Book contents
- Climate Change and Ocean Governance
- Climate Change and Ocean Governance
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Vulnerable Islands and Coasts
- Part III Marine Fisheries and Pelagic Seas
- Part IV Changing Polar Seas
- Part V Institutions and Law for Ocean Governance
- Part VI Policies for Ocean Governance
- 21 The Plastic–Climate Nexus
- 22 Financing Emission Reductions
- 23 Capturing a Moving Target
- 24 Energy from the Sea
- 25 Climate Change and Navies
- 26 Geoengineering at Sea
- Part VII Conclusion
- Index
- References
23 - Capturing a Moving Target
Decarbonizing Shipping through Informational Governance
from Part VI - Policies for Ocean Governance
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 February 2019
Edited by
Book contents
- Climate Change and Ocean Governance
- Climate Change and Ocean Governance
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Vulnerable Islands and Coasts
- Part III Marine Fisheries and Pelagic Seas
- Part IV Changing Polar Seas
- Part V Institutions and Law for Ocean Governance
- Part VI Policies for Ocean Governance
- 21 The Plastic–Climate Nexus
- 22 Financing Emission Reductions
- 23 Capturing a Moving Target
- 24 Energy from the Sea
- 25 Climate Change and Navies
- 26 Geoengineering at Sea
- Part VII Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Climate Change and Ocean GovernancePolitics and Policy for Threatened Seas, pp. 376 - 392Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Bows-Larkin, A. (2015). All adrift: Aviation, shipping, and climate change policy. Climate Policy, 15(6), 681–702.Google Scholar
Bush, S. R., Toonen, H., Oosterveer, P., and Mol, A. P. (2013). The “devils triangle” of MSC certification: Balancing credibility, accessibility and continuous improvement. Marine Policy, 37, 288–93.Google Scholar
Business for Social Responsibility. (2017). Clean Cargo Working Group (CCWG) 2016 Progress Report, Business for Social Responsibility. Available at www.bsr.org/reports/Clean_Cargo_Progress_Report_2016.pdf.Google Scholar
Cashore, B. (2002). Legitimacy and the privatization of environmental governance: How non–state market–driven (NSMD) governance systems gain rule–making authority. Governance, 15(4), 503–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castells, M. (2000). The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture; Volume 1: The Rise of the Network Society. Malden, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Clean Cargo Working Group. (2017). Our Accomplishments. Available at www.bsr.org/en/collaboration/groups/clean-cargo-working-group.Google Scholar
COGEA. (2017). Study on Differentiated Port Infrastructure Charges to Promote Environmentally Friendly Maritime Transport Activities and Sustainable Transportation. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
DeSombre, E. R. (2006). Flagging Standard; Globalization and Environmental, Safety and Labor Regulations at Sea. Cambridge, MA, London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dufour, J. (2016). EU MRV vs. IMO Fuel Consumption Data Collection System. Available at www.green4sea.com/eu-mrv-vs-imo-fuel-consumption-data-collection-system.Google Scholar
Environmental Ship Index. (n.d.). Introduction. Available at www.environmentalshipindex.org/Public/Home.Google Scholar
Environmental Ship Index. (2017). List of Participating Ships. Available at www.environmentalshipindex.org/Public/Ships.Google Scholar
European Commission. (2013). Integrating maritime transport emissions in the EU’s greenhouse gas reduction policies. COM(2013) 479 Final. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
Falkner, R. (2003). Private environmental governance and international relations: Exploring the links. Global Environmental Politics, 3(2), 72–87.Google Scholar
Fenton, P. (2017). The role of port cities and transnational municipal networks in efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions on land and at sea from shipping–An assessment of the World Ports Climate Initiative. Marine Policy, 75, 271–7.Google Scholar
Gilbert, P., Bows-Larkin, A., Mander, S., and Walsh, C. (2014). Technologies for the high seas: Meeting the climate challenge. Carbon Management, 5(4), 447–61.Google Scholar
Glasbergen, P., Biermann, F., and Mol, A. P. J. (2007). Partnerships, Governance and Sustainable Development; Reflections on Theory and Practice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Green Award. (2015). Green Award Foundation Annual Report 2014–2015. Available at http://annualreport2014-2015.greenaward.org/index.php/greenaward/?page=3.Google Scholar
Green Award. (2017). All Seagoing Ships. Available at www.greenaward.org/greenaward/13-all-seagoing-ships.html.Google Scholar
Gulbrandsen, L. H. (2009). The emergence and effectiveness of the Marine Stewardship Council. Marine Policy, 33(4), 654–60.Google Scholar
Gupta, A. and Mason, M. (2014). Transparency in Global Environmental Governance: Critical perspectives. Cambridge, MA, London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hackmann, B. (2012). Analysis of the governance architecture to regulate GHG emissions from international shipping. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 12(1), 85–103.Google Scholar
International Maritime Organization. (2014). Third IMO Greenhouse Gas Study 2014. London: International Maritime Organization.Google Scholar
International Maritime Organization. (2016a). New Requirements for International Shipping as UN Body Continues to Address Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Available at www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/PressBriefings/Pages/28-MEPC-data-collection--.aspx.Google Scholar
International Maritime Organization. (2016b). IMO Takes Further Action on Climate Change. Available at www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/PressBriefings/Pages/11-data-collection-.aspx.Google Scholar
Johnson, H., Johansson, M., Andersson, K., and Södahl, B. (2013). Will the ship energy efficiency management plan reduce CO2 emissions? A comparison with ISO 50001 and the ISM code. Maritime Policy & Management, 40(2), 177–90.Google Scholar
Karim, M. S. (2015). Prevention of Pollution of the Marine Environment from Vessels: The Potential and Limits of the International Maritime Organisation. Chem, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London: Springer.Google Scholar
Lister, J. (2015). Green shipping: Governing sustainable maritime transport. Global Policy 6(2), 118–29.Google Scholar
Lister, J., Poulsen, R. T., and Ponte, S. (2015). Orchestrating transnational environmental governance in maritime shipping. Global Environmental Change, 34, 185–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lund-Thomsen, P., Poulsen, R. T., and Ackrill, R. (2016). Corporate social responsibility in the international shipping industry: State-of-the-art, current challenges and future directions. The Journal of Sustainable Mobility, 3(2), 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marine Environment Protection Committee. (2011). Resolution MEPC.203(62); Amendments to the Annex of the Protocol of 1997 to amend the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973, as modified by the Protocol of 1978 relating thereto. London: International Maritime Organization.Google Scholar
Marine Environment Protection Committee. (2012). Resolution MEPC.213(63); 2012 Guidelines for the Development of a Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan (SEEMP). London: International Maritime Organization.Google Scholar
Martinez Romera, B. (2016). The Paris agreement and the regulation of international bunker fuels. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 25(2), 215–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R. B. (1994). Intentional Oil Pollution at Sea; Environmental Policy and Treaty Compliance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mol, A. P. (2006). Environmental governance in the Information Age: The emergence of informational governance. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 24(4), 497–514.Google Scholar
Mol, A. P. (2015). Transparency and value chain sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 154–61.Google Scholar
Pattberg, P. (2005). What role for private rule-making in global environmental governance? Analysing the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC). International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 5(2), 175–89.Google Scholar
Pierre, J. and Peters, B. G. (2000). Governance, Politics and the State. London: MacMillan Press.Google Scholar
Poulsen, R. T. and Sornn-Friese, H. (2015). Achieving energy efficient ship operations under third party management: How do ship management models influence energy efficiency? Research in Transportation Business & Management, 17, 41–52.Google Scholar
Rahim, M. M., Islam, M. T., and Kuruppu, S. (2016). Regulating global shipping corporations’ accountability for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the seas. Marine Policy, 69, 159–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringbom, H. (1999). Preventing pollution from ships – Reflections on the ‘adequacy’ of existing rules. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 8(1), 21–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, J., Smith, T., Rehmatulla, N., and Milligan, B. (2017). The promise and limits of private standards in reducing greenhouse gas emissions from shipping. Journal of Environmental Law, 29(2), 231–62.Google Scholar
Soma, K., Termeer, C. J., and Opdam, P. (2016). Informational governance–A systematic literature review of governance for sustainability in the Information Age. Environmental Science & Policy, 56, 89–99.Google Scholar
Svensson, E. and Andersson, K. (2012). Inventory and Evaluation of Environmental Performance Indices for Shipping. Gothenburg: Chalmers University of Technology.Google Scholar
Tan, A.K.-J. (2006). Vessel-Source Marine Pollution; The Law and Politics of International Regulation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Toonen, H. M. and Mol, A. P. J. (2016). Governing the marine environment through information: Fisheries, shipping, and tourism. In MacDonald, B. H., Soomai, S. S., De Sante, E. M., and Wells, P. G., eds., Science, Information and Policy interface for Effective Coastal and Ocean Management. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press (Taylor & Francis Group), 125–51.Google Scholar
UNCTAD Secretariat. (2016). Review of Maritime Transport. New York and Geneva: UNCTAD.Google Scholar
Van Kersbergen, K. and Van Waarden, F. (2004). ‘Governance’ as a bridge between disciplines: Cross-disciplinary inspiration regarding shifts in governance and problems of governability, accountability and legitimacy. European Journal of Political Research, 43(2), 143–71.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, J. (2010). Who Greens the Waves? Changing Authority in the Environmental Governance of Shipping and Offshore Oil and Gas Production. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, J. (2015). The regionalization of maritime governance: Towards a polycentric governance system for sustainable shipping in the European Union. Ocean & Coastal Management, 117, 23–31.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, J. (2016). Governing the Artic in the era of the Anthropocene: Does corporate authority matter in Arctic shipping governance? In Pattberg, P. and Zelli, F., eds., Environmental Politics and Governance in the Anthropocene; Institutions and Legitimacy in a Complex World. London, New York: Routledge, 127–45.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, J. and van Koppen, C. (2016). Moving sustainable shipping forward. Journal of Sustainable Mobility, 3(2), 42–66.Google Scholar
Vorbach, J. E. (2001). The vital role of non-flag state actors in the pursuit of safer shipping. Ocean Development & International Law, 32(1), 27–42.Google Scholar
Wuisan, L., van Leeuwen, J., and van Koppen, C. S. A. (2012). Greening international shipping through private governance: A case study of the Clean Shipping Project. Marine Policy, 36(1), 165–73.Google Scholar
Yliskylä-Peuralahti, J. and Gritsenko, D. (2014). Binding rules or voluntary actions? A conceptual framework for CSR in shipping. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 13(2), 251–68.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by