de Koning, ME, Scheenen, ME, van der Horn, HJ, Hageman, G, Roks, G, Spikman, JM, et al. Non-hospitalized patients with mild traumatic brain injury: the forgotten minority. J Neurotrauma 2016; 34(1):257–261.Google Scholar

Arciniegas, DB, Frey, KL, Newman, J, Wortzel, HS. Evaluation and management of posttraumatic cognitive impairments. Psychiatr Ann 2010; 40:540–552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pretz, CR, Malec, JF, Hammond, FM. Longitudinal description of the disability rating scale for individuals in the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research traumatic brain injury model systems national database. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013; 94(12):2478–2485.Google Scholar

Alves, W, Macciocchi, SN, Barth, JT. Postconcussive symptoms after uncomplicated mild head injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1993; 8(3):48–59.Google Scholar

Bazarian, JJ, Atabaki, S. Predicting postconcussion syndrome after minor traumatic brain injury. Acad Emerg Med 2001; 8(8):788–795.Google Scholar

Bazarian, JJ, Blyth, B, Mookerjee, S, He, H, McDermott, MP. Sex differences in outcome after mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2010; 27(3):527–539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bazarian, JJ, Wong, T, Harris, M, Leahey, N, Mookerjee, S, Dombovy, M. Epidemiology and predictors of post-concussive syndrome after minor head injury in an emergency population. Brain Inj 1999; 13(3):173–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benson, BW, Meeuwisse, WH, Rizos, J, Kang, J, Burke, CJ. A prospective study of concussions among National Hockey League players during regular season games: the NHL-NHLPA Concussion Program. Can Med Assoc J 2011; 183(8):905–911.Google Scholar

Binder, LM. Persisting symptoms after mild head injury: a review of the postconcussive syndrome. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1986; 8(4):323–346.Google Scholar

Carroll, LJ, Cassidy, JD, Holm, L, Kraus, J, Coronado, VG, the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. Methodological issues and research recommendations for mild traumatic brain injury: the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. J Rehabil Med 2004; (43 Suppl):113–125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dischinger, PC, Ryb, GE, Kufera, JA, Auman, KM. Early predictors of postconcussive syndrome in a population of trauma patients with mild traumatic brain injury. J Trauma 2009; 66(2):289–296; discussion 296–297.Google Scholar

Edna, TH, Cappelen, J. Late post-concussional symptoms in traumatic headinjury. An analysis of frequency and risk factors. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1987; 86(1–2):12–17.Google Scholar

Field, M, Collins, MW, Lovell, MR, Maroon, J. Does age play a role in recovery from sports-related concussion? A comparison of high school and collegiate athletes. J Pediatr 2003; 142(5):546–553.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jacobs, B, Beems, T, Stulemeijer, M, van Vugt, AB, van der Vliet, TM, Borm, GF, et al. Outcome prediction in mild traumatic brain injury: age and clinical variables are stronger predictors than CT abnormalities. J Neurotrauma 2010; 27(4):655–668.Google Scholar

Jotwani, V, Harmon, KG. Postconcussion syndrome in athletes. Curr Sports Med Rep 2010; 9(1):21–26.Google Scholar

King, NS, Kirwilliam, S. Permanent post-concussion symptoms after mild head injury. Brain Inj 2011; 25(5):462–470.Google Scholar

Leininger, S, Strong, CA, Donders, J. Predictors of outcome after treatment of mild traumatic brain injury: a pilot study. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2014; 29(2):109–116.Google Scholar

Luis, CA, Vanderploeg, RD, Curtiss, G. Predictors of postconcussion symptom complex in community dwelling male veterans. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2003; 9(7):1001–1015.Google Scholar

McCauley, SR, Boake, C, Levin, HS, Contant, CF, Song, JX. Postconcussional disorder following mild to moderate traumatic brain injury: anxiety, depression, and social support as risk factors and comorbidities. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2001; 23(6):792–808.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McCrory, P, Meeuwisse, WH, Aubry, M, Cantu, B, Dvorak, J, Echemendia, RJ, et al. Consensus statement on concussion in sport: the 4th International Conference on Concussion in Sport held in Zurich, November 2012. Br J Sports Med 2013; 47(5):250–258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ponsford, J, Willmott, C, Rothwell, A, Cameron, P, Kelly, AM, Nelms, R, et al. Factors influencing outcome following mild traumatic brain injury in adults. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2000; 6(5):568–579.Google Scholar

Scott, KL, Strong, CA, Gorter, B, Donders, J. Predictors of post-concussion rehabilitation outcomes at three-month follow-up. Clin Neuropsychol 2016; 30(1):66–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Silverberg, ND, Gardner, AJ, Brubacher, JR, Panenka, WJ, Li, JJ, Iverson, GL. Systematic review of multivariable prognostic models for mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2015; 32(8):517–526.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wall, PL. Posttraumatic stress disorder and traumatic brain injury in current military populations: a critical analysis. J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc 2012; 18(5):278–298.Google Scholar

Wojcik, SM. Predicting mild traumatic brain injury patients at risk of persistent symptoms in the Emergency Department. Brain Inj 2014; 28(4):422–430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Zemek, RL, Farion, KJ, Sampson, M, McGahern, C. Prognosticators of persistent symptoms following pediatric concussion: a systematic review. JAMA Pediatr 2013; 167(3):259–265.Google Scholar

Johnson, B, Zhang, K, Gay, M, Horovitz, S, Hallett, M, Sebastianelli, W, et al. Alteration of brain default network in subacute phase of injury in concussed individuals: Resting-state fMRI study. NeuroImage 2012; 59: 511–518.Google Scholar

Maines, RP. The technology of orgasm: “hysteria,” the vibrator, and women’s sexual satisfaction. Baltimore, MD: JHU Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garrod, A. The Croonian lectures on inborn errors of metabolism. Delivered before the Royal College of Physicians on June 18th, 23rd, 25th, and 30th (1908). Lancet 172(4427): 1–7; 172(4428): 73–79; 172(4429): 142–148; 172(4430): 214–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garrod, A. Inborn errors of metabolism. London, England: Frowde, Hodder & Stoughton, 1909.Google Scholar

Tator, CH, Davis, HS, Dufort, PA, Tartaglia, MC, Davis, KD, Ebraheem, A, et al. Postconcussion syndrome: demographics and predictors in 221 patients. J Neurosurg 2016; 1–11.Google Scholar

King, NS, Crawford, S, Wenden, FJ, Moss, NE, Wade, DT. The Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire: a measure of symptoms commonly experienced after head injury and its reliability. J Neurol 1995; 242(9):587–592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jennett, B, Bond, M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet 1975; 1(7905):480–484.Google Scholar

Hamilton, B, Granger, C, Sherwin, F, Zielezny, M, Tashman, J. Uniform national data system for medical rehabilitation. In: Fuhrer, M, editor. Rehabilitation outcomes: analysis and measurement. Baltimore, MD: Brookes, 1987, pp. 137–147.Google Scholar

Keith, RA, Granger, CV, Hamilton, BB, Sherwin, FS. The Functional Independence Measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. Adv Clin Rehabil 1987; 1:6–18.Google Scholar

Guide for the Uniform Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation (Adult FIM), version 4.0. Buffalo, NY: State University of New York at Buffalo, 1993.Google Scholar

Corrigan, JD, Smith-Knapp, K, Granger, CV. Validity of the functional independence measure for persons with traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 78(8):828–834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

World Health Organization (WHO). WHODAS II – Disability Assessment Schedule training manual: a guide to administration. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2004. Available from: www.who.int/icidh/whodas/training_man.pdf.Google Scholar

Üstün, TB, Kostanjsek, N, Chatterji, S, Rehm, J. Measuring health and disability: manual for WHO Disability Assessment Schedule WHODAS 2.0. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2010.Google Scholar

Eyres, S, Carey, A, Gilworth, G, Neumann, V, Tennant, A. Construct validity and reliability of the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire. Clin Rehabil 2005; 19(8):878–887.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Achenbach, T. Achenbach system of empirically based assessment (ASEBA). April 12, 2014 [cited 2017 August 17]. Available from: www.aseba.org/adults.html.Google Scholar

Achenbach, TM. Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA): development, findings, theory, and applications. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Center of Children, Youth & Families, 2009.Google Scholar

Achenbach, T, Rescorla, L. Manual for the ASEBA adult forms and profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families, 2003.Google Scholar

Achenbach, TM. Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/4–18 and 1991 profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry, 1991.Google Scholar

Achenbach, TM. Integrative guide to the 1991 CBCL/4–18, YSR, and TRF profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry, 1991.Google Scholar

Achenbach, TM, Becker, A, Döpfner, M, Heiervang, E, Roessner, V, Steinhausen, HC, et al. Multicultural assessment of child and adolescent psychopathology with ASEBA and SDQ instruments: research findings, applications, and future directions. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2008; 49(3):251–275.Google Scholar

Achenbach, TM, Edelbrock, CS. Manual for the Teacher’s Report Form and Teacher Version of Child Behavior Profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry, 1986.Google Scholar

Achenbach, TM, Ruffle, TM. The Child Behavior Checklist and related forms for assessing behavioral/emotional problems and competencies. Pediatr Rev 2000; 21(8):265–271.Google Scholar

Brigidi, BD, Achenbach, TM, Dumenci, L, Newhouse, PA. Broad spectrum assessment of psychopathology and adaptive functioning with the Older Adult Behavior Checklist: a validation and diagnostic discrimination study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2010; 25(11):1177–1185.Google Scholar

Reef, J, Diamantopoulou, S, van Meurs, I, Verhulst, F, van der Ende, J. Predicting adult emotional and behavioral problems from externalizing problem trajectories in a 24-year longitudinal study. J Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2010; 19(7):577–585.Google Scholar

Reef, J, van Meurs, I, Verhulst, FC, van der Ende, J. Children’s problems predict adults’ DSM-IV disorders across 24 years. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2010; 49(11):1117–1124.Google Scholar

Rescorla, L, Achenbach, T, Ivanova, MY, Dumenci, L, Almqvist, F, Bilenberg, N, et al. Behavioral and emotional problems reported by parents of children ages 6 to 16 in 31 societies. J Emot Behav Disord 2007; 15(3):130–142.Google Scholar

National Institutes of Health. NIH Tool Box for the assessment of neurological and behavioral function. 2016. [cited 2017 August 17]. Available from: www.nihtoolbox.org/Pages/default.aspx.Google Scholar

Fayol, P, Carriere, H, Habonimana, D, Dumond, JJ. Preliminary questions before studying mild traumatic brain injury outcome. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2009; 52(6):497–509.Google Scholar

Bearn, AG. Archibald Garrod and the individuality of man. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Teasdale, G, Jennett, B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet 1974; 2(7872):81–84.Google Scholar

Jefferson, G. Notes on cortical localization. Can Med Assoc J 1916; 6(1):30–38.Google Scholar

Sabbatini, RM. Phrenology: the history of brain localization. [Internet]. Brain Mind 1997 [cited 2017 August 17]. Available from: www.cerebromente.org.br/n01/frenolog/frenologia.htm.Google Scholar

Wells, SR. How to read character: a new illustrated hand-book of phrenology and physiognomy, for students and examiners; with a descriptive chart. New York: Samuel R. Wells, 1874.Google Scholar

Brodmann, K. Vergleichende Lokalisationslehre der Grosshirnrinde in ihren Prinzipien dargestellt auf Grund des Zellenbaues [Brodmann’s localization in the cerebral cortex]. Leipzig: Barth, 1909.Google Scholar

von Economo, CF, Koskinas, GN. Die Cytoarchitektonik der Hirnrinde des erwachsenen Menschen [The cyto-architectonics of the cerebral cortex of adult man]. Vienna: Julius Springer, 1925. Edited and translated by Garey, LJ. New York: Springer, 2006.Google Scholar

Auburtin, S. Reprise de la discussion sur la forme et le volume du cerveau [Resuming debate on the shape and volume of the brain]. Bull Soc Anthropol 1861; 2:209–220.Google Scholar

Jefferson, G. The prodromes to cortical localization. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1953; 16(2):59.Google Scholar

Gross, CG. The discovery of motor cortex and its background. J Hist Neurosci 2007; 16(3):320–331.Google Scholar

Hoaken, PC. Monozygotic twins discordant for schizophrenia. Similarities and differences in life patterns. Psychiatr Q 1969; 43(4):612–621.Google Scholar

Reveley, AM, Reveley, MA, Clifford, CA, Murray, RM. Cerebral ventricular size in twins discordant for schizophrenia. Lancet 1982; 1(8271):540–541.Google Scholar

Suddath, RL, Christison, GW, Torrey, EF, Casanova, MF, Weinberger, DR. Anatomical abnormalities in the brains of monozygotic twins discordant for schizophrenia. N Engl J Med 1990; 322(12):789–794.Google Scholar

Kato, T, Iwamoto, K, Kakiuchi, C, Kuratomi, G, Okazaki, Y. Genetic or epigenetic difference causing discordance between monozygotic twins as a clue to molecular basis of mental disorders. Mol Psychiatry 2005; 10(7):622–630.Google Scholar

Machin, G. Non‐identical monozygotic twins, intermediate twin types, zygosity testing, and the non‐random nature of monozygotic twinning: a review. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2009; 151C(2):110–127.Google Scholar

Silva, S, Martins, Y, Matias, A, Blickstein, I. Why are monozygotic twins different? J Perinat Med 2011; 39(2):195–202.Google Scholar

Singh, SM, Murphy, B, O’Reilly, R. Epigenetic contributors to the discordance of monozygotic twins. Clin Genet 2002; 62(2):97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haque, FN, Gottesman, II, Wong, AH. Not really identical: epigenetic differences in monozygotic twins and implications for twin studies in psychiatry. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2009; 151C(2):136–141.Google Scholar

Dempster, EL, Pidsley, R, Schalkwyk, LC, Owens, S, Georgiades, A, Kane, F, et al. Disease-associated epigenetic changes in monozygotic twins discordant for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Hum Mol Genet 2011; 20(24):4786–4796.Google Scholar

Zwijnenburg, PJ, Meijers-Heijboer, H, Boomsma, DI. Identical but not the same: the value of discordant monozygotic twins in genetic research. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2010; 153B(6):1134–1149.Google Scholar

