Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T09:27:23.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Forging an iron triangle: the politics of verisimilitude

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2010

Brian Balogh
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Get access

Summary

By setting up a civilian agency to administer America's atomic program and the Joint Committee on Atomic Energy to oversee it, the Atomic Energy Act gave the look of regularized politics to what had been a highly exceptional arrangement. Several factors assured that regularization as it was understood before World War II was skin-deep at best. The premium on military priorities and corollary restrictions on access to information that the national security state placed on the program ensured that its development would not follow prewar patterns. Robert Oppenheimer and his colleagues on the General Advisory Committee (GAC) summed up the AEC's priorities best, informing the president in June 1952 that the GAC could not say where, when, and under what circumstances civilian power would be generated because the bulk of the AEC's work had involved military demands and the production of fissionable materials.

Two additional factors distinguished the politics of commercial nuclear power from politics as usual. The first was the degree to which atomic power was government-initiated. To the extent that interest groups were involved with the issue, only the organized scientists contributed very much to the shape of the program. Government-funded research had made atomic power an issue. For the time being, it would take government initiative to develop it. It was a combination of scientists and administrators, working almost exclusively within the Atomic Energy Commission, that initially kept hopes alive for economically feasible commercial nuclear power, even though these advocates were often the first to admit that this would not occur overnight.

Type
Chapter
Information
Chain Reaction
Expert Debate and Public Participation in American Commercial Nuclear Power 1945–1975
, pp. 60 - 94
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×