Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- Section 1 Introduction
- 1 Integrating ecology and systematics in climate change research
- 2 Climate modelling and deep-time climate change
- 3 The perils of addressing long-term challenges in a short-term world: making descriptive taxonomy predictive
- Section 2 Adaptation, speciation and extinction
- Section 3 Biogeography, migration and ecological niche modelling
- Section 4 Conservation
- Index
- Systematics Association Publications
- Plate section
- References
3 - The perils of addressing long-term challenges in a short-term world: making descriptive taxonomy predictive
from Section 1 - Introduction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 May 2011
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- Section 1 Introduction
- 1 Integrating ecology and systematics in climate change research
- 2 Climate modelling and deep-time climate change
- 3 The perils of addressing long-term challenges in a short-term world: making descriptive taxonomy predictive
- Section 2 Adaptation, speciation and extinction
- Section 3 Biogeography, migration and ecological niche modelling
- Section 4 Conservation
- Index
- Systematics Association Publications
- Plate section
- References
Summary
Abstract
Increased political interest in addressing environmental issues, notably climate change, conservation and landscape restoration, has the potential to strengthen the focus, integration and profile of systematic biology. In particular, it could rescue descriptive taxonomy from its current state of near-extirpation in the developed world. However, exploiting this opportunity will require greater consensus than the systematics community has previously achieved, together with the determination to resist exaggerating the value of existing systematic data and of technological advances such as DNA barcoding and web-based identification. Descriptive taxonomy erects hypotheses of species existence that must be tested using other categories of data if systematics is to become a genuinely predictive enterprise. Prediction followed by recommendations for adaptation and/or mitigation, each essential to address the consequences of climate change, are possible only with good knowledge of the species and ecosystems under scrutiny. Taxonomic data alone are of little value, but, equally, non-taxonomic data are rarely of value in the absence of a taxonomic framework. Instead of seeking shortcuts to, or even substitutes for, taxonomy in the hope of accelerating the rate of superficial species description (and redescription), the climate change challenge is best addressed by obligatorily increasing the rigour required in taxonomic descriptions. This especially requires: (1) escaping from traditional typology by prescribing minimum levels of both morphological and molecular data via obligatory online registration of species; (2) requiring taxonomists to state the species concept(s) employed in each study; (3) improving feedback to taxonomy from identifications performed by non-systematists; and (4) prioritising groups for taxonomic study according to the importance of the questions that the study group can address.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Climate Change, Ecology and Systematics , pp. 67 - 96Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2011
References
, , , . and (2004). Bmp4 and morphological variation of beaks in Darwin's finches. Science, 305, 1462–1465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
., ., . et al. (1993). Abrupt accumulation increase of the Younger Dryas termination in the GISP2 ice core. Nature, 262, 527–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
., , et al. (2004). The evolution of alternative parasitic life histories in large blue butterflies. Nature, 432, 386–390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
. (2000). Phylogeography: the History and Formation of Species. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
and (2008). Global change and biodiversity: future challenges. Biology Letters, 4, 553–555.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
. (2001). Evolution and classification of European orchids: insights from molecular and morphological characters. Journal Europäischer Orchideen, 33, 33–119.Google Scholar
. (2009a). Field-based molecular identification within the next decade? Journal of the Hardy Orchid Society, 6, 31–34.
., ., . and (in press). Contrast in morphological versus molecular divergence between two closely related Eurasian species of Platanthera (Orchidaceae) suggests recent evolution with a strong allometric component. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society.
(2006). Research lab closures to go ahead. BBC News, 13 March 2006. news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/4801814.stm.
, , . et al. (1998). The Web of Life: A Strategy for Systematic Biology in the United Kingdom. London: UK Systematics Forum/Office of Science and Technology.Google Scholar
., and . (2006). Microfabricated bioprocessor for integrated nanoliter-scale Sanger DNA sequencing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 103, 7240–7245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2008). Red Band Needle Blight of Conifers in Britain. Research Note 0002, Forestry Commission.
., , et al. (2005). Tropical tree alpha-diversity: results from a worldwide network of large plots. Biologiske Skrifter Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab, 55, 565–582.Google Scholar
(2009). Elite v-cs fear ‘end of road’ for concentration of research. Times Higher Education (1 January), 4–5.Google Scholar
, , , and , eds. (2002). Assembling the Tree of Life. National Science Foundation.
, ed. (2003). Measuring Biodiversity for Conservation, Policy document 11/03. London: The Royal Society.
., ., . and . (2008). Friends or relatives? Phylogenetics and species delimitation in the controversial European orchid genusOphrys. Annals of Botany, 101, 385–402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and , eds. (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Biodiversity Synthesis. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
(2006). Why taxonomy is fundamental to conserving the plants of this world: a review of E. Leadlay and S. Jury. Taxonomy and plant conservation. The Systematist, 27, 19–21.Google Scholar
, ed. (2007). The Marine Environmental Change Network – Strategy Meeting Report. London: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
, and ., eds. (2006). The Evaluation of Time Series: Their Scientific Value and Contribution to Policy Needs. Plymouth: Marine Biology Association.Google Scholar
, ed. (1998). Evolution, Science, and Society: Evolutionary Biology and the National Research Agenda. American Society of Naturalists [etc.]. www.rci.rutgers.edu/~ecolevol/fulldoc.pdf.
. (1999). A new forest dynamics plot in Belize. Inside the Center of Forest Dynamics, Summer, 2.
. and . (2002). Unpredictable evolution in a 30-year study of Darwin's finches. Science, 296, 707–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. and . (2008). How and Why Species Multiply: The Radiation of Darwin's Finches. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
., ., ., . and (2004). Convergent evolution of Darwin's finches caused by introgressive hybridization and selection. Evolution, 58, 1588–1599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(in press). Field identification of vectors and pathogens of military significance. In Descriptive Taxonomy Serving Biodiversity, ed. and . Systematics Association Special Volume 79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2007). Are Biofuels Sustainable? House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee 1st Report of Session 2007–08, HC76–11. London: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
(2002). What on Earth? The Threat to the Science Underpinning Conservation, House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology Paper 118. London: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
(2008). Systematics and Taxonomy: Follow-up (S. Sutherland, chair). 5th report of Session 2007–08, House of Lords Science and Technology Committee, HL162. London: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
, . and (2008). 4 ± 1.5 °C abrupt warming 11,270 years ago identified from trapped air in Greenland ice. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 268, 397–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2005). Demography of coleopterists and their thoughts on DNA barcoding and the Phylocode, with commentary. Coleopterists Bulletin, 59, 284–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ed. (2007). Automated Taxon Identification in Systematics: Theory, Approaches and Applications. Systematics Association Special Volume 74. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor and Francis.CrossRef
. (1999). The dimensions of life on earth. In Nature and Human Society: The Quest for a Sustainable World, ed. and . Washington DC: National Academy of Sciences, pp. 30–45.Google Scholar
. (1997). A hierarchy of species concepts: the denouement in the saga of the species problem. In Species: the Units of Biodiversity, ed. , and . London: Chapman and Hall, pp. 381–421.Google Scholar
(2008). DNA sequences in taxonomy: opportunities and challenges. In The New Taxonomy, ed. Q. D. Wheeler. Systematics Association Special Volume 76. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 95–127.Google Scholar
., ., et al. (2005). LINNE: Legacy Infrastructure Network for Natural Environments. Champaign, IL: Illinois Natural History Survey.Google Scholar
., ., . et al. (2000). Predicting species diversity in tropical forests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 97, 10850–10854.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (2008). Animal names for all: ICZN, ZooBank and the New Taxonomy. In The New Taxonomy, ed. . Systematics Association Special Volume 76. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 129–141.Google Scholar
., . and . (2002). New Atlas of the British and Irish Flora. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2005). Handheld DNA scanners to ID instantly? National Geographic News, 26 January.
. (2004). The truly new systematics: megascience in the information age. Hydrobiologia, 519, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. (2008). Networks and their role in e-taxonomy. In The New Taxonomy, ed. Q. D. Wheeler. Systematics Association Special Volume 76. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 19–31.CrossRef
(2004). The future of systematics: assembling the tree of life. The Systematist, 23, 2–8.Google Scholar
, , et al. (2006). The Park Grass experiment 1856–2006. Journal of Ecology, 94, 801–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. (2006). Stern Review of the Economics of Climate Change. London: HM Government.
(1994). Systematics Agenda 2000: Charting the Biosphere. New York, NY: Society of Systematic Biologists, American Society of Plant Taxonomists, Willi Hennig Society and Association of Systematics Collections.Google Scholar
, ed. (2008a). The New Taxonomy. Systematics Association Special Volume 76. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.CrossRef
. (2008b). Taxonomic shock and awe. In The New Taxonomy, ed. Q. D. Wheeler. Systematics Association Special Volume 76. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 211–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ., et al. (2008). Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services. Science, 314, 787–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18
- Cited by