Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:24:11.360Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2023

Rong Chen
Affiliation:
California State University, San Bernardino
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Chinese Politeness
Diachrony, Variation, and Universals in Politeness Theory
, pp. 180 - 199
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agha, A. (2004). Registers of language. In Duranti, A., ed., A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology. Blackwell, pp. 2345.Google Scholar
Alsagoff, L., Bao, Z., & Wee, L. (1998). Why you talk like that?: The pragmatics of a why construction in Singapore English. English World-Wide, 19, 247–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ardila, J. G. (2019). Impoliteness as a rhetorical strategy in Spain’s politics. Journal of Pragmatics, 140, 160–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.11.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arundale, R. (2013). Face as a research focus in interpersonal pragmatics: Relational and emic perspectives. Journal of Pragmatics, 58, 108–20.Google Scholar
Atkinson, J. M., & Drew, P. (1979). Order in Court. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Attardo, S. (1994). Linguistic Theories of Humor. Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Attardo, S. (2002). Humor and irony in interaction: From mode adoption to failure of detection. In Anolli, L., Ciceri, R., & Riva, G., eds., Say Not to Say: New Perspectives on Miscommunication. IOS Press, pp. 159–79.Google Scholar
Augustine, St. (1952). Lying (M. Muldowney, trans.). In Deferrari, R., ed., Treatises on Various Subjects. Catholic University of America, pp. 53120.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Barcelona, A. (2000). On the plausibility of claiming a metonymic motivation for conceptual metaphor. In Barcelona, A., ed., Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. Mouton de Guyter, pp. 3158.Google Scholar
Barcelona, A. (2002). Clarifying and applying the notions of metaphor and metonymy within cognitive linguistics. In Dirven, R. & Pörings, R., eds., Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. Walter de Gruyter, pp. 207–78.Google Scholar
Barron, A., Gu, Y., & Steen, G. (2018). The Routledge Handbook of Pragmatics. Routledge.Google Scholar
Barron, A., & Schneider, K. P. (2009). Variational pragmatics: Studying the impact of social factors on language use in interaction. Intercultural Pragmatics, 6, 425–42.Google Scholar
Barros García, M. J., & Terkourafi, M. (2014). First-order politeness in rapprochement and distancing cultures: Understandings and uses of politeness by Spanish native speakers from Spain and Spanish nonnative speakers from the US. Pragmatics, 24, 134.Google Scholar
Beebe, L. M. (1995). Polite fictions: Instrumental rudeness as pragmatic competence. Georgetown University Round Table on Language and Linguistics. Georgetown University, pp. 154–68.Google Scholar
Bella, S., & Ogiermann, E. (2019). An intergenerational perspective on (im)politeness. Journal of Politeness Research, 15, 163–93.Google Scholar
Beller, S., & Bender, A. (2017). Speech act of promising across cultures. In Kim, Y. Y., ed., The International Encyclopedia of Intercultural Communication. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783665.ieicc0261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhatia, V., & Allori, A. E. (2011). Discourse and Identity in the Professions: Legal, Corporate, and Institutional Citizenship. Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Blommaet, J. (2005). Discourse: A Critical Approach. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (1989). Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S., & Olshtain, E. (1984). Requests and apologies: A cross-cultural study of speech act realization patterns (CCSARP). Applied Linguistics, 5, 196213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bok, S. (1999). Lying: Moral Choice in Public and Private Life. Vintage.Google Scholar
Bolívar, A. (2008). (Im)politeness in Spanish-speaking socio-cultural contexts. Pragmatics, 18, 605–33.Google Scholar
Book of Rites, compiled by Dai Sheng (Yuan dynasty). China Press. (礼记, 中华书局)Google Scholar
Book of Zhou, written BCE, author unknown. In Liu, B., Wang, C., & Deng, Q., eds., (2014) Zhou Li. Nanjing University Press. (周礼, 南京大学出版社 2014)Google Scholar
Bousfield, D. (2008). Impoliteness in Interaction. Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bousfield, D. (2010). Researching impoliteness and rudeness: Issues and definitions. In Locher, M. & Graham, S. L., eds., Interpersonal Pragmatics. De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Bousfield, D., & Locher, M. (2008). Impoliteness in Language: Studies on Its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Brown, B., & Crawford, P. (2009). Politeness strategies in question formulation in a UK telephone advisory service. Journal of Politeness Research, 5, 7391.Google Scholar
Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, L. (2013). “Mind your own esteemed business”: Sarcastic honorifics use and impoliteness in Korean TV dramas. Journal of Politeness Research, 9, 159–86. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2013-0008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, L. (2015). Revisiting “polite” –yo and “deferential” –supnita speech style shifting in Korean from the viewpoint of indexicality. Journal of Pragmatics, 79, 4359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.01.009Google Scholar
Brown, P. (2002). Everyone has to lie in Tzeltal. In Blum-Kulka, S. & Snow, C. E., eds., Talking to Adults: The Contribution of Multiparty Discourse to Language Acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 241–75.Google Scholar
Brown, P. (2017). Politeness and impoliteness. In Huang, Y., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford University Press, pp. 383–99.Google Scholar
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1978). Politeness: Politeness phenomena: Some universals in language usage. In Goody, E., ed., Questions and Answers: Strategies in Social Interaction. Cambridge University Press, pp. 56311.Google Scholar
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bublitz, W., Jucker, A. H., & Schneider, K. P. (2011). Handbook of Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2004). Language and identity. In Duranti, A., ed., A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology. Blackwell, pp. 369–94.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7, 585614.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2008). Finding identity: Theory and data. Multilingua, 27, 151–63.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2010). Locating identity in language. In Llamas, C. & Watt, D., eds., Language and Identities. Edinburgh University Press, pp. 1828.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge.Google Scholar
Camden, C., Michael, T., Motley, M. T., & Wilson, A. (1984). White lies in interpersonal communication. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 48, 309–25.Google Scholar
Cao, A. (2002). On the Confucian views of women. Journal of Suzhou Railway Teachers’ College, 2002, 23–6. (曹爱群, 论孔子的妇女观, 苏州铁道师范学院学报, 社会科学版)Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B., Levinson, S., & Lee, P. (2012). Language, Thought, and Reality. Random House.Google Scholar
Carson, T. L. (2006). The definition of lying. Nous, 40, 284306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, T. L. (2010). Lying and Deception. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Catrambone, M. (2016). Off-record politeness in Sophocles: The patterned dialogues of female characters. Journal of Politeness Research, 12, 173–95.Google Scholar
Chang, H.-C. (1997). Language and words: Communication in the Analects of Confucius. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16, 107–31.Google Scholar
Chang, H.-C. (2001). Harmony as performance: The turbulence under Chinese interpersonal communication. Discourse Studies, 3, 155–79.Google Scholar
Chang, H.-C., & Holt, G. R. (1994a). A Chinese perspective on face as inter-relational concern. In Ting-Toomey, S., ed., The Challenge of Facework: Cross-Cultural and Interpersonal Issues. State University of New York Press, pp. 95132.Google Scholar
Chang, H.-C., & Holt, G. R. (1994b). Debt-repaying mechanism in Chinese relationships: An exploration of the folk concepts of pao and human emotional debt. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 27, 351–87.Google Scholar
Chang, W.-L. M., & Haugh, M. (2011). Evaluations of (im)politeness of an intercultural apology. Intercultural Pragmatics, 8. https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2011.019Google Scholar
Chejnová, P. (2021). Apology as a multifunctional speech act in Czech students’ e-mails to their lecturer. Journal of Pragmatics, 183, 5366. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.07.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, G. (1936). A History of Chinese Marriage. Commercial Press. (陈顾远, 中国婚姻史, 商务印书馆)Google Scholar
Chen, P. ([1935] 1990). Historical Manuscripts on Chinese Marriages. China Press. (陳鵬. 中國婚姻史稿, 中華書局.)Google Scholar
Chen, R. (1990). Verbal irony as conversational implicature. PhD diss., Ball State University.Google Scholar
Chen, R. (1993). Responding to compliments: A contrastive study of politeness strategies between American and Chinese speakers. Journal of Pragmatics, 20, 4975.Google Scholar
Chen, R. (1996). Food-plying and Chinese politeness. Journal of Asian and Pacific Communication, 7 (3&4), 143–55.Google Scholar
Chen, R. (2001). Self-politeness: A proposal. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 87106.Google Scholar
Chen, R. (2010a). Compliment and compliment response research: A cross-cultural survey. In Trosborg, A., ed., Pragmatics across Languages and Cultures. Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 79101.Google Scholar
Chen, R. (2010b). Pragmatics between East and West: Similar or different? In Trosborg, A., ed., Pragmatics across Languages and Culture. Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 167–88.Google Scholar
Chen, R. (2010c). WATER networks, the Chinese radical, and beyond. International Journal of Cognitive Linguistics, 1 (2), 91115.Google Scholar
Chen, R. (2016). Illocutionary acts of requesting and inviting. In Sybesma, R., ed., Encyclopedia of Chinese Language and Linguistics. Brill. https://brill.com/view/db/ecloGoogle Scholar
Chen, R. (2019b). Identity studies and identity construction: Insights from Donald J. Trump’s (un)presidentiality. Pragmatics and Cognition, 26 (2&3), 386413.Google Scholar
Chen, R. (2020). Single-author self-reference: Identity construction and pragmatic competence. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 45, 114.Google Scholar
Chen, R. (2022a). Toward a Motivation Model of Pragmatics. De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Chen, R. (2022b). Why impolite: Politeness, impoliteness; other-politeness, self-politeness. Journal of East Asian Pragmatics, 8 (1), 7–32.Google Scholar
Chen, R., He, L., & Hu, C. (2013). Chinese requests: In comparison with American English and Japanese and with reference to the “East-West divide.” Journal of Pragmatics, 55, 140–61.Google Scholar
Chen, R., & Hu, C. (2020). End-of-dinner food offering: A three-way contrastive study. Contrastive Pragmatics, 1, 242–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, R., Hu, C., & He, L. (2013). Lying between English and Chinese: An intercultural study. Journal of Intercultural Pragmatics, 10, 375401.Google Scholar
Chen, R., & Yang, D. (2010). Responding to compliment in Chinese: Has it changed? Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 1951–63.Google Scholar
Chen, R., & Yang, D. (2023). Conventions of author self-reference in Chinese academic writing. Pragmatics and Society. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.19065.cheGoogle Scholar
Chen, W., & Wong, Y. (2014). What my parents make me believe in learning: The role of filial piety in Hong Kong students’ motivation and academic achievement. International Journal of Psychology, 49, 249–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12014Google Scholar
Chen, X. (2019a). “You’re a nuisance!”: “Patch-up” jocular abuse in Chinese fiction. Journal of Pragmatics, 139, 5263.Google Scholar
Chen, X. (2019b). “Family-culture” and Chinese politeness: An emancipatory pragmatic account. Acta Linguistica Académica, 66 (2), 251–70.Google Scholar
Chen, X., & Lee, J. (2021). The relationship between stereotypical meaning and contextual meaning of Korean honorifics. Journal of Pragmatics, 171, 118–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.10.011Google Scholar
Chen, X., & Ren, J. (2018). “We’re family”: Kinship term generalization in Chinese PhD research seminars. Paper presented at the Fourth International Conference of the American Pragmatics Association, University at Albany, State University of New York.Google Scholar
Chen, X., & Wu, D. (2022). East Asian Pragmatics: Commonalities and Variations. Routledge.Google Scholar
Chen, Z. (1993). The Plain of White Deer. People’s Literature Press. (陈忠实, 白鹿原, 人民文学出版社)Google Scholar
Cheng, S. (2022). Analects Annotated. China Book Press. (程树德, 论语集释, 中华书局)Google Scholar
Cheng, W., & Tsui, A. (2009). “Ahh ((laugh)) well there is no comparison between the two I think”: How do Hong Kong Chinese and native speakers of English disagree with each other. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 2365–80.Google Scholar
Chew, C. L. G. (2005). The functions of “dˉu̓o˙̓c” (OK; possible; can) in business communication in Vietnam. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 15, 229–56.Google Scholar
Chew, C. L. G. (2011). Politeness in Vietnam. In Kádár, D. Z. & Mills, S., eds., Politeness in East Asia. Cambridge University Press, pp. 208–55.Google Scholar
Chiang, B. T. P. (2016). Pragmatic norms of request making of spoken business English in Hong Kong. PhD diss., Education University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Chu, X. (2003). The generalization of Chinese “family culture” and cultural capital. Academic Research, 11, 1519.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Bangerter, A. (2004). Changing ideas about reference. In Noveck, I. & Sperber, D., eds., Experimental Pragmatics. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 2549.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Haviland, S. (1975). Comprehension and the given-new contract. In Freedle, R. O., ed., Discourse Production and Comprehension. Ablex Publishing, pp. 140.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Schunk, D. H. (1980). Polite responses to polite requests. Cognition, 8 (2), 111–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(80)90009-8Google Scholar
Cole, T. (2001). Lying to the one you love: The use of deception in romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18 (1), 107–29.Google Scholar
Coleman, L., & Kay, P. (1981). Prototype semantics: The English word lie. Language, 57, 2644.Google Scholar
, Confucius & Legge, J. (2017). The Analects of Confucius: Translated by James Legge with an Introduction by Lionel Giles. Digireads.com Publishing.Google Scholar
Cook, H. M. (2011). Are honorifics polite? Uses of referent honorifics in a Japanese committee meeting. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 3655–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.08.008Google Scholar
Cooke, J. R. (1968). Pronominal Reference in Thai, Burmese, and Vietnamese. University of California Publications.Google Scholar
Coulmas, F. (1992). Linguistic etiquette in Japanese society. In Watts, R., Ide, S., & Ehlich, K., eds., Politeness in Language: Studies in Its History, Theory, and Practice. Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 299323.Google Scholar
Coulmas, F. (1999). The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Writing Systems. Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulthard, M. (1985). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis, 2nd edn. Longman.Google Scholar
Culpeper, J. (1996). Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 25, 349–67.Google Scholar
Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Culpeper, J., O’Driscoll, J., & Hardaker, C. (2019). Notions of politeness in Britain and North America. In Ogiermann, E. & Blitvich, P. G., eds., From Speech Acts to Lay Understandings of Politeness: Multilingual and Multicultural Perspectives. Cambridge University Press, pp. 177200.Google Scholar
Culpeper, J., & Pat, K. (2021). Compliment responses in Hong Kong: An application of Leech’s pragmatics of politeness. Text & Talk, 41, 667–69. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2020-0047Google Scholar
Dahlberg-Dodd, H. (2019). Japanese at work: Politeness, power, and personae in Japanese workplace discourse. Language in Society, 48 (1), 151–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404518001197Google Scholar
Daikuhara, M. (1986). A study of compliments from a cross-cultural perspective: Japanese vs. American English. Penn Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 2, 2341.Google Scholar
Danziger, E. (2010). On trying and lying: Cultural configurations of Grice’s Maxim of Quality. Intercultural Pragmatics, 7, 199219.Google Scholar
Darics, E. (2010). Politeness in computer-mediated discourse of a virtual team. Journal of Politeness Research, 6, 129–50.Google Scholar
De Fina, A. (2007). Code switching and the construction of ethnic identity in a community of practice. Language in Society, 36, 371–92.Google Scholar
De Fina, A. (2010). The negotiation of identities. In Locher, M. A. & Graham, S. L., eds., Interpersonal Pragmatics. Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 205–24.Google Scholar
