Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T20:11:07.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - The Role of Surgery in the Management of Esophageal Cancer and Palliation of Inoperable Disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2009

Robert Mason
Affiliation:
Consultant, Upper GI Surgeon, Guy's and St. Thomas' Foundation Trust St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
Sheila C. Rankin
Affiliation:
Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In spite of improvements in diagnosis, staging, and treatment, the outcome for patients with esophageal cancer remains poor. Although 1-year survival has improved in recent years, there has been little change in the 5-and 10-year survival (Figure 7.1). This is because many of the patients have metastatic disease, with a large percentage having micrometastases. These have been found in the bone marrow in patients undergoing resection in 88% of cases.

A significant factor in the improved 1-year survival is the reduction in inhospital operative mortality (Table 7.1). This relates to improvement in staging, fitness testing, technique, perioperative care, and probably most importantly centralization of services in large centers (Table 7.2). In a study from the United Kingdom there was a 40% reduction in operative mortality for every 10 patient increase in a surgeon's caseload.. Such large centers with dedicated teams can achieve inhospital mortality figures of less than 2% by utilizing a multidisciplinary team approach.

Another factor in improved short-term survival is the recognition that surgery alone is not the answer for most cases and that survival benefits can accrue by the use of preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy and possible chemoradiotherapy. This is certainly now the practice in the United Kingdom for all cases other than early T1/2 N0 disease. Whether such treatment acts as a prolongation of disease-free interval only or improves long-term cure remains to be determined.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

O'Sullivan, G. C., Sheehan, D., Clarke, A., et al. Micrometastases in esophagogastric cancer: high detection rate in resected rib segments. Gastroenterology, 116 (1999), 543–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muller, J. M., Erasmi, H., Stelzner, M., Zieren, U., and Pichmaier, H.. Surgical therapy of oesophageal carcinoma. Br J Surg, 77 (1990), 845–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jamieson, G. G., Mathew, G., Ludemann, R., et al. Postoperative mortality following oesophagectomy and problems in reporting its rate. Br J Surg, 91 (2004), 943–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forshaw, M. J., Gossage, J. A., Stephens, J., et al. Centralisation of oesophagogastric cancer services: can specialist units deliver?Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 88:6 (2006), 566–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Birkmeyer, J. D., Siewers, A. E., Finlayson, E. V. A., et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med, 346 (2002), 1128–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Birkmeyer, J. D., Stukel, T. A., Siewers, A. E., et al. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med, 349 (2003), 2117–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lanschot, J. J. B., Hulscher, J. B. F., Buskens, C. J., et al. Hospital volume and hospital mortality for esophagectomy. Cancer, 91 (2001), 1574–8.3.0.CO;2-2>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bachmann, M. O., Alderson, D., Edwards, D., et al. Cohort study in South and West England of the influence of specialization on the management and outcome of patients with oesophageal and gastric cancers. Br J Surg, 89 (2002), 914–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Medical Research Council Oesophageal Cancer Working Group. Surgical resection with or without preoperative chemotherapy in oesophageal cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 359:9319 (2002), 1727–33.CrossRef
Blazeby, J. M., Williams, M. H., Brookes, S. T., et al. Quality of life measurement in patients with oesophageal cancer. Gut, 37:4 (1995), 505–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lerut, T., Leyn, P. W., Coosemans, W.et al. Surgical strategies in esophageal carcinoma with emphasis on radical lymphadenectomy. Ann Surg, 216:5 (1992), 583–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orringer, M. B.. Transhiatal esophagectomy without thoracotomy for carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus. Ann Surg, 200 (1984), 282–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alderson, D., Courtney, S. P., and Kennedy, R. H.. Radical transhiatal oesophagectomy under direct vision. Br J Surg, 81 (1994), 404–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akiyama, H., Tsurumaru, M., Udagawa, H., and Kajiyama, Y.. Radical lymph node dissection for cancer of the thoracic esophagus. Ann Surg, 220 (1994), 364–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sutton, D. N., Wayman, J., and Griffin, S. M.. Learning curve for oesophageal cancer surgeryBr J Surg, 85 (1998), 1399–402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skinner, D. B.. En bloc resection for neoplasms of the esophagus and cardia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 85 (1983), 59–71.Google ScholarPubMed
Forshaw, M. J., Gossage, J. A., Ockrim, J., Atkinson, S. W., and Mason, R. C.. Left thoracoabdominal esophagogastrectomy: still a valid operation for carcinoma of the distal esophagus and esophagogastric junction. Dis Esophagus, 19 (2006), 340–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luketich, J. D., Schauer, P. R., Christie, N. A., et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg, 70 (2000), 906–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bizekis, C., Kent, M. S., Luketich, J., et al. Initial experience with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg, 82:2 (2006), 402–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hulscher, J. B., Sandick, J. W., Boer, A. G., et al. Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med, 347 (2002), 1662–9. Comment in N Engl J Med, 347 (2002), 1705–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rindani, R., Martin, C. J., and Cox, M. R.. Transhiatal versus Ivor–Lewis oesophagectomy: is there a difference?Aust and N Z Surg, 69 (1999), 187–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wayman, J., Bennett, M. K., Raimes, S. A., et al. The pattern of recurrence of adenocarcinoma of the oesophago-gastric junction. Br J Cancer, 86:8 (2002), 1223–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dresner, S. M. and Griffin, S. M.. Pattern of recurrence following radical oesophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy. Br J Surg, 87:10 (2000), 1426–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lerut, T., Nafteux, T., Moons, J., et al. Three-field lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction in 174 R0 resections: impact on staging, disease-free survival, and outcome – a plea for adaptation of TNM classification in upper-half esophageal carcinoma. Ann Surg, 240:6 (2004), 962–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheung, H. C., Siu, K. F., and Wong, J.. Is pyloroplasty necessary in esophageal replacement by stomach? A prospective, randomized controlled trial. Surgery, 102 (1987), 19–24.Google ScholarPubMed
Wong, A. C., Law, S., and Wong, J.. Influence of the route of reconstruction on morbidity, mortality and local recurrence after esophagectomy for cancer. Dig Surg, 20 (2003), 209–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dowson, H. M. P., Strauss, D., Ng, R., and Mason, R.. The acute management and surgical reconstruction following failed esophagectomy in malignant disease of the esophagus. Dis Esophagus, 20 (2007), 135–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caldwell, M. T., Murphy, P. G., Page, R., Walsh, T. N., and Hennessy, T. P.. Timing of extubation after oesophagectomy. Br J Surg, 80 (1993), 1537–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robertson, S. A., Skipworth, R. J., Clarke, D. L., et al. Ventilatory and intensive care requirements following oesophageal resection. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 88 (2006), 354–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mason, R. C.. Palliation of malignant dysphagia: an alternative to surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 78:5 (1996), 457–62.Google Scholar
Adam, A., Morgan, R., Ellul, J., and Mason, R. C.. A new design of the esophageal Wallstent endoprosthesis resistant to distal migration. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 170:6 (1998), 1477–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alderson, D. and Wright, P. D.. Laser recanalization versus endoscopic intubation in the palliation of malignant dysphagia. Br J Surg, 77 (1990), 1151–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carazzone, A., Bonavina, L., Segalin, A., Ceriani, C., and Peracchia, A.. Endoscopic palliation of oesophageal cancer: results of a prospective comparison of Nd:YAG laser and ethanol injection. Eur J Surg, 165 (1999), 351–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Low, D. E. and Pagliero, K. M.. Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing brachytherapy and laser photoablation for palliation of esophageal cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 104 (1992), 173–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Sargeant, I. R., Tobias, J. S., Blackman, G., et al. Radiotherapy enhances laser palliation of malignant dysphagia: a randomised study. Gut, 40 (1997), 362–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Highley, M. S., Parnis, F. X., Trotter, G. A., et al. Combination chemotherapy with epirubicin, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil for the palliation of advanced gastric and oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg, 81:12 (1994), 1763–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knyrim, K., Wagner, H. J., Bethge, N., Keymling, M., and Vakil, N.. A controlled trial of an expansile metal stent for palliation of esophageal obstruction due to inoperable cancer. N Engl J Med, 329 (1993), 1302–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palma, G. D., di Matteo, E., Romano, G., et al. Plastic prosthesis versus expandable metal stents for palliation of inoperable esophageal thoracic carcinoma: a controlled prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc, 43 (1996), 478–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanyika, C., Corr, P., and Haffejee, A.. Palliative treatment of oesophageal carcinoma – efficacy of plastic versus self-expandable stents. S Afr Med J, 89 (1999), 640–3.Google ScholarPubMed
Adam, A., Ellul, J., Watkinson, A. F., et al. Palliation of inoperable esophageal carcinoma: a prospective randomized trial of laser therapy and stent placement. Radiology, 202 (1997), 344–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Konigsrainer, A., Riedmann, B., Vries, A., et al. Expandable metal stents versus laser combined with radiotherapy for palliation of unresectable esophageal cancer: a prospective randomized trial. Hepatogastroenterology, 47:33 (2000), 724–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Dallal, H. J., Smith, G. D., Grieve, D. C., et al. A randomized trial of thermal ablative therapy versus expandable metal stents in the palliative treatment of patients with esophageal carcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc, 54 (2001), 549–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cantero, R., Torres, A. J., Hernando, F., et al. Palliative treatment of esophageal cancer: self-expanding metal stents versus Postlethwait technique. Hepatogastroenterology, 46 (1999), 971–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Shenfine, J., McNamee, P., Steen, N., Bond, J., and Griffin, S. M.. A pragmatic randomised controlled trial of the cost-effectiveness of palliative therapies for patients with inoperable oesophageal cancer. Health Technol Assess, 9:5 (2005), iii, 1–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellul, J. P. M., Morgan, R., Gold, D., et al. Parallel self-expanding covered metal stents in the trachea and oesophagus for the palliation of complex high tracheo-oesophageal fistula. Br J Surg, 83:12 (1996), 1767–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×