Weinberger, D, Bartley, A, Jones, D, Zigun, J, editors. Regional cortical gyral variations in human monozygotic twins. Soc Neurosci Abstr 1992.Google Scholar

Steinmetz, H, Herzog, A, Huang, Y, Hacklander, T. Discordant brain-surface anatomy in monozygotic twins. N Engl J Med 1994; 331(14):952–953.Google Scholar

Biondi, A, Nogueira, H, Dormont, D, Duyme, M, Hasboun, D, Zouaoui, A, et al. Are the brains of monozygotic twins similar? A three-dimensional MR study. Am J Neuroradiol 1998; 19(7):1361–1367.Google Scholar

Oppenheim, JS, Skerry, JE, Tramo, MJ, Gazzaniga, MS. Magnetic resonance imaging morphology of the corpus callosum in monozygotic twins. Ann Neurol 1989; 26(1):100–104.Google Scholar

Peper, JS, Brouwer, RM, Boomsma, DI, Kahn, RS, Pol, H, Hilleke, E. Genetic influences on human brain structure: a review of brain imaging studies in twins. Hum Brain Mapp 2007; 28(6):464–473.Google Scholar

Schmitt, JE, Eyler, LT, Giedd, JN, Kremen, WS, Kendler, KS, Neale, MC. Review of twin and family studies on neuroanatomic phenotypes and typical neurodevelopment. Twin Res Hum Genet 2007; 10(5):683–694.Google Scholar

Eyler, LT, Chen, CH, Panizzon, MS, Fennema-Notestine, C, Neale, MC, Jak, A, et al. A comparison of heritability maps of cortical surface area and thickness and the influence of adjustment for whole brain measures: a magnetic resonance imaging twin study. Twin Res Hum Genet 2012; 15(3):304–314.Google Scholar

Batouli, SA, Trollor, JN, Wen, W, Sachdev, PS. The heritability of volumes of brain structures and its relationship to age: a review of twin and family studies. Ageing Res Rev 2014; 13:1–9.Google Scholar

Pedersen, NL, Miller, BL, Wetherell, JL, Vallo, J, Toga, AW, Knutson, N, et al. Neuroimaging findings in twins discordant for Alzheimer’s disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 1999; 10(1):51–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jansen, AG, Mous, SE, White, T, Posthuma, D, Polderman, TJ. What twin studies tell us about the heritability of brain development, morphology, and function: a review. Neuropsychol Rev 2015; 25(1):27–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lee, T, Sachdev, P. The contributions of twin studies to the understanding of brain ageing and neurocognitive disorders. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2014; 27(2):122–127.Google Scholar

Eyler, LT, Vuoksimaa, E, Panizzon, MS, Fennema-Notestine, C, Neale, MC, Chen, CH, et al. Conceptual and data-based investigation of genetic influences and brain asymmetry: a twin study of multiple structural phenotypes. J Cogn Neurosci 2014; 26(5):1100–1117.Google Scholar

Yoon, U, Fahim, C, Perusse, D, Evans, AC. Lateralized genetic and environmental influences on human brain morphology of 8-year-old twins. NeuroImage 2010; 53(3):1117–1125.Google Scholar

Brouwer, RM, Mandl, RC, Peper, JS, van Baal, GC, Kahn, RS, Boomsma, DI, et al. Heritability of DTI and MTR in nine-year-old children. NeuroImage 2010; 53(3):1085–1092.Google Scholar

Shen, K-K, Rose, S, Fripp, J, McMahon, KL, de Zubicaray, GI, Martin, NG, et al. Investigating brain connectivity heritability in a twin study using diffusion imaging data. NeuroImage 2014; 100:628–641.Google Scholar

Vuoksimaa, E, Panizzon, MS, Hagler, DJ, Hatton, SN, Fennema‐Notestine, C, Rinker, D, et al. Heritability of white matter microstructure in late middle age: a twin study of tract‐based fractional anisotropy and absolute diffusivity indices. Hum Brain Mapp 2017; 38(4):2026–2036.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Polk, TA, Park, J, Smith, MR, Park, DC. Nature versus nurture in ventral visual cortex: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study of twins. J Neurosci 2007; 27(51):13921–13925.Google Scholar

Matthews, SC, Simmons, AN, Strigo, I, Jang, K, Stein, MB, Paulus, MP. Heritability of anterior cingulate response to conflict: an fMRI study in female twins. NeuroImage 2007; 38(1):223–227.Google Scholar

Silverman, MH, Krueger, RF, Iacono, WG, Malone, SM, Hunt, RH, Thomas, KM. Quantifying familial influences on brain activation during the monetary incentive delay task: an adolescent monozygotic twin study. Biol Psychol 2014; 103:7–14.Google Scholar

Glahn, DC, Winkler, AM, Kochunov, P, Almasy, L, Duggirala, R, Carless, MA, et al. Genetic control over the resting brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010; 107(3):1223–1228.Google Scholar

Spencer, H. The principles of psychology. London: Longman, Brown, Green and Longmans, 1855.Google Scholar

Kenzie, JM, Semrau, JA, Findlater, SE, Yu, AY, Desai, JA, Herter, TM, et al. Localization of impaired kinesthetic processing post-stroke. Front Hum Neurosci 2016; 10:505.Google Scholar

Kambara, T, Brown, EC, Jeong, JW, Ofen, N, Nakai, Y, Asano, E. Spatio-temporal dynamics of working memory maintenance and scanning of verbal information. Clin Neurophysiol 2017; 128(6):882–891.Google Scholar

Ferri, F, Ebisch, SJ, Costantini, M, Salone, A, Arciero, G, Mazzola, V, et al. Binding action and emotion in social understanding. PLoS One 2013; 8(1):e54091.Google Scholar

von Monakow, C. Die Lokalisation im Grosshirn und der Abbau der Funktion durch kortikale Herde [The localization in the cerebrum and the reduction of the function by cortical head]. Wiesbaden: JF Bergmann, 1914.Google Scholar

Bennett, CM, Baird, AA, Miller, MB, Wolford, GL. Neural correlates of interspecies perspective taking in the post-mortem Atlantic Salmon: an argument for multiple comparisons correction [Internet]. 2009. Presented at Organization for Human Brain Mapping Annual Conference, San Francisco [cited 2017 August 17]. Available from: www.wired.com/2009/09/fmrisalmon/.Google Scholar

McGonigle, DJ, Howseman, AM, Athwal, BS, Friston, KJ, Frackowiak, RS, Holmes, AP. Variability in fMRI: an examination of intersession differences. Neuroimage 2000; 11(6 Pt 1):708–734.Google Scholar

Wei, X, Yoo, SS, Dickey, CC, Zou, KH, Guttmann, CR, Panych, LP. Functional MRI of auditory verbal working memory: long-term reproducibility analysis. NeuroImage 2004; 21(3):1000–1008.Google Scholar

Yoo, SS, Wei, X, Dickey, CC, Guttmann, CR, Panych, LP. Long-term reproducibility analysis of fMRI using hand motor task. Int J Neurosci 2005; 115(1):55–77.Google Scholar

Plichta, MM, Schwarz, AJ, Grimm, O, Morgen, K, Mier, D, Haddad, L, et al. Test–retest reliability of evoked BOLD signals from a cognitive-emotive fMRI test battery. NeuroImage 2012; 60(3):1746–1758.Google Scholar

