Adickes, Erich. 1913. Ein neu aufgefundenes Kollegheft nach Kants Verlesung über physische Geographie. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar

Adickes, Erich 1911. Untersuchungen zu Kants physischer Geographie. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar

Albrecht, Michael. 1978. Kants Antinomie der praktischen Vernunft. Hildesheim: G. Olms.Google Scholar

Allais, Lucy. 2004. “Kant’s One World: Interpreting ‘Transcendental Idealism.’” British Journal of the History of Philosophy 12(4): 655–84.Google Scholar

Allais, Lucy 2015. Manifest Reality: Kant’s Idealism and His Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Allison, Henry. 1983. Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Allison, Henry 2004. Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense, Revised and Enlarged Edition. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Ameriks, Karl. 1992. “The Critique of Metaphysics: Kant and Traditional Ontology.” In The Cambridge Companion to Kant, edited by Guyer, Paul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 249–79.Google Scholar

Ameriks, Karl 2003. Interpreting Kant’s Critiques. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Anderson, R. Lanier. 2015. The Poverty of Conceptual Truth: Kant’s Analytic/Synthetic Distinction and the Limits of Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Arnoldt, Emil. 1909. “Möglichstbollständiges Verzeichnis aller von Kant gehaltenen oder auch nur angekündigten Kollegia.” In Gesammelte Schriften, vol. v, part ii, edited by Schöndörffer, Otto. Berlin: Cassirer, pp. 173–343.Google Scholar

Bacin, Stefano. 2015. “Kant’s Lectures on Ethics and Baumgarten’s Moral Philosophy.” In Kant’s Lectures on Ethics: A Critical Guide, edited by Denis, Lara and Sensen, Oliver. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 15–33.Google Scholar

Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. 1739 / 4th ed. 1757. Metaphysica. Halle: Hemmerde.Google Scholar

Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb 2013. Metaphysics: A Critical Translation with Kant’s Elucidations, Selected Notes, and Related Materials. Translated and edited by Fugate, Courtney D. and Hymers, John. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar

Baxley, Anne Margaret. 2015. “Virtue, Self-Mastery, and the Autocracy of Practical Reason.” In Kant’s Lectures on Ethics: A Critical Guide, edited by Denis, Lara and Sensen, Oliver. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 223–38.Google Scholar

Beck, Lewis White. 1960. A Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Bennett, Jonathan. 1966. Kant’s Analytic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bohman, James, and Lutz-Bachmann, Matthias, eds. 1997. Perpetual Peace: Essays on Kant’s Cosmopolitan Ideal. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Brandt, Reinhard. 1999. Kritischer Kommentar zu Kants ‘Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht.’ Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar

Brandt, Reinhard. 2003. “The Guiding Idea of Kant’s Anthropology and the Vocation of the Human Being.” In Essays on Kant’s Anthropology, edited by Jacobs, Brian and Kain, Patrick. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 85–104.Google Scholar

Brandt, Reinhard, and Stark, Werner. 1997. Introduction to Kant’s Gesammelte Schriften, vol. xxv, edited by Brandt, Reinhard and Stark, Werner. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. vii–cli.Google Scholar

Brook, Andrew. 1994. Kant and the Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brook, Andrew 2001. “Kant, Self-Awareness and Self-Reference.” In Self-Reference and Self-Awareness, edited by Brook, A. and DeVidi, R.. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 9–30.Google Scholar

Byrd, Sharon, and Hruschka, Joachim. 2010. Kant’s Doctrine of Right: A Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Caranti, Luigi, ed. 2006. Kant’s Perpetual Peace: New Interpretative Essays. Rome: Luiss University Press.Google Scholar

Cavallar, Georg. 1999. Kant and the Theory and Practice of International Right. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar

Cohen, Alix. 2009. Kant and the Human Sciences. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Cohen, Alix, ed. 2013. Kant’s Lectures on Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Collins, Arthur W. 1999. Possible Experience: Understanding Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Denis, Lara. 2015. “Proper Self-Esteem and Duties to Oneself.” In Kant’s Lectures on Ethics: A Critical Guide, edited by Denis, Lara and Sensen, Oliver. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 205–22.Google Scholar

Dicker, Georges. 2004. Kant’s Theory of Knowledge: An Analytical Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dyck, Corey. 2014. Kant and Rational Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eisler, Rudolf. 1930, 1964. Kant Lexikon: Nachschlagewerk zu Kants sämtlichen Schriften, Briefen und handschriftlichen Nachlaß. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar

Fackenheim, Emil L. 1956–7. “Kant’s Concept of History.” Kant-Studien 48: 381–98.Google Scholar

Feder, Johann Heinrich, Georg. 1782. “Kritik der reinen Venunft von Immanuel Kant.” Zugabe zu den Göttingischen Anzeigen von gelehrten Sachen 1: 40–8. “The Göttingen Review: [Anonymous] Zugabe zu den Göttingischen Anzeigen von gelehrten Sachen (January 19, 1782).” Reprinted in Kant’s Early Critics: The Empiricist Critique of the Theoretical Philosophy. Translated and edited by Sassen, Brigitte. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 53–8.Google Scholar

Firla, Monika. 1981. Untersuchungen zum Verhältnis von Anthropologie und Moralphilosophie bei Kant. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Flikschuh, Katrin. 2000. Kant and Modern Political Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flikschuh, Katrin 2007. “Duty, Nature, Right: Kant’s Response to Mendelssohn in Theory and Practice III.” Journal of Moral Philosophy 4(2): 223–41.Google Scholar

Forgie, J. William. 2000. “Kant and Frege: Existence as a Second-Level Property.” Kant-Studien 91(2): 165–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 1961, 2008. “Introduction à l’anthropologie de Kant.” In Immanuel Kant: Anthropologie d’un point de vue pragmatique. Paris: Vrin, pp. 11–79.Google Scholar

Frierson, Patrick R. 2015. “Herder: Religion and Moral Motivation.” In Kant’s Lectures on Ethics: A Critical Guide, edited by Denis, Lara and Sensen, Oliver. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 34–51.Google Scholar

Fugate, Courtney D., and Hymers, John, eds. 2016. Preparation for Natural Theology: With Kant’s Notes and the Danzig Rational Theology Transcript. Translated by Fugate, Courtney D. and Hymers, John. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar

Gardner, Sebastian. 2006. “The Primacy of Practical Reason.” In A Companion to Kant, edited by Bird, Graham. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 259–73.Google Scholar

Gerhardt, Carl Immanuel. 1882, 1960. Die philosophischen Schriften von Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, vol. v. Berlin: Weidmann, 1882; reprinted Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlagsbuchhandlung. 1960).Google Scholar

Gerhardt, Volker. 1998. “Die Disziplin der reinen Vernunft, 2. bis 4. Abschnitt.” In Immanuel Kant: Kritik der reinen Vernunft, edited by Mohr, Georg and Marcus, Willaschek. Klassiker auslegen 17/18. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, pp. 571–95.Google Scholar

Grenberg, Jeanine. 2015. “Love.” In Kant’s Lectures on Ethics: A Critical Guide, edited by Denis, Lara and Sensen, Oliver. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 239–55.Google Scholar

Grier, Michelle. 2001. Kant’s Doctrine of Transcendental Illusion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul. 1987. Kant and the Claims of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul 2000. “From a Practical Point of View: Kant’s Conception of a Postulate of Pure Practical Reason.” In Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness, edited by Guyer, Paul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 333–71.Google Scholar

Hartnack, Justus. 1967. Kant’s Theory of Knowledge. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar

Henrich, Dieter, ed. 1967. Kant, Gentz, Rehberg, Über Theorie und Praxis. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Hinske, Norbert. 1966. “Kants Idee der Anthropologie.” In Die Frage nach dem Menschen., edited by Rombach, Heinrich and Müller, Max. Freiburg: Karl Alber, pp. 410–27.Google Scholar

Höffe, Otfried. 2004. Wirtschaftsbürger, Staatsbürger, Weltbürger. Politische Ethik im Zeitalter der Globalisierung. Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar

Höffe, Otfried 2006. Kant’s Cosmopolitan Theory of Law and Peace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. First published 2001 as “Königliche Völker” Zu Kants kosmopolitischer Rechts -und Friedenstheorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Höffe, Otfried 2010. Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. The Foundation of Modern Philosophy. New York: Springer. First published 2004 as Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Die Grundlegung der modernen Philosophie. Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar

Höffe, Otfried 2012. Kants Kritik der praktischen Vernunft. Eine Philosophie der Freiheit. Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar

Höffe, Otfried, ed. 2002. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der praktischen Vernunft. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar

Hogan, Desmond. 2010. “Kant’s Copernican Turn and the Rationalist Tradition.” In The Cambridge Companion to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, edited by Guyer, Paul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 21–40.Google Scholar

Hruschka, Joachim. 2015. Kant und der Rechtsstaat und andere Essays zu Kants Rechtslehre und Ethik. Freiburg/München: Karl Alber.Google Scholar

Irmscher, Hans Dietrich, ed. 1964. Immanuel Kant: Aus den Vorlesungen der Jahre 1762 bis 1764. Auf Grund der Nachschriften Johann Gottfried Herders. Cologne: Universitäts-Verlag.Google Scholar

Jachmann, Reinhold Bernhard. 1804. Immanuel Kant geschildert in Briefen an einen Freund. Königsberg: Friedrich Nicolovius.Google Scholar

Jacobs, Brian, and Kain, Patrick, eds. 2003. Essays on Kant’s Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Johnson, Gregory J., ed. 2002. Kant on Swedenborg: Dreams of a Spirit-Seer & Other Works. West Chester, PA: Swedenborg Foundation.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. 1992. Über den Gemeinspruch: Das mag in der Theorie richtig sein, taugt aber nicht für die Praxis./Zum Ewigen Frieden: Ein philosophischer Entwurf. Introduction by Klemme, Heiner F.. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel 2001. Lectures on Ethics. Translated and edited by Heath, Peter and Schneewind, J. B.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel 2004. Vorlesung zur Moralphilosophie, edited by Stark, Werner. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel 2011. Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime and other Writings, edited by Frierson, Patrick and Guyer, Paul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kersting, Wolfgang. 1993. Wohlgeordnete Freiheit. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Kim, Soo Bae. 1994. Die Entstehung der Kantischen Anthropologie und ihre Beziehung zur empirischen Psychologie der Wolffschen Schule. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Kirchmann, Julius Hermann. 1893. Erläuterungen zu Kants Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht. Leipzig: Dürr’sche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar

Kleingeld, Pauline. 1993. “The Problematic Status of Gender-Neutral Language in the History of Philosophy: The Case of Kant.” Philosophical Forum 25(2): 134–50.Google Scholar

Kleingeld, Pauline 1995. Fortschritt und Vernunft: Zur Geschichtsphilosophie Kants. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar

Kleingeld, Pauline 2012. Kant and Cosmopolitanism: The Philosophical Ideal of World Citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Klemme, Heiner F. 2010. “The Origin and Aim of Kant’s ‘Critique of Practical Reason.’” In Kant’s ‘Critique of Practical Reason’: A Critical Guide, edited by Reath, Andrews and Timmermann, Jens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 11–30.Google Scholar

Klemme, Heiner F. 2015. “Freiheit, Recht und Selbsterhaltung. Zur philosophischen Bedeutung von Kants Begriff der Verbindlichkeit.” In Normativität des Lebens – Normativität der Vernunft?, edited by Rothhaar, Markus and Hähnel, Martin. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 95–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klemme, Heiner F. 2017. Kants Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten: Ein systematischer Kommentar. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar

Kowalewski, Arnold. 1924. Die philosophischen Hauptvorlesungen Immanuel Kants: Nach den aufgefundenen Kollegheften des Grafen Heinrich zu Dohna-Wundlacken. Munich and Leipzig: Rösl & Cie.Google Scholar

Kowalewski, Sabina Laetitia, and Stark, Werner. 2000. Königsberger Kantiana: Immanuel Kant, Werke, Volksausgabe. Vol. i. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar

Kuehn, Manfred. 1995. “The Moral Dimension of Kant’s Great Light of 1769.” In Proceedings of the Eighth International Kant Congress, vol. i, edited by Robinson., H. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, pp. 373–92.Google Scholar

Kuehn, Manfred 2015. “Collins: Kant’s Proto-Critical Position.” In Kant’s Lectures on Ethics: A Critical Guide, edited by Denis, Lara and Sensen, Oliver. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 51–67.Google Scholar

Landau, Albert, ed. 1991. Rezensionen zur Kantischen Philosophie. Vol. i, 1781–1787. Berlin: Bebra-Verlag.Google Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfied Wilhelm. 1714a. The Monadology. Reprinted in Leibniz Selections, edited by Weiner, P.. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1951.Google Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfied Wilhelm 1714b. The Principles of Nature and Grace, Based on Reason. Reprinted in Leibniz Selections, edited by Weiner, P.. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1951.Google Scholar

Louden, Robert B. 2000. Kant’s Impure Ethics: From Rational Beings to Human Beings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Louden, Robert B. 2003. “The Second Part of Morals.” In Essays on Kant’s Anthropology, edited by Jacobs, Brian and Kain, Patrick. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 60–84.Google Scholar

Louden, Robert B. 2011. Kant’s Human Being: Essays on His Theory of Human Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Louden, Robert B. 2014. “Cosmopolitical Unity: The Final Destiny of the Human Species.” In Kant’s Lectures on Anthropology: A Critical Guide, edited by Cohen, Alix. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 211–29.Google Scholar

Louden, Robert B. 2015. “Vigilantius: Morality for Humans.” In Kant’s Lectures on Ethics: A Critical Guide, edited by Denis, Lara and Sensen, Oliver. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 84–100.Google Scholar

Ludwig, Bernd. 2005. Kants Rechtslehre: Mit einer Untersuchung zur Drucklegung Kantischer Schriften von Werner Stark, 2. Auflage, vol. II, Kant Forschungen. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar

Makkreel, Rudolf A. 2008. “Kant and the Development of the Human and Cultural Sciences.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 39(4): 546–53.Google Scholar

Martin, Gottfried. 1951. Immanuel Kant: Ontologie und Wissenschaftstheorie. Cologne: Kölner Universitätsverlag. 4th ed. 1969, Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Martin, Wayne. 2006. Theories of Judgment: Psychology, Logic, Phenomenology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Marwede, Florian. 2016. “Kant on Happiness and the Duty to Promote the Highest Good.” In The Highest Good in Kant’s Philosophy, edited by Thomas, Höwing. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 51–70.Google Scholar

Mellin, Georg Albert, Samuel. 1797–1804. Encyclopädisches Wörterbuch der Kritischen Philosophie. 6 vols. Jena and Leipzig: Friedrich Frommann.Google Scholar

Menzer, Paul. 1991. “Einleitung.” In Immanuel Kant, Eine Vorlesung über Ethik, edited by Gerhardt, Gerd. Frankfurt: Fischer, pp. 281–9.Google Scholar

Mikkelsen, Jon M., ed. 2013. Kant and the Concept of Race: Late Eighteenth-Century Writings. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Milz, Bernhard. 2002. Der gesuchte Widerstreit: Die Antinomie in Kants “Kritik der praktischen Vernunft.” Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Munzel, G. Felicitas. 1999. Kant’s Conception of Moral Character. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Muthu, Sankar. 2003. Enlightenment against Empire. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Naragon, Steve. 2000. “The Metaphysics Lectures in the Academy Edition of Kants Gesammelte Schriften.” In Zustand und Zukunft der Akademie-Ausgabe von Kants Gesammelten Schriften, edited by Brandt, Reinhard and Stark, Werner. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 189–215.Google Scholar

Naragon, Steve 2006. Kant in the Classroom. http://users.manchester.edu/FacStaff/SSNaragon/Kant/home/index.htm.Google Scholar

Naragon, Steve 2007. Kant’s Physics Notes. http://users.manchester.edu/FacStaff/SSNaragon/Kant/Notes/notesPhysics.htm.Google Scholar

Neukirchen, Aloys. 1914. Das Verhältnis der Anthropologie Kants zu seiner Psychologie. Bonn: Hauptmann.Google Scholar

Niesen, Peter. 2007. “Colonialism and Hospitality.” Politics and Ethics Review 3(1): 90–108.Google Scholar

Onof, Christian. 2015. “Kant’s Lectures on Physics and the Development of the Critical Philosophy.” In Reading Kant’s Lectures, edited by Clewis, Robert R.. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 461–83.Google Scholar

Paton, H. J. 1936. Kant’s Metaphysic of Experience. Vol. ii. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Pauen, Michael. 1999. “Teleologie und Geschichte in der Kritik der Urteilskraft.” In Aufklärung und Interpretation: Studien zu Kants Philosophie und ihrem Umkreis, edited by Klemme, H., Ludwig, B., Pauen, M., and Stark, W.. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, pp. 197–215.Google Scholar

Pauen, Michael 2001. “Zur Rolle des Individuums in Kants Geschichtsphilosophie.” In Akten des IX. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, vol. IV, edited by Horstmann, R.-P. and Gerhardt, V.. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, pp. 35–43.Google Scholar

Perry, John. 1979. “The Problem of the Essential Indexical.” In Self-Reference and Self-Awareness, edited by Brook, A. and DeVidi, R.. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 143–59.Google Scholar

Pollok, Konstantin. 2001. Kants Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Naturwissenschaft: Ein Kritischer Kommentar. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar

Prauss, Gerold. 1974. Kant und das Problem der Dinge an sich. Bonn: Bouvier.Google Scholar

Proops, Ian. 2005. “Kant’s Conception of Analytic Judgment.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70(3): 588–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reath, Andrews. 1988. “Two Conceptions of the Highest Good in Kant.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 26(4): 593–619.Google Scholar

Rink, Friedrich Theodor. 1805. Ansichten aus Immanuel Kant’s Leben. Königsberg: Göbbels & Unzer.Google Scholar

Rink, Friedrich Theodor, ed. 1803, 1968. Immanuel Kant über Pädagogik. In Kant’s Works, Academy edition, vol. 9. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 437–500.Google Scholar

Riley, Patrick. 2007. “Kant against Hobbes in Theory and Practice.” Journal of Moral Philosophy 4(2): 194–206.Google Scholar

Ripstein, Arthur. 2009. Force and Freedom. Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Rohs, Peter. 1998. “Die Disziplin der reinen Vernunft, 1. Abschnitt.” In Immanuel Kant: Kritik der reinen Vernunft, edited by Mohr, Georg and Willaschek, Marcus. Klassiker auslegen 17/18. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, pp. 547–69.Google Scholar

Rosefeldt, Tobias. 2007. “Dinge an sich und sekundäre Qualitäten.” In Kant in der Gegenwart, edited by Stolzenberg, J.. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 161–203.Google Scholar

Rosefeldt, Tobias 2020. “Kant’s Logic of Existence.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 58(3): 521–48.Google Scholar

Rovira, Rogelio. 2011. “Kant ante la cuestión de la pneumatologia.” Tópicos, Revista de Filosofía 41(1): 281–311.Google Scholar

Sala, Giovanni B. 2004. Kants “Kritik der praktischen Vernunft”: Ein Kommentar. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar

Sassen, Brigitte, ed. and trans. 2000. Kant’s Early Critics: The Empiricist Critique of the Theoretical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schmidt, Claudia. 2007. “Kant’s Transcendental, Empirical, Pragmatic, and Moral Anthropology.” Kant-Studien 98(2): 156–82.Google Scholar

Sensen, Oliver, ed. 2013. Kant on Moral Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Shoemaker, Sydney S. 1968. “Self-Reference and Self-Awareness.” In Self-Reference and Self-Awareness, edited by Brook, A. and DeVidi, R.. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 81–94.Google Scholar

Stang, Nicholas F. 2013. “The Non-Identity of Appearances and Things in Themselves.” Nous 48(1): 106–36.Google Scholar

Stang, Nicholas 2015. “Kant’s Argument That Existence is Not a Determination.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 91(1): 583–626.Google Scholar

Stark, Werner. 1999. “Zu Kants Moralkolleg der 1770er Jahre: Die Relevanz der wiederentdeckten Nachschrift Kaehler.” In Aufklärung und Interpretation: Studien zu Kants Philosophie und ihrem Umkreis. Tagung aus Anlaß des 60. Geburtstags von Reinhard Brandt, edited by Klemme, Heiner F., Ludwig, Bernd, Pauen, Michael, and Stark, Werner. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar

Stark, Werner 2003. “Historical Notes and Interpretive Questions about Kant’s Lectures on Anthropology.” In Essays on Kant’s Anthropology, edited by Jacobs, Brian and Kain, Patrick. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 15–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stark, Werner 2004. “Nachwort.” In Immanuel Kant, Vorlesung zur Moralphilosophie, edited by Stark, Werner. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 371–407.Google Scholar

Stark, Werner 2011. “Kant’s Lectures on ‘Physical Geography’: A Brief Outline of its Origins, Transmission and Development: 1754–1805.” In Reading Kant’s Geography, edited by Elden, Stuart and Mendieta, Eduardo. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 69–85.Google Scholar

Strawson, Peter F. 1966. The Bounds of Sense: An Essay on Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Sturm, Thomas. 2001. “Eine Frage des Charakters: Kant über die empirische Erklärung freier Handlungen.” In Kant und die Berliner Aufklärung, vol. iv, edited by Gerhardt, Volker, Horstmann, Rolf-Peter, and Ralph, Schumacher. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 440–9.Google Scholar

Sturm, Thomas 2008. “Why Did Kant Reject Physiological Explanations Within His Pragmatic Anthropology?” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 39: 495–505.Google Scholar

Sturm, Thomas 2009. Kant und die Wissenschaften vom Menschen. Paderborn: Mentis Verlag.Google Scholar

Sturm, Thomas 2012. “What’s Philosophical about Kant’s Philosophy of the Human Sciences?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 43(1): 203–7.Google Scholar

Tafel, J. F. I. 1847. Documents Concerning the Life and Character of Emanuel Swedenborg. New York: J. Allen.Google Scholar

Tetens, Johann Nicolas. 1777. Philosophische Versuch über die menschliche Natur und ihre Entwicklung. Leipzig: Weidmanns.Google Scholar

Timmermann, Jens. 2007. “Simplicity and Authority: Reflections on Theory and Practice in Kant’s Moral Philosophy.” Journal of Moral Philosophy 4(2): 167–82.Google Scholar

Timmermann, Jens 2015. “Mrongovius II: A Supplement to the Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals.” In Kant’s Lectures on Ethics: A Critical Guide, edited by Denis, Lara and Sensen, Oliver. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 68–83.Google Scholar

Tonelli, Giorgio. 1964. “Das Wiederaufleben der deutsch-aristotelischen Terminologie bei Kant während der Entstehung der Kritik der reinen Venunft.” Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte 9: 233–42.Google Scholar

Tonelli, Giorgio, ed. 1976. Immanuel Kant’s Menschenkunde. Nach handschriftlichen Vorlesungen herausgegeben von Fr. Ch. Starke. Im Anhang Immanuel Kants Anweisung zur Menschen- und Weltkenntniß. Nach dessen Vorlesungen im Winterhalbjahre 1790–91 herausgegeben von Fr. Ch. Starke. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.Google Scholar

Vaihinger, Hans. 1892. Commentar zu Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Vol. ii. Stuttgart: Union Deutsche Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar

Vorländer, Karl, 2003. Immanuel Kant: Der Mann und das Werk. 2 vols. 3rd ed. Wiesbaden: Fourier.Google Scholar

Waschkies, Hans-Joachim. 1987. Physik und Physikotheologie des jungen Kant: Die Vorgeschichte seiner Allgemeinen Naturgeschichte und Theorie des Himmels. Amsterdam: B. R. Grüner.Google Scholar

Watkins, Eric. 2001. “Kant on Rational Cosmology.” In Kant and the Sciences, edited by Watkins, Eric. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 70–89.Google Scholar

Watkins, Eric 2005. Kant and the Metaphysics of Causality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Watkins, Eric 2010. “The Antinomy of Practical Reason: Reason, the Unconditioned and the Highest Good.” In Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason, edited by Reath, Andrews and Timmermann, Jens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 145–67.Google Scholar

Willaschek, Marcus. 1997. “Der transzendentale Idealismus und die Idealität von Raum und Zeit: Eine ‘lückenlose’ Interpretation von Kants Beweis in der ‘Transzendentalen Ästhetik.’” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 51: 537–64.Google Scholar

Willaschek, Marcus 2016. “Must We Believe in the Realizability of our Ends? On a Premise of Kant’s Argument for the Postulates of Pure Practical Reason.” In The Highest Good in Kant’s Philosophy, edited by Höwing, Thomas. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 223–43.Google Scholar

Willaschek, Marcus 2017. “Freedom as a Postulate.” In Kant on Persons and Agency, edited by Eric Watkins. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 102–19.Google Scholar

Willaschek, Marcus 2018. Kant on the Sources of Metaphysics: The Dialectic of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wilson, Holly L. 2006. Kant’s Pragmatic Anthropology: Its Origin, Meaning, and Critical Significance. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Withers, Charles W. J. 2011. “Kant’s Geography in Comparative Perspective.” In Reading Kant’s Geography, edited by Elden, Stuart and Mendieta, Eduardo. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 47–65.Google Scholar

Wolandt, Gerhard. 1988. “Kants Anthropologie und die Begründung der Geisteswissenschaften.” In Kant. Analysen – Probleme – Kritik, edited by Oberer, Hariolf and Seel, Gerhard. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, pp. 357–78.Google Scholar

Wood, Allen W. 2003. “Kant and the Problem of Human Nature.” In Essays on Kant’s Anthropology, edited by Jacobs, Brian and Kain, Paul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 38–59.Google Scholar

Wuerth, Julian. 2006. “Kant’s Immediatism, Pre-Critique.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 44(4): 489–532.Google Scholar

Wuerth, Julian 2010a. “The Paralogisms of Pure Reason.” In The Cambridge Companion to Kant, edited by Guyer, Paul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 210–44.Google Scholar

Wuerth, Julian 2010b. “Sense and Sensibility in Kant’s Practical Agent: Against the Intellectualism of Korsgaard and Sidgwick.” European Journal of Philosophy 21(1): 1–36.Google Scholar

Wood, Allen W. 2014. Kant on Mind, Action, and Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wuerth, Julian Forthcoming. Kant's Questions: What Should I Do? New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Yovel, Yirmiyahu. 1980. Kant and the Philosophy of History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Zammito, John H. 2001. Kant, Herder, and the Birth of Anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar