Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T18:52:53.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2011

Noam Chomsky
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Cartesian Linguistics
A Chapter in the History of Rationalist Thought
, pp. 147 - 153
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aarslef, H. “Leibniz on Locke on Language,” American Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 1, 1964, pp. 1–24.
Abrams, M. H.The Mirror and the Lamp. Oxford University Press, Fair Lawn, N. J., 1953.Google Scholar
Aristotle. De Interpretatione.
Aristotle. De Anima.
Arnauld, A., and Lancelot, C.. General and Rational Grammar: The Port-Royal Grammar, trans. Rieux, J. and Rollin, B. E.. Mouton, The Hague, 1975. (PRG)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnauld, A., and Nicole, P.. La logique, ou l'art de penser, 1662.
Arnauld, A., and Nicole, P.. The Art of Thinking: Port-Royal Logic, trans. Dickoff, J. and James, P.. Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, 1964.Google Scholar
Arnauld, A., and Nicole, P.. Logic or The Art of Thinking, trans. Buroker, J. V.. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996. (PRL)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacon, R.Grammatica Graeca.
Baker, Mark C.The Atoms of Language. Basic Books, New York, 2001.Google Scholar
Bayle, F.The General System of the Cartesian Philosophy, 1669.
Bayle, P.Dictionnaire historique et critique, 1697. Trans. Popkin, R. H., Historical and Critical Dictionary. Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, 1965.Google Scholar
Beauzée, N.Grammaire générale, ou exposition raisonnée des éléments nécessaires du langage, 1767; rev. edn., 1819.
Bentham, J.Works, ed. Bowring, J.. Russell and Russell, New York, 1962.Google Scholar
Berthelot, R.Science et philosophie chez Goethe. F. Alcan, Paris, 1932.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L.Language. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1933.Google Scholar
Bougeant, G. H.Amusement philosophique sur le langage des bestes, 1739.
Brekle, H. E. “Semiotik und linguistische Semantik in Port-Royal,” Indogermanische Forschungen, vol. 69, 1964, pp. 103–121.
Brown, R. L. “Some Sources and Aspects of Wilhelm von Humboldt's Conception of Linguistic Relativity,” unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, 1964.
Bruner, J. S.On Perceptual Readiness,” Psychological Review, vol. 64, 1957.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brunot, F.Histoire de la langue française. Armand Colin, Paris, 1924.
Buffer, C.Grammaire françoise sur un plan nouveau, 1709.
Carmichael, L. “The Early Growth of Language Capacity in the Individual,” in Lenneberg, E. H. (ed.), New Directions in the Study of Language. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1964.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E.Philosophie der symbolischen Formen, 1923. Trans. The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn., 1953.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.Morphophonemics of Modern Hebrew. 1949 University of Pennsylvania undergraduate thesis, revised as 1951 MA thesis. Garland Publishing, New York, 1951/1979.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.Syntactic Structures. Mouton and Co., The Hague, 1957.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.“Review of B. F. Skinner, Verbal Behavior,” Language, vol. 35, 1959, pp. 26–58. Repr. with added preface in Jakobovits, L. and Miron, M. (eds.), Readings in the Psychology of Language. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1967.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. “Explanatory Models in Linguistics,” in Nagel, E. et al. (eds.), Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science. Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calif., 1962.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. Mouton and Co., The Hague, 1964. Repr. in part in Fodor and Katz, The Structure of Language.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1965.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.The Sound Pattern of English (with Morris Halle). Harper and Row, New York, 1968.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.Language and Mind (1968), enlarged edition. Harcourt, Brace, New York, 1972.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.Reflections on Language. Pantheon, New York, 1975a.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory (written in 1955). Plenum, New York, 1975b.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.Language and Responsibility (Interviews with Mitsou Ronat). Pantheon, New York, 1979.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.Rules and Representations. Blackwell, Oxford, 1980.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.Lectures on Government and Binding. Foris, Dordrecht, 1981.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.Towards a New Cold War: Essays on the Current World Crisis and How We Got There. Pantheon, New York, 1982.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. Praeger, New York, 1986.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.The Chomsky Reader (ed. Peck, James). Pantheon, New York, 1987.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.Language and Problems of Knowledge: The Managua Lectures. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1988a.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.Necessary Illusions. South End Press, Boston, 1988b.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. “A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory.” MIT Working Papers in Linguistics. 1992.
Chomsky, N.Language and Nature.” Mind, 104, 1995a, pp. 1–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N.The Minimalist Program. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1995b.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.Powers and Prospects: Reflections on Human Nature and the Social Order. South End, Boston, 1996. Also published as Perspectives on Power. Black Rose, Montreal.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind, ed. Smith, Neil. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. “Beyond Explanation.” MS, M.I.T., 2001.
Chomsky, N.Three Factors in Language Design,” Linguistic Inquiry, 36, no. 1, Winter 2005, pp. 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. “Approaching UG from Below,” in Interfaces + Recursion = Language?: Chomsky's Minimalism and the View from Syntax-Semantics, Sauerland, Uli and Gartner, Hans-Martin (eds.). Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, New York, 2007.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. forthcoming. Of Minds and Language: A Dialogue with Noam Chomsky in the Basque Country, ed. Piattelli-Palmarini, M., Uriagereka, J., and Salaburu, P.. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2009.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N., and Halle, M.. The Sound Pattern of English. Harper and Row, New York, 1968.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N., Halle, M., and Lukoff, F.. “On Accent and Juncture in English,” in For Roman Jakobson. Mouton, The Hague, 1956.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N., and Herman, E.. The Political Economy of Human Rights, vol. I: The Washington Connection and Third Word Fascism. South End Press, Boston, 1978.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. and Herman, E.. The Political Economy of Human Rights, vol. II: After the Cataclysm: Postwar Indochina and the Reconstruction of Imperial Ideology. South End Press, Boston, 1979.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. and Herman, E.. Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. Pantheon, New York, 1988.Google Scholar
Coleridge, S. T. “Lectures and Notes of 1818,” in Ashe, T. (ed.), Lectures and Notes on Shakespeare and Other English Poets. G. Bell & Sons, London, 1893.Google Scholar
Cordemoy, Géraud. Discours physique de la parole, 1666. 2nd edn., 1677; English trans., 1668.
Couturat, L., and Leau, L.. Histoire de la langue universelle. Paris, 1903.Google Scholar
Cowan, M.Humanist without Portfolio. Wayne State University Press, Detroit, 1963.Google Scholar
Cowie, F.What's Within?Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999.Google Scholar
Cudworth, R.Treatise Concerning Eternal and Immutable Morality. American edn. of Works, ed. Birch, T., 1838.
Cudworth, R.A Treatise Concerning Eternal and Immutable Morality, ed. Hutton, S.. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996.Google Scholar
Curtiss, S.Genie: A Psycholinguistic Study of a Modern Day “Wild Child”. Academic Press, London, 1976.Google Scholar
D'Alembert, J.Éloge de du Marsais.
Descartes, R.The Philosophical Writings of Descartes (2 vols.), trans. Cottingham, John, Stoothoff, Robert, and Murdoch, Dugald. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1984–1985. (CSM)Google Scholar
Descartes, R.The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. III: The Correspondence, trans. Cottingham, John, Stoothoff, Robert, Murdoch, Dugald, and Kenny, Anthony. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991. (CSMK)Google Scholar
Descartes, R.The Philosophy of Descartes. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1892.Google Scholar
Descartes, R.Correspondence,” trans. Rosenfield, L. C. (Cohen, L.), Annals of Science, vol. 1, no. 1, 1936.Google Scholar
Diderot, D.Lettre sur les sourds et muets. 1751.
Du Marsais, César Chesneau.Véritables principes de la grammaire, 1729.
Du Marsais, César Chesneau. Logique et principes de grammaire. Paris, 1769.Google Scholar
Elders, Fons (ed.) Reflexive Water: The Basic Concerns of Mankind. Souvenir Press, London, 1974.
Fiesel, E.Die Sprachphilosophie der deutschen Romantik. Mohr, Tübingen, 1927.Google Scholar
Flew, A. “Introduction” to Logic and Language, First Series. Blackwell, Oxford, 1951.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A.Could Meaning Be an ‘rm’?Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, vol. 4, 1965, pp. 73–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. A.Psychological Explanation. Random House, New York, 1968.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. “The Present Status of the Innateness Controversy,” in Fodor, , Representations. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1982.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A.Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. Oxford University Press, New York, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. A., and Katz, J. J.. The Structure of Language: Readings in the Philosophy of Language. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1964.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. “Über Sinn und Bedeutung,” Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 100, 1892, pp. 25–50.Google Scholar
Galileo, G.Dialogo dei due massimi sistemi del mondo, 1630. Trans. Dialogue on the Great World Systems. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1953.Google Scholar
Gallistel, C. R.The Organization of Learning. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1990.Google Scholar
Gallistel, C. R. (with John Gibbon). Symbolic Foundations of Conditioned Behavior. L. ErlbaumMahwah, N.J., 2002.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J., and Lewontin, R.. “The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme,” in Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 205 (1161), 1979, pp. 581–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grammont, M. “Review of A. Gregoire, ‘Petit traité de linguistique,’” Revue des langues romanes, vol. 60, 1920.
Grammont, M.Traité de phonétique. Delagrave, Paris, 1933.Google Scholar
Gunderson, K. “Descartes, La Mettrie, Language and Machines,” Philosophy, vol. 39, 1964.
Gysi, L.Platonism and Cartesianism in the Philosophy of Ralph Cudworth. Herbert Lang, Bern, 1962.Google Scholar
Halle, M., and Stevens, K. N.. “Speech Recognition: A Model and a Program for Research,” in Fodor, and Katz, , Structure of Language.
Harnois, G. “Les théories du langage en France de 1660 à 1821,” Études Françaises, vol. 17, 1929.
Harris, J.Works, ed. Earl of Malmesbury. F. Wingrove, London, 1801.
Harris, Z. S.Co-occurrence and Transformation in Linguistic Structure,” Language, vol. 33, 1957, pp. 283–340. Repr. in Fodor and Katz, Structure of Language.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauser, M., Chomsky, N., and Fitch, W. T.. “The Faculty of Language: What Is It, Who Has It, and How Did It Evolve?Science, 298, 2002, pp. 1569–1579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herbert of Cherbury. De Veritate, 1624. Trans. Carré, M. H., On Truth, University of Bristol Studies No. 6, 1937.
Herder, J. G.Abhandlung über den Ursprung der Sprache, 1772. Repr. in part in Heintel, E. (ed.), Herder's Sprachphilosophie. Felix Meiner Verlag, Hamburg, 1960.Google Scholar
Herder, J. G.Ideen zur Philosophie der Geschichte der Menschheit. 1784–1785.
Herder, J. G.Essay on the Origin of Language, trans. Gode, Alexander, in On the Origin of Language, trans. Moran, John H. and Gode, Alexander. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1966.Google Scholar
Hockett, C. F.A Course in Modern Linguistics. Macmillan, New York, 1958.Google Scholar
Huarte, J.Examen de Ingenios, 1575. English trans. Bellamy, 1698.Google Scholar
Humboldt, Wilhelm. Ideen zu einem Versuch die Grenzen der Wirksamkeit des Staats zu bestimmen, 1792. Trans. in part in Cowan, Humanist without Portfolio, pp. 37–64.
Humboldt, Wilhelm. Über die Verschiedenheit des Menschlichen Sprachbaues, 1836. Facsimile, edn. F. Dümmlers Verlag, Bonn, 1960.Google Scholar
Humboldt, Wilhelm. On Language: The Diversity of Human Language Construction and its Influence on the Mental Development of the Human Species, 2nd edn., ed. Lomansky, M., trans. Heath, P. L.. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Lyle. Biolinguistics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, O.The Philosophy of Grammar. George Allen & Unwin, London, 1924.Google Scholar
Joos, M. (ed.) Readings in Linguistics. ACLS, Washington, 1957.
Katz, J. J.Mentalism in Linguistics,” Language, vol. 40, 1964, pp. 124–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, J. J.Philosophy of Language. Harper & Row, New York, 1965.Google Scholar
Katz, J. J., and Postal, P. M.. An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1964.Google Scholar
Kirkinen, H. “Les origines de la conception moderne de l'homme-machine,” Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae, Helsinki, 1961.Google Scholar
Kretzmann, N. “History of Semantics,” in Edwards, P. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Macmillan, New York, 1967.Google Scholar
Mettrie, J.O. de. L'homme-machine, 1747. Critical edition, ed. Vartanian, A., Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1960.Google Scholar
Mettrie, J.O. de. Man a Machine. Open Court, La Salle, 1912. (MaM)Google Scholar
Mettrie, J.O. de. Machine Man and Other Writings, ed. Thomson, A.. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamprecht, S. P. “The Role of Descartes in Seventeenth-century England,” Studies in the History of Ideas, vol. III. Columbia University Press, New York, 1935.Google Scholar
Lamy, B.De l'art de parler, 1676.
Lancelot, C., and Arnauld, A.. Grammaire générale et raisonnée, 1660. Facsimile repr. The Scolar Press, Menston, England, 1967.Google Scholar
Lees, R. B.Grammar of English Nominalizations. Mouton, The Hague, 1960.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W.Discours de métaphysique, 1686. Trans. in Leibniz: Discourse on Metaphysics and Correspondence with Arnauld, ed. Montgomery, G. R.. Open Court, La Salle, Ill., 1902.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W.Nouveaux essais sur l'entendement humain, 1765. Trans. New Essays Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Langley, A. G.. Open Court, La Salle, Ill., 1949.Google Scholar
Leitzmann, A. (ed.) Briefwechsel zwischen W. von Humboldt und A. W. Schlegel. Halle a. S., 1908.
Lenneberg, E. H. “A Biological Perspective of Language,” in Lenneberg, E. H. (ed.), New Directions in the Study of Language. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1964.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, E. H.Biological Foundations of Language. John Wiley, New York, 1967.Google Scholar
Livet, Ch.-L.La grammaire française et les grammairiens du XVIe siècle. Paris, 1859.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, A. O. “Kant and the English Platonists,” in Essays Philosophical and Psychological in Honor of William James. Longmans, Green, New York, 1908.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, A. O.The Great Chain of Being. Harper, New York, 1936.Google Scholar
Lyons, G.L'idéalisme en Angleterre au XVIIIe siècle. Paris, 1888.Google Scholar
MacKay, D. M.Mindlike Behavior in Artefacts,” British Journal for Philosophy of Science, vol. 2, 1951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnus, R.Goethe als Naturforscher. Barth, Leipzig, 1906. Trans. Goethe as a Scientist. New York, 1949.Google Scholar
Marr, David. Vision. New York: W.H. Freeman, 1982.Google Scholar
Marx, K.Critique of the Gotha Program, 1875.
Marx, K.Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts, 1844. Trans. in Fromm, E. (ed.), Marx's Concept of Man. Ungar, New York, 1961.Google Scholar
McGilvray, J.Chomsky: Language, Mind, and Politics. Polity (Blackwell), Cambridge, 1999.Google Scholar
McGilvray, J. (ed.) Cambridge Companion to Chomsky. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005.CrossRef
McIntosh, Margaret M. C.“The Phonetic and Linguistic Theory of the Royal Society School,” unpublished B.Litt. thesis. Oxford University, 1956.
Mendelsohn, E.The Biological Sciences in the Nineteenth Century: Some Problems and Sources,” History of Science, vol. 3, 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, J. S.Rectorial Address at St. Andrews. 1867.
Miller, G. A., and Chomsky, N.. “Finitary Models of Language Users,” in Luce, R. D. et al. (eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, vol. II. John Wiley, New York, 1963.Google Scholar
Morris, William C., Cottrell, G. W., and Elman, J.. “A Connectionist Simulation of the Empirical Acquisition of Grammatical Relations.” In Wermter, S. and Sun, R. (eds.), Hybrid Neural Systems. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2000, pp. 179–193.Google Scholar
Passmore, J.Ralph Cudworth. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S.The Language Instinct. New York: Harper Perennial, 1995.Google Scholar
Postal, P. M.Constituent Structure. Mouton, The Hague, 1964.Google Scholar
Postal, P. M.Underlying and Superficial Linguistic Structures,” Harvard Educational Review, vol. 34, 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prinz, Jesse. Furnishing the Mind: Concepts and Their Perceptual Basis. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 2002.Google Scholar
Proudhon, P.-J.Correspondance, ed. Langlois, J.-A.. Librairie Internationale, Paris, 1875.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O.Word and Object. John Wiley, New York, and M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1960.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O.Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. Columbia University Press, New York, 1969.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O.The Roots of Reference. Open Court, LaSalle, Ill., 1974.Google Scholar
Rai, Milan. Chomsky's Politics. Verso, London, 1995.Google Scholar
Reid, Thomas. Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man, 1785.
Robinet, J. B.De la Nature, 1761–1768.
Rocker, R.Nationalism and Culture, trans. Chase, R. E.. Freedom Press, London, 1937.Google Scholar
Rosenfield, L. C.From Beast-Machine to Man-Machine. Oxford University Press, Fair Lawn, N.J., 1941.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Discourse on the Origins and Foundations of Inequality among Men, 1755. Trans. in Masters, R. D. (ed.), The First and Second Discourses, St. Martin's Press, New York, 1964.Google Scholar
Ryle, G.The Concept of Mind. Hutchinson, London, 1949.Google Scholar
Sahlin, G.César Chesneau du Marsais et son rôle dans l'évolution de la grammaire générale. Presses-Universitaires, Paris, 1928.Google Scholar
Sainte-Beuve, Ch.-A.Port Royal, vol. III, 2nd edn. Paris, 1860.Google Scholar
Schlegel, August Wilhelm. “Briefe über Poesie, Silbenmass und Sprache,” 1795, in Kritische Schriften und Briefe, vol. I, Sprache und Poetik. W. Kohlhammer Verlag, Stuttgart, 1962.Google Scholar
Schlegel, August Wilhelm.Kritische Schriften und Briefe, vol. II, Die Kunstlehre, 1801. W. Kohlhammer Verlag, Stuttgart, 1963.Google Scholar
Schlegel, August Wilhelm.Vorlesungen über dramatische Kunst und Literatur, 1808. Trans. Lectures on Dramatic Art and Literature. G. Bell & Sons, London, 1892.Google Scholar
Schlegel, August Wilhelm.De l'étymologie en générale,” in Böcking, E. (ed.), Oeuvres écrites en français. Leipzig, 1846.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich von.Geschichte der alten und neuen Literatur, 1812.
Skinner, B. F.Verbal Behavior. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, 1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Adam.Considerations concerning the First Formation of Languages, The Philological Miscellany, vol. I, 1761.
Smith, Neil. Chomsky: Ideas and Ideals. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Neil, and Tsimpli, I.-M.. The Mind of a Savant: Language-learning and Modularity. Blackwell, Oxford, 1995.Google Scholar
Snyder, A. D.Coleridge on Logic and Learning. Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn., 1929.Google Scholar
Steinthal, H.Grammatik, Logik und Psychologie. Berlin, 1855.Google Scholar
Steinthal, H.Gedächtnissrede auf Humboldt an seinem hundertjahrigen Geburtstage. Berlin, 1867.Google Scholar
Strawson, Peter F.On Referring.” Mind, New Series 59 (235), 1950, pp. 320–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teuber, H. L. “Perception,” in Field, J. et al. (eds.), Handbook of Physiology: Neurophysiology, vol. III. American Physiological Society, Washington, D. C., 1960.Google Scholar
Thompson, D'Arcy Wentworth.On Growth and Form. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1942.Google Scholar
Troubetzkoy, N. S.La phonologie actuelle,” in Psychologie de langage. Paris, 1933.Google Scholar
Turing, Alan, 1950. “Computing Machinery and Intelligence.” Mind, New Series 59, 1950 pp. 433–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turing, Alan. Morphogenesis. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1992.Google Scholar
Vaugelas, Claude Favre de.Remarques sur la langue françoise, 1647.
Veitch, J.The Method, Meditations and Selections from the Principles of Descartes. William Blackwood & Sons, Edinburgh, 1880.Google Scholar
Wellek, R.Kant in England. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N. J., 1931.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. N.Science and the Modern World. Macmillan, New York, 1925.Google Scholar
Whitney, W. D. “Steinthal and the Psychological Theory of Language,” North American Review, 1872; repr. in Oriental and Linguistic Studies. Scribner, Armstrong, New York, 1874.Google Scholar
Wilkins, J.An Essay towards a Real Character and a Philosophical Understanding. 1668.
Wittgenstein, L.Tractatus Logico-philosophicus, 1922. Trans. Pears, D. F. and McGuinness, B. F.. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1961.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L.Blue and Brown Books. Harper & Row, New York, 1958.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L.Philosophical Investigations, trans. Anscombe, Elizabeth. The MacMillan Company, New York, 1953.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Noam Chomsky, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Book: Cartesian Linguistics
  • Online publication: 25 January 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803116.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Noam Chomsky, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Book: Cartesian Linguistics
  • Online publication: 25 January 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803116.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Noam Chomsky, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Book: Cartesian Linguistics
  • Online publication: 25 January 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803116.011
Available formats
×