google Scholar
Madigan, Kevin J. and Levenson, Jon D.. Resurrection: The Power of God for Christians and Jews (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
McGlothlin, Thomas D. Resurrection as Salvation: Development and Conflict in Pre-Nicene Paulinism (Cambridge: Cambridge University, 2018).Google Scholar
Ménard, Jacques. Le traité sur la resurrection (NH I,4) (Quebec: University of Laval, 1983).Google Scholar
Miller, Richard C. Resurrection and Reception in Early Christianity (London: Routledge, 2015).Google Scholar
Moss, Candida R. Divine Bodies: Resurrecting Perfection in the New Testament and Early Christianity (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Nellas, Panayiotis. Deification in Christ: Orthodox Perspectives on the Nature of the Human Person (Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Økland, Jorunn, “Genealogies of the self.” Pages 83–108 in Metamorphoses: Resurrection, Body and Transformative Practices in Early Christianity. Edited by Karlsen Seim, Turid and Økland, Jorunn (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2009).Google Scholar
Origen, . Contra Celsum. Translated by Chadwick, Henry (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1953).Google Scholar
Origen, . Die Homilien zu Lukas in der Übersetzung des Hieronymus und die griechischen Reste der Homilien und des Lukas-Kommentars. Edited by Rauer, Max (GCS 9; Berlin: Akademie, 1959).Google Scholar
Origen, . On First Principles. Edited by Behr, John, 2 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Petrey, Taylor. Resurrecting Parts: Early Christians on Desire, Reproduction, and Sexual Difference (London: Routledge, 2015).Google Scholar
Pseudo-Justin, . Über die Auferstehung. Edited by Heimgartner, Martin (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2001).Google Scholar
Rasimus, Tuomas Paradise Reconsidered in Gnostic Mythmaking: Rethinking Sethianism in Light of the Ophite Evidence (Leiden: Brill, 2009).Google Scholar
Rogich, Daniel M. Becoming Uncreated: The Journey to Human Authenticity (Minneapolis: Light and Life, 1997).Google Scholar
Roukema, Riemer. “Origen’s interpretation of 1 Corinthians 15.” Pages 329–42 in Gelitten-Gestorben-Auferstanden: Passions- und Ostertraditionen im antiken Christentum. Edited by Nicklas, Tobias, Merkt, Andreas, and Verheyden, Joseph (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2010).Google Scholar
Roukema, Riemer. “The resurrection according to 1 Corinthians 15:35–55 as understood and debated in ancient Christianity.” Pages 33–60 in “If Christ Has Not Been Raised”: Studies on the Reception of the Resurrection Stories and the Belief in the Resurrection in the Early Church. Edited by Verheyden, Joseph, Merkt, Andreas, and Nicklas, Tobias (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, Jean Le Commentaire d’Origène sur Rom. III.5–V.7 d’après les extraits du papyrus 88748 du Musée du Caire (Cairo: French Institute of Archaeology, 1957).Google Scholar
Schibli, Hermann S. “Origen, Didymus, and the vehicle of the soul.” Pages 381–91 in Origeniana Quinta. Edited by Daly, Robert J. (Leuven: Peeters, 1992).Google Scholar
Schmid, Herbert. Die Eucharistie ist Jesus: Anfänge einer Theorie des Sakraments im koptischen Philippusevangelium (NHC II,3) (Leiden: Brill, 2007).Google Scholar
Scott, Alan. Origen and the Life of the Stars: A History of an Idea (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Setzer, Claudia Resurrection of the Body in Early Judaism and Early Christianity (Leiden: Brill, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigvartsen, Jan A. Afterlife and Resurrection Beliefs in the Apocrypha and Apocalyptic Literature (London: Bloomsbury: 2019).Google Scholar
Sigvartsen, Jan A. Afterlife and Resurrection Beliefs in the Pseudepigrapha (London: Bloomsbury, 2019).Google Scholar
Smith, Gregory A. “How thin is a demon?” Journal of Early Christian Studies 16.4 (2008), 479–512.Google Scholar
Songe-Møller, Vigdis. “‘With what kind of body will they come?’ Metamorphosis and the concept of change: From Platonic thinking to Paul’s notion of the resurrection of the dead.” Pages 109–22 in Metamorphoses: Resurrection, Body and Transformative Practices in Early Christianity. Edited by Karlsen Seim, Turid and Økland, Jorunn (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2009).Google Scholar
Tappenden, Frederick S. Resurrection in Paul: Cognition, Metaphor, and Transformation (Atlanta: SBL Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Tappenden, Frederick S. and Daniel-Hughes, Carly (eds.) Coming Back to Life: The Permeability of Past and Present, Mortality and Immortality, Death and Life in the Ancient Mediterranean (Montreal: McGill University, 2017).Google Scholar
Tertullian, . Opera. Edited by Kroymann, A. and Evans, E., 2 vols. (CCSL 2.1–2; Turnhout: Brepols, 1954).Google Scholar
Thiselton, Anthony C. The First Epistle to the Corinthians: A Commentary on the Greek Text (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2000).Google Scholar
Thomassen, Einar The Spiritual Seed: The Church of the ‘Valentinians’ (Leiden: Brill, 2006).Google Scholar
Thomassen, Einar “Valentinian ideas about salvation as transformation.” Pages 167–86 in Metamorphoses: Resurrection, Body and Transformative Practices in Early Christianity. Edited by Karlsen Seim, Turid and Økland, Jorunn (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2009).Google Scholar
Ware, James “The resurrection of Jesus in the pre-Pauline formula of 1 Cor 15:3–5,” New Testament Studies 60 (2014), 475–98.Google Scholar
Williams, Michael Allen. Rethinking “Gnosticism”: An Argument for Dismantling a Dubious Category (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Zizioulas, John. Being as Communion: Studies in Personhood and Church (Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1985).Google Scholar