Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T06:22:28.234Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Structuralism, computation, and cognition: The contribution of glossematics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2010

Peter Bxgh Andersen
Affiliation:
Aarhus Universitet, Denmark
Berit Holmqvist
Affiliation:
Aarhus Universitet, Denmark
Jens F. Jensen
Affiliation:
Aalborg University, Denmark
Get access

Summary

This chapter is concerned with the intrinsic semiotic nature of a computer. We shall begin by sketching the principles of the computational paradigm of cognitive science in order to establish the cognitive relevance of the computer. Then we shall show that this cognitive relevance is also semiotically relevant by analyzing the glossematic relations, with particular reference to the “constant” concept. Finally, we shall define a “cognitive virtual machine” that specifies (a part of) the semiotic nature of a computational machine.

For nearly 40 years, the methodology of linguistics has been based on an “epistemology of refutation” (Popper, 1959; Milner, 1989). According to this epistemology, a theory is scientific only to the degree that it can be refuted. This claim can be summed up in the following two points:

  1. (1) The theory must be expressed in unequivocal and calculable terms in order that theoretical descriptions can be submitted to a refutation test.

  2. (2) The theory must contain operational methods for the refutation of hypotheses.

The framework of computer science satisfies these prerequisites in a coherent way: The general theory of formal languages – the principal foundation of computer science – allows a precise formulation of linguistic descriptions, and at the same level of formal analysis (the logico-algebraic level) it provides a device for evaluating linguistic theories, since the computer can process symbolic data automatically.

This epistemological position has pointed linguistic research in a certain direction: It assigns a test function to the computer system, and it forces linguists to choose a certain kind of formal description.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×