Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T09:32:59.156Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2015

Edited by
Jeremy Moss
Jeremy Moss
Affiliation:
University of New South Wales, Sydney
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Climate Change and Justice , pp. 236 - 248
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldred, J., ‘The ethics of emissions trading’, New Political Economy, 17/3 (2012), 339–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Law Institute, Restatement (Second) of Torts. §§431–3 (1965).Google Scholar
Anderson, E., ‘Democracy, public policy, and lay assessments of scientific testimony’, Episteme, 8 (2011), 144–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M., ‘War and murder’, in Stein, W. (ed.), Nuclear Weapons: a Catholic Response (London: Burns and Oates, 1961), pp. 43–62.Google Scholar
Armstrong, C., ‘Against “permanent sovereignty” over natural resources’, Politics, Philosophy and Economics, 14 (May 2015), 129–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, C., ‘Fairness, free-riding and rainforest protection’, unpublished manuscript, www.academia.edu/8449971/Fairness_Free-Riding_and_Rainforest_Protection, last accessed 10 October 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, C., ‘Justice and attachment to natural resources’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 22/1 (2014), 48–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, C., ‘Natural resources: the demands of equality’, Journal of Social Philosophy, 44/4 (2013), 331–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, C., ‘Resources, rights and global justice: a response to Kolers’, Political Studies, 62/1 (2014), 216–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arneson, R. J., ‘The principle of fairness and the free-rider problem’, Ethics, 92/4 (1982), 616–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrhenius, G., Population Ethics (Oxford University Press, forthcoming).Google Scholar
Asilomar Scientific Organizing Committee, The Asilomar Conference Recommendations on Principles for Research into Climate Engineering Techniques (Washington DC: Climate Institute, 2010).Google Scholar
Athanasiou, T. and Baer, P., Dead Heat: Global Justice and Global Warming (New York: Seven Stories Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Attfield, R., ‘Mediated responsibilities, global warming, and the scope of ethics’, Journal of Social Philosophy, 40 (2009), 225–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baer, P., ‘Equity, greenhouse gas emissions, and global common resources’, in Schneider, S., Rosencranz, A. and Niles, J. O. (eds.), Climate Change Policy: a Survey (Washington DC: Island Press, 2002), pp. 393–408.Google Scholar
Barrett, S., Environment and Statecraft: the Strategy of Environmental Treaty-making (Oxford University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, B., Democracy, Power and Justice (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Barry, C. and Øverland, G., ‘The feasible alternatives thesis’, Politics, Philosophy and Economics, 11/1 (2012), 97–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumert, K. A., Herzog, T. and Pershing, J., ‘Navigating the numbers: greenhouse gas data and international climate policy’, World Resources Institute (2005).Google Scholar
Beitz, C., Political Theory and International Relations (Princeton University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Bennett, J., The Act Itself (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Binmore, K., Natural Justice (Oxford University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bipartisan Policy Centre Report, bipartisanpolicy.org/library/report/task-force-climate-remediation-research, last accessed 9 June 2014.Google Scholar
Blomfield, M., ‘Global common resources and the just distribution of emissions shares’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 21/3 (2013), 283–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodansky, D., ‘Legitimacy’, in Bodansky, D., Brunnee, J. and Hey, E. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law (Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 711–12.Google Scholar
Bodansky, D., The Art and Craft of International Environmental Law (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Bodansky, D., ‘The who, what, and wherefore of geoengineering governance’, Climatic Change, 121 (2013), 539–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boucher, O., Forster, P. M., Gruber, N., Ha-Duong, M., Lawrence, M. G. et al., ‘Rethinking climate engineering categorization in the context of climate change mitigation and adaptation’, WIREs Climate Change, 5 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, B., ‘Doing away with harm’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 85/2 (2012), 390–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratman, M. E., ‘Shared cooperative activity’, Philosophical Review, 101 (1992), 327–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, G. and Buchanan, J. M., The Reason of Rules: Constitutional Political Economy (Indianapolis, IN: Library of Economics and Liberty, 2000), www.econlib.org/library/Buchanan/buchCv10.html, accessed 21 May 2014.Google Scholar
Brighouse, H. and Fleurbaey, M., ‘Democracy and proportionality’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 18/2 (2010), 137–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broome, J., Climate Matters: Ethics in a Warming World (New York: W. W. Norton and Company, 2012).Google Scholar
Broome, J., ‘The public and private morality of climate change’, The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, University of Michigan, 16 March 2012.Google Scholar
Broome, J., Weighing Goods (Oxford: Blackwell, 1991).Google Scholar
Broome, J., Weighing Lives (Oxford University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunzl, M., ‘Causal overdetermination’, Journal of Philosophy, 76/3 (1979), 134–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butt, D., ‘A doctrine quite new and altogether untenable: defending the beneficiary pays principle’, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 31/4 (2014), 336–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldeira, K. and Keith, D. W., ‘The need for climate engineering research’, Issues in Science and Technology, 27 (2010), 57–62.Google Scholar
Caney, S., ‘Climate change and the duties of the advantaged’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 13/1 (2010), 203–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caney, S., ‘Climate change, human rights, and moral thresholds’, in Gardiner, S. M., Caney, S. and Shue, H. (eds.), Climate Ethics: Essential Readings (Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 163–77.Google Scholar
Caney, S., ‘Cosmopolitan justice, responsibility, and global climate change’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 18/4 (2005), 747–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caney, S., ‘Environmental degradation, reparations, and the moral significance of history’, The Journal of Social Philosophy, 37/3 (2006), 464–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caney, S., ‘Just emissions’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 40/4 (2013), 255–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caney, S., ‘Two kinds of climate justice: avoiding harm and sharing burdens’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 21/4 (2014), 125–49.Google Scholar
Caney, S. and Hepburn, C., ‘Carbon trading: unethical, unjust and ineffective?’, Royal Institute of Philosophy, Supplement 69 (2011), 201–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardwell, M., Milk Quotas, European Community and United Kingdom Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiano, T. ‘Equality, fairness and agreements’, Journal of Social Philosophy: Special Issue on New Directions in Egalitarianism, 44/4 (2013), 370–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiano, T. ‘Rational deliberation among citizens and experts’, in Mansbridge, J. and Parkinson, J. (eds.), Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Christiano, T. ‘The legitimacy of international institutions’, in Marmor, A. (ed.), The Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Law (New York: Routledge, 2012).Google Scholar
Christiano, T. The Rule of the Many (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Christiano, T. and Braynen, W., ‘Inequality, injustice and leveling down’, Ratio, 21 (2008), 392–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cicerone, R. J., ‘Geoengineering: encouraging research and overseeing implementation’, Climatic Change 77/3 (2006), 221–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G. A., If You’re an Egalitarian, How Come you’re So Rich? (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A., ‘Luck and equality’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 72 (2006), 439–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G. A., ‘On the currency of egalitarian justice’, Ethics, 99 (1989), 906–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G. A., Rescuing Justice and Equality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Cohen, S. and Spacapan, S., ‘The social psychology of noise’, in Jones, D. M. and Chapman, A. J. (eds.), Noise and Society (Chichester: John Wiley, 1984), pp. 221–45.Google Scholar
Conor, S. ‘Sun sets on sceptics’ case against climate change’, The Independent, Monday, 14 December 2009, www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/sun-sets-on-sceptics-case-against-climate-change-1839875.html, last accessed 10 October 2014.Google Scholar
Convention on Biological Diversity, www.cbd.int/climate/geoengineering/default.shtml, last accessed 28 May 2014.Google Scholar
Convention on Environmental Modification, www.un-documents.net/enmod.htm, last accessed 28 May 2014.Google Scholar
Cripps, E. ‘Climate change, collective harm and legitimate coercion’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 14/2 (2011), 171–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullity, G., ‘Moral free riding’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 24/1 (1995), 3–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullity, G., ‘Public goods and fairness’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 86 (2008), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullity, G., ‘The moral, the personal, and the political’, in Primoratz, I. (ed.), Politics and Morality (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007), pp. 54–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, S. L., The Second-person Standpoint: Morality, Respect, and Accountability (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006),Google Scholar
de la Croix, D. and Gosseries, A., ‘Population policy through tradable procreation entitlements’, International Economic Review, 50 (2009), 507–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobson, A., Citizenship and Environment (Oxford University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellerman, D., Joskow, P. L., Schmalensee, R., Montero, J.-P. and Bailey, E. M., Markets for Clean Air: the US Acid Rain Program (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, E. C., ‘Anthropogenic transformation of the terrestrial biosphere’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 369 (2011), 1010–35.Google ScholarPubMed
ETC, ‘IPCC and geoengineering: the bitter pill is also a poison pill’, ETC News Release, 16 April 2014, www.etcgroup.org/content/ipcc-and-geoengineering-bitter-pill-also-poison-pill, last accessed 20 May 2014.Google Scholar
Feinberg, J., Harm to Others: the Moral Limits of the Criminal Law (Oxford University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Fleurbaey, M., ‘Justice et climat: alliance ou tension?’, Raison Publique, April 2010.Google Scholar
Forst, R., ‘The justification of human rights and the basic right to justification: a reflexive approach’, Ethics, 120 (2010), 711–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forst, R., The Right to Justification: Elements of a Constructivist Theory of Justice, Flynn, J. (trans.), (New York: Columbia University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Frankfurt, H. G., The Importance of What We Care About (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, S. M., A Perfect Moral Storm: the Ethical Tragedy of Climate Change (Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, S. M., ‘Ethics and global climate change’, in Gardiner, S. M., Caney, S. and Shue, H. (eds.), Climate Ethics: Essential Readings (Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, S. M., ‘Some early ethics of geoengineering the climate: a commentary on the values of the Royal Society report’, Environmental Values, 20/2 (May 2011), 163–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, S. M, Caney, S. and Shue, H. (eds.), Climate Change: Essential Readings (Oxford University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
German Advisory Council on Global Change (WBGU), Solving the Climate Dilemma: the Budget Approach (Berlin, 2009), www.wbgu.de/en/publications/special-reports/special-report-2009, last accessed 10 October 2014.Google Scholar
Gilbert, M., Living Together: Rationality, Sociality, and Obligation (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1996).Google Scholar
Global Humanitarian Forum, The Anatomy of a Silent Crisis: Climate Change Human Impact Report (2009), www.ghf-ge.org/human-impact-report.pdf, last accessed 10 October 2014.Google Scholar
Glover, J., Causing Death and Saving Lives (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1977).Google Scholar
Goldman, A. I., ‘Experts: which ones should you trust?’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 63/1 (2001), 85–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, A. I., ‘Why citizens should vote: a causal responsibility approach’, Social Philosophy and Policy, 2 (1999), 201–17.Google Scholar
Goodin, R., ‘Selling environmental indulgences’, in Dryzek, J. and Schlosberg, D. (eds.), Debating the Earth (Oxford University Press, 1994), pp. 237–54.Google Scholar
Goodin, R. and Barry, C., ‘Benefitting from the wrong doing of others’, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 31/2 (2014), 363–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodin, R. E. and Dryzek, J., ‘Risk sharing and justice: the motivational foundations of the post-war welfare state’, in Goodin, R. and LeGrand, J. (eds.), Not Only the Poor: the Middle Classes and the Welfare State (London: Allen and Unwin, 1987), pp. 37–73.Google Scholar
Gosseries, A., ‘Cosmopolitan luck egalitarianism and climate change’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, suppl. 31 (2007), 279–309.Google Scholar
Gosseries, A., ‘Historical emissions and free-riding’, Ethical Perspectives, 11/1 (2004), 36–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosseries, A. and Van Steenberghe, V., ‘Pourquoi les marches de permis de polluter? Les enjeux économiques et éthiques de Kyoto’, Regards Économiques, 21 (2004), 1–14.Google Scholar
Grotius, H., On the Law of War and Peace, student edn, Neff, S. (ed.), (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Habermas, J., Between Facts and Norms (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Habermas, J., ‘Discourse ethics’, in Lenhardt, C. and Nicholson, S. W (eds.), Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Habermas, J., Truth and Justification (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Hale, B., ‘Can we remediate wrongs?’, in Hiller, A., Ilea, R. and Kahn, L. (eds.), Consequentialism and Environmental Ethics (New York, NY: Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar
Hale, B., ‘Getting the bad out: remediation technologies and respect for others’, in Cambell, J. K (eds.), The Environment: Topics in Contemporary Philosophy, vol. 9. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Hale, B., ‘Moral considerability: deontological, not metaphysical’, Ethics and the Environment, 16/2 (2011), 37–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, B., ‘Polluting and unpolluting’, in Boylan, M. (ed.), Environmental Ethics, 2nd edition (Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013).Google Scholar
Hale, B., ‘Technology, the environment, and the moral considerability of artifacts’, in Selinger, D. E., Olsen, J. K. B. and Riis, S. (eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Technology (London: Ashgate, 2008), pp. 216–40.Google Scholar
Hale, B., Hermans, A. and Lee, A., ‘Adaptation, reparation, and the baseline problem’, in Boykoff, M. and Moser, S. (eds.), Toward Successful Adaptation: Linking Science and Practice in Managing Climate Change Impacts (London and New York: Routledge, 2013), pp. 67–80.Google Scholar
Hale, B., Lee, A. and Hermans, A., ‘Clowning around with conservation: adaptation, reparation, and the new substitution problem’, Environmental Values, 23 (2014) 181–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, N., ‘Non-locality on the cheap? A new problem for counterfactual analyses of causation’, Noûs, 36/2 (2002), 276–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, N., ‘Two concepts of causation’, in Collins, J., Hall, N. and Paul, L. A. (eds.), Causation and Counterfactuals (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004), pp. 225–76.Google Scholar
Halliday, D., ‘Review essay of Justice, Institutions and Luck’, Utilitas, 25/1 (2013), 121–32.Google Scholar
Hansen, J., Sato, M., Kharecha, P., Beerling, D., Berner, R. et al., ‘Target atmospheric CO2: where should humanity aim?’, Open Atmospheric Science Journal, 2 (2008), 217–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanser, M., ‘The metaphysics of harm’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 77/2 (2008), 421–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hare, C., ‘Voices from another world: must we respect the interests of people who do not, and will never, exist?’, Ethics, 117 (2007), 498–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, E., ‘Harming as causing harm’, in Roberts, M. A. and Wasserman, D. (eds.), Harming Future Persons (Dordrecht: Springer, 2009), pp. 137–54.Google Scholar
Harsanyi, J. C., ‘Can the maximin principle serve as a basis for morality? A critique of John Rawls’s theory’, American Political Science Review, 69 (1975), 594–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. and Honoré, T., Causation in the Law, 2nd edition (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hathaway, J. and Neve, A., ‘Making international refugee law relevant again: a proposal for a collectivized and solution-oriented protection’, Harvard Human Rights Journal, 10 (1997).Google Scholar
Held, V. ‘Can a random collection of individuals be morally responsible?’, Journal of Philosophy, 67 (1970), 471–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helm, D., ‘Climate change policy: why has so little been achieved?’ in Helm, D. and Hepburn, C. (eds.), The Economics and Politics of Climate Change (Oxford University Press, 2011), pp. 9–35.Google Scholar
Heyward, C., ‘Situating and abandoning geoengineering: a typology of five responses to dangerous climate change’, Political Science and Politics, 46/1 (2013), 23–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgs, E., ‘Changing nature: novel ecosystems, intervention, and knowing when to step back sustainability science’, in Weinstein, M. P. and Turner, R. E. (eds.), Sustainability Science: the Emerging Paradigm and the Urban Environment (New York: Springer, 2012).Google Scholar
Hinkle Charitable Foundation, How do we Contribute Individually to Global Warming?, www.thehcf.org/emaila5.html, last accessed 27 October 2014.Google Scholar
Hirose, I., Egalitarianism (London: Routledge, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, T., The Leviathan, Gaskin, J. C. A (ed.), (Oxford University Press, 1996 [1651]).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, R. J., Higgs, E. and Harris, J. A, ‘Novel ecosystems: implications for conservation and restoration’, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 24 (2009), 599–605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoekman, B. and Kosteki, M., The Political Economy of the World Trading System: the WTO and Beyond, 3rd edition (Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höhne, N., Kejun, J., Rogelj, J., Segafredo, L., da Motta, R. S. and Shukla, P. R., The Emissions Gap Report 2012: a UNEP Synthesis Report (Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), place: publisher, 2012), www.unep.org/publications/ebooks/emissionsgap2012.Google Scholar
Holtug, N., Persons, Interests, and Justice (Oxford University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honore, A. M., ‘Necessary and sufficient conditions in tort law’, in Owen, D. G (ed.), Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995), pp. 363–85.Google Scholar
Hulme, M., Why We Disagree about Climate Change (Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Climate Change 2001: Synthesis Report. A Contribution of Working Groups I, II, and III to the Third Assessment Report of the IPCC. Watson, R. T. and the core writing team (eds.), (Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Parry, M. L. et al. (eds.), (Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Climate Change 2013: the Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Firth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K. et al. (eds.), (Cambridge, UK and New York, USA: Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 1535.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg2, last accessed 10 October 2014.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation: Summary for Policymakers’, A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the IPCC, Field, C. B. et al. (eds.), (Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Working Group III, Summary for Policymakers, 25.Google Scholar
Irvine, P. J., Ridgwell, A. and Lunt, D. J., ‘Assessing the regional disparities in geoengineering impacts’, Geophysical Research Letters, 37/18 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irvine, P. J., Ridgwell, A. and Lunt, D. J., ‘Climatic effects of surface albedo geoengineering’, Journal of Geophysical Research, 116/D24 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, F. ‘Which effects?’, In Dancy, J. (ed.), Reading Parfit (Oxford: Blackwell, 1997), pp. 42–53.Google Scholar
Jaeger, C. and Jaeger, J., ‘Three views of two degrees’, Regional Environmental Change, 11 (2011), 815–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jamieson, D., ‘Ethics and intentional climate change’, Climatic Change, 33 (1996), 331–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jamieson, D., ‘Ethics, public policy, and global warming’, in Gardiner, S. M, Caney, S. and Shue, H. (eds.), Climate Ethics: Essential Readings (Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 77–98.Google Scholar
Jamieson, D., Reason in a Dark Time (New York: Oxford University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffrey, R., The Logic of Decision, 2nd edition (University of Chicago Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Johnson, B., ‘Ethical obligations in a tragedy of the commons’, Environmental Values, 12 (2003), 271–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, A., Haywood, J. and Boucher, O., ‘Climate impacts of geoengineering marine stratocumulus clouds’, Journal of Geophysical Research, 114/D10 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, S., ‘Do I make a difference?’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 39 (2011), 105–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahan, D. M. and Braman, D., ‘Cultural cognition and public policy’, Yale Law and Policy Review, 24 (2006), 147–70.Google Scholar
Kanowski, P., McDermott, C. and Cashore, B., ‘Implementing REDD+: lessons from analysis of forest governance’, Environmental Science and Policy, 14/2 (2011), 111–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. The Metaphysics of Morals, Gregor, M. (trans), (Cambridge University Press, 1991 [1797]).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keith, D. W., Parson, E. and Morgan, M. G., ‘Research on global sun block needed now’, Nature, 463 (2010), 426–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keohane, R. and Victor, D., ‘The regime complex for climate change’, Perspectives on Politics, 9/1 (2011), 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, R. and Nye, J. S. Jr., ‘The club model of multilateral cooperation and problems of democratic legitimacy’, in Keohane, R. (ed.), Power and Governance in a Partially Globalized World (London: Routledge Publishers, 2002), pp. 219–44.Google Scholar
Keohane, R., Macedo, S. and Moravscik, A., ‘Democracy enhancing multilateralism’, International Organization, 63/1 (2009), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Killoren, D. and Williams, B. ‘Group agency and overdetermination’, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 16 (2013), 295–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingsbury, B., Krisch, N. and Stewart, R., ‘The emergence of global administrative law’, Law and Contemporary Problems, 68/3 (2005), 15–62.Google Scholar
Kolers, A., ‘Justice, territory and natural resources’, Political Studies, 60/2 (2012), 269–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolstad, C. D., ‘Piercing the veil of uncertainty in transboundary pollution agreements’, Environmental and Resource Economics, 31 (2005), 21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolstad, C. D. and Ulph, A., ‘Uncertainty, learning and heterogeneity in international environmental agreements’, Environmental and Resource Economics, 50/3 (2011), 389–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, L., ‘Climate engineering and international law: what is in the national interest?’ Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law), 105 (2011), 525–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, A., ‘Forest tenure reform in the age of climate change: lessons for REDD+’, Global Environmental Change, 21/2 (2011), 540–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawford-Smith, H., ‘The feasibility of collectives’ actions’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 90 (2012), 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, S. D. and Dubner, S. J., Superfreakonomics (New York: William Morrow, 2009).Google Scholar
Lewis, D., ‘Causation as influence’, Journal of Philosophy, 97/4 (2000), 182–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippert-Rasmussen, K., ‘Hurley on egalitarianism and the luck-neutralizing aim’, Politics, Philosophy, and Economics, 4 (2005), 249–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippert-Rasmussen, K., ‘Inequality, incentives, and the interpersonal test’, Ratio, 21 (2008), 421–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippert-Rasmussen, K., ‘Luck-egalitarianism: faults and collective choice’, Economics and Philosophy, 27 (2011), 151–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippert-Rasmussen, K. Luck Egalitarianism (London: Bloomsbury, 2015).Google Scholar
Lizza, R., ‘As the world burns’, The New Yorker (11 October 2010).Google Scholar
Locke, J., Two Treatises of Government, Laslett, P. (ed.), (Cambridge University Press, 1960).Google Scholar
London Convention and Protocol, imo.org/OurWork/Environment/LCLP/Pages/default.aspx, last accessed 28 May 2014.Google Scholar
Lunt, D. J., Ridgwell, A., Valdes, P. J. and Seale, A., ‘“Sunshade world”: a fully coupled GCM evaluation of the climatic impacts of geoengineering’, Geophysical Research Letters, 35/12 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCracken, M. ‘Geoengineering: worthy of cautious evaluation?’ Climatic Change, 77 (2006), 235–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, J. L., Cement of the Universe, 2nd edition (Oxford University Press, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meinshausen, M., Meinshausen, N., Hare, W., Raper, S. C. B., Frieler, K. et al., ‘Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2 degrees C’, Nature, 458 (2009), 1158–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyer, A., Contraction and Convergence: the Global Solution to Climate Change (Dartington, UK: Green Books, 2000).Google Scholar
Meyer, L. H., ‘Compensating wrongless historical emissions of greenhouse gases’, Ethical Perspectives, 11/1 (2004), 20–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, L. and Sanklecha, P., ‘Individual expectation and climate justice’, Analyze and Kritik, 2 (2011), 449–71.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S., On Liberty (Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books, 1986).Google Scholar
Miller, D., ‘Global justice and climate change: how should responsibilities be distributed?’, The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 24–5 March (2008), http://tannerlectures.utah.edu/_documents/a-to-z/m/Miller_08.pdf, last accessed 10 October 2014.Google Scholar
Miller, D., National Responsibility and Global Justice (Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D., ‘Territorial rights: concept and justification’, Political Studies, 60/2 (2012), 252–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moellendorf, D., ‘Treaty norms and climate mitigation’, Ethics and International Affairs, 23/3 (2009), 247–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, M., ‘For what must we pay? Causation and counterfactual baselines’, San Diego Law Review, 40 (2003), 1181–271.Google Scholar
Morgan-Knapp, C. and Goodman, C., ‘Consequentialism, climate harm and individual obligations’, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrow, D. R., Kopp, R. E. and Oppenheimer, M., ‘Toward ethical norms and institutions for climate engineering research’, Environmental Research Letters, 4 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, J., Reassessing Egalitarianism (London: Palgrave McMillan, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, L., ‘Institutions and the demands of justice’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 27/4 (1999), 251–91.Google Scholar
Murphy, L., ‘The demands of beneficence’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 22/4 (1993), 267–92.Google Scholar
Na, S. and Shin, H. S., ‘International environmental agreements under uncertainty’, Oxford Economic Papers, 50 (1998), 173–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, T., ‘The problem of global justice’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 33 (2005), 113–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narain, U. and van’t Veld, K., ‘The clean development mechanism’s low-hanging fruit problem: when might it arise, and how might it be solved?’, Environmental Resource Economics, 40 (2008), 445–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narveson, J., ‘Moral problems of population’, The Monist, 57 (1973), 62–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neumayer, E., ‘In defense of historical accountability for greenhouse gas emissions’, Ecological Economics, 33 (2000), 185–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nine, C., Global Justice and Territory (Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolt, J., ‘How harmful are the average American’s greenhouse gas emissions?’, Ethics, Policy and Environment, 14/1 (2011), 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordhaus, W., A Question of Balance: Weighing Options on Global Warming Policies (Yale University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Nordhaus, W., ‘A review of the Stern Review on the economics of climate change’, Journal of Economic Literature, 45 (2007), 686–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North Pacific Fur Seal Treaty, Article III (1911).Google Scholar
Nozick, R., Anarchy, State and Utopia (New York: Basic Books, 1974).Google Scholar
Oreskes, N. and Conway, E. M., Merchants of Doubt (New York: Bloomsbury Press, 2010).Google ScholarPubMed
Page, E., ‘Cashing in on climate change: political theory and global emissions trading’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 14/2 (2011), 259–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, E., ‘Climatic justice and the fair distribution of atmospheric burdens: a conjunctive account’, Monist, 94/3 (2011), 412–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, E., ‘Distributing the burdens of climate change’, Environmental Politics, 17 (2008), 556–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, E., ‘Give it up for climate change: a defence of the beneficiary pays principle’, International Theory, 4 (2012), 300–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, E., ‘Intergenerational justice and climate change’, Political Theory, 47 (1999), 53–66.Google Scholar
Page, E., ‘Intergenerational justice of what: welfare, resources or capabilities?’, Environmental Politics, 16 (2007), 453–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, E., ‘Equality and priority’, in Mason, A. (ed.), Ideals of Equality (Oxford: Blackwell, 1998), pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
Page, E., Reasons and Persons (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Parson, E. A., Parfit, D. and Ernst, L. N., ‘International governance of climate engineering’, Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 14 (2013), 307–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persson, I., ‘Why leveling down could be worse for prioritarianism than for egalitarianism’, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 11 (2008), 295–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phelps, J., Webb, E. and Agrawal, A., ‘Does REDD+ threaten to recentralize forest governance?’, Science, 328/5976 (2010), 312–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pogge, T., ‘An egalitarian law of peoples’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 23/3 (1994), 195–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pogge, T., ‘The categorical imperative’, in Guyer, P. (ed.), Kant’s “Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals”: Critical Essays (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1998), pp. 189–213.Google Scholar
Posner, E. A. and Weisbach, D., Climate Change Justice (Princeton University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Preston, C. J., ‘Ethics and geoengineering: reviewing the moral issues raised by solar radiation management and carbon dioxide removal’, WIREs Climate Change, 4 (2013), 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rakowski, E., Equal Justice (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Ramsey, F., ‘Truth and probability’, in Mellor, D. H. (ed.), Foundations: Essays in Philosophy, Logic, Mathematics and Economics (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1978), pp. 58–100.Google Scholar
Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition (Oxford University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J., Justice as Fairness (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J., Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Rawls, J., The Law of Peoples (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Rayner, S., ‘To know or not to know? A note on ignorance as a rhetorical resource in geoengineering debates’, Climate Geoengineering Governance Working Paper Series, 10 (2014).Google Scholar
Rayner, S., Heyward, C., Kruger, T., Pidgeon, N., Redgwell, C. and Savulescu, J., ‘The Oxford Principles’, Climatic Change, 121 (2013), 499–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, J., Practical Reason and Norms, 2nd edition (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Ricke, K. L., Morgan, M. G. and Allen, M. R., ‘Regional climate response to solar-radiation management’, Nature Geoscience, 3 (2010), 537–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, M., On Global Justice (Princeton University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Robock, A., Oman, L. and Stenchikov, G. L., ‘Regional climate responses to geoengineering with tropical and arctic SO2 injections’, Journal of Geophysical Research, 113/D16 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robock, A., Bunzl, M., Kravitz, B. and Stenchikov, G. L., ‘A test for geoengineering?’, Science, 327/5965 (2010), 530–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandberg, J., ‘My emissions make no difference: climate change and the argument from inconsequentialism’, Environmental Ethics, 33 (2011), 229–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandel, M., ‘It’s immoral to buy the right to pollute’, in M. Sandel, Public Philosophy: Essays on Morality in Politics (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005), pp. 93–6.Google Scholar
Satz, D., Why Some Things Should Not Be for Sale: the Moral Limits of Markets (Oxford University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, L., The Foundations of Statistics (New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1954).Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M., What We Owe to Each Other (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Schaffer, J., ‘Overdetermining causes’, Philosophical Studies, 114 (2003), 23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffler, S., Boundaries and Allegiances: the Problems of Justice and Responsibility in Liberal Thought (Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Schroeder, D. and Pogge, T., ‘Justice and the convention on biological diversity’, Ethics and International Affairs, 23/3 (2009), 267–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuck, P., ‘Refugee burden-sharing: a modest proposal’, Yale Journal of International Law, 22 (1997), 243–97.Google Scholar
Segall, S., ‘Why egalitarians should not care about equality’, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 15 (2012), 507–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepherd, J., Caldeira, K., Cox, P., Haigh, J., Keith, D. et al., Geoengineering the Climate: Science, Governance and Uncertainty (London: Royal Society, 2009).Google Scholar
Shiffrin, S., ‘Wrongful life, procreative responsibility, and the significance of harm’, Legal Theory, 5 (1999), 117–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shue, H. ‘Exporting hazards’, Ethics, 91/4 (1981), 579–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shue, H. ‘Global environment and international inequality’, in Gardiner, S. M, Caney, S. and Shue, H. (eds.), Climate Ethics: Essential Readings (Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 101–11.Google Scholar
Shue, H. ‘Global environment and international inequality’, International Affairs, 75/3 (2003), 531–45.Google Scholar
Shue, H. ‘Subsistence emissions and luxury emissions’, Law and Policy, 15/1 (1993), 39–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shui, B. and Harris, R., ‘The role of CO2 embodiment in US–China trade’, Energy Policy, 34/18 (2006) 4063–8.Google Scholar
Simmons, A. J., Moral Principles and Political Obligations (Princeton University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Singer, P., ‘Famine, affluence and morality’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1/1 (1972), 229–43.Google Scholar
Singer, P., ‘One atmosphere’, in Gardiner, S. M, Caney, S. and Shue, H. (eds.), Climate Ethics: Essential Readings (Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 181–99.Google Scholar
Singer, P., One World (Melbourne: Text Publishing, 2002), p. 39.Google Scholar
Singer, P., One World: the Ethics of Globalization, 2nd edition (New Haven: Nota Bene Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Singer, P., Practical Ethics, 3rd edition (Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinnott-Armstrong, W., ‘“It’s not my fault”: global warming and individual moral obligations’, in Sinnott-Armstrong, W. and Howarth, R. B. (eds.), Perspectives on Climate Change: Science, Economics, Politics, Ethics. Advances in the Economics of Environmental Resources (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2005), vol. V, pp. 285–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spash, C., ‘The brave new world of carbon trading’, New Political Economy, 15/2 (2010) 169–95.Google Scholar
Spencer, R. W., The Great Global Warming Blunder (New York: Encounter Books, 2010).Google Scholar
Stapleton, J., ‘Choosing what we mean by “causation” in law’, Missouri Law Review, 73 (2008), 433–80.Google Scholar
Stapleton, J., ‘Legal cause: cause-in-fact and the scope of liability for consequences’, Vanderbilt Law Review, 54 (2001), 941–1009.Google Scholar
Steiner, H., An Essay on Rights (Oxford: Blackwell, 1994).Google Scholar
Stern, N., Stern Review of the Economics of Climate Change (2006), http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/sternreview_summary.htm, last accessed 10 October 2014.Google Scholar
Stern, N., The Economics of Climate Change: the Stern Review (Cambridge University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stern, N., ‘The economics of climate change’, in Gardiner, S. M., Caney, S. and Shue, H. (eds.), Climate Ethics: Essential Readings (Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 39–86.Google Scholar
Stilz, A., ‘Nations, states and territory’, Ethics, 121/3 (2011), 575–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stratton-Lake, P., ‘Introduction’, in Ross, W. D. (ed.), The Right and the Good (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002), ix–lviii.Google Scholar
Strawson, P., ‘Freedom and resentment’, Proceedings of the British Academy, 48 (1960).Google Scholar
Suk, J., ‘From antidiscrimination to equality: stereotypes and the life cycle in the United States and Europe’, American Journal of Comparative Law, 60 (2012), 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, K. C., ‘Justice and personal pursuits’, The Journal of Philosophy, 101/7 (2004), 331–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, K. C., Justice, Institutions and Luck (Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temkin, L. S., Inequality (Oxford University Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temkin, L. S., ‘Justice and equality: some questions about scope’, Social Philosophy and Policy, 12 (1995), 72–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, J., ‘More on the metaphysics of harm’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 82 (2011), 436–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, J., ‘Some ruminations on rights’, Arizona Law Review, 19 (1977), 45–60.Google Scholar
Tobin, J., ‘On limiting the domain of inequality’, Journal of Law and Economics, 13 (1970), 263–77.Google Scholar
The Economist, ‘American public opinion and climate change: no green tea’, The Economist Online, 8 September 2011, www.economist.com/blogs/dailychart/2011/09/american-public-opinion-and-climate-change, last accessed October 10, 2014.Google Scholar
The Economist, ‘Stopping a scorcher’, 23 November 2013, www.economist.com/news/books-and-arts/21590347-controversy-over-manipulating-climate-change-stopping-scorcher, last accessed 24 May 2014.Google Scholar
Trail Smelter, Arbitral Tribunal (1939).Google Scholar
Trillionth tonne, www.trillionthtonne.org, last accessed 10 October 2014.Google Scholar
Tronto, J., ‘The “Nanny” question in feminism’, Hypatia, 17 (2002), 34–51.Google Scholar
Tuck, R., Free Riding (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanderheiden, S., Atmospheric Justice (Oxford University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Victor, D., Global Warming Gridlock: Creating More Effective Strategies for Protecting the Planet (Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O., Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (Princeton University Press, 1944).Google Scholar
Waldron, J., ‘Moments of carelessness and massive loss’, in Owen, D. G. (ed.), The Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995), pp. 387–40.Google Scholar
Walzer, M., Spheres of Justice (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1983).Google Scholar
Watson, G., Agency and Answerability (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitzman, M., ‘A review of the Stern Review on the economics of climate change’, Journal of Economic Literature, 45 (2007), 703–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitzman, M., ‘On modeling and interpreting the economics of catastrophic climate change’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 91/1 (2009), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whyte, K. P., ‘Now this! Indigenous sovereignty, political obliviousness and governance models for SRM research’, Ethics, Policy and Environment, 15 (2012), 172–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, G., ‘Climate engineering and international law: last resort or the end of humanity?’, Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 20/3 (2011), 277–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank, http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.CO2E.PC, last accessed 27 October 2014.Google Scholar
World Health Organisation (WHO), Global Health Risks: Mortality and Burden of Disease Attributable to Selected Major Risks (Geneva: WHO Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Wright, R. W., ‘Causation in tort law’, California Law Review, 73 (1985), 1737–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ypi, L., ‘Territorial rights and exclusion’, Philosophy Compass, 8/3 (2013), 241–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Jeremy Moss, University of New South Wales, Sydney
  • Book: Climate Change and Justice
  • Online publication: 05 November 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316145340.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Jeremy Moss, University of New South Wales, Sydney
  • Book: Climate Change and Justice
  • Online publication: 05 November 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316145340.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Jeremy Moss, University of New South Wales, Sydney
  • Book: Climate Change and Justice
  • Online publication: 05 November 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316145340.014
Available formats
×