Song, X, Panych, LP, Chou, YH, Chen, NK. A study of long-term fMRI reproducibility using data-driven analysis methods. Int J Imaging Syst Technol 2014; 24(4):339–349.Google Scholar

Pinel, P, Thirion, B, Meriaux, S, Jobert, A, Serres, J, Le Bihan, D, et al. Fast reproducible identification and large-scale databasing of individual functional cognitive networks. BMC Neurosci 2007; 8:91.Google Scholar

Mesulam, MM. Large-scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language, and memory. Ann Neurol 1990; 28(5):597–613.Google Scholar

Mesulam, M-M. Principles of behavioral and cognitive neurology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Mesulam, M. Imaging connectivity in the human cerebral cortex: the next frontier? Ann Neurol 2005; 57(1):5–7.Google Scholar

Ross, ED. Cerebral localization of functions and the neurology of language: fact versus fiction or is it something else? Neuroscientist 2010; 16(3):222–243.Google Scholar

Catani, M, Dell’acqua, F, Bizzi, A, Forkel, SJ, Williams, SC, Simmons, A, et al. Beyond cortical localization in clinico-anatomical correlation. Cortex 2012; 48(10):1262–1287.Google Scholar

Pezawas, L, Verchinski, BA, Mattay, VS, Callicott, JH, Kolachana, BS, Straub, RE, et al. The brain-derived neurotrophic factor Val66Met polymorphism and variation in human cortical morphology. J Neurosci 2004; 24(45):10099–10102.Google Scholar

Dannlowski, U, Kugel, H, Grotegerd, D, Redlich, R, Opel, N, Dohm, K, et al. Disadvantage of social sensitivity: interaction of oxytocin receptor genotype and child maltreatment on brain structure. Biol Psychiatry 2015; 80(5):398–405.Google Scholar

Perrier, E, Pompei, F, Ruberto, G, Vassos, E, Collier, D, Frangou, S. Initial evidence for the role of CACNA1C on subcortical brain morphology in patients with bipolar disorder. Eur Psychiatry 2011; 26(3):135–137.Google Scholar

Sprooten, E, Gupta, CN, Knowles, EE, McKay, DR, Mathias, SR, Curran, JE, et al. Genome-wide significant linkage of schizophrenia-related neuroanatomical trait to 12q24. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2015; 168(8):678–686.Google Scholar

Tavor, I, Parker Jones, O, Mars, RB, Smith, SM, Behrens, TE, Jbabdi, S. Task-free MRI predicts individual differences in brain activity during task performance. Science 2016; 352(6282):216–220.Google Scholar

Hibar, DP, Stein, JL, Renteria, ME, Arias-Vasquez, A, Desrivieres, S, Jahanshad, N, et al. Common genetic variants influence human subcortical brain structures. Nature 2015; 520(7546):224–229.Google Scholar

Beckwith, JG, Chu, JJ, Greenwald, RM. Validation of a noninvasive system for measuring head acceleration for use during boxing competition. J Appl Biomech 2007; 23(3):238–244.Google Scholar

Beckwith, JG, Greenwald, RM, Chu, JJ. Measuring head kinematics in football: correlation between the head impact telemetry system and Hybrid III headform. Ann Biomed Eng 2012; 40(1):237–248.Google Scholar

Greenwald, R, Chu, JJ, Crisco, JJ, Finkelstein, JA. Head impact telemetry system (HITS) for measurement of head acceleration in the field. Lebanon, NH: Simbex, 2003.Google Scholar

Guskiewicz, KM, Mihalik, JP, Shankar, V, Marshall, SW, Crowell, DH, Oliaro, SM, et al. Measurement of head impacts in collegiate football players: relationship between head impact biomechanics and acute clinical outcome after concussion. Neurosurgery 2007; 61(6):1244–1252; discussion 1252–1253.Google Scholar

Duhaime, AC, Beckwith, JG, Maerlender, AC, McAllister, TW, Crisco, JJ, Duma, SM, et al. Spectrum of acute clinical characteristics of diagnosed concussions in college athletes wearing instrumented helmets: clinical article. J Neurosurg 2012; 117(6):1092–1099.Google Scholar

von Holst, H, Li, X. Consequences of the dynamic triple peak impact factor in traumatic brain injury as measured with numerical simulation. Front Neurol 2013; 4:23.Google Scholar

Oeur, RA, Karton, C, Post, A, Rousseau, P, Hoshizaki, TB, Marshall, S, et al. A comparison of head dynamic response and brain tissue stress and strain using accident reconstructions for concussion, concussion with persistent postconcussive symptoms, and subdural hematoma. J Neurosurg 2015; 123(2):415–422.Google Scholar

Post, A, Hoshizaki, TB, Gilchrist, MD, Brien, S, Cusimano, M, Marshall, S. The dynamic response characteristics of traumatic brain injury. Accid Anal Prev 2015; 79:33–40.Google Scholar

Carlsen, RW, Daphalapurkar, NP. The importance of structural anisotropy in computational models of traumatic brain injury. Front Neurol 2015; 6:28.Google Scholar

Giordano, C, Cloots, RJ, van Dommelen, JA, Kleiven, S. The influence of anisotropy on brain injury prediction. J Biomech 2014; 47(5):1052–1059.Google Scholar

Giordano, C, Kleiven, S. Evaluation of axonal strain as a predictor for mild traumatic brain injuries using finite element modeling. Stapp Car Crash J 2014; 58:29–61.Google Scholar

Bohnen, N, Jolles, J. Neurobehavioral aspects of postconcussive symptoms after mild head injury. J Nerv Ment Dis 1992; 180(11):683–692.Google Scholar

Bohnen, N, Twijnstra, A, Jolles, J. Post-traumatic and emotional symptoms in different subgroups of patients with mild head injury. Brain Inj 1992; 6(6):481–487.Google Scholar

Lidvall, HF, Linderoth, B, Norlin, B. Causes of the post-concussional syndrome. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl 1974; 56:3–144.Google Scholar

Rutherford, W. Postconcussion symptoms: relationship to acute neurological indices, individual differences, and circumstances of injury. In: Levin, H, Eisenberg, H, Benton, A, editors. Mild head injury. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989, pp. 217–228.Google Scholar

Adler, A. Mental symptoms following head injury: a statistical analysis of two hundred cases. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 1945; 53(1):34–43.Google Scholar

Dikmen, S, Machamer, J, Fann, JR, Temkin, NR. Rates of symptom reporting following traumatic brain injury. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2010; 16(3):401–411.Google Scholar

Lundin, A, de Boussard, C, Edman, G, Borg, J. Symptoms and disability until 3 months after mild TBI. Brain Inj 2006; 20(8):799–806.Google Scholar

M M. Postcommotionelle Klager. Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1967.Google Scholar

Meares, S, Shores, EA, Taylor, AJ, Batchelor, J, Bryant, RA, Baguley, IJ, et al. The prospective course of postconcussion syndrome: the role of mild traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychology 2011; 25(4):454–465.Google Scholar

Slobounov, S, Sebastianelli, W, Hallett, M. Residual brain dysfunction observed one year post-mild traumatic brain injury: combined EEG and balance study. Clin Neurophysiol 2012; 123(9):1755–1761.Google Scholar

McMahon, P, Hricik, A, Yue, JK, Puccio, AM, Inoue, T, Lingsma, HF, et al. Symptomatology and functional outcome in mild traumatic brain injury: results from the prospective TRACK-TBI study. J Neurotrauma 2014; 31(1):26–33.Google Scholar

Kelly, R. The post-traumatic syndrome: an iatrogenic disease. Forensic Sci 1975; 6(1–2):17–24.Google Scholar

Long, CJ, Novack, TA. Postconcussion symptoms after head trauma: interpretation and treatment. South Med J 1986; 79(6):728–732.Google Scholar

Wallace, AR. Sir Charles Lyell on geological climates and the origin of species. Q Rev 1869; 126(252):359–394.Google Scholar

Colak, T, Cine, N, Bamac, B, Kurtas, O, Ozbek, A, Bicer, U, et al. Microarray-based gene expression analysis of an animal model for closed head injury. Injury 2012; 43(8):1264–1270.Google Scholar

Di Pietro, V, Amin, D, Pernagallo, S, Lazzarino, G, Tavazzi, B, Vagnozzi, R, et al. Transcriptomics of traumatic brain injury: gene expression and molecular pathways of different grades of insult in a rat organotypic hippocampal culture model. J Neurotrauma 2010; 27(2):349–359.Google Scholar

Di Pietro, V, Amorini, AM, Tavazzi, B, Hovda, DA, Signoretti, S, Giza, CC, et al. Potentially neuroprotective gene modulation in an in vitro model of mild traumatic brain injury. Mol Cell Biochem 2013; 375(1–2):185–198.Google Scholar

Giza, CC, Prins, ML, Hovda, DA, Herschman, HR, Feldman, JD. Genes preferentially induced by depolarization after concussive brain injury: effects of age and injury severity. J Neurotrauma 2002; 19(4):387–402.Google Scholar

Lei, P, Li, Y, Chen, X, Yang, S, Zhang, J. Microarray based analysis of microRNA expression in rat cerebral cortex after traumatic brain injury. Brain Res 2009; 1284:191–201.Google Scholar

Michael, DB, Byers, DM, Irwin, LN. Gene expression following traumatic brain injury in humans: analysis by microarray. J Clin Neurosci 2005; 12(3):284–290.Google Scholar

Natale, JE, Ahmed, F, Cernak, I, Stoica, B, Faden, AI. Gene expression profile changes are commonly modulated across models and species after traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2003; 20(10):907–927.Google Scholar

Raghavendra Rao, VL, Dhodda, VK, Song, G, Bowen, KK, Dempsey, RJ. Traumatic brain injury-induced acute gene expression changes in rat cerebral cortex identified by GeneChip analysis. J Neurosci Res 2003; 71(2):208–219.Google Scholar

Rojo, DR, Prough, DS, Falduto, MT, Boone, DR, Micci, MA, Kahrig, KM, et al. Influence of stochastic gene expression on the cell survival rheostat after traumatic brain injury. PLoS One 2011; 6(8):e23111.Google Scholar

Shimamura, M, Garcia, JM, Prough, DS, Dewitt, DS, Uchida, T, Shah, SA, et al. Analysis of long-term gene expression in neurons of the hippocampal subfields following traumatic brain injury in rats. Neuroscience 2005; 131(1):87–97.Google Scholar

Tweedie, D, Rachmany, L, Rubovitch, V, Lehrmann, E, Zhang, Y, Becker, KG, et al. Exendin-4, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist prevents mTBI-induced changes in hippocampus gene expression and memory deficits in mice. Exp Neurol 2013; 239:170–182.Google Scholar

Tweedie, D, Rachmany, L, Rubovitch, V, Zhang, Y, Becker, KG, Perez, E, et al. Changes in mouse cognition and hippocampal gene expression observed in a mild physical- and blast-traumatic brain injury. Neurobiol Dis 2013; 54:1–11.Google Scholar

Tweedie, D, Rachmany, L, Kim, DS, Rubovitch, V, Lehrmann, E, Zhang, Y, et al. Mild traumatic brain injury-induced hippocampal gene expressions: The identification of target cellular processes for drug development. J Neurosci Methods 2016; 272:4–18.Google Scholar

Dardiotis, E, Fountas, KN, Dardioti, M, Xiromerisiou, G, Kapsalaki, E, Tasiou, A, et al. Genetic association studies in patients with traumatic brain injury. Neurosurg Focus 2010; 28(1):e9.Google Scholar

Diaz-Arrastia, R, Baxter, VK. Genetic factors in outcome after traumatic brain injury: what the human genome project can teach us about brain trauma. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2006; 21(4):361–374.Google Scholar

Finnoff, JT, Jelsing, EJ, Smith, J. Biomarkers, genetics, and risk factors for concussion. PM R 2011; 3(10 Suppl 2):S452–S459.Google Scholar

Kurowski, B, Martin, LJ, Wade, SL. Genetics and outcomes after traumatic brain injury (TBI): what do we know about pediatric TBI? J Pediatr Rehabil Med 2012; 5(3):217–231.Google Scholar

McAllister, TW. Genetic factors modulating outcome after neurotrauma. PM R 2010; 2(12 Suppl 2):S241–S252.Google Scholar

Waters, RJ, Nicoll, JA. Genetic influences on outcome following acute neurological insults. Curr Opin Crit Care 2005; 11(2):105–110.Google Scholar

Weaver, SM, Chau, A, Portelli, JN, Grafman, J. Genetic polymorphisms influence recovery from traumatic brain injury. Neuroscientist 2012; 18(6):631–644.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barr, TL, Alexander, S, Conley, Y. Gene expression profiling for discovery of novel targets in human traumatic brain injury. Biol Res Nurs 2011; 13(2):140–153.Google Scholar

Shen, F, Wen, L, Yang, X, Liu, W. The potential application of gene therapy in the treatment of traumatic brain injury. Neurosurg Rev 2007; 30(4):291–298.Google Scholar

Longhi, L, Watson, DJ, Saatman, KE, Thompson, HJ, Zhang, C, Fujimoto, S, et al. Ex vivo gene therapy using targeted engraftment of NGF-expressing human NT2N neurons attenuates cognitive deficits following traumatic brain injury in mice. J Neurotrauma 2004; 21(12):1723–1736.Google Scholar

Watson, DJ, Longhi, L, Lee, EB, Fulp, CT, Fujimoto, S, Royo, NC, et al. Genetically modified NT2N human neuronal cells mediate long-term gene expression as CNS grafts in vivo and improve functional cognitive outcome following experimental traumatic brain injury. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2003; 62(4):368–380.Google Scholar

Yamada, KH, Kozlowski, DA, Seidl, SE, Lance, S, Wieschhaus, AJ, Sundivakkam, P, et al. Targeted gene inactivation of calpain-1 suppresses cortical degeneration due to traumatic brain injury and neuronal apoptosis induced by oxidative stress. J Biol Chem 2012; 287(16):13182–13193.Google Scholar

Kabadi, SV, Stoica, BA, Loane, DJ, Byrnes, KR, Hanscom, M, Cabatbat, RM, et al. Cyclin D1 gene ablation confers neuroprotection in traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2012; 29(5):813–827.Google Scholar

Yao, XL, Liu, J, Lee, E, Ling, GS, McCabe, JT. Progesterone differentially regulates pro- and anti-apoptotic gene expression in cerebral cortex following traumatic brain injury in rats. J Neurotrauma 2005; 22(6):656–668.Google Scholar

Anderson, GD, Farin, FM, Bammler, TK, Beyer, RP, Swan, AA, Wilkerson, HW, et al. The effect of progesterone dose on gene expression after traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2011; 28(9):1827–1843.Google Scholar

Shin, SS, Bales, JW, Yan, HQ, Kline, AE, Wagner, AK, Lyons-Weiler, J, et al. The effect of environmental enrichment on substantia nigra gene expression after traumatic brain injury in rats. J Neurotrauma 2013; 30(4):259–270.Google Scholar

Svenningsson, P, Chergui, K, Rachleff, I, Flajolet, M, Zhang, X, El Yacoubi, M, et al. Alterations in 5-HT1B receptor function by p11 in depression-like states. Science 2006; 311(5757):77–80.Google Scholar

Svenningsson, P, Kim, Y, Warner-Schmidt, J, Oh, YS, Greengard, P. p11 and its role in depression and therapeutic responses to antidepressants. Nat Rev Neurosci 2013; 14(10):673–680.Google Scholar

Warner-Schmidt, JL, Flajolet, M, Maller, A, Chen, EY, Qi, H, Svenningsson, P, et al. Role of p11 in cellular and behavioral effects of 5-HT4 receptor stimulation. J Neurosci 2009; 29(6):1937–1946.Google Scholar

Verhagen, M, van der Meij, A, van Deurzen, PA, Janzing, JG, Arias-Vasquez, A, Buitelaar, JK, et al. Meta-analysis of the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism in major depressive disorder: effects of gender and ethnicity. Mol Psychiatry 2010; 15(3):260–271.Google Scholar

Park, SW, Nhu le, H, Cho, HY, Seo, MK, Lee, CH, Ly, NN, et al. p11 mediates the BDNF-protective effects in dendritic outgrowth and spine formation in B27-deprived primary hippocampal cells. J Affect Disord 2016; 196:1–10.Google Scholar

Warner-Schmidt, JL, Chen, EY, Zhang, X, Marshall, JJ, Morozov, A, Svenningsson, P, et al. A role for p11 in the antidepressant action of brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Biol Psychiatry 2010; 68(6):528–535.Google Scholar

Cordell, HJ. Detecting gene–gene interactions that underlie human diseases. Nat Rev Genet 2009; 10(6):392–404.Google Scholar

Koo, CL, Liew, MJ, Mohamad, MS, Salleh, AH. A review for detecting gene-gene interactions using machine learning methods in genetic epidemiology. Biomed Res Int 2013; 2013:432375.Google Scholar

Rodrigues, SM, Saslow, LR, Garcia, N, John, OP, Keltner, D. Oxytocin receptor genetic variation relates to empathy and stress reactivity in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106(50):21437–21441.Google Scholar

Hostinar, CE, Cicchetti, D, Rogosch, FA. Oxytocin receptor gene polymorphism, perceived social support, and psychological symptoms in maltreated adolescents. Dev Psychopathol 2014; 26(2):465–477.Google Scholar

McQuaid, RJ, McInnis, OA, Stead, JD, Matheson, K, Anisman, H. A paradoxical association of an oxytocin receptor gene polymorphism: early-life adversity and vulnerability to depression. Front Neurosci 2013; 7:128.Google Scholar

Colhoun, HM, McKeigue, PM, Davey Smith, G. Problems of reporting genetic associations with complex outcomes. Lancet 2003; 361(9360):865–872.Google Scholar

Duncan, LE, Keller, MC. A critical review of the first 10 years of candidate gene-by-environment interaction research in psychiatry. Am J Psychiatry 2011; 168(10):1041–1049.Google Scholar

Keller, MC. Gene × environment interaction studies have not properly controlled for potential confounders: the problem and the (simple) solution. Biol Psychiatry 2014; 75(1):18–24.Google Scholar

Lee, JJ, McGue, M. Why behavioral genetics matters: comment on Plomin et al. Perspect Psychol Sci 2016; 11(1):29–30.Google Scholar

Turkheimer, E. Weak genetic explanation 20 years later: reply to Plomin et al. Perspect Psychol Sci 2016; 11(1):24–28.Google Scholar

Hodes, GE, Pfau, ML, Purushothaman, I, Ahn, HF, Golden, SA, Christoffel, DJ, et al. Sex differences in nucleus accumbens transcriptome profiles associated with susceptibility versus resilience to subchronic variable stress. J Neurosci 2015; 35(50):16362–16376.Google Scholar

Le Francois, B, Soo, J, Millar, AM, Daigle, M, Le Guisquet, AM, Leman, S, et al. Chronic mild stress and antidepressant treatment alter 5-HT1A receptor expression by modifying DNA methylation of a conserved Sp4 site. Neurobiol Dis 2015; 82:332–341.Google Scholar

McGowan, PO, Kato, T. Epigenetics in mood disorders. Environ Health Prev Med 2008; 13(1):16–24.Google Scholar

Vialou, V, Feng, J, Robison, AJ, Nestler, EJ. Epigenetic mechanisms of depression and antidepressant action. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2013; 53:59–87.Google Scholar

Zannas, AS, West, AE. Epigenetics and the regulation of stress vulnerability and resilience. Neuroscience 2014; 264:157–170.Google Scholar

Benson, DF. Neuropsychiatry and behavioral neurology: past, present, and future. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 1996; 8(3):351–357.Google Scholar

Hawrylycz, MJ, Lein, ES, Guillozet-Bongaarts, AL, Shen, EH, Ng, L, Miller, JA, et al. An anatomically comprehensive atlas of the adult human brain transcriptome. Nature 2012; 489(7416):391–399.Google Scholar

Pardini, M, Krueger, F, Koenigs, M, Raymont, V, Hodgkinson, C, Zoubak, S, et al. Fatty-acid amide hydrolase polymorphisms and post-traumatic stress disorder after penetrating brain injury. Transl Psychiatry 2012; 2:e75.Google Scholar

Kokiko-Cochran, ON, Ransohoff, L, Veenstra, M, Lee, S, Saber, M, Sikora, M, et al. Altered neuroinflammation and behavior following traumatic brain injury in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurotrauma 2015; 33(7):625–640.Google Scholar

Lynch, JR, Tang, W, Wang, H, Vitek, MP, Bennett, ER, Sullivan, PM, et al. APOE genotype and an ApoE-mimetic peptide modify the systemic and central nervous system inflammatory response. J Biol Chem 2003; 278(49):48529–48533.Google Scholar

Lynch, JR, Wang, H, Mace, B, Leinenweber, S, Warner, DS, Bennett, ER, et al. A novel therapeutic derived from apolipoprotein E reduces brain inflammation and improves outcome after closed head injury. Exp Neurol 2005; 192(1):109–116.Google Scholar

Weng, JF, Chen, J, Hong, WC, Luo, LF, Yu, W, Luo, SD. Plasma visfatin, associated with a genetic polymorphism –1535C>T, is correlated with C-reactive protein in Chinese Han patients with traumatic brain injury. Peptides 2013; 40:8–12.Google Scholar

Acaz-Fonseca, E, Duran, JC, Carrero, P, Garcia-Segura, LM, Arevalo, MA. Sex differences in glia reactivity after cortical brain injury. Glia 2015; doi: 10.1002/glia.22867.Google Scholar

Pardini, M, Krueger, F, Hodgkinson, C, Raymont, V, Ferrier, C, Goldman, D, et al. Prefrontal cortex lesions and MAO-A modulate aggression in penetrating traumatic brain injury. Neurology 2011; 76(12):1038–1045.Google Scholar

Isoniemi, H, Tenovuo, O, Portin, R, Himanen, L, Kairisto, V. Outcome of traumatic brain injury after three decades – relationship to ApoE genotype. J Neurotrauma 2006; 23(11):1600–1608.Google Scholar

Jordan, BD, Relkin, NR, Ravdin, LD, Jacobs, AR, Bennett, A, Gandy, S. Apolipoprotein E epsilon4 associated with chronic traumatic brain injury in boxing. JAMA 1997; 278(2):136–140.Google Scholar

Moran, LM, Taylor, HG, Ganesalingam, K, Gastier-Foster, JM, Frick, J, Bangert, B, et al. Apolipoprotein E4 as a predictor of outcomes in pediatric mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2009; 26(9):1489–1495.Google Scholar

Ponsford, J, McLaren, A, Schonberger, M, Burke, R, Rudzki, D, Olver, J, et al. The association between apolipoprotein E and traumatic brain injury severity and functional outcome in a rehabilitation sample. J Neurotrauma 2011; 28(9):1683–1692.Google Scholar

Teasdale, GM, Nicoll, JA, Murray, G, Fiddes, M. Association of apolipoprotein E polymorphism with outcome after head injury. Lancet 1997; 350(9084):1069–1071.Google Scholar

Willemse-van Son, AH, Ribbers, GM, Hop, WC, van Duijn, CM, Stam, HJ. Association between apolipoprotein-epsilon4 and long-term outcome after traumatic brain injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008; 79(4):426–430.Google Scholar

Zhou, W, Xu, D, Peng, X, Zhang, Q, Jia, J, Crutcher, KA. Meta-analysis of APOE4 allele and outcome after traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2008; 25(4):279–290.Google Scholar

Lendon, CL, Harris, JM, Pritchard, AL, Nicoll, JA, Teasdale, GM, Murray, G. Genetic variation of the APOE promoter and outcome after head injury. Neurology 2003; 61(5):683–685.Google Scholar

Terrell, TR, Bostick, RM, Abramson, R, Xie, D, Barfield, W, Cantu, R, et al. APOE, APOE promoter, and Tau genotypes and risk for concussion in college athletes. Clin J Sport Med 2008; 18(1):10–17.Google Scholar

Garringer, JA, Niyonkuru, C, McCullough, EH, Loucks, T, Dixon, CE, Conley, YP, et al. Impact of aromatase genetic variation on hormone levels and global outcome after severe TBI. J Neurotrauma 2013; 30(16):1415–1425.Google Scholar

Wang, R, Fratiglioni, L, Laukka, EJ, Lovden, M, Kalpouzos, G, Keller, L, et al. Effects of vascular risk factors and APOE epsilon4 on white matter integrity and cognitive decline. Neurology 2015; 84(11):1128–1135.Google Scholar

Al Nimer, F, Strom, M, Lindblom, R, Aeinehband, S, Bellander, BM, Nyengaard, JR, et al. Naturally occurring variation in the glutathione-S-transferase 4 gene determines neurodegeneration after traumatic brain injury. Antioxid Redox Signal 2013; 18(7):784–794.Google Scholar

Chuang, PY, Conley, YP, Poloyac, SM, Okonkwo, DO, Ren, D, Sherwood, PR, et al. Neuroglobin genetic polymorphisms and their relationship to functional outcomes after traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2010; 27(6):999–1006.Google Scholar

Waters, RJ, Murray, GD, Teasdale, GM, Stewart, J, Day, I, Lee, RJ, et al. Cytokine gene polymorphisms and outcome after traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2013; 30(20):1710–1716.Google Scholar

Ariza, M, Matarin, MD, Junque, C, Mataro, M, Clemente, I, Moral, P, et al. Influence of angiotensin-converting enzyme polymorphism on neuropsychological subacute performance in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2006; 18(1):39–44.Google Scholar

McAllister, TW, Flashman, LA, Harker Rhodes, C, Tyler, AL, Moore, JH, Saykin, AJ, et al. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in ANKK1 and the dopamine D2 receptor gene affect cognitive outcome shortly after traumatic brain injury: a replication and extension study. Brain Inj 2008; 22(9):705–714.Google Scholar

Myrga, JM, Failla, MD, Ricker, JH, Dixon, CE, Conley, YP, Arenth, PM, et al. A dopamine pathway gene risk score for cognitive recovery following traumatic brain injury: methodological considerations, preliminary findings, and interactions with sex. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2015; 31(5):e15–e29.Google Scholar

Anderson, GD, Temkin, NR, Dikmen, SS, Diaz-Arrastia, R, Machamer, JE, Farhrenbruch, C, et al. Haptoglobin phenotype and apolipoprotein E polymorphism: relationship to posttraumatic seizures and neuropsychological functioning after traumatic brain injury. Epilepsy Behav 2009; 16(3):501–506.Google Scholar

Ariza, M, Pueyo, R, Matarin Mdel, M, Junque, C, Mataro, M, Clemente, I, et al. Influence of APOE polymorphism on cognitive and behavioural outcome in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2006; 77(10):1191–1193.Google Scholar

Chen, Y, Lomnitski, L, Michaelson, DM, Shohami, E. Motor and cognitive deficits in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice after closed head injury. Neuroscience 1997; 80(4):1255–1262.Google Scholar

Crawford, FC, Vanderploeg, RD, Freeman, MJ, Singh, S, Waisman, M, Michaels, L, et al. APOE genotype influences acquisition and recall following traumatic brain injury. Neurology 2002; 58(7):1115–1118.Google Scholar

Han, SD, Drake, AI, Cessante, LM, Jak, AJ, Houston, WS, Delis, DC, et al. Apolipoprotein E and traumatic brain injury in a military population: evidence of a neuropsychological compensatory mechanism? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007; 78(10):1103–1108.Google Scholar

Kutner, KC, Erlanger, DM, Tsai, J, Jordan, B, Relkin, NR. Lower cognitive performance of older football players possessing apolipoprotein E epsilon4. Neurosurgery 2000; 47(3):651–657; discussion 657–658.Google Scholar

Muller, K, Ingebrigtsen, T, Wilsgaard, T, Wikran, G, Fagerheim, T, Romner, B, et al. Prediction of time trends in recovery of cognitive function after mild head injury. Neurosurgery 2009; 64(4):698–704; discussion 704.Google Scholar

Noe, E, Ferri, J, Colomer, C, Moliner, B, Chirivella, J. APOE genotype and verbal memory recovery during and after emergence from post-traumatic amnesia. Brain Inj 2010; 24(6):886–892.Google Scholar

Ponsford, J, Rudzki, D, Bailey, K, Ng, KT. Impact of apolipoprotein gene on cognitive impairment and recovery after traumatic brain injury. Neurology 2007; 68(8):619–620.Google Scholar

Shadli, RM, Pieter, MS, Yaacob, MJ, Rashid, FA. APOE genotype and neuropsychological outcome in mild-to-moderate traumatic brain injury: a pilot study. Brain Inj 2011; 25(6):596–603.Google Scholar

Krueger, F, Pardini, M, Huey, ED, Raymont, V, Solomon, J, Lipsky, RH, et al. The role of the Met66 brain-derived neurotrophic factor allele in the recovery of executive functioning after combat-related traumatic brain injury. J Neurosci 2011; 31(2):598–606.Google Scholar

McAllister, TW, Tyler, AL, Flashman, LA, Rhodes, CH, McDonald, BC, Saykin, AJ, et al. Polymorphisms in the brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene influence memory and processing speed one month after brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2012; 29(6):1111–1118.Google Scholar

Lipsky, RH, Sparling, MB, Ryan, LM, Xu, K, Salazar, AM, Goldman, D, et al. Association of COMT Val158Met genotype with executive functioning following traumatic brain injury. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2005; 17(4):465–471.Google Scholar

Winkler, EA, Yue, JK, McAllister, TW, Temkin, NR, Oh, SS, Burchard, EG, et al. COMT Val 158 Met polymorphism is associated with nonverbal cognition following mild traumatic brain injury. Neurogenetics 2016; 17(1):31–41.Google Scholar

McAllister, TW, Rhodes, CH, Flashman, LA, McDonald, BC, Belloni, D, Saykin, AJ. Effect of the dopamine D2 receptor T allele on response latency after mild traumatic brain injury. Am J Psychiatry 2005; 162(9):1749–1751.Google Scholar

Wagner, AK, Hatz, LE, Scanlon, JM, Niyonkuru, C, Miller, MA, Ricker, JH, et al. Association of KIBRA rs17070145 polymorphism and episodic memory in individuals with severe TBI. Brain Inj 2012; 26(13–14):1658–1669.Google Scholar

Ost, M, Nylen, K, Csajbok, L, Blennow, K, Rosengren, L, Nellgard, B. Apolipoprotein E polymorphism and gender difference in outcome after severe traumatic brain injury. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2008; 52(10):1364–1369.Google Scholar

Romeiro, RR, Romano-Silva, MA, De Marco, L, Teixeira, AL, Jr., Correa, H. Can variation in aquaporin 4 gene be associated with different outcomes in traumatic brain edema? Neurosci Lett 2007; 426(2):133–134.Google Scholar

Rossi, JL, Todd, T, Daniels, Z, Bazan, NG, Belayev, L. Interferon-stimulated gene 15 upregulation precedes the development of blood–brain barrier disruption and cerebral edema after traumatic brain injury in young mice. J Neurotrauma 2015; 32(14):1101–1108.Google Scholar

Ferguson, S, Mouzon, B, Kayihan, G, Wood, M, Poon, F, Doore, S, et al. Apolipoprotein E genotype and oxidative stress response to traumatic brain injury. Neuroscience 2010; 168(3):811–819.Google Scholar

Sarnaik, AA, Conley, YP, Okonkwo, DO, Barr, TL, Fink, EL, Szabo, C, et al. Influence of PARP-1 polymorphisms in patients after traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2010; 27(3):465–471.Google Scholar

Kerr, ME, Ilyas Kamboh, M, Yookyung, K, Kraus, MF, Puccio, AM, DeKosky, ST, et al. Relationship between apoE4 allele and excitatory amino acid levels after traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Med 2003; 31(9):2371–2379.Google Scholar

Martinez-Lucas, P, Moreno-Cuesta, J, Garcia-Olmo, DC, Sanchez-Sanchez, F, Escribano-Martinez, J, del Pozo, AC, et al. Relationship between the Arg72Pro polymorphism of p53 and outcome for patients with traumatic brain injury. Intens Care Med 2005; 31(9):1168–1173.Google Scholar

Clark, RS, Kochanek, PM, Chen, M, Watkins, SC, Marion, DW, Chen, J, et al. Increases in Bcl-2 and cleavage of caspase-1 and caspase-3 in human brain after head injury. FASEB J 1999; 13(8):813–821.Google Scholar

Graham, SH, Chen, J, Clark, RS. Bcl-2 family gene products in cerebral ischemia and traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2000; 17(10):831–841.Google Scholar

Hoh, NZ, Wagner, AK, Alexander, SA, Clark, RB, Beers, SR, Okonkwo, DO, et al. BCL2 genotypes: functional and neurobehavioral outcomes after severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2010; 27(8):1413–1427.Google Scholar

Hartman, RE, Laurer, H, Longhi, L, Bales, KR, Paul, SM, McIntosh, TK, et al. Apolipoprotein E4 influences amyloid deposition but not cell loss after traumatic brain injury in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci 2002; 22(23):10083–10087.Google Scholar

Johnson, VE, Stewart, W, Smith, DH. Traumatic brain injury and amyloid-beta pathology: a link to Alzheimer’s disease? Nat Rev Neurosci 2010; 11(5):361–370.Google Scholar

Johnson, VE, Stewart, W, Smith, DH. Widespread tau and amyloid-beta pathology many years after a single traumatic brain injury in humans. Brain Pathol 2012; 22(2):142–149.Google Scholar

Johnson, VE, Stewart, W, Graham, DI, Stewart, JE, Praestgaard, AH, Smith, DH. A neprilysin polymorphism and amyloid-beta plaques after traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2009; 26(8):1197–1202.Google Scholar

Jellinger, KA, Paulus, W, Wrocklage, C, Litvan, I. Effects of closed traumatic brain injury and genetic factors on the development of Alzheimer’s disease. Eur J Neurol 2001; 8(6):707–710.Google Scholar

Mauri, M, Sinforiani, E, Bono, G, Cittadella, R, Quattrone, A, Boller, F, et al. Interaction between apolipoprotein epsilon 4 and traumatic brain injury in patients with Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Funct Neurol 2006; 21(4):223–228.Google Scholar

Tanriverdi, F, Taheri, S, Ulutabanca, H, Caglayan, AO, Ozkul, Y, Dundar, M, et al. Apolipoprotein E3/E3 genotype decreases the risk of pituitary dysfunction after traumatic brain injury due to various causes: preliminary data. J Neurotrauma 2008; 25(9):1071–1077.Google Scholar

Crawford, F, Wood, M, Ferguson, S, Mathura, V, Gupta, P, Humphrey, J, et al. Apolipoprotein E-genotype dependent hippocampal and cortical responses to traumatic brain injury. Neuroscience 2009; 159(4):1349–1362.Google Scholar

Han, SH, Chung, SY. Marked hippocampal neuronal damage without motor deficits after mild concussive-like brain injury in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2000; 903:357–365.Google Scholar

Gentleman, SM, Nash, MJ, Sweeting, CJ, Graham, DI, Roberts, GW. Beta-amyloid precursor protein (beta APP) as a marker for axonal injury after head injury. Neurosci Lett 1993; 160(2):139–144.Google Scholar

Leclercq, PD, Murray, LS, Smith, C, Graham, DI, Nicoll, JA, Gentleman, SM. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy in traumatic brain injury: association with apolipoprotein E genotype. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005; 76(2):229–233.Google Scholar

Mannix, R, Meehan, WP, Mandeville, J, Grant, PE, Gