Book contents
- Clinical Imaging of Spinal Trauma
- Clinical Imaging of Spinal Trauma
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Section 1 Normal Variants and Mimickers
- Section 2 Recommendations, Pitfalls, and Controversies
- Case 9 When and How to Scan
- Case 10 Role of Plain Films in Spine Trauma
- Case 11 CT Streak Artifacts
- Case 12 Utility of MRI after Negative CT
- Case 13 Stable vs. Unstable Spine Injuries
- Case 14 Whiplash Injury
- Case 15 Findings Likely to Be Missed
- Section 3 Trauma to Uncompromised Spine
- Section 4 Thoracolumbar Trauma Classification
- Section 5 Specifics of Pediatric Spinal Trauma
- Section 6 Trauma to Compromised Spine
- Index
- References
Case 10 - Role of Plain Films in Spine Trauma
from Section 2 - Recommendations, Pitfalls, and Controversies
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2018
Book contents
- Clinical Imaging of Spinal Trauma
- Clinical Imaging of Spinal Trauma
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Section 1 Normal Variants and Mimickers
- Section 2 Recommendations, Pitfalls, and Controversies
- Case 9 When and How to Scan
- Case 10 Role of Plain Films in Spine Trauma
- Case 11 CT Streak Artifacts
- Case 12 Utility of MRI after Negative CT
- Case 13 Stable vs. Unstable Spine Injuries
- Case 14 Whiplash Injury
- Case 15 Findings Likely to Be Missed
- Section 3 Trauma to Uncompromised Spine
- Section 4 Thoracolumbar Trauma Classification
- Section 5 Specifics of Pediatric Spinal Trauma
- Section 6 Trauma to Compromised Spine
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Clinical Imaging of Spinal TraumaA Case-Based Approach, pp. 24 - 25Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Hoffman, JR, Mower, WR, Wolfson, AB, Todd, KH, Zucker, MI. Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study Group. N Engl J Med 2000;343:94–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiell, IG, Wells, GA, Vandemheen, KL, et al. The Canadian C-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. JAMA 2001;286:1841–1848.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, PA, Muchow, RD, Munoz, A, Tontz, WL, Resnick, DK. Clearance of the asymptomatic cervical spine: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Trauma 2010;24:100–106.Google Scholar
Nigrovic, LE, Rogers, AJ, Adelgais, KM, et al. Utility of plain radiographs in detecting traumatic injuries of the cervical spine in children. Pediatr Emerg Care 2012;28:426–432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hernandez, JA, Chupik, C, Swischuk, LE. Cervical spine trauma in children under 5 years: productivity of CT. Emerg Radiol 2004;10:176–178.Google Scholar
Pearce, MS, Salotti, JA, Little, MP, et al. Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2012;380:499–505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mulkens, TH, Marchal, P, Daineffe, S, et al. Comparison of low-dose with standard-dose multidetector CT in cervical spine trauma. AJNR 2007;28:1444–1450.Google Scholar
Becce, F, Ben Salah, Y, Verdun, FR, et al. Computed tomography of the cervical spine: comparison of image quality between a standard-dose and a low-dose protocol using filtered back-projection and iterative reconstruction. Skeletal Radiol 2013;42:937–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar