Abraham, R., & Ueda, Y. (2000). The Chaos Avant-Garde: Memories of the Early Days of Chaos Theory. Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar

Ackerley, D., Highwood, E. J., & Frame, D. J. (2009). Quantifying the Effects of Perturbing the Physics of an Interactive Sulfur Scheme Using an Ensemble of GCMs on the Climateprediction.net Platform. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 114(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ackerman, F., DeCanio, S. J., Howarth, R. B., & Sheeran, K. (2009). Limitations of Integrated Assessment Models of Climate Change. Climatic Change, 95(3–4), 297–315.Google Scholar

Alexander, K., & Easterbrook, S. M. (2015). The Software Architecture of Climate Models: A Graphical Comparison of CMIP5 and EMICAR5 Configurations. Geoscientific Model Development, 8(4), 1221–1232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allaho, M. Y., & Lee, W. (2015). Analyzing the Social Networks of Contributors in Open Source Software Community. In Kazienko, P. & Chawla, N. (Eds.), Applications of Social Media and Social Network Analysis (pp. 57–75). Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar

Allen, M. R., Frame, D. J., Huntingford, C. et al. (2009). Warming Caused by Cumulative Carbon Emissions towards the Trillionth Tonne. Nature, 458(7242), 1163–1166.Google Scholar

Anonymous. (1963, January). The General Circulation: A Testing Ground. NCAR Quarterly.Google Scholar

Arakawa, A. (2000). A Personal Perspective on the Early Years of General Circulation Modeling at UCLA. In Randall, D. A. (Ed.), General Circulation Model Development: Past, Present, and Future (pp. 1–65). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Arakawa, A., & Lamb, V. R. (1977). Computational Design of the Basic Dynamical Processes of the UCLA General Circulation Model. Methods in Computational Physics: Advances in Research and Applications, 17(1), 173–265.Google Scholar

Archer, D., & Pierrehumbert, R. T. (2011). The Warming Papers. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Armour, K. C., & Roe, G. H. (2011). Climate Commitment in an Uncertain World. Geophysical Research Letters, 38(1), 1–5.Google Scholar

Arnlond, J. R., & Anderson, E. C. (1957). The Distribution of Carbon-14 in Nature. Tellus, 9(1), 28–32.Google Scholar

Arrhenius, S. (1896). On the Influence of Carbonic Acid in the Air upon the Temperature of the Ground. Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 41(251), 237–276.Google Scholar

Arrhenius, S. (1896). Über Den Einfluss Des Atmosphärischen Kohlensäuregehalts auf Die Temperatur Der Erdoberfläche. Appendix to the Papers of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (Bihang till Konglig Svenska Vetenskaps-Akademiens Handlingar), 29(1), 1–102.Google Scholar

Aspray, W. (1990). John von Neumann and the Origins of Modern Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Aumont, O., Ethé, C., Tagliabue, A., Bopp, L., & Gehlen, M. (2015). PISCES-v2: An Ocean Biogeochemical Model for Carbon and Ecosystem Studies. Geoscientific Model Development, 8(8), 2465–2513.Google Scholar

Baker, A. H., Hammerling, D. M., Levy, M. N. et al. (2015). A New Ensemble-Based Consistency Test for the Community Earth System Model (pyCECT v1.0). Geoscientific Model Development, 8(9), 2829–2840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, E. (2007). Hadley Centre Review 2006 Final Report.Google Scholar

Bauer, P., Thorpe, A. J., & Brunet, G. (2015). The Quiet Revolution of Numerical Weather Prediction. Nature, 525(7567), 47–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Beck, K. (2002). Test-Driven Development by Example. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Bender, M. (2013). Paleoclimate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bjerknes, V. (1904). Das Problem der Wettervorhersage, betrachtet vom Standpunkte der Mechanik und der Physik (The Problem of Weather Prediction, Considered from the Viewpoints of Mechanics and Physics). Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 21(1–7), 663–667.Google Scholar

Bolin, B., & Eriksson, E. (1958). Changes in the Carbon Dioxide Content of the Atmosphere and Sea Due to Fossil Fuel Combustion. In Bolin, B. (Ed.), The Atmosphere and the Sea in Motion: Scientific Contributions to the Rossby Memorial Volume 1 (pp. 130–142). New York: Rockefeller Institute Press.Google Scholar

Bony, S., Stevens, B., Held, I. M. et al.(2013). Carbon Dioxide and Climate: Perspectives on a Scientific Assessment. In Ghassem R. Asrar & James W. Hurrell (Eds.), Climate Science for Serving Society (pp. 391–413). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Braconnot, P., Marti, O., & Joussaume, S. (1997). Adjustment and Feedbacks in a Global Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Model. Climate Dynamics, 13(7–8), 507–519.Google Scholar

Brand, S. (1995). How Buildings Learn: What Happens after They’re Built. New York, NY: Viking Press.Google Scholar

Bretherton, F., Fulker, D., Gille, J. et al. (1975). Development and Use of the NCAR GCM. Technical Report No. NCAR-TN/STR-101, National Center for Atmospheric Research.Google Scholar

Broecker, W. S. (1987). Unpleasant Surprises in the Greenhouse? Nature, 328(6126), 123–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, A., Milton, S., Cullen, M. et al. (2012). Unified Modeling and Prediction of Weather and Climate: A 25-Year Journey. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 93(12), 1865–1877.Google Scholar

Brownsword, L., & Clements, P. C. (1996). A Case Study in Successful Product Line Development (No. CMU/SEI-96-TR-016). Pittsburgh: Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar

Bryan, K., Manabe, S., & Pacanowski, R. C. (1975). A Global Ocean-Atmosphere Climate Model. Part II. The Oceanic Circulation. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 5(1), 30–46.Google Scholar

Caesar, L., Rahmstorf, S., Robinson, A., Feulner, G., & Saba, V. (2018). Observed Fingerprint of a Weakening Atlantic Ocean Overturning Circulation. Nature, 556(7700), 191–196.Google Scholar

Callendar, G. S. (1938). The Artificial Production of Carbon Dioxide and Its Influence on Temperature. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 64(1909), 223–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carrington, D. (2022, July 21). Revealed: Oil Sector’s ‘Staggering’ $3bn-a-day Profits for Last 50 years. The Guardian.Google Scholar

Cess, R. D., & Potter, G. L. (1988). A Methodology for Understanding and Intercomparing Atmospheric Climate Feedback Processes in General Circulation Models. Journal of Geophysical Research, 93(D7), 8305.Google Scholar

Cess, R. D., Potter, G. L., Blanchet, J. P. et al. (1989). Interpretation of Cloud-Climate Feedback as Produced by 14 Atmospheric General Circulation Models. Science, 245(4917), 513–516.Google Scholar

Charney, J. G., Arakawa, A., Baker, J., Bolin, B., Dickinson, R. E., Goody, R. M., … Wunsch, C. I. (1979). Carbon Dioxide and Climate: A Scientific Assessment. Washington, DC: US National Academies.Google Scholar

Charney, J. G., & Eliassen, A. (1949). A Numerical Method for Predicting the Perturbations of the Middle Latitude Westerlies. Tellus A, 2, 38–54.Google Scholar

Charney, J. G., Fjörtoft, R., & Neumann, J. Von. (1950). Numerical Integration of the Barotropic Vorticity Equation. Tellus, 2(4), 237–254.Google Scholar

Chassignet, E. P., & Xu, X. (2017). Impact of Horizontal Resolution (1/12° to 1/50°) on Gulf Stream Separation, Penetration, and Variability. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 47(8), 1999–2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cinquini, L., Crichton, D., Mattmann, C. et al. (2014). The Earth System Grid Federation: An Open Infrastructure for Access to Distributed Geospatial Data. Future Generation Computer Systems, 36, 400–417.Google Scholar

Connolley, W. M., & Bracegirdle, T. J. (2007). An Antarctic Assessment of IPCC AR4 Coupled Models. Geophysical Research Letters, 34(22), L22505.Google Scholar

Conway, M. E. (1968). How Do Committees Invent. Datamation, 14(4), 28–31.Google Scholar

Craig, A., Valcke, S., & Coquart, L. (2017). Development and Performance of a New Version of the OASIS Coupler, OASIS3-MCT-3.0. Geoscientific Model Development, 10(9), 3297–3308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craig, H. (1957). The Natural Distribution of Radiocarbon and the Exchange Time of Carbon Dioxide between Atmosphere and Sea. Tellus, 9(1), 1–17.Google Scholar

Crawford, E. (1996). Arrhenius: From Ionic Theory to the Greenhouse Effect. Canton, MA: Science History Publications.Google Scholar

Crutzen, P. J. (2006). Albedo Enhancement by Stratospheric Sulfur Injections: A Contribution to Resolve a Policy Dilemma? Climatic Change, 77(3–4), 211–219.Google Scholar

Cubasch, U., & Cess., R. D. (1990). Processes and Modelling. In Houghton, J. T., Jenkins, G. J., & Ephraums, J. J. (Eds.), Climate Change: The IPCC Scientific Assessment: Report Prepared for Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change by Working Group I (pp. 69–91). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dahan, A. (2010). Putting the Earth System in a Numerical Box? The Evolution from Climate Modeling toward Global Change. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 41(3), 282–292.Google Scholar

Davies, T., Cullen, M. J. P., Malcolm, A. J. et al. (2005). A New Dynamical Core of the Met Office’s Global and Regional Modelling of the Atmosphere. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 131(608), 1759–1782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dennis, J. M., & Loft, R. D. (2011). Refactoring Scientific Applications for Massive Parallelism. In Lauritzen, P., Jablonowski, C., Taylor, M., & Nair, R. (Eds.), Numerical Techniques for Global Atmospheric Models (pp. 539–556). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diacu, F. (1996). The Solution of the N-Body Problem. The Mathematical Intelligencer, 18(3), 66–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doyle, J. (2011). Where Has All the Oil Gone? BP Branding and the Discursive Elimination of Climate Change Risk. In Heffernan, N. & Wragg, D. (Eds.), Culture, Environment and Ecopolitics (pp. 200–225). Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar

Dufresne, J.-L. (2008). La détermination de la constante solaire par Claude Matthias Pouillet. La Météorologie, 8(60), 36.Google Scholar

Dufresne, J.-L. (2009). L’effet de serre: sa découverte, son analyse par la méthode des puissances nettes échangées et les effets de ses variations récentes et futures sur le climat terrestre. Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris.Google Scholar

Dyson, G. (2012). Turing’s Cathedral. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar

Easterbrook, S. M., & Johns, T. C. (2009). Engineering the Software for Understanding Climate Change. Computing in Science & Engineering, 11(6), 65–74.Google Scholar

Edwards, P. N. (1997). Interview of Cecil Leith by Paul Edwards. Niels Bohr Library & Archives. American Institute of Physics, College Park, MD. www.aip.org/history-programs/niels-bohr-library/oral-histories/31392Google Scholar

Edwards, P. N. (1998). Interview of Akira Kasahara by Paul Edwards. Niels Bohr Library & Archives. American Institute of Physics, College Park, MD. www.aip.org/history-programs/niels-bohr-library/oral-histories/32440-1Google Scholar

Edwards, P. N. (2000). A Brief History of Atmospheric General Circulation Modeling. In Randall, D. A. (Ed.), General Circulation Model Development: Past, Present, and Future (Vol. 70, pp. 67–90). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Edwards, P. N. (2010). A Vast Machine: Computer Models, Climate Data, and the Politics of Global Warming. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Ekholm, N. (1901). On the Variations of the Climate of the Geological and Historical Past and Their Causes. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 27(117), 1–62.Google Scholar

England, M. H., Kajtar, J. B., & Maher, N. (2015). Robust Warming Projections Despite the Recent Hiatus. Nature Climate Change, 5(5), 394–396.Google Scholar

Eyring, V., Bony, S., Meehl, G. A. et al. (2016). Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) Experimental Design and Organization. Geoscientific Model Development, 9(5), 1937–1958.Google Scholar

Feldman, D. R., Collins, W. D., Gero, P. J. et al. (2015). Observational Determination of Surface Radiative Forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010. Nature, 519(7543), 339–343.Google Scholar

Ferreira, D., Marshall, J., & Campin, J. M. (2010). Localization of Deep Water Formation: Role of Atmospheric Moisture Transport and Geometrical Constraints on Ocean Circulation. Journal of Climate, 23(6), 1456–1476.Google Scholar

Feyerabend, P. (1975). Against Method: Outline of an Anarchist Theory of Knowledge. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar

Finkbeiner, A. K. (2006). The Jasons: The Secret History of Science’s Postwar Elite. New York, NY: Viking Press.Google Scholar

Fisher, A. (1988). One Model to Fit All. Mosaic, 19(3).Google Scholar

Fishman, C. (1998). They Write the Wight Stuff. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 26(4), 26–31.Google Scholar

Fleming, J. R. (1999). Joseph Fourier, the ‘Greenhouse Effect’, and the Quest for a Universal Theory of Terrestrial Temperatures. Endeavour, 23(2), 72–75.Google Scholar

Foote, E. (1856). Circumstances Affecting the Heat of the Sun’s Rays. American Journal of Art and Science, 23(67), 382–383.Google Scholar

Fourier, J. (1827). On the Temperatures of the Terrestrial Sphere and Interplanetary Space. Mémoires de l’Académie Royale Des Sciences, 7, 569–604.Google Scholar

Frenzen, P. (1993). Interview of Dave Fultz. American Meteorological Society Oral History Project. https://opensky.ucar.edu/islandora/object/archives:7598/Google Scholar

Friedman, R. M. (1993). Appropriating the Weather: Vilhelm Bjerknes and the Construction of a Modern Meteorology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Frigg, R., & Reiss, J. (2009). The Philosophy of Simulation: Hot New Issues or Same Old Stew? Synthese, 169(3), 593–613.Google Scholar

Frölicher, T. L., Sarmiento, J. L., Paynter, D. J. et al. (2015). Dominance of the Southern Ocean in Anthropogenic Carbon and Heat Uptake in CMIP5 Models. Journal of Climate, 28(2), 862–886.Google Scholar

Fultz, D. (1949). A Preliminary Report on Experiments with Thermally Produced Lateral Mixing in a Rotating Hemispherical Shell of Liquid. Journal of Meteorology, 6(1), 17–33.Google Scholar

Gao, Y., Gao, X., & Zhang, X. (2017). The 2 °C Global Temperature Target and the Evolution of the Long-Term Goal of Addressing Climate Change – From the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change to the Paris Agreement. Engineering, 3(2), 272–278.Google Scholar

Garvey, J. (2008). The Ethics of Climate Change: Right and Wrong in a Warming World. London, UK: Continuum International Publishing.Google Scholar

Gates, W. L. (1992). AMIP: The Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 73(12), 1962–1970.Google Scholar

Gleckler, P. J., Randall, D. A., Boer, G. et al. (1995). Cloud-Radiative Effects on Implied Oceanic Energy Transports as Simulated by Atmospheric General Circulation Models. Geophysical Research Letters, 22(7), 791–794.Google Scholar

Gleick, J. (1987). Chaos: Making a New Science. New York, NY: Viking Books.Google Scholar

Grubb, M. (2016). Full Legal Compliance with the Kyoto Protocol’s First Commitment Period – Some Lessons. Climate Policy, 16(6), 673–681.Google Scholar

Hanel, R. A., Conrath, B. J., Kunde, V. G. et al. (1972). The Nimbus 4 Infrared Spectroscopy Experiment: 1. Calibrated Thermal Emission Spectra. Journal of Geophysical Research, 77(15), 2629–2641.Google Scholar

Hansen, J. E., Sato, M., Kharecha, P. et al. (2008). Target Atmospheric CO2: Where Should Humanity Aim? Open Atmospheric Science Journal, 2(15), 217–231.Google Scholar

Harper, K. C. (2008). Weather by the Numbers: The Genesis of Moden Meteorology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Harper, K. C., Doel, R., & Smagorinsky Thompson, T. (2006). Interview of Margaret Smagorinsky. American Meteorological Society Oral History Project. https://opensky.ucar.edu/islandora/object/archives%3A7644Google Scholar

Hausfather, Z., Drake, H. F., Abbott, T., & Schmidt, G. A. (2020). Evaluating the Performance of Past Climate Model Projections. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(1), 2019GL085378.Google Scholar

Hayhoe, K. (2021). Saving Us: A Climate Scientist’s Case for Hope and Healing in a Divided World. Atria/One Signal Publishers.Google Scholar

Hegerl, G. C., Zwiers, F. W., Braconnot, P. et al. (2007). Understanding and Attributing Climate Change. In Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K. B., … Miller, H. L. (Eds.), Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 663–745). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Held, I. M. (2005). The Gap between Simulation and Understanding in Climate Modeling. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 86(11), 1609–1614.Google Scholar

Herraiz, I., Gonzalez-Barahona, J. M., & Robles, G. (2007). Towards a Theoretical Model for Software Growth. In Fourth International Workshop on Mining Software Repositories (MSR’07:ICSE Workshops 2007) (pp. 21–21). IEEE.Google Scholar

Högbom, A. (1894). Om sannolikheten för sekulära förändringar i atmosfärens kolsyrehalt (On the probability of global changes in the level of atmospheric carbon dioxide). Svensk Kemisk Tidskrift (Swedish Chemical Journal), 6, 169–177.Google Scholar

Hourdin, F., Mauritsen, T., Gettelman, A. et al. (2017). The Art and Science of Climate Model Tuning. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 98(3), 589–602.Google Scholar

Hovy, C. (2020). Unittests für die Klimamodellentwicklung. PhD thesis, University of Hamburg.Google Scholar

Howard, P., & Sylvan, D. (2015). Expert Consensus on the Economics of Climate Change. Institute for Policy Integrity, New York, NY: New York University School of Law.Google Scholar

Hurrell, J., Meehl, G. A., Bader, D. et al. (2009). A Unified Modeling Approach to Climate System Prediction. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 90(12), 1819–1832.Google Scholar

IPCC. (2021). Summary for Policymakers. In Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S. L., Péan, C., Berger, S., … Zhou, B. (Eds.), Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 3–32). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

IPCC. (2018). Global Warming of 1.5°C, Summary for Policymakers. Geneva.Google Scholar

IPCC. (1998). Principles Governing IPCC Work. Geneva.Google Scholar

Jackson, S. J., Arbor, A., Ribes, D., & Arbor, A. (2010). Exploring Collaborative Rhythm: Temporal Flow and Alignment in Collaborative Scientific Work. In iConference, 3–6 February, 2010 (245–254). Urbana-Champaign, IL.Google Scholar

Jakob, C. (2010). Accelerating Progress in Global Atmospheric Model Development through Improved Parameterizations. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 91(7), 869–876.Google Scholar

Jouzel, J., Masson-Delmotte, V., Cattani, O. et al. (2007). Orbital and Mmillennial Antarctic Climate Variability Over the Past 800,000 Years. Science (New York, N.Y.), 317(5839), 793–796.Google Scholar

Karl, T., Hassol, S. J., Miller, C. D., & Murray, W. (2006). Temperature Trends in the Lower Atmosphere: Steps for Understanding and Reconciling Differences. Washington, DC: US Climate Change Science Program.Google Scholar

Kasahara, A. (2015). Serendipity: Research Career of One Scientist. NCAR Technical Note NCAR/TN-507+PROC (Vol. 507).Google Scholar

Katzav, J., & Parker, W. S. (2015). The Future of Climate Modeling. Climatic Change, 132(4), 475–487.Google Scholar

Keeling, R. F., Walker, S. J., Piper, S. C., & Bollenbacher, A. F. (2018). Scripps CO2 Program. Retrieved from http://scrippsco2.ucsd.eduGoogle Scholar

Kemp, L., Xu, C., Depledge, J. et al. (2022). Climate Endgame: Exploring Catastrophic Climate Change Scenarios. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(34).Google Scholar

Kikstra, J. S., Waidelich, P., Rising, J. et al. (2021). The Social Cost of Carbon Dioxide Under Climate-Economy Feedbacks and Temperature Variability. Environmental Research Letters, 16(9).Google Scholar

Klein, S. (2020). A Good War: Mobilizing Canada for the Climate Emergency. Toronto, Canada: ECW Press.Google Scholar

Knutti, R., & Rogelj, J. (2015). The Legacy of Our CO2 Emissions: A Clash of Scientific Facts, Politics and Ethics. Climatic Change, 133(3), 361–373.Google Scholar

Knutti, R., Rugenstein, M. A. A., & Hegerl, G. C. (2017). Beyond Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity. Nature Geoscience, 10(10), 727–736.Google Scholar

Knutti, R., & Sedláček, J. (2013). Robustness and Uncertainties in the New CMIP5 Climate Model Projections. Nature Climate Change, 3(4), 369–373.Google Scholar

Lakatos, I. (1976). Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. In Can Theories be Refuted? (pp. 205–259). Dordrecht, Holland: Springer Netherlands.Google Scholar

Lamb, W. F., Mattioli, G., Levi, S. et al. (2020). Discourses of Climate Delay. Global Sustainability, 3, 1–5.Google Scholar

Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Beverly Hills: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar

Laurent, C., Le Treut, H., Fairhead, L., & Dufresne, J.-L. (1998). The Influence of Resolution in Simulating Inter-Annual and Inter-Decadal Variability in a Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere GCM, with Emphasis Over the North Atlantic. Paris: Université Pierre et Marie Curie.Google Scholar

Lawrence, B. N., Rezny, M., Budich, R. et al. (2018). Crossing the Chasm: How to Develop Weather and Climate Models for Next Generation Computers? Geoscientific Model Development, 11(5), 1799–1821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lehner, F., Deser, C., Maher, N. et al. (2020). Partitioning Climate Projection Uncertainty with Multiple Large Ensembles and CMIP5/6. Earth System Dynamics, 11(2), 491–508.Google Scholar

Lenhard, J., & Winsberg, E. (2010). Holism, Entrenchment, and the Future of Climate Model Pluralism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 41(3), 253–262.Google Scholar

Lenton, T. M., Rockström, J., Gaffney, O. et al. (2019). Climate Tipping Points – Too Risky to Bet Against. Nature, 575(7784), 592–595.Google Scholar

Leveson, N. G. (1995). Safeware: System Safety and Computers. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Lewandowsky, S. (2020). Climate Change Disinformation and How to Combat It. Annual Review of Public Health, 42, 1–21.Google Scholar

Lewandowsky, S., Cowtan, K., Risbey, J. S. et al. (2018). The ‘Pause’ in Global Warming in Historical Context: (II). Comparing Models to Observations. Environmental Research Letters, 13(12), 123007.Google Scholar

Lewandowsky, S., Oberauer, K., & Gignac, G. E. (2013). NASA Faked the Moon Landing – Therefore, (Climate) Science Is a Hoax: An Anatomy of the Motivated Rejection of Science. Psychological Science, 24(5), 622–633.Google Scholar

Lewis, J. M. (1993). Meteorologists from the University of Tokyo: Their Exodus to the United States Following World War II. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 74(7), 1351–1360.Google Scholar

Lewis, J. M. (1998). Clarifying the Dynamics of the General Circulation: Phillips’s 1956 Experiment. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 79(1), 39–60.Google Scholar

Li, X., & Peng, X. (2018). Long-Term Integration of a Global Non-Hydrostatic Atmospheric Model on an Aqua Planet. Journal of Meteorological Research, 32(4), 517–533.Google Scholar

Lorenz, E. N. (1963). Deterministic Nonperiodic Flow. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 20(2), 130–141.Google Scholar

Lorenz, E. N. (1993). The Essence of Chaos. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar

Lorenz, E. N. (2006). Reflections on the Conception, Birth, and Childhood of Numerical Weather Prediction. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 34(1), 37–45.Google Scholar

Lozier, M. S. (2010). Deconstructing the Conveyor Belt. Science, 328(5985), 1507–1511.Google Scholar

Lynch, P. (1993). Richardson’s Forecast Factory: the $64,000 Question. The Meteorological Magazine, 122, 69–70.Google Scholar

Lynch, P. (2008). The Origins of Computer Weather Prediction and Climate Modeling. Journal of Computational Physics, 227(7), 3431–3444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2007.02.034CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lynch, P. (2014). The Emergence of Numerical Weather Prediction: Richardson’s Dream. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lynch, P. (2016). An Artist’s Impression of Richardson’s Fantastic Forecast Factory. Weather, 71(1), 14–18.Google Scholar

Lynch, P., & Lynch, O. (2008). Forecasts by PHONIAC. Weather, 63(11), 324–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/wea.241Google Scholar

MacDonald, G., Abarbanel, H., Carruthers, P. et al. (1979). The Long Term Impact of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide on Climate. Technical Report No. JSR-78-07. SRI International.Google Scholar

Machiavelli, N. (1532). The Prince. Antonio Blado d’Asola.Google Scholar

Madec, G. (2008). NEMO Ocean Engine. IPSL Technical Report.Google Scholar

Madey, G., Freeh, V., & Tynan, R. (2002). The Open Source Software Development Phenomenon: An Analysis Based on Social Network Theory. In Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), Vol. 247, pp. 1806–1813.Google Scholar

Maher, N., Milinski, S., Suarez-Gutierrez, L. et al. (2019). The Max Planck Institute Grand Ensemble: Enabling the Exploration of Climate System Variability. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 11(7), 2050–2069.Google Scholar

Manabe, S., & Bryan, K. (1969). Climate Calculations with a Combined Ocean-Atmosphere Model. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 26(4), 786–789.Google Scholar

Manabe, S., & Wetherald, R. T. (1967). Thermal Equilibrium of the Atmosphere with a Given Distribution of Relative Humidity. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 24(3), 241–259.Google Scholar

Manabe, S., & Wetherald, R. T. (1975). The Effects of Doubling the CO2 Concentration on the Climate of a General Circulation Model. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 32(1), 3–15.Google Scholar

Matthews, D., Wilson, G. V., & Easterbrook, S. M. (2008). Configuration Management for Large-Scale Scientific Computing at the UK Met Office. Computing in Science & Engineering, 10(6), 56–64.Google Scholar

Matthews, H. D., & Caldeira, K. (2008). Stabilizing Climate Requires Near-Zero Emissions. Geophysical Research Letters, 35(4), 1–5.Google Scholar

Mauritsen, T., Bader, J., Becker, T. et al. (2019). Developments in the MPI‐M Earth System Model Version 1.2 (MPI‐ESM1.2) and Its Response to Increasing CO 2. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 11(4), 998–1038.Google Scholar

Mauritsen, T., Stevens, B., Roeckner, E. et al. (2012). Tuning the Climate of a Global Model. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 4(3).Google Scholar

McCusker, K. E., Armour, K. C., Bitz, C. M., & Battisti, D. S. (2014). Rapid and Extensive Warming Following Cessation of Solar Radiation Management. Environmental Research Letters, 9(2).Google Scholar

McGuffie, K., & Henderson-Sellers, A. (2005). A Climate Modelling Primer. A Climate Modelling Primer (Vol. 1). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Google Scholar

Meehl, G. A., Boer, G. J., Covey, C., Latif, M., & Stouffer, R. J. (2000). The Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP). Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 81(2), 313–318.Google Scholar

Meehl, G. A., Teng, H., & Arblaster, J. M. (2014). Climate Model Simulations of the Observed Early-2000s Hiatus of Global Warming. Nature Climate Change, 4(10), 898–902.Google Scholar

Meinshausen, M., Meinshausen, N., Hare, W. et al. (2009). Greenhouse-Gas Emission Targets for Limiting Global Warming to 2 Degrees C. Nature, 458(7242), 1158–1162.Google Scholar

Mohr, S. E. (2018). First in Fly. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Möller, F. (1963). On the Influence of Changes in the CO2 Concentration in Air on the Radiation Balance of the Earth’s Surface and on the Climate. Journal of Geophysical Research, 68(13), 3877–3886.Google Scholar

Monnin, E., Indermühle, A., Dällenbach, A. et al. (2001). Atmospheric CO2 Concentrations Over the Last Glacial Termination. Science (New York, N.Y.), 291(5501), 112–114.Google Scholar

Moore, G. E. (2006). Moore’s Law at 40. In Brock, D. C. (Ed.), Understanding Moore’s Law: Four Decades of Innovation (pp. 67–84), Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar

Moss, R. H., Babiker, M., Brinkman, S. et al. (2008). Towards New Scenarios for Analysis of Emissions, Climate Change, Impacts, and Response Strategies: IPCC Expert Meeting Report. IPCC. Geneva.Google Scholar

Moss, R. H., Edmonds, J. A., Hibbard, K. A. et al. (2010). The Next Generation of Scenarios for Climate Change Research and Assessment. Nature, 463(7282), 747–756.Google Scholar

NASA. (1986). Earth System Science. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar

National Academies. (2016). From Maps to Models. From Maps to Models: Augmenting the Nation’s Geospatial Intelligence Capabilities. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar

National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine. (2017). Valuing Climate Changes: Updating Estimation of the Social Cost of Carbon Dioxide. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar

Nebeker, F. (1995). Calculating the Weather. International Geophysical Series (Vol. 60). Academic Press.Google Scholar

Olson, S. (2014). The National Academy of Sciences at 150. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(Supplement_2), 9327–9364.Google Scholar

Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. M. (2010). Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar

Oreskes, N., Shrader-Frechette, K., & Belitz, K. (1994). Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth Sciences. Science, 263(5147), 641.Google Scholar

Ortiz, J. D., & Jackson, R. (2022). Understanding Eunice Foote’s 1856 Experiments: Heat Absorption by Atmospheric Gases. Notes and Records: The Royal Society Journal of the History of Science, 76(1), 67–84.Google Scholar

Parnas, D. L. (1994). Software Aging. In Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Software Engineering (pp. 279–287). IEEE Comput. Soc. Press.Google Scholar

Perrow, C. (1984). Normal Accidents: Living with High Risk Technologies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton university press.Google Scholar

Persson, A. O. (2006). Hadley’s Principle: Understanding and Misunderstanding the Trade Winds. History of Meteorology, 3, 17–42.Google Scholar

Peterson, T. C., Connolley, W. M., & Fleck, J. (2008). The Myth of the 1970s Global Cooling Scientific Consensus. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 89(9), 1325–1337.Google Scholar

Petit, J. R., Basile, I., Leruyuet, A. et al. (1997). Four Climate Cycles in Vostok Ice Core. Nature, 387(6631), 359–360.Google Scholar

Petrov, Y. (2012). Harmony: EEG/MEG Linear Inverse Source Reconstruction in the Anatomical Basis of Spherical Harmonics. PLoS ONE, 7(10).Google Scholar

Pfeffer, R. L., & Chiang, Y. (1967). Two Kinds of Vacillation in Rotating Laboratory Experiments. Monthly Weather Review, 95(2), 75–82.Google Scholar

Phillips, N. A. (1956). The General Circulation of the Atmosphere: A Numerical Experiment. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 82(352), 123–164.Google Scholar

Pierrehumbert, R. T. (2004). Warming the World. Nature, 432(December), 2004.Google Scholar

Pierrehumbert, R. T., & Archer, D. (2011). By the Light of the Silvery Moon. In The Warming Papers: The Scientific Foundation for the Climate Change Forecast (pp. 45–55). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Pindyck, R. S. (2013). Climate Change Policy: What Do the Models Tell Us? Journal of Economic Literature, 51(3), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pipitone, J., & Easterbrook, S. M. (2012). Assessing Climate Model Software Quality: A Defect Density Analysis of Three Models. Geoscientific Model Development, 5(4), 1009–1022.Google Scholar

Plass, G. N. (1956). The Carbon Dioxide Theory of Climatic Change. Tellus A, 8, 140–154. https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v8i2.8969Google Scholar

Plass, G. N. (1956). The Influence of the 15μ Carbon-Dioxide Band on the Atmospheric Infra-Red Cooling Rate. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 82(353), 310–324.Google Scholar

Plass, G. N. (1959). Carbon Dioxide and Climate. Scientific American, 201(1).Google Scholar

Platzman, G. W. (1979). The ENIAC Computations of 1950: Gateway to Numerical Weather Prediction. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 60, 302–312.Google Scholar

Pope, V., & Davies, T. (2002). Testing and Evaluating Atmospheric Climate Models. Computing in Science and Engineering, 4(5), 64–69.Google Scholar

Poynting, J. H. (1907). On Prof. Lowell’s Method for Evaluating the Surface-Temperatures of the Planets; with an Attempt to Represent the Effect of Day and Night on the Temperature of the Earth. Philosophical Magazine, 14(84), 749–760.Google Scholar

Pulkkinen, K., Undorf, S., Bender, F. et al. (2022). The Value of Values in Climate Science. Nature Climate Change, 12(1), 4–6.Google Scholar

Rahmstorf, S. (2002). Ocean Circulation and Climate during the Past 120,000 Years. Nature, 419(6903), 207–214.Google Scholar

Randalls, S. (2010). History of the 2°C Climate Target. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(4), 598–605.Google Scholar

Reason, J. (1997). Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents. London, UK: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar

Reichler, T., & Kim, J. (2008). How Well Do Coupled Models Simulate Today’s Climate? Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 89(3), 303–311.Google Scholar

Revelle, R., Broecker, W. S., Craig, H., Keeling, C. D., & Smagorinsky, J. (1965). Appendix Y4: Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide. In Tukey, J. W. (Ed.), Restoring the Quality of Our Environment. Washington DC.Google Scholar

Revelle, R., & Suess, H. E. (1957). Carbon Dioxide Exchange between Atmosphere and Ocean and the Question of an Increase of Atmospheric CO2 During the Past Decades. Tellus, 9(1), 18–27.Google Scholar

Richardson, L. F. (1922). Weather Prediction by Numerical Processes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rijsberman, F. R., & Swart, R. (1990). Targets and Indicators of Climatic Change. Report of Working Group II of the Advisory Group on Greenhouse Gases. The Stockholm Environment Institute.Google Scholar

Rodhe, H., Charlson, R., & Crawford, E. (1997). Svante Arrhenius and the Greenhouse Effect. Ambio, 26(1), 2–5.Google Scholar

Roeckner, E., Mauritsen, T., Esch, M., & Brokopf, R. (2012). Impact of Melt Ponds on Arctic Sea Ice in Past and Future Climates as Simulated by MPI-ESM. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 4(9).Google Scholar

Rogelj, J., den Elzen, M., Höhne, N. et al. (2016). Paris Agreement Climate Proposals Need a Boost to Keep Warming Well below 2 °C. Nature, 534(7609), 631–639.Google Scholar

Rousset, C., Vancoppenolle, M., Madec, G. et al. (2015). The Louvain-La-Neuve Sea Ice Model LIM3.6: Global and Regional Capabilities. Geoscientific Model Development, 8(10), 2991–3005.Google Scholar

Russell, M., Boulton, G., Clarke, P., Eyton, D., & Norton, J. (2010). The Independent Climate Change E-mails Review. www.cce-review.org/.Google Scholar

Santer, B. D., Wigley, T. M. L., & Taylor, K. E. (2011). The Reproducibility of Observational Estimates of Surface and Atmospheric Temperature Change. Science, 334(6060), 1232–1233.Google Scholar

Schaeffer, M., Hare, W., Rahmstorf, S., & Vermeer, M. (2012). Long-Term Sea-Level Rise Implied by 1.5 °C and 2 °C Warming Levels. Nature Climate Change, 2(12), 867–870.Google Scholar

Schlesinger, M. (1986). Physically Based Modeling and Simulation of Climate and Climatic Change. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 67(49), 1377.Google Scholar

Schleussner, C.-F., Lissner, T. K., Fischer, E. M. et al. (2016). Differential Climate Impacts for Policy-Relevant Limits to Global Warming: The Case of 1.5 °C and 2 °C. Earth System Dynamics, 7(2), 327–351.Google Scholar

Schmidt, G. A. (2005). Water Vapour: Feedback or Forcing? Retrieved from www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2005/04/water-vapour-feedback-or-forcing/Google Scholar

Schmidt, G. A., & Sherwood, S. (2015). A Practical Philosophy of Complex Climate Modelling. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 5(2), 149–169.Google Scholar

Schneider, S. H., & Dickinson, R. E. (1974). Climate Modeling. Reviews of Geophysics, 12(3), 447.Google Scholar

Schneider, T., Teixeira, J., Bretherton, C. S. et al. (2017). Climate Goals and Computing the Future of Clouds. Nature Climate Change, 7(1), 3–5.Google Scholar

Schulte-Uebbing, L., Hansen, G., Hernández, A. M., & Winter, M. (2015). Chapter Scientists in the IPCC AR5-Experience and Lessons Learned. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14(June), 250–256.Google Scholar

Seidel, D. J., Gillett, N. P., Lanzante, J. R., Shine, K. P., & Thorne, P. W. (2011). Stratospheric Temperature Trends: Our Evolving Understanding. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2(4), 592–616.Google Scholar

Serreze, M. C., Barrett, A. P., Stroeve, J. C., Kindig, D. N., & Holland, M. M. (2009). The Emergence of Surface-Based Arctic Amplification. Cryosphere, 3(1), 11–19.Google Scholar

Shackley, S., Risbey, J., Stone, P., & Wynne, B. (1999). Adjusting to Policy Expectations in Climate Change Modeling: An Interdisciplinary Study of Flux Adjustments in Coupled Atmosphere-Ocean General Circulation Models. Stockholm, Sweden: The Stockholm Environment Institute.Google Scholar

Shaw, M., & Garlan, D. (1996). Software Architecture: Perspectives on an Emerging Discipline. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Simpson, I. R., Tilmes, S., Richter, J. H. et al. (2019). The Regional Hydroclimate Response to Stratospheric Sulfate Geoengineering and the Role of Stratospheric Heating. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 124(23), 12587–12616.Google Scholar

Slingo, J., Bates, K., Nikiforakis, N. et al. (2009). Developing the Next-Generation Climate System Models: Challenges and Achievements. Philosophical Transactions. Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences, 367(1890), 815–831.Google ScholarPubMed

Smagorinsky, J. (1983). The Beginnings of Numerical Weather Prediction and General Circulation Modelling: Early Recollections. Advances in Geophysics, 25, 3–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Snyder, C. W. (2016). Evolution of Global Temperature Over the Past Two Million Years. Nature, 18, 1–17.Google Scholar

Soden, B. J., Held, I. M., Colman, R. et al. (2008). Quantifying Climate Feedbacks Using Radiative Kernels. Journal of Climate, 21(14), 3504–3520.Google Scholar

Soden, B. J., Wetherald, R. T., Stenchikov, G. L., & Robock, A. (2002). Global Cooling After the Eruption of Mount Pinatubo: A Test of Climate Feedback by Water Vapor. Science, 296(5568), 727–730.Google Scholar

Solomon, S., Pierrehumbert, R. T., Matthews, H. D., Daniel, J. S., & Friedlingstein, P. (2013). Atmospheric Composition, Irreversible Climate Change, and Mitigation Policy. In Asrar, G. R. & Hurrell, J. W. (Eds.), Climate Science for Serving Society: Research, Modeling and Prediction Priorities (pp. 415–436). Dordrecht, NL: Springer.Google Scholar

Sparrow, S., Millar, R. J., Yamazaki, K. et al. (2018). Finding Ocean States That Are Consistent with Observations from a Perturbed Physics Parameter Ensemble. Journal of Climate, 31(12), 4639–4656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stainforth, D., Allen, M. R., Tredger, E. R., & Smith, L. A. (2007). Confidence, Uncertainty and Decision-Support Relevance in Climate Predictions. Philosophical Transactions. Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences, 365(1857), 2145–2161.Google Scholar

Staniforth, A., & Thuburn, J. (2012). Horizontal Grids for Global Weather and Climate Prediction Models: A Review. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 138(662), 1–26.Google Scholar

Staniforth, A., & Wood, N. (2008). Aspects of the Dynamical Core of a Nonhydrostatic, Deep-Atmosphere, Unified Weather and Climate-Prediction Model☆. Journal of Computational Physics, 227(7), 3445–3464.Google Scholar

Star, S. L. (2010). This is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 35(5), 601–617.Google Scholar

Stern, N. (2016). Current Climate Models Are Grossly Misleading. Nature, 530, 407–409.Google Scholar

Stevens, B., Giorgetta, M., Esch, M. et al. (2013). Atmospheric Component of the MPI-M Earth System Model: ECHAM6. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 5(2), 146–172.Google Scholar

Stocker, T. (2011). Introduction to Climate Modelling. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Strong, J., & Plass, G. N. (1950). The Effect of Pressure Broadening of Spectral Lines on Atmospheric Temperature. The Astrophysical Journal, 112(4), 365.Google Scholar

Supran, G., & Oreskes, N. (2017). Assessing ExxonMobil’s Climate Change Communications (1977–2014). Environmental Research Letters, 12(8), 084019.Google Scholar

Tait, P. G., Buchan, A., Creak, E. W., & Renard, A. (1889). The Voyage of the HMS Challenger: Physics and Chemistry (Thomson, C. W. & Murray, J., Eds.) (Vol. II). London, England: Morrison & Gibb.Google Scholar

Talandier, C., Deshayes, J., Treguier, A. M. et al. (2014). Improvements of Simulated Western North Atlantic Current System and Impacts on the AMOC. Ocean Modelling, 76, 1–19.Google Scholar

Teixeira, M. A. C. (2014). The Physics of Orographic Gravity Wave Drag. Frontiers in Physics, 2(July), 1–24.Google Scholar

Thompson, D. W. J., Kennedy, J. J., Wallace, J. M., & Jones, P. D. (2008). A Large Discontinuity in the Mid-Twentieth Century in Observed Global-Mean Surface Temperature. Nature, 453(7195), 646–649.Google Scholar

Thorpe, A. J., Volkert, D. H., & Ziemianski, M. (2003). The Bjerknes’ Circulation Theorem: A Historical Perspective. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 84(4), 471–480.Google Scholar

Tilmes, S., Richter, J. H., Kravitz, B. et al. (2018). CESM1(WACCM) Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering Large Ensemble Project. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 99(11), 2361–2371.Google Scholar

Tokarska, K. B., Stolpe, M. B., Sippel, S. et al. (2020). Past Warming Trend Constrains Future Warming in CMIP6 Models. Science Advances, 6(12), 1–14.Google Scholar

Tyndall, J. (1861). I. The Bakerian Lecture.—On the Absorption and Radiation of Heat by Gases and Vapours, and on the Physical Connexion of Radiation, Absorption, and Conduction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 151(0), 1–36.Google Scholar

United Nations (1992) United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.Google Scholar

University Committee on Atmospheric Research. (1959). Preliminary Plans for a National Institute for Atmospheric Research. Technical Report, National Center for Atmospheric Research.Google Scholar

Valcke, S., Balaji, V., Craig, A. et al. (2012). Coupling Technologies for Earth System Modelling. Geoscientific Model Development, 5(6), 1589–1596.Google Scholar

Vancoppenolle, M., Fichefet, T., Goosse, H. et al. (2009). Simulating the Mass Balance and Salinity of Arctic and Antarctic Sea ice. 1. Model Description and Validation. Ocean Modelling, 27(1–2), 33–53.Google Scholar

Very, F. W. (1901). Knut Angstrom on Atmospheric Absorption. Monthly Weather Review, 29 June (6), 268.Google Scholar

Walters, D., Boutle, I., Brooks, M. et al. (2017). The Met Office Unified Model Global Atmosphere 6.0/6.1 and JULES Global Land 6.0/6.1 configurations. Geoscientific Model Development, 10(4), 1487–1520.Google Scholar

Wan, H., Giorgetta, M. A., Zängl, G. et al. (2013). The ICON-1.2 Hydrostatic Atmospheric Dynamical Core on Triangular Grids – Part 1: Formulation and Performance of the Baseline Version. Geoscientific Model Development, 6(3), 735–763.Google Scholar

Warner, L. (1985). The National Center for Atmospheric Research: An Architectural Masterpiece. Boulder, CO: The University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (UCAR).Google Scholar

Washington, W. M., Buja, L., & Craig, A. (2009). The Computational Future for Climate and Earth System Models: On the Path to Petaflop and Beyond. Philosophical Transactions. Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences, 367(1890), 833–846.Google Scholar

Washington, W. M., & Meehl, G. A. (1989). Climate Sensitivity Due to Increased CO2: Experiments with a Coupled Atmosphere and Ocean General Circulation Model. Climate Dynamics, 4(1), 1–38.Google Scholar

Weart, S. (1989). Interview of Joseph Smagorinsky by Spencer Weart. Niels Bohr Library & Archives. American Institute of Physics, College Park, MD. www.aip.org/history-programs/niels-bohr-library/oral-histories/5056Google Scholar

Weart, S. (2007). Roger Revelle’s Discovery. Retrieved June 18, 2018, from https://history.aip.org/climate/pdf/Revelle.pdfGoogle Scholar

Weart, S. (2013). Rise of Interdisciplinary Research on Climate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 3657–3664.Google Scholar

Weisman, A. (2007). The World without Us. New York: Thomas Dunne Books.Google Scholar

Weyant, J. P. (2009). A Perspective on Integrated Assessment. Climatic Change, 95(3–4), 317–323.Google Scholar

White, A. A., & Wood, N. (2015). Dynamical Meteorology | Primitive Equations. In Encyclopedia of Atmospheric Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 384–392). Elsevier.Google Scholar

Willett, K., Williams, C., Jolliffe, I. T. et al. (2014). A Framework for Benchmarking of Homogenisation Algorithm Performance on the Global Scale. Geoscientific Instrumentation, Methods and Data Systems, 3(2), 187–200.Google Scholar

Williams, K. D., Copsey, D., Blockley, E. W. et al. (2018). The Met Office Global Coupled Model 3.0 and 3.1 (GC3.0 and GC3.1) Configurations. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 10(2), 357–380.Google Scholar

Williamson, D. L., Kiehl, J. T., Ramanathan, V., Dickinson, R. E., & Hack, J. J. (1987). Description of NCAR Community Climate Model (CCM1) (No. NCAR/TN285+STR). NCAR.Google Scholar

Williamson, D. L. (2007). The Evolution of Dynamical Cores for Global Atmospheric Models. Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan, 85B, 241–269.Google Scholar

Williamson, D. L., Drake, J. B., Hack, J. J., Jakob, R., & Swarztrauber, P. N. (1992). A Standard Test Set for Numerical Approximations to the Shallow Water Equations in Spherical Geometry. Journal of Computational Physics, 102(1), 211–224.Google Scholar

Williamson, D. L., Olson, J. G., & Jablonowski, C. (2009). Two Dynamical Core Formulation Flaws Exposed by a Baroclinic Instability Test Case. Monthly Weather Review, 137(2), 790–796.Google Scholar

Wirth, N. (1995). A Plea for Lean Software. IEEE Computer, 28(2), 64–68.Google Scholar

Xu, J., Gao, Y., Christley, S., & Madey, G. (2005). A Topological Analysis of the Open Source Software Development community. In Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences – 2005 (Vol. 00, pp. 1–10).Google Scholar