De Fina, A., Schiffrin, D., & Bamberg, M. (2006). Discourse and Identity. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Deng, Z., & Qiu, J. (2019). The regional variation of contemporary Chinese politeness: A case study of apology. Foreign Languages Research, 1, 4451.Google Scholar
Donadio, P., & Passariello, M. (2022). Hedges and boosters in English and Italian medical research articles: A cross-cultural comparison. International Journal of Language Studies, 16 (1), 120.Google Scholar
The Dream of the Red Chamber, by Cao Xueqin. (2014). Liaoning Children’s Press. (红楼梦, 曹雪芹著, 辽宁少年儿童出版社, 2014版)Google Scholar
Durkheim, É. (1912). Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse (The elementary forms of religious life). The French Sociologist.Google Scholar
Dynel, M. (2008). No aggression, only teasing: The pragmatics of teasing and banter. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 4, 241–61.Google Scholar
Dynel, M. (2009). Beyond a Joke: Types of conversational humor. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3, 1284–99.Google Scholar
Dynel, M. (2017). But seriously: On conversational humor and (un)truthfulness. Lingua, 197, 83102.Google Scholar
Eelen, G. (2001). A Critique of Politeness Theories. St. Jerome Publishing.Google Scholar
Egner, I. (2002). The speech act of promising in an intercultural perspective. SIL Electronic Working Papers (SILEWP), 1, 110.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, S. (1996). Some observations on the transformation of Confucianism (and Buddhism) in Japan. In Tu, W., ed., Confucian Traditions in East Asian Modernity. Harvard University Press, pp. 175–85.Google Scholar
El-Dakhs, D., & Ahmed, M. M. (2021). A variational pragmatic analysis of the speech act of complaint focusing on Alexandrian and Nadji Arabic. Journal of Pragmatics, 181, 120–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.05.023Google Scholar
El-Dakhs, D., Ambreen, F., Zaheer, M., & Gusarova, Y. (2019). A pragmatic analysis of the speech act of criticizing in university teacher-student talk: The case of English as a lingua franca. Pragmatics, 29, 493520. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/prag.18028.eldGoogle Scholar
Emery, C. R., Nguyen, H. T., & Kim, J. (2014). Understanding child maltreatment in Hanoi: Intimate partner violence, low self-control, and social and childcare support. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29, 1228–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260513506276Google Scholar
Escandell-Vidal, V. (1996). Towards a cognitive approach to politeness. Language Sciences, 180, 629–50.Google Scholar
Fallis, D. (2009). What is lying? Journal of Philosophy, 106, 2956.Google Scholar
Fei, X. (1992). From the Soil: The Foundations of Chinese Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Finker, L. N., & Félix-Brasdefer, J. C. (2015). Pragmalinguistic variation and barista perceptions in US café service encounters. In Beeching, K. & Woodfield, H., eds., Researching Sociopragmatic Variability Perspectives from Variational, Interlanguage and Contrastive Pragmatics. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1948. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137373953_2Google Scholar
Fischer, E. (1999). Cultural logic and Maya identity: Rethinking constructivism and essentialism. Current Anthropology, 40, 473500.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, J., & Dudley-Evans, T. (2002). Genre analysis of editorial letters to international journal contributors. Applied Linguistics, 23, 463–89.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, J., & Wan, A. (2006). Genre analysis of tax computation letters: How and why tax accountants write the way they do. English for Specific Purposes, 25, 133–53.Google Scholar
Ford, C. V., King, B., & Hollender, M. H. (1988). Lies and liars: Psychiatric aspects of prevarication. American Journal of Psychiatry, 145, 554–62.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1976/1984). History of Sexuality. 3 vols. Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Fraser, B. (1990). Perspectives on politeness. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 219–36.Google Scholar
Fukada, A., & Asato, N. (2004). Universal politeness theory: Application to the use of Japanese honorifics. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 19912002.Google Scholar
Fukushima, S. (2003). Requests and Culture: Politeness in British English and Japanese. Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Fukushima, S. (2004). Evaluation of politeness: The case of attentiveness. Multilingua, 23, 365–88.Google Scholar
Fukushima, S. (2011). A cross-generational and cross-cultural study on demonstration of attentiveness. Pragmatics, 21, 549–71.Google Scholar
Fukushima, S. (2013). Evaluation of (im)politeness: A comparative study among Japanese students, Japanese parents, and American students on evaluation of attentiveness. Pragmatics, 23, 275–99.Google Scholar
Fukushima, S. (2019). A metapragmatic aspect of politeness with a special emphasis on attentiveness in Japanese. In Ogiermann, E. & Blitvich, P., eds., From Speech Acts to Lay Understandings of Politeness: Multilingual and Multicultural Perspectives. Cambridge University Press, pp. 226–49.Google Scholar
Fukushima, S., & Sifianou, M. (2017). Conceptualizing politeness in Japanese and Greek. Intercultural Pragmatics, 14, 525–55.Google Scholar
Gao, H. (1999). Features of request strategies in Chinese. Lund University Working Papers, 47, 7386.Google Scholar
Gillette, M. (2000). What’s in a Dress? Brides in the Hui Quarter of Xi’an. In Davis, D., ed., The Consumer Revolution in Urban China. University of California Press, pp. 80106.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. ([1955] 1967). On face-work. In Goffman, E., ed., Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. Penguin, pp. 545. (Originally in Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes, 18 (3), 213–31.)Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Free Press.Google Scholar
Gong, L., & Ran, Y. (2020). Discursive constraints of teasing: Constructing professionality via teasing in Chinese entertainment interviews. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 43, 6482.Google Scholar
Grainger, K, Mansor, K. Z., & Mills, S. (2015). Offering and hospitality in Arabic and English. Journal of Politeness Research, 11, 4170.Google Scholar
Grainger, K., & Mills, S. (2016). Directness and Indirectness across Cultures. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Grandy, R. E., & Warner, R. (1986). Philosophical Grounds of Rationality: Intentions, Categories, Ends. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greenfield, P. M. (2009). Linking social change and developmental change: Shifting pathways of human development. Developmental Psychology, 45, 401–18.Google Scholar
Greenfield, P. M. (2013). The changing psychology of culture from 1800 through 2000. Psychological Science, 24, 1722–31.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J., eds., Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts. Academic Press, pp. 4158.Google Scholar
Gromnica, R. (2017). Projevy vulgarity a zdvořilosti v diskusních fórech k domácí politice (Expressions of vulgarity and politeness in discussion forums on domestic politics). Casopis Pro Moderni Filologii 99, 214–24.Google Scholar
Gu, Y. (1985). Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. MA thesis, University of Lancaster.Google Scholar
Gu, Y. (1990). Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 237–57.Google Scholar
Gu, Y. (1992). Politeness, pragmatics and culture. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 4, 1017.Google Scholar
Hall, S. (1989). Ethnicity: Identity and difference. Radical America, 23, 920.Google Scholar
Hall, S. (1996a). Introduction: Who needs identity? In Hall, S. & Gay, P. D., eds., Questions of Cultural Identity. Sage, pp. 117.Google Scholar
Hall, S. (1996b). Cultural identity and cinematic representation. In Baker, H. A. Jr., Diawara, M., & Lindeborg, R. H., eds., Black British Cultural Studies: A Reader. Chicago University Press, pp. 210–20.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. Routledge.Google Scholar
Hamamura, T. (2012). Are cultures becoming individualistic? A cross-temporal comparison of individual-ism-collectivism in the United States and Japan. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 324.Google Scholar
Hamamura, T., & Xu, Y. (2015). Changes in Chinese culture as examined through changes in personal pronoun usage. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46, 930–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022115592968Google Scholar
Hample, D. (1980). Purpose and effects of lying. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 46, 3347.Google Scholar
Han, C. (1992). A comparative study of compliment responses: Korean females in Korean interactions and in English interactions. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 8 (2), 1731.Google Scholar
Harb, Mustafa. (2021). Disagreement among Arabic speakers in faceless computer-mediated communication. Journal of Politeness Research, 16 (2). http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/pr-2017-0045Google Scholar
Hardin, K. J. (2010). The Spanish notion of lie: Revisiting Coleman and Kay. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 3199–213.Google Scholar
Haugh, M. (2005). The importance of “place” in Japanese politeness: Implications for cross-cultural and intercultural analysis. Intercultural Pragmatics, 2, 4168.Google Scholar
Haugh, M. (2007). Emic conceptualizations of (im)politeness and face in Japanese: Implications for the discursive negotiation of second language learner identities. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 657–80.Google Scholar
Haugh, M. (2010). Jocular mockery, (dis)affiliation, and face. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 2106–19.Google Scholar
Haugh, M. (2013). (Im)politeness, social practice and the participation order. Journal of Pragmatics, 58, 5272.Google Scholar
Haugh, M. (2014). Jocular mockery as interactional practice in everyday Anglo-Australian conversation. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 34, 7699.Google Scholar
Haugh, M. (2015). (Im)politeness Implicatures. De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Haugh, M., & Bousfield, D. (2012). Mock impoliteness, jocular mockery, and jocular abuse in Australian and British English. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 1099–114.Google Scholar
Haugh, M., & Chang, W.-L. M. (2019). “The apology seemed (in)sincere”: Variability in perceptions of (im)politeness. Journal of Pragmatics, 142, 207–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.11.022Google Scholar
Haugh, M., & Hinze, C. (2003). A metalinguistic approach to deconstructing the concepts of “face” and “politeness” in Chinese, English and Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 1581–611.Google Scholar
Haugh, M., & Obana, Y. (2011). Politeness in Japan. In Kádár, D. Z. & Mills, S., eds., Politeness in East Asia. Cambridge University Press, pp. 147–77.Google Scholar
Haugh, M., & Schneider, K. (2012). (Im)politeness across Englishes. Special issue, Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 1017–21.Google Scholar
He, L., Chen, R., & Dong, M. (2022). “Leftover women”: A sociolinguistic study of gender bias in Chinese. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 58, 477507. https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2022-0022Google Scholar
He, L., Chen, R., & Dong, M. (2023). Humorous mockery: How to amuse and be polite at the same time. Journal of Pragmatics, 211, 31–40.Google Scholar
He, Z., & Ren, W. (2016). Current address behavior in China. East Asian Pragmatics, 12, 163–80.Google Scholar
Heritage, J., & Raymond, C. W. (2016). Are explicit apologies proportional to the offenses they address? Discourse Processes, 53, 525. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2015.105669Google Scholar
Heritage, J., Raymond, C. W., & Drew, P. (2019). Constructing apologies: Reflexive relationships between apologies and offenses. Journal of Pragmatics, 142, 185200.Google Scholar
Heritage, J., & Raymond, G. (2012). Navigating epistemic landscapes: Acquiescence, agency and resistance in responses to polar questions. In De Ruiter, J. P., ed., Questions: Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives. Cambridge University Press, pp. 179–92.Google Scholar
Hernandez-Flores, N. (2008). Politeness and other types of facework: Communicative and social meaning in a television panel discussion. Pragmatics, 18, 681706.Google Scholar
Higgins, K. M. (2013). Loyalty from a Confucian Perspective. In Levinson, S., Woodruff, P., & Parker, J., eds., Loyalty. University Press Scholarship Online. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9780814785935.003.0002Google Scholar
Hill, B., Ide, S., Ikuta, S., Kawasaki, A., & Ogino, T. (1986). Universals of linguistic politeness: Quantitative evidence from Japanese and American English. Journal of Pragmatics, 10, 347–71.Google Scholar
Hinze, C. (2005). Looking into “face”: The importance of Chinese mian and lian as emic categories. In Bargiela-Chiappini, F. & Gotti, M., eds., Asian Business Discourse(s). Peter Lang, pp. 169210.Google Scholar
History of Qing. (1977). China Press. (清史稿, 中华书局, 1977版)Google Scholar
Hoˆ`, N. C., & Ngô, Ð. K. (1931). Sách Phép Li˙ch Su˙̓ Annam (The book of Annamite politeness). Imprimerie de la Mission.Google Scholar
Hodeib, C. (2021). Variability in perceptions of (im)politeness in Syrian Arabic: The observers’ perspective. Argumentum, 17, 125–60. https://doi.org/10.34103/ARGUMENTUM/2021/8Google Scholar
Holmes, J. (1988). Compliments and compliment responses in New Zealand English. Anthropological Linguistics, 28, 485508.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. (2000). Politeness, power and provocation: How humor functions in the workplace. Discourse Studies, 2, 159–85.Google Scholar
Hori, M. (1986). A sociolinguistic analysis of the Japanese honorifics. Journal of Pragmatics, 10, 373–86.Google Scholar
Hu, C., & Chen, R. (2017). Backchannelling for positive politeness. In Chen, X., ed., Politeness Phenomena across Chinese Genres. Equinox, pp. 229–52.Google Scholar
Hu, D., & Huang, J. (2018). The reconstruction of the family clan culture in migrant families. Social Sciences of Ganshu, 3, 23–9.Google Scholar
Hu, H. C. (1944). The Chinese concept of “face.” American Anthropologist, 46, 4564. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1944.46.1.02a00040Google Scholar
Huang, M. (1996). Achieving cross-cultural equivalence in a study of American and Taiwanese requests. PhD diss., University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Hwang, K. (1987). Face and favor: The Chinese power game. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 944–74.Google Scholar
Hwang, K. (2006). Moral face and social face: Contingent self-esteem in a Confucian society. International Journal of Psychology, 41, 276–81.Google Scholar
Hwang, K. (2012). Foundations of Chinese Psychology: Confucian Social Relations. Springer.Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (1999). Disciplinary discourses: Writer stance in research articles. In Candlin, C. & Hyland, K., eds., Writing: Texts, Processes and Practices. Longman, pp. 99121.Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (2002). Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1091–112.Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7, 173–92.Google Scholar
Hyon, S. (2018). Introducing Genre and English for Specific Purposes. Routledge.Google Scholar
Ide, R. (1998). “Sorry for your kindness”: Japanese interactional ritual in public discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 29, 509–29.Google Scholar
Ide, S. (1989). Formal forms and discernment: Two neglected aspects of universals of linguistic politeness. Multilingua, 8, 223–48.Google Scholar
Ide, S. (1992). On the notion of “wakimae”: Toward an integrated framework of linguistic politeness. In Takeuchi, M., ed., Kotoba no mozaiku: Collection of Papers in Honor of Professor Natsuko Okuda. Mejiro Linguistic Society, pp. 298305.Google Scholar
Ide, S. (2005). How and why honorifics can signify dignity and elegance: The indexicality and reflexivity of linguistic rituals. In Lakoff, R. & Ide, S., eds., Broadening the Horizon of Linguistic Politeness. John Benjamins, pp. 4565.Google Scholar
Ide, S. (2006). Wakimae no goyooron/Pragmatics of Discernment. Taishuukan.Google Scholar
Ide, S., Hill, B., Carnes, Y. M., Ogino, T., & Kawasake, A. (1992). The concept of politeness: An empirical study of American English and Japanese. In Watts, R., Ide, S., & Ehlich, K., eds., Politeness in Language: Studies in Its History, Theory, and Practice. Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 281–97.Google Scholar
Idemaru, K., Winter, B., & Brown, L. (2019). Cross-cultural multimodal politeness: The phonetics of Japanese deferential speech in comparison to Korean. Intercultural Pragmatics, 16, 517–55.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65, 1951.Google Scholar
Ishiyama, O. (2009). Discussion note: A note on Matsumoto regarding Japanese verbs of giving and receiving. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1061–5.Google Scholar
Isosävi, J. (2020). Cultural outsiders’ reported adherence to Finnish and French politeness norms. Journal of Pragmatics, 155, 177–92.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. ([1957] 1971). Selected Writings, Vol. 2: Word and Language. Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Janney, R. W., & Arndt, H. (1993). Universality and relativity in cross-cultural politeness research: A historical perspective. Multilingua, 12, 1350.Google Scholar
Jaworski, A. (1994). Apologies and non-apologies: Negotiation in speech act realization. Text, 14, 185206.Google Scholar
Jensen, L. A., Arnett, J. J., Feldman, S., & Cauffman, E. (2004). The right to do wrong: Lying to parents among adolescents and emerging adults. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33, 101–12.Google Scholar
Jia, M. (2020). Emancipating Chinese (im)politeness research: Looking back and looking forward. Lingua, 251, 103–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.103028Google Scholar
Jucker, A. H. (2009). Speech act research between armchair, field and laboratory: The case of compliments. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1611–35.Google Scholar
Jucker, A. H., & Taavitsainen, I. (2010). Trends and development in historical pragmatics. In Jucker, A. & Taavitsainen, I., eds., Historical Pragmatics. De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 330.Google Scholar
Kádár, D. Z. (2008). Terms of (im)politeness: A study of communication properties of traditional Chinese (im)polite terms of address. Journal of Politeness Research, 4, 327–30.Google Scholar
Kádár, D. Z. (2013). Relational Rituals and Communication: Ritual Interaction in Groups. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kádár, D. Z. (2017). Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kádár, D. Z., & De La Cruz, M. (2016). Rituals of outspokenness and verbal conflict. Pragmatics and Society, 7, 265–90.Google Scholar
Kádár, D. Z., & Haugh, M. (2013). Understanding Politeness. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kádár, D. Z., Haugh, M., & Chang, W.-L. M. (2013). Aggression and perceived national face threats in mainland Chinese and Taiwanese CMC discussion boards. Multilingua, 32, 343–72.Google Scholar
Kádár, D. Z., & House, J. (2020a). Revisiting the duality of convention and ritual: A contrastive pragmatic inquiry. Poznan´ Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 56, 83111.Google Scholar
Kádár, D. Z., & House, J. (2020b). The pragmatics of ritual: An introduction. Special issue, Pragmatics, 30, 114.Google Scholar
Kádár, D. Z., & Márquez-Reiter, R. (2015). (Im)politeness and (im)morality: Insights from intervention. Journal of Politeness Research, 11, 239–60.Google Scholar
Kádár, D. Z., & Mills, S. (2011). Politeness in East Asia. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kádár, D. Z., & Pan, Y. (2011). Politeness in China. In Kádár, D. Z. & Mills, S., eds., Politeness in East Asia. Cambridge University Press, pp. 125–46.Google Scholar
Kádár, D. Z., & Zhou, L. (2020). Self-denigration in 21st century Chinese. Journal of Politeness Research, 17. www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/pr-2018-0043/htmlGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, H. R. (2014). (Im)politeness in Uruguay: Negotiating refusals in three domains of interaction. PhD diss., University of Florida.Google Scholar
Kasper, G., & Blum-Kulka, S. (1993). Interlanguage Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kenny, A. J. (1966). Practical inference. Analysis, 26, 6575.Google Scholar
Kim, A. H.-O. (2006a) Grammaticalization in sentence-final politeness marking in Korean and Japanese. In Kuno, S., Whitman, J., Kang, Y.-S., Sohn, Y.-S., Lee, I.-H., Maling, J., Sells, P., & Jang, Y., eds., Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, Vol. 11. Harvard University Department of Linguistics, pp. 7285.Google Scholar
Kim, A. H.-O. (2006b). On origins of Korean supnita and Japanese desu/masu: Deriving addressee honorific markers from “reporting” verbs. In O’Grady, W., ed., Inquiries into Korean Linguistics, Vol. 2. Thaehaksa, pp. 1526.Google Scholar
Kim, A. H.-O. (2010). On the evolution of Japanese politeness marker desu/masu from old Korean sources (일본어 공손법 <desu/masu>의 한국어 기원에 대하여: 새로운 은유화이론의 사각에서” 이정민/정성여(편) 한국어 연구의 새지평, 서울:태학사). In Lee, C. & Chung, S.-Y., eds., New Horizons of Korean Language Studies. Thaehaksa, pp. 227–83.Google Scholar
Kim, A. H.-O. (2011). Politeness in Korea. In Kádár, D. Z. & Mills, S., eds., Politeness in East Asia. Cambridge University Press, pp. 176207.Google Scholar
Kim, A. H.-O. (2014). Grammatical Encoding of Politeness: A Systemic Metaphorization in Japanese Honorifics (アラン・ヒョンオク・キム, メタファー体系としての敬語:日本語におけるその支配原理). Akashi Shoten.Google Scholar
Knapp, M. L. (2008). Lying and Deception in Human Interaction. Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Kopykto, R. (1995). Against rationalistic pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics, 23, 475–91.Google Scholar
Kumatoridani, T. (1999). Alternation and co-occurrence in Japanese thanks. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 623–42.Google Scholar
Kyono, C. (2017). Japanese politeness situated in thanking a benefactor: Examining the use of four types of Japanese benefactive auxiliary verbs. East Asian Pragmatics, 2, 2557.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R. (1973). The logic of politeness, or minding your p’s and q’s. In Corum, C. W., Smith-Stark, T. C., & Weiser, A., eds., Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 292305.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R. (1976). What you can do with words: Politeness, pragmatics, and performatives. In Rogers, A. & Ball, B., eds., Proceedings of the Texas Conference on Performatives, Presuppositions, and Implicature. Center for Applied Linguistics, pp. 79106.Google Scholar
Lee, C. L. (2011). Politeness in Singapore. In Kádár, D. Z. & Mills, S., eds., Politeness in East Asia. Cambridge University Press, pp. 26251.Google Scholar
Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. Longman.Google Scholar
Leech, G. (2007). Politeness: Is there an East-West divide? Journal of Politeness Research, 3, 167206.Google Scholar
Leech, G. (2014). The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lee-Wong, S. M. (1994). Qing/please: A polite or requestive marker?: Observations from Chinese. Multilingua, 13 (4), 343–60.Google Scholar
Levine, T. R., Kim, R. K., & Hamel, L. M. (2010). People lie for a reason: Three experiments documenting the principle of veracity. Communication Research Reports, 27, 271–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2010.496334Google Scholar
Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lewin, B. A. (2005). Contentiousness in science: The discourse of critique in two sociology journals. Text, 25, 723–44.Google Scholar
Li, J., Wang, L., & Fischer, K. W. (2004). The organization of Chinese shame concepts. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 767–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930341000202Google Scholar
Li, M. (2015). Research thesis abstracts in applied linguistics by Chinese writers: Rhetorical variations on academic criticism and its interpersonal functions. MA thesis, Xi’an International Studies University.Google Scholar
Li, W., & Li, Y. (1996). “My stupid wife and ugly daughter”: The use of pejorative references as politeness strategy by Chinese speakers. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 7, 129–42.Google Scholar
Li, Y. (1988). Chinese family and the culture of family. In Wen, C. & Xiao, X., eds., The Chinese People: Beliefs and Behaviors. Taiwan Juliu Books, pp. 8598.Google Scholar
Li, Y., & Feng, J. (2000). Compliments and compliment responses in Mandarin. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, 9, 2832.Google Scholar
Liang, S. (2005). Essentials of Chinese Culture. Shanghai People’s Press.Google Scholar
Lin, H. H. (2005). Contextualizing linguistic politeness in Chinese: A socio-pragmatic approach with examples from persuasive sales talk in Taiwan mandarin. PhD diss., Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Lin, Y., & Chen, X. (2022). Also on humblebragging: Why many Chinese posters brag by complaining? Journal of Pragmatics, 201, 149–59.Google Scholar
Linde, C. (1988). The quantitative study of communicative success: Politeness and accidents in aviation discourse. Language in Society, 17, 375–99.Google Scholar
Liu, X. (2000). In One’s Own Shadow: An Ethnographic Account of the Condition of Post-Reform Rural China. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Locher, M. (2004). Power and Politeness in Action: Disagreement in Communication, Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Locher, M., & Hoffmann, S. (2006). The emergence of the identity of a fictional expert advice-giver in an American internet advice column. Text & Talk, 26, 67104.Google Scholar
Locher, M., & Watts, R. (2008). Relational work and impoliteness: Negotiating norms of linguistic behavior. In Bousfield, D. & Locher, M., eds., Impoliteness in Language. De Guyter Mouton, pp. 7799.Google Scholar
Luong, H. (1990). Discursive Practices and Linguistic Meanings: The Vietnamese System of Person Reference. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ly, A. (2016). Internal e-mail communication in the workplace: Is there an “East-West divide.” Intercultural Pragmatics, 13, 3770.Google Scholar
Maíz-Arévalo, C. (2015). Jocular mockery in computer-mediated communication: A contrastive study of a Spanish and English Facebook community. Journal of Politeness Research, 11, 289327.Google Scholar
Maíz-Arévalo, C. (2021). “Blowing our own trumpet”: Self-praise in peninsular Spanish face-to-face communication. Journal of Pragmatics, 183, 107–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.07.001Google Scholar
Mandelbaum, E. (1949). Selected Writings of Edward Sapir in Language, Culture, and Personality. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Manes, J. (1983). Compliments: A mirror of cultural values. In Wolfson, N. & Judd, E., eds., Sociolinguistics and Language Acquisition. Newbury House, pp. 96102.Google Scholar
Manes, J., & Wolfson, N. (1981). The compliment formula. In Coulmas, F., ed., Conversational Routines. Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 115–32.Google Scholar
Mao, R. L. (1992). Invitational discourse and Chinese identity. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 3, 7996.Google Scholar
Mao, R. L. (1994). Beyond politeness theory: “Face” revisited and renewed. Journal of Pragmatics, 21, 451–86.Google Scholar
Martin, S. E. (1964). Speech level and social structure in Japanese and Korean. In Hymes, D., ed., Language in Culture and Society. Harper and Row, pp. 407–15.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Y. (1988). Reexamination of the universality of face: Politeness phenomena in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, 2, 403–26.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Y. (1989). Politeness and conversational universals: Observations from Japanese. Multilingua, 8, 207–21.Google Scholar
McCornack, S. A. (1997). The generation of deceptive messages: Laying the groundwork for a viable theory of interpersonal deception. In Greene, J. O., ed., Message Production: Advances in Communication Theory. Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 91126.Google Scholar
McNamee, G. (2015). Shame vs. guilt. Virginia Quarterly Review, 91 (1), 197.Google Scholar
Meibauer, J. (2014). Lying at the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface. De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Meibauer, J. (2016). Topics in the linguistics of lying: A reply to Marta Dynel. Intercultural Pragmatics, 13, 107–23.Google Scholar
Metts, S. (1989). An exploratory investigation of deception in close relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 159–79.Google Scholar
Miyahara, A., Kim, M-S., Shin, H-C., & Yoon, K. (1998). Conflict resolution styles among collectivist cultures: A comparison between Japanese and Koreans. Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22, 505–25.Google Scholar
Molodchenko, O., & You, S. (2021). Request mitigation by Korean learners of Russian: Power and social distance factors. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 25 (2), 2144.Google Scholar
Morris, C. W. (1938). Foundations of theories of signs. In Neurath, O., Carnap, R., & Morris, C. W., eds., International Encyclopedia of Unified Science. University of Chicago Press, pp. 159.Google Scholar
Neurauter-Kessels, M. (2011). Im/polite reader responses on British online news sites. Journal of Politeness Research, 7, 187214.Google Scholar
Ochs, E. (1990). Indexicality and socialization. In Stigler, J. W., Shweder, R. A., & Herdt, G., eds., Cultural Psychology: Essays on Comparative Human Development. Cambridge University Press, pp. 287308.Google Scholar
Ochs, E. (1992). Indexing gender. In Duranti, A. & Goodwin, C., eds., Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge University Press, pp. 335–58.Google Scholar
Ogiermann, E., & Saloustrou, V. (2020). Conceptualizing politeness in Greece and Great Britain. Γλωσσολογία (Glossologia), 28, 125.Google Scholar
Ogiermann, E., & Suszczyńska, M. (2011). On im/politeness behind the Iron Curtain. In Bargiela, F. & Kádár, D. Z., eds., Politeness across Cultures. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 194215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohashi, J. (2003). Japanese culture specific face and politeness orientation: A pragmatic investigation of yoroshiku onegaishimasu. Multilingua, 22, 257–74.Google Scholar
Ohashi, J. (2008). Linguistic rituals for thanking in Japanese: Balancing obligations. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 2150–74.Google Scholar
Okamoto, S. (2011). The use and interpretation of addressee honorifics and plain forms in Japanese: Diversity, multiplicity, and ambiguity. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 3673–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.06.012Google Scholar
Pan, Y., & Kádár, D. Z. (2011). Politeness in Historical and Contemporary Chinese. Continuum.Google Scholar
Parvaresh, V., & Tayebi, T. (2018). Impoliteness, aggression, and the moral order. Journal of Pragmatics, 132, 91107.Google Scholar
Peng, L. (1966). A Study on the Marriage Customs of the Song Dynasty. Xinwenfeng Press. (彭利云, 宋代婚俗研究, 新文封出版社)Google Scholar
Penman, R. (1990). Facework and politeness: Multiple goals in courtroom discourse. In Tracy, K. & Coupland, N., eds., Multiple Goals in Discourse. Multilingual Matters, pp. 1538.Google Scholar
People’s Daily. (2014). Confucian Institutes in the World. http://politics.people.com.cn/n/2014/0417/c1001-24908823.htmlGoogle Scholar
Pizziconi, B. (2003). Re-examining politeness, face and the Japanese language. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 1471–506.Google Scholar
Pizziconi, B. (2007). The lexical mapping of politeness in British English and Japanese. Journal of Politeness Research, 3, 207–41.Google Scholar
Pizziconi, B. (2011). Honorifics: The cultural specificity of a universal mechanism in Japanese. In Kádár, D. Z. & Mills, S., eds., Politeness in East Asia. Cambridge University Press, pp. 4570.Google Scholar
Pizziconi, B. (2012). The regulation of normative interpersonal behavior and public morality in Japanese public service encounters. www.liar3.illinois.edu/revabs/LIAR3Pizziconi.pdfGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, A. (1975). Second assessment: A study of some features of agreements/disagreements. PhD diss., University of California, Irvine.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, A. (1978). Compliment responses: Notes on the cooperation of multiple constraints. In Schenkein, J., ed., Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction. Academic Press, pp. 79112.Google Scholar
Poos, D., & Simpson, R. (2002). Cross-disciplinary comparisons of hedging: Some findings from the Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English. In Reppen, R., Fitzmaurice, S., & Biber, D., eds., Using Corpora to Explore Linguistic Variation. John Benjamins, pp. 323.Google Scholar
Prince, E. (1981). Toward a taxonomy of given/new information. In Cole, P., ed., Radical Pragmatics. Academic Press, pp. 223–54.Google Scholar
Prince, E. (1992). ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness, and information status. In Thompson, S. & Wann, W., eds., Discourse Description: Diverse Analyses of a Fundraising Text. John Benjamins, pp. 399416.Google Scholar
Qin, D. (2013). Confucian filial piety and the fifth commandment: A fulfillment approach. Asian Journal of Pentecostal Studies, 16 (2), 139–64.Google Scholar
Qiu, J., Chen, X., & Haugh, M. (2021). Jocular flattery in Chinese multi-party instant messaging interactions. Journal of Pragmatics, 178, 225–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.03.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabab’ah, G., & Alali, N. (2020). Impoliteness in reader comments on the Al-Jazeera channel news website. Journal of Politeness Research, 16, 143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/pr-2017-0028Google Scholar
Ran, Y., & Lai, H. (2004). A study of the interpersonal pragmatic motivations of ostensible refusals. Foreign Language Research, 2, 6570.Google Scholar
Ran, Y., Zhao, L., & Kádár, D. Z. (2020). The rite of reintegrative shaming in Chinese public dispute mediation. Pragmatics, 30, 4063.Google Scholar
Rappaport, R. A. (1999). Ritual and Religion in the Making of Humanity. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ren, J., & Chen, X. (2019). Kinship term generalization as a cultural pragmatic strategy among Chinese graduate students. Pragmatics and Society 10, 613–38.Google Scholar
Ren, W. (2019). Emancipating (im)politeness research and increasing its impact. Acta Linguistica Academica, 66, 289–98. https://doi.org/10.1556/2062.2019.66.2.8Google Scholar
Ren, W., & Guo, Y. (2021). What is “Versailles literature?”: Humblebrags on Chinese social networking sites. Journal of Pragmatics, 184, 185–95.Google Scholar
Ren, W., Lin, C-Y., & Woodfield, H. (2013). Variational pragmatics in Chinese: Some insights from an empirical study. In Kecskés, I. & Romero-Trillo, J., eds., Research Trends in Intercultural Pragmatics. Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 283314.Google Scholar
Ren, Y. (2020). Committee chair as a jointly constructed identity at Chinese PhD dissertation defenses. East Asian Pragmatics, 5, 6797.Google Scholar
Rue, Y.-J., & Zhang, G. Q. (2008). Request Strategies: A Comparative Study in Mandarin Chinese and Korean. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ruhi, S. (2006). Politeness in compliment responses: A perspective from naturally occurring exchanges in Turkish. Pragmatics, 16, 43101.Google Scholar
Ruhi, S. (2007). Higher–order intentions and self-politeness in evaluations of (im)politeness: The relevance of compliment responses. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 27, 107–45.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. (2000). Politeness in English: Implications of the speech act of offering. Sintagma, 12, 6172.Google Scholar
Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on Conversation, Vol. 2. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696735.Google Scholar
Saft, S. (2014). Rethinking Western individualism from the perspective of social interaction and from the concept of ba. Journal of Pragmatics, 69, 108–20.Google Scholar
Sapir, E. (1921). Language, Harcourt.Google Scholar
Savić, M. (2018). Lecturer perceptions of im/politeness and in/appropriateness in student e-mail requests: A Norwegian perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 124, 5272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.12.005Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (2002). Beginnings in the telephone. In Katz, J. E. & Aakhus, M., eds., Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance. Cambridge University Press, pp. 284300.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis, Vol 1. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse Markers. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, K. P. (2012). Appropriate behavior across varieties of English. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 1022–37.Google Scholar
Schneider, K. P., & Barron, A. (2008). Variational Pragmatics: A Focus on Regional Varieties in Pluricentric Languages. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Schneider, K. P., & Schneider, I. (2000). Bescheidenheit in vier Kulturen: Komplimenterwiderungen in den USA, Irland, Deutschland und China/Modesty in four cultures: Reciprocals of compliments in the US, Ireland, Germany and China. In Skog-Södersved, M., ed., Ethische Konzepte und mentale Kulturen 2: Sprachwissenschaftliche Studien zu Höflichkeit und Respektverhalten/Ethical Concepts and Mental Cultures 2: Linguistic studies on politeness and respectful behavior. Vaasan Yliopisto, pp. 6580.Google Scholar
Searle, J. (1965). What is a speech act? In Max, B., ed., Philosophy in America. Cornell University Press, pp. 221–39.Google Scholar
Searle, J. (1969). Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. ([1975] 1991). Indirect speech acts. In Davis, S., ed., Pragmatics: A Reader. Oxford University Press, pp. 265–77.Google Scholar
Shen, Q. (1990). A Dictionary of Government Titles. Shanghai Dictionaries Press. (沈起炜, 中国历代职官词典, 上海辞书出版社)Google Scholar
Shinmura, Izuru (ed.). (1998). Kojien (Japanese dictionary). Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Shi-Xu, . (2005). A Cultural Approach to Discourse. Palgrave Press.Google Scholar
Shum, W., & Lee, C. (2013). (Im)politeness and disagreement in two Hong Kong internet discussion forums. Journal of Pragmatics, 50, 5283.Google Scholar
Sifianou, M. (1992). Politeness Phenomena in England and Greece: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sifianou, M., & Tzanne, A. (2010). Conceptualizations of politeness and impoliteness in Greek. Intercultural Pragmatics, 7, 661–87.Google Scholar
Simpson, D. (1992). Lying, liars and language. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 52, 623–39.Google Scholar
Skewis, M. (2003). Mitigated directness in Hongloumeng: Directive speech acts and politeness in eighteenth century Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 161–89.Google Scholar
Smith, A. H. (1894). Chinese Characteristics. Fleming H. Revell.Google Scholar
Snow, C. E., Perlman, R. Y., Gleason, J. P., & Hooshyar, N. (1990). Developmental perspectives on politeness: Sources of children’s knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 289302.Google Scholar
Sorensen, R. (2010). Knowledge-lies. Analysis, 70, 608–15.Google Scholar
Sousa, A. P. (2020). Fostering civility and politeness awareness in professional discourse: Critical genre analysis of course books in professional communication. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 16, 305–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/lpp-2020-0014Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2007). Theories of identity and the analysis of face. Journal of Pragmatics, 29, 639–56.Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2008). Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness. Continuum.Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, H., & Kádár, D. Z. (2016). The bases of (im)politeness evaluations: Culture, the moral order and the East–West divide. East Asian Pragmatics, 1, 73106.Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, H., & Ng, P. (2001). Reconsidering Chinese modesty: Hong Kong and Mainland Chinese evaluative judgments of compliment response. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 11, 181201.Google Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Su, H.-Y. (2019). The metapragmatics of Taiwanese (im)politeness: Conceptualization and evaluation of limo. Journal of Pragmatics, 148, 2643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.018Google Scholar
Sun, X. (2017). Benevolence as beauty and harmony as virtue: The ethics of mutual help in traditional family rules. Journal of Hebei Normal University, 4, 4751.Google Scholar
Swales, J. (1981). Aspects of Article Introductions. University of Aston in Birmingham.Google Scholar
Swales, J. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Swales, J. (2011). The concept of discourse community. In Wardle, E. & Downs, D., eds., Writing about Writing: A College Reader. Bedford & St. Martin’s, pp. 215–27.Google Scholar
Sweet, N. (2020). Ritual contingency: Teasing and the politics of participation. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 30 (1), 86102.Google Scholar
Sweetser, E. E. (1987). The definition of lie: An examination of the folk models underlying a semantic prototype. In Holland, D. & Quinn, N., eds., Cultural Models in Language and Thought. Cambridge University Press, pp. 366.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, I., & Jucker, A. (2015). Twenty years of historical pragmatics: Origins, developments and changing thought styles. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 16, 124.Google Scholar
Tang, C.-H., & Zhang, G. Q. (2009). A contrastive study of compliment responses among Australian English and Mandarin Chinese speakers. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 325–45.Google Scholar
Tang, R., & John, S. (1999). The “I” in identity: Exploring writer identity in student academic writing through the first-person pronoun. English for Specific Purposes, 18, S23–S39.Google Scholar
Tannen, D. (1986). That’s Not What I Meant: How Conversational Style Makes or Breaks Relationships. Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
Tao, L. Yoon, S., & Nishijima, Y. (2016). Teinei (丁寧), limao (禮貌), and kongson (恭遜): A comparison of Japanese, Chinese, and Korean concepts of politeness. Intercultural Communication Studies, 25, 3455.Google Scholar
Tedeschi, J. T., & Felson, R. B. (1994). Violence, Aggression, and Coercive Actions. American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Terkourafi, M. (2004). Testing Brown and Levinson’s theory in a corpus of spontaneous conversational data from Cypriot Greek. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 168, 119–34.Google Scholar
Tillman, M. M., & Tillman, H. C. (2010). A joyful union: The modernization of the Zhu Xi family wedding ceremony. Oriens Extremus, 49, 115–42.Google Scholar
Toyama, E. (1977). Keigo no hensen 2/Changes in keigo 2. In Oˉno, S. & Shibata, T. M., eds., Iwanami Koˉza Nihongo 4: Keigo/Iwanami Series on Japanese Language 4: Keigo. Iwanami Shoten, pp. 135–67.Google Scholar
Trier, J. (1931), Der deutsche Wortschatz im Sinnbezirk des Verstandes (The German lexicon in the semantic fields of the mind). PhD diss., University of Bonn.Google Scholar
Tsai, W-H. (1989). New trends in marriage and family reform in mainland China: Impacts from the Four Modernizations campaign. In Leng, S. C., ed., Party, State, and Society: Changes in China. University Press of America, pp. 225–46.Google Scholar
Tseng, M-F. (1996). An examination of Chinese invitational discourse: How Chinese accept an invitation. Studies in the Linguistics Sciences, 26, 341–56.Google Scholar
Turner, R. E., Edgley, C., & Olmstead, G. (1975). Information control in conversations: Honesty is not always the best policy. Kansas Journal of Sociology, 11, 6989.Google Scholar
Twenty-Four Histories. (1977). China Press. (二十四史, 中华书局, 1977版)Google Scholar
Upadhyay, S. R. (2003). Nepali requestive acts: Linguistic indirectness and politeness reconsidered. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 1651–77.Google Scholar
Upadhyay, S. R. (2010). Identity and impoliteness in computer-mediated reader responses. Journal of Politeness Research, 6, 105–27.Google Scholar
Usami, M. (2002). Discourse Politeness in Japanese Conversation: Some Implications for a Universal Theory of Politeness. Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar
Vasek, M. E. (1986). Lying as a skill: The development of deception in children. In Mitchell, R. W. & Thompson, N. S., eds., Deception Perspectives on Human and Nonhuman Deceit. State University of New York Press, pp. 271–91.Google Scholar
Vu, T. T. (1997). Politeness in modern Vietnamese: A sociolinguistic study of a Hanoi speech community. PhD diss., University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky. Springer.Google Scholar
Wang, J., & Taylor, C. (2019). The conventionalization of mock politeness in Chinese and British online forums. Journal of Pragmatics, 142, 270–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.10.019Google Scholar
Wang, S. (2012). Ready to Die of Fulfilling a Desire. Beijing October Art and Literature Press. (王朔, 过把瘾就死, 北京十月文艺出版社)Google Scholar
Wang, Y. (2013). From funeral to wedding ceremony: Change in the metaphoric nature of the Chinese color term white. Semiotica, 193, 361–80. www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2012-0034/pdfGoogle Scholar
Watts, R. J. (1991). Power in Family Discourse. Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Watts, R. J. (1992). Linguistic politeness and politic verbal behavior: Reconsidering claims for universality. In Watts, R., Ide, S., & Ehlich, K., eds., Politeness in Language: Studies in Its History, Theory, and Practice. Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 4369.Google Scholar
Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Watts, R. J., Ide, S., & Ehlich, K. (1992). Introduction. In Watts, R., Ide, S., & Ehlich, K., eds., Politeness in Language: Studies in Its History, Theory, and Practice. Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 120.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (1985). Different cultures, different languages, different speech acts. Journal of Pragmatics, 9, 145–78.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (1992). Semantics, Culture, and Cognition: Universal Human Concepts in Cultural-Specific Configurations. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (2003). Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction, 2nd edn. Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A., & Goddard, C. (2004). Cultural scripts: What are they and what are they good for? Special issue, Intercultural Pragmatics 1, 153–66.Google Scholar
Woodman, G. (2005). Review of Apologizing in British English. Language in Society, 34, 314–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S004740450530011XGoogle Scholar
Xia, D., & Lan, C. (2019). (Im)politeness at a Chinese dinner table: A discursive approach to (im)politeness in multi-party communication. Journal of Politeness Research, 15, 223–56.Google Scholar
Yabuuchi, A. (2006). Hierarchy politeness: What Brown and Levinson refused to see. Intercultural Pragmatics, 3, 323–51.Google Scholar
Yan, Y. (2010). The Chinese path to individualization. British Journal of Sociology, 61, 489512.Google Scholar
Yang, J., & Lim, S. (2017). A tentative analysis on Xi Jinping’s new concept of “both sides are close as a family.” Leading Journal of Ideological and Theoretical Education, 11, 31–6.Google Scholar
Yang, K.-S. (1996). The psychological transformation of the Chinese people as a result of societal modernization. In Bond, M. H., ed., The Psychology of the Chinese People. Oxford University Press, pp. 106–70.Google Scholar
Yang, M. C. (1945). A Chinese Village. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Yang, N., & Ren, W. (2020). Jocular mockery in the context of a localized playful frame: Unpacking humor in a Chinese reality TV show. Journal of Pragmatics, 162, 3244.Google Scholar
Ye, Z. (2004). Chinese categorization of interpersonal relationships and the cultural logic of Chinese social interaction: An indigenous perspective. Intercultural Pragmatics, 1, 211–30.Google Scholar
Ye, Z. (2019). The politeness bias and the society of strangers. Language Sciences, 76, 111.Google Scholar
Yoon, K.-J. (2004). Not just words: Korean social models and the use of honorifics. Intercultural Pragmatics, 1, 189210.Google Scholar
Yu, N. (2001). What does face means to us? Pragmatics and Cognition, 9, 136.Google Scholar
Yuan, L. (2002). Compliments and compliment responses in Kunming Chinese. Pragmatics, 12, 183226.Google Scholar
Zhai, X. W. (1994). Face, Interactional Face, and the Network of Relationships: Features of the Social Psychology and Behavior of Chinese. Hunan People’s Press. (翟学伟, 面子, 人情, 关系网, 中国人社会心理与行为的特征)Google Scholar
Zhai, X. W. (2004). The reproduction of favor, face and power. Sociological Studies, 113, 4857.Google Scholar
Zhai, X. W. (2005). The Reproduction of Interactional Face and Power. Peking University Press. (翟学伟,人情面子与权力的再生产, 北京大学出版社)Google Scholar
Zhai, X. W. (2011). The Chinese View of Lian and Mian. Peking University Press. (翟学伟, 中国人的脸面观, 形式主义的心理动因与社会表征, 北京大学出版社)Google Scholar
Zhang, D., & Ryden, E. (2002). Key Concepts in Chinese Philosophy. Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Zhang, F. (2017). “In the application of the rites, harmony is to be prized” as a theoretical predication to uphold the three cardinal guides and the fire virtues and ethical codes: Taking Zhu Xi’s doctrine on authoritative harmony as an example. Journal of Tianjin Normal University (Social Science edn), 1, 1420.Google Scholar
Zhang, G. (2008). Pragmatic analysis of white lie and its perlocutionary act. Journal of Zhaotong Teachers College, 30 (4), 2730.Google Scholar
Zhang, L., & Wang, J. (2004). Comparison of criticism speech act between English and Chinese culture. Journal of Xi’an United University, 6, 65–8.Google Scholar
Zhang, M. (2003). Ancient Chinese Marriage and Family. Zhejiang People’s Press.Google Scholar
Zhao, L. (2020). Mock impoliteness and co-construction of hudui rituals in Chinese online interaction. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 43, 4563.Google Scholar
Zhao, L., & Ran, Y. (2019). Impoliteness revisited: Evidence from qingmian threats in Chinese interpersonal conflicts. Journal of Politeness Research, 15, 257–91. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2017-0027Google Scholar
Zheng, T. (2015). Filiality: Core category of Chinese traditional culture. Folklore Studies, 2, 3640.Google Scholar
Zhou, L. (2022). Self-denigration in Mandarin Chinese: An alternative account from sincerity. Language and Communication, 87, 110.Google Scholar
Zhou, L & Kádár, D. Z. (2020). Self-denigration in 21st century Chinese. Journal of Politeness Research, 17, 125. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2018-0043Google Scholar
Zhou, L., & Zhang, S. (2017). How face as a system of value-constructs operates through the interplay of mianzi and lian in Chinese: A corpus-based study. Language Sciences, 64, 152–66.Google Scholar
Zhou, L., & Zhang, S. (2018). Reconstructing the politeness principle in Chinese: A response to Gu’s approach. Intercultural Pragmatics, 15, 693721.Google Scholar
Zhu, J. (2010). Experimentation of the Zhu marriage ritual. Bolan qunshu, 12, 22–6. (朱杰人, 朱子家礼之婚礼的现代实验. 博览群书).Google Scholar
Zhu, J. (2011). A reading of Zhuzi Jiali: Evidence from the marriage ritual. Studies of Historical Records, 30, 1422. (朱杰人, 朱子家礼解读 – 以婚礼为例. 历史文献研究)Google Scholar
Zhu, H., Li, W., & Qian, Y. (2000). The sequential organization of gift offering and acceptance in Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 81103.Google Scholar
Zhuzi jiali. (2003). In Zhuzi quanshu, vol. 7, pp. 857–957. Shanghai Classics, Anhui Jiaoyu. (朱子全書, 朱子家禮, 上海古籍, 安徽教育出版社, 2003版)Google Scholar
Zimmerman, D. H. (1988). On conversation: The conversation analytic perspective. In International Communication Association Communication Yearbook. Sage, pp. 406–32.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, D. H. (1992). Achieving context: Openings in emergency calls. In Watson, G. & Sieler, R. M., eds., Text in Context: Contributions to Ethnomethodology. Sage, pp. 3551.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, D. H. (1998). Identity, context and interaction. In Antaki, C. & Widdicombe, S., eds., Identities in Talk. Sage, pp. 87106.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Rong Chen, California State University, San Bernardino
  • Book: Chinese Politeness
  • Online publication: 02 November 2023
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Rong Chen, California State University, San Bernardino
  • Book: Chinese Politeness
  • Online publication: 02 November 2023
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Rong Chen, California State University, San Bernardino
  • Book: Chinese Politeness
  • Online publication: 02 November 2023
Available formats
×