Book contents
- Frontmatter
- General Introduction
- Part I The Earlier Empire c. 500–c. 700
- Part II The Middle Empire c. 700–1204
- Part III The Byzantine Lands in the Later Middle Ages 1204–1492
- 20 After the Fourth Crusade
- 20a The Greek Rump States and the Recovery of Byzantium
- 20b The Latin Empire of Constantinople and the Frankish States
- 21 Balkan Powers: Albania, Serbia and Bulgaria (1200–1300)
- 22 The Palaiologoi and the World Around Them (1261–1400)
- 23 Latins in the Aegean and the Balkans (1300–1400)
- 24 The Roman Orthodox World (1393–1492)
- Glossary (Including some Proper Names)
- Genealogical Tables and Lists of Rulers
- List of alternative place names
- Bibliography
- Picture Acknowledgements
- Index
- References
20a - The Greek Rump States and the Recovery of Byzantium
from 20 - After the Fourth Crusade
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2010
- Frontmatter
- General Introduction
- Part I The Earlier Empire c. 500–c. 700
- Part II The Middle Empire c. 700–1204
- Part III The Byzantine Lands in the Later Middle Ages 1204–1492
- 20 After the Fourth Crusade
- 20a The Greek Rump States and the Recovery of Byzantium
- 20b The Latin Empire of Constantinople and the Frankish States
- 21 Balkan Powers: Albania, Serbia and Bulgaria (1200–1300)
- 22 The Palaiologoi and the World Around Them (1261–1400)
- 23 Latins in the Aegean and the Balkans (1300–1400)
- 24 The Roman Orthodox World (1393–1492)
- Glossary (Including some Proper Names)
- Genealogical Tables and Lists of Rulers
- List of alternative place names
- Bibliography
- Picture Acknowledgements
- Index
- References
Summary
introduction
It was almost unthinkable that the ‘queen of cities’ should fall. It was in the words of Byzantine contemporaries a ‘cosmic cataclysm’. The Byzantine ruling class was disorientated and uprooted. The Constantinopolitan elite sought refuge where they could. Among the common people there was at first a sense of jubilation at their discomfiture: the proud had been humbled. Such was the demoralisation that at all levels of society submission to the conquering crusaders seemed a natural solution. Many leading Byzantines threw in their lot with the Latins. The logothete of the Drome Demetrios Tornikes continued to serve them in this capacity. He was the head of one of the great bureaucratic families which had dominated Constantinople before 1204. In the provinces leading families made deals with the conquerors. Theodore Branas governed the city of Adrianople – the key to Thrace – on behalf of the Venetians. Michael Angelos Doukas – a member of the Byzantine imperial house – took service with Boniface of Montferrat, now ruler of Thessaloniki. The cooperation of the local archontes smoothed Geoffrey I of Villehardouin’s conquest of the Peloponnese.
The crusaders elected a Latin emperor and created a Latin patriarch of Constantinople. There seemed every possibility that Byzantium would be refashioned in a Latin image. For exactly a year the Latins carried all before them. Then in April 1205 their success came abruptly to an end. They had alienated and underestimated the Bulgarians, who crushed them at the battle of Adrianople. Many of the crusade leaders were killed. The Latin emperor Baldwin of Flanders was led away into captivity, never again to be seen alive.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of the Byzantine Empire c.500–1492 , pp. 729 - 758Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2009