Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-14T01:21:08.995Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Sociality in Shrimps

from Part I - Invertebrates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2017

By
Kristin Hultgren ,
J. Emmett Duffy  and
Dustin R. Rubenstein
Edited by
Dustin R. Rubenstein  and
Patrick Abbot
Dustin R. Rubenstein
Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York
Patrick Abbot
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University, Tennessee
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Comparative Social Evolution , pp. 224 - 250
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aviles, L. & Purcell, J. (2012) The evolution of inbred social systems in spiders and other organisms: From short-term gains to long-term evolutionary dead ends? Advances in the Study of Behavior, 44, 99–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banner, D. M. & Banner, A. H. (1975) The alpheid shrimp of Australia. Part 2: The genus Synalpheus. Records of the Australian Museum, 29, 267–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banner, A. H. & Banner, D. M. (1981) Annotated checklist of the alpheid shrimp of the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden. Zoologische Verhandelingen, 190, 1–99.Google Scholar
Banner, A. H. & Banner, D. M. (1983) An annotated checklist of the alpheid shrimp from the Western Indian Ocean. Travaux et Documents de l’ORSTOM, 158, 2–164.Google Scholar
Bauer, R. T. (2011) Chemical communication in decapod shrimps: The influence of mating and social systems on the relative importance of olfactory and contact pheromones. In: Breithaupt, T. & Thiel, M. (eds.) Chemical Communication in Crustaceans. New York: Springer, pp. 277–296.Google Scholar
Bertness, M., Garrit, S., & Levings, S. (1981) Predation pressure and gastropod foraging: A tropical-temperate comparison. Evolution, 35, 995–1007.Google ScholarPubMed
Boomsma, J. J. (2007) Kin selection vs. sexual selection: Why the ends do not meet. Current Biology, 17, R673-R683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boomsma, J. J. (2009) Lifetime monogamy and the evolution of eusociality. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 364, 3191–3207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boomsma, J. J. (2013) Beyond promiscuity: Mate-choice commitments in social breeding. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 368, 20120050.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bourke, A. (1999) Colony size, social complexity and reproductive conflict in social insects. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 12, 245–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, A. (1988) Synalpheus dorae, a new commensal alpheid shrimp from the Australian Northwest shelf. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 101, 843–852.Google Scholar
Chace, F. A. J. (1972) The shrimps of the Smithsonian-Bredin Caribbean Expeditions with a summary of the West Indian shallow-water species (Crustacea: Decapoda: Natantia). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 98, 1–179.Google Scholar
Chak, T. C. S, Duffy, J. E., & Rubenstein, D. R. (2015a) Reproductive skew drives patterns of sexual dimorphism in sponge-dwelling snapping shrimps. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 282, 20150342.Google ScholarPubMed
Chak, T. C. S, Rubenstein, D. R., & Duffy, J. E. (2015b) Social control of reproduction and breeding monopolization in the eusocial snapping shrimp Synalpheus elizabethae. The American Naturalist, 186, 660–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chak, S. C., Bauer, R., & Thiel, M. (2015c) Social behaviour and recognition in decapod shrimps, with emphasis on the Caridea. In: Aquiloni, L. & Tricarico, E. (eds.) Social Recognition in Invertebrates, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, pp. 57–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cockburn, A. (2003) Cooperative breeding in oscine passerines: Does sociality inhibit speciation? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 270, 2207–2214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coutière, H. (1909) The American species of snapping shrimps of the genus Synalpheus. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 36, 1–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crespi, B. J. & Mound, L. A. (1997) Ecology and evolution of social behavior among Australian gall thrips and their allies. In: Choe, J. C. & Crespi, B. J. (eds.) The Evolution of Social Behavior in Insects and Arachnids. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 166–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dardeau, M. (1984) Synalpheus shrimps (Crustacea: Decapoda: Alpheidae). I. The Gambarelloides group, with a description of a new species. Memoirs of the Hourglass Cruises, 7 (part 2), 1–125.Google Scholar
Didderen, K., Fransen, C., & deVoogd, N. (2006) Observations on sponge-dwelling colonies of Synalpheus (Decapoda, Alpheidae) of Sulawesi, Indonesia. Crustaceana, 79, 961–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diesel, R. (1997) Maternal control of calcium concentration in the larval nursery of the bromeliad crab, Metopaulias depressus (Grapsidae). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 264, 1403–1406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobkin, S. (1965) The first post-embryonic stage of Synalpheus brooksi Coutière. Bulletin of Marine Science, 15, 450–462.Google Scholar
Dobkin, S. (1969) Abbreviated larval development in caridean shrimps and its significance in the artificial culture of these animals. FAO Fisheries Reports, 57, 935–946.Google Scholar
Duffy, J. E. (1993) Genetic population-structure in two tropical sponge-dwelling shrimps that differ in dispersal potential. Marine Biology, 116, 459–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, J. E. (1996a) Eusociality in a coral-reef shrimp. Nature, 381, 512–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, J. E. (1996b) Species boundaries, specialization, and the radiation of sponge-dwelling Alpheid shrimp. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 58, 307–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, J. E. (1996c) Resource-associated population subdivision in a symbiotic coral-reef shrimp. Evolution, 50, 360–373.Google Scholar
Duffy, J. E. (2003) The ecology and evolution of eusociality in sponge-dwelling shrimp. In: Kikuchi, T., T., Higashi, S. and Azuma, N. (eds.) Genes, Behaviour and Evolution in Social Insects. Sapporo, Japan: University of Hokkaido Press, pp. 1–38.Google Scholar
Duffy, J. E. (2007) Ecology and evolution of eusociality in sponge-dwelling shrimp. In: Duffy, J. E. & Thiel, M. (eds.) Evolutionary Ecology of Social and Sexual Systems: Crustaceans as Model Organisms. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 387–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, J. E. (2010) Social biology of crustacea. In: Breed, M. & Moore, J. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Animal Behavior. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 421–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, J. E. & Thiel, M. (eds). (2007) Evolutionary Ecology of Social and Sexual Systems: Crustaceans as Model Organisms. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, J. E. & Macdonald, K. (1999) Colony structure of the social snapping shrimp Synalpheus filidigitus in Belize. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 19, 283–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, J. E. & Macdonald, K. S. (2010) Kin structure, ecology and the evolution of social organization in shrimp: A comparative analysis. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 277, 1–13.Google ScholarPubMed
Duffy, J. E., Morrison, C., & Rios, R. (2000) Multiple origins of eusociality among sponge-dwelling shrimps (Synalpheus). Evolution, 54, 503–516.Google ScholarPubMed
Duffy, J. E., Morrison, C., & Macdonald, K. (2002) Colony defense and behavioral differentiation in the eusocial shrimp Synalpheus regalis. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 51, 488–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, J. E., Macdonald, K. S. III, Hultgren, K. M., et al. (2013) Decline and local extinction of Caribbean eusocial shrimp. PLOS ONE, 8, e54637.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emlen, S. T. (1982) The evolution of helping. 1. An ecological constraints model. The American Naturalist, 119, 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freestone, A. L., Osman Richard, W., Ruiz, G. M., & Torchin, M. E. (2011) Stronger predation in the tropics shapes species richness patterns in marine communities. Ecology, 92, 983–993.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenwood, P. J. (1980) Mating systems, philopatry and dispersal in birds and mammals. Animal Behaviour, 28, 1140–1162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, W. D. (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 17–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartnoll, R. G. (2001) Growth in crustacea. Hydrobiologia, 449, 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernáez, P., Martínez-Guerrero, B., Anker, A., & Wehrtmann, I. S. (2010) Fecundity and effects of bopyrid infestation on egg production in the Caribbean sponge-dwelling snapping shrimp Synalpheus yano (Decapoda: Alpheidae). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 90, 691–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, M. (1996a) Size assessment via a visual signal in snapping shrimp. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 38, 51–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, M. (1996b) The function of concurrent signals: Visual and chemical communication in snapping shrimp. Animal Behaviour, 52, 247–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, M., Williamson, T., Hollowell, K., & Vickery, R. (2014) Sex and weapons: Contrasting sexual dimorphisms in weaponry and aggression in snapping shrimp. Ethology, 120, 982–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hultgren, K. M. (2014) Variable effects of symbiotic snapping shrimps on their sponge hosts. Marine Biology 161, 1217–1227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hultgren, K. M. & Brandt, A. (2015) Taxonomy and phylogenetics of the Synalpheus paraneptunus-species-complex (Decapoda: Alpheidae), with a description of two new species. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 35, 547–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hultgren, K. M. & Duffy, J. E. (2011) Multi-locus phylogeny of sponge-dwelling snapping shrimp (Caridea: Alpheidae: Synalpheus). supports morphology-based species concepts. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 31, 352–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hultgren, K. M. & Duffy, J. E. (2010) Sponge host characteristics shape the community structure of their shrimp associates. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 407, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hultgren, K. M. & Duffy, J. E. (2012) Phylogenetic community ecology and the role of social dominance in sponge-dwelling shrimp. Ecology Letters, 15, 704–713.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hultgren, K., Macdonald, K. S., & Duffy, J. E. (2010) Sponge-dwelling snapping shrimps of Curaçao, with descriptions of three new species, Zootaxa, 2372, 221–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hultgren, K. M., Macdonald, K. S., & Duffy, J. E. (2011) Sponge-dwelling snapping shrimps (Alpheidae: Synalpheus) of Barbados, West Indies, with a description of a new eusocial species. Zootaxa, 2834, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hultgren, K. M., Hurt, C., & Anker, A. (2014) Phylogenetic relationships within the snapping shrimp genus Synalpheus (Decapoda: Alpheidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 77, 116–125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeffrey, N. W., Hultgren, K. M., Chak, T. C. S, Gregory, T. R., & Rubenstein, D. R. (2016) Patterns of genome size variation in snapping shrimps. Genome, 59, 393–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kakui, K. & Hiruta, C. (2013) Selfing in a malacostracan crustacean: Why a tanaidacean but not decapods. Naturwissenschaften, 100, 891–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karplus, I. & Thompson, A. (2011) The partnership between gobiid fishes and burrowing alpheid shrimps. In: Patzner, R. A., Van Tassell, J. L., Kovacic, M., & Kapoor, B. G. (eds.) The Biology of Gobies. Boca Raton: Science Publishers, pp. 559–608.Google Scholar
Keller, L. & Genoud, M. (1997) Extraordinary lifespans in ants: A test of evolutionary theories of ageing. Nature, 389, 958–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, L. & Perrin, N. (1995) Quantifying the level of eusociality, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 260, 311–315.Google Scholar
Knowlton, N. (1980) Sexual selection and dimorphism in two demes of a symbiotic, pair-bonding snapping shrimp, Evolution, 34, 161–173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koenig, W. D., Pitelka, F. A., Carmen, W. J., Mumme, R. L., & Stanback, M. T. (1992) The evolution of delayed dispersal in cooperative breeders. Quarterly Review of Biology, 67, 111–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Korb, J. (2008) The ecology of social evolution in termites. In: Korb, J. & Heinze, J. (eds.) Ecology of Social Evolution. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 151–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kough, A. S., Paris, C. B., & Butler, M. J. IV. (2013) Larval connectivity and the international management of fisheries. PLOS ONE, 8, e64970.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linsenmair, K. E. (1987) Kin recognition in subsocial arthropods, in particular in the desert isopod Hemilepistus reaumuri. In: Fletcher, D. & Michener, C. (eds.) Kin Recognition in Animals. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., pp. 121–207.Google Scholar
Macdonald, K. S., Rios, R., & Duffy, J. E. (2006) Biodiversity, host specificity, and dominance by eusocial species among sponge-dwelling alpheid shrimp on the Belize Barrier Reef, Diversity and Distributions, 12, 165–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdonald, K. S., Hultgren, K., & Duffy, J. E. (2009) The sponge-dwelling snapping shrimps (Crustacea, Decapoda, Alpheidae, Synalpheus) of Discovery Bay, Jamaica, with descriptions of four new species. Zootaxa, 2199, 1–57.Google Scholar
Martin, J. & Davis, G. (2001) An Updated Classification of the Recent Crustacea. Los Angeles: Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County.Google Scholar
Mathews, L. (2002) Tests of the mate-guarding hypothesis for social monogamy: Does population density, sex ratio, or female synchrony affect behavior of male snapping shrimp (Alpheus angulatus)? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 51, 426–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMurry, S. E., Blum, J. E., & Pawlik, J. R. (2008) Redwood of the reef: Growth and age of the giant barrel sponge Xestospongia muta in the Florida Keys. Marine Biology, 155, 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, C., Rios, R., & Duffy, J. E. (2004) Phylogenetic evidence for an ancient rapid radiation of Caribbean sponge-dwelling snapping shrimps (Synalpheus). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 30, 563–581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nolan, B. & Salmon, N. (1970) The behavior and ecology of snapping shrimp (Crustacea: Alpheus heterochaelis and Alpheus normanni). Forma et Functio, 2, 289–335.Google Scholar
Obermeier, M. & Schmitz, B. (2003) Recognition of dominance in the big-clawed snapping shrimp (Alpheus heterochaelis Say 1818), Part I: Individual or group recognition? Marine and Freshwater Behavior and Physiology, 36, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ory, N. C., Dudgeon, D., Duprey, N., & Thiel, M. (2014) Effects of predation on diel activity and habitat use of the coral-reef shrimp Cinetorhynchus hendersoni (Rhynchocinetidae). Coral Reefs, 33, 639–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawlik, J., Chanas, B., Toonen, R., & Fenical, W. (1995) Defenses of Caribbean sponges against predatory reef fish. 1. Chemical deterrency. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 127, 183–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Queller, D. & Strassmann, J. (1998) Kin selection and social insects, Bioscience, 48, 165–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ríos, R. & Duffy, J. E. (2007) A review of the sponge-dwelling snapping shrimp from Carrie Bow Cay, Belize, with description of Zuzalpheus, new genus, and six new species (Crustacea: Decapoda: Alpheidae). Zootaxa, 1602, 1–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, C.M. (1997) Connectivity and management of Caribbean coral reefs. Science, 278, 1454–1456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubenstein, D. R. (2012) Sexual and social competition: Broadening perspectives by defining female roles. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 367, 2248–2252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubenstein, D. R., McCleery, B., & Duffy, J. E. (2008) Microsatellite development suggests evidence of polyploidy in the social sponge-dwelling snapping shrimp Zuzalpheus brooksi. Molecular Ecology Resources, 8, 890–894.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shellman-Reeve, J. S. (1997) The spectrum of eusociality in termites. In: Choe, J. C. & Crespi, B. J. (eds.) The Evolution of Social Behavior in Insects and Arachnids. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 52–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, P. W., Lacey, E. A., Reeve, H. K., & Keller, L. (1995) The eusociality continuum. Behavioral Ecology, 6, 102–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shuster, S. M. & Wade, M. J. (1991) Equal mating success among male reproductive strategies in a marine isopod. Nature, 350, 608–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spanier, E., Cobb, J. S., & James, M. J. (1993) Why are there no reports of eusocial marine crustaceans? Oikos, 67, 573–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, D. L. & Foster, W. A. (1997) The evolution of sociality in aphids: A clone’s-eye view. In: Choe, J. C. & Crespi, B. J. (eds.) The Evolution of Social Behavior in Insects and Arachnids. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 150–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, S.-J., Rubenstein, D.R., Liu, J.-N., et al. (2014) Climate-mediated cooperation promotes niche expansion in burying beetles. eLife, 3, e02440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tóth, E. & Bauer, R. T. (2007) Gonopore sexing technique allows determination of sex ratios and helper composition in eusocial shrimps. Marine Biology, 151, 1875–1886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tóth, E. & Bauer, R. T. (2008) Synalpheus paraneptunus (Crustacea: Decapoda: Caridea) populations with intersex gonopores: A sexual enigma among sponge-dwelling snapping shrimps. Invertebrate Reproduction and Development, 51, 49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tóth, E. & Duffy, J. E. (2005) Coordinated group response to nest intruders in social shrimp. Biology Letters, 1, 49–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tóth, E. & Duffy, J. E. (2008) Influence of sociality on allometric growth and morphological differentiation in sponge-dwelling alpheid shrimp. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 94, 527–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vehrencamp, S. (1983) Optimal degree of skew in cooperative societies. American Zoologist, 23, 327–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Versluis, M., Schmitz, B., Heydt, , von der, A., & Lohse, D. (2000) How snapping shrimp snap: Through cavitating bubbles. Science, 289, 2114–2117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vollmer, S. V. & Palumbi, S. R. (2007) Restricted gene flow in the Caribbean staghorn coral Acropora cervicornis: Implications for the recovery of endangered reefs. Journal of Heredity, 98, 40–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, E. (1971) The Insect Societies. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University.Google Scholar
Woodward, G., Ebenman, B., Emmerson, M., J., et al. (2005) Body size in ecological networks. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20, 402–409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×