Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g7rbq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T08:16:46.599Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

45 - Access to medicines and the role of corporate social responsibility: the need to craft a global pharmaceutical system with integrity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

Jillian Clare Cohen-Kohler
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor University of Toronto, Canada
Patricia Illingworth
Affiliation:
Associate Professor Northeastern University, USA
Peter A. Singer
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
A. M. Viens
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Dr. D is a primary healthcare worker in a large city in an East European country. He struggles to make ends meet for his family given his paltry income. Recently, Dr. D was approached by a multinational pharmaceutical company at his practice. He was told that for every prescription of the company's product for high blood pressure, he will receive an additional 5 dollars. Dr. D believes it is a pretty good medication but knows there are other equally effective, though much less expensive medications. He does not want to engage in unethical prescribing, but the monetary incentives offered to him make this a difficult choice.

Company E has a new drug that could considerably help to cure inflicted populations in Africa and elsewhere. However, this new product is priced well beyond the purchasing power of most persons in developing countries and would significantly drain already limited health budgets of developing country governments. The company argues that it needs to price the drug at a rate that will enable it to recoup its significant research and development costs. But people will die without access to it.

What is access to medicines and corporate social responsibility?

The phrase “access to medicines” as used in this context refers to the social problem of providing medicines to those who need them both domestically and globally. The problem exists primarily because of the high cost of these medicines.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashford, E. (2007). The duties imposed by the human right to basic necessities. In Freedom From Poverty as a Human Right: Who Owes What to the Very Poor? ed. Pogge, T.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 210.Google Scholar
CIPIH (2006). Public Health, Innovation and Intellectual Property Rights. Geneva: World Health Organization Commission on Intellectual Property Rights, Innovation and Public Health.
Cohen, J. (2006). Pharmaceuticals and corruption: a risk assessment. In Transparency International, Global Corruption Report 2006. London: Pluto Press for Transparency International, p. 77.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. and Illingworth, P. (2003). The dilemma of international property rights for pharmaceuticals: the tension between securing access of the poor to medicines and committing to international agreements. Devel World Bioethics 3: 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J., Illingworth, P., and Schuklenk, U. (eds.) (2006). The Power of Pills: Social, Ethical, and Legal Issues in Drug Development, Marketing, and Pricing. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Cullet, P. (2003). Patents and medicines: the relationship between TRIPS and the human right to health. Int Affairs 79: 139–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankena, W. (1973). Ethics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. (2004). A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation. In Ethical Theory and Business, ed. Beauchamp, T. L. and Bowie, N. E.. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, pp. 55–64.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (2004). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. In Ethical Theory and Business, ed. Beauchamp, T. L. and Bowie, N. E.. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, pp. 50–5.Google Scholar
Hennigsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc. (1960). 32 N.J. 358, 161 A.2d 69.
Henry, D. and Lexchin, J. (2002). The pharmaceutical industry as a medicines provider. Lancet 360: 1590–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Illingworth, P. (2006). Trusting Medicine. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Light, D. (2006). Advance purchase commitments: moral and practical problems. In The Power of Pills: Social, Ethical and Legal Issues in Drug Development, Marketing and Pricing, ed. Cohen, J., Illingworth, P., and Schuklenk, U.. London: Pluto Press, pp. 230–43.Google Scholar
Mills, A., Werhane P., and Gorman M. (2006). The pharmaceutical industry and its obligations in the developing world. In The Power of Pills: Social, Ethical and Legal Issues in Drug Development, Marketing and Pricing, ed. Cohen, J., Illingworth, P., and Schuklenk, U.. London: Pluto Press, pp. 57–74.Google Scholar
MSF (2001). Fatal Imbalance: The Crisis in Research and Development for Drugs for Neglected Diseases. Geneva: Medécins Sans Frontiéres Access to Essential Medicines Campaign and the Drugs for Neglected Diseases Working Group (http://www.msf.org/source/access/2001/fatal/fatalshort.pdf) accessed 9 October 2001.
MSH (2003). Strategies for Enhancing Access to Medicines (SEAM), Ghana: Key Findings. Management Sciences for Health Cambridge, MA (www.msh.org) accessed 5 November 2003.
National Institute for Health Care Management (2002). Changing Patterns of Pharmaceutical Innovation. Washington, DC: National Institute for Health Care Management (www.nihcm.org).Google Scholar
Pogge, T. (2004). “Assisting” the global poor. In The Ethics of Assistance, ed. Chatterjee, D. K.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 260–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pogge, T. (2006). The Montréal Statement on the Human Right to Essential Medicines. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 16: 97–108.Google Scholar
Reich, M. (2000). The global drug gap. Science 287: 1979–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Relman, A. S. and Angell, M. (2002). America's other drug problem. The New Republic 16: 27–41.Google Scholar
Schott, J. (ed.) (2000). The WTO after Seattle. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics, p. 115.Google Scholar
Scientific Organising Committee for the Montréal Statement (2005). The Montréal Statement on the Human Right to Essential Medicines. International Workshop on Human Rights and Access to Essential Medicines. Montréal: University of Montréal.Google Scholar
Singer, P. (2004). One World: The Ethics of Globalization. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (2000). General Comment No. 14: Substantive Issues Arising in the Implementation of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, E/C.12/2000/4. New York: United Nations (http://www.unhchr.ch/tbs/doc.nsf/(symbol)/E.C.12.2000.4.En?OpenDocument) accessed 24 March 2005.
UN Department of Public Information (2005). The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Geneva: United Nations (http://www.unhchr.ch/udhr/index.htm) accessed 2 June 2006.
United States Congress (1996). The Federal Bill Emerson Good Samaritan Food Donation Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104–210.
Velasquez, G., Madrid, Y., and Quick, J. (1998). Health Reform and Drug Financing, Selected Topics. Health Economics and Drugs. DAP series [No. 6; WHO/DAP/98.3] Geneva: World Health Organization (http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/1998/WHO_DAP_98.3.pdf).
WHO (2000). WHO Medicines Strategy: 2000–2003. Framework for Action in Essential Drugs and Medicines Policy. Geneva: World Health Organization Department of Essential Drugs and Medicines Policy, Health Technology and Pharmaceuticals Cluster (http://www.who.int/medicines/strategy/strategy.pdf).
WHO (2001). Macroeconomics and Health: Investing in Health for Economic Development. Geneva: World Health Organization Commission on Macroeconomics and Health (www3.who.int/whosis/cmh/cmh_report/e/pdf/cmh_english).
WHO (2003). Access to essential medicines: a global necessity. Essential Drugs Monitor32: 13 (http://www.who.int/medicines/mon/32_6.pdf).
WHO (2006). The Declaration of Alma-Ata. Geneva: World Health Organization (http://www.who.int/chronic_conditions/primary_health_care/en/almaata_declaration.pdf) accessed 2 June 2006.
World Trade Organization (2001). Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health. Geneva: World Trade Organization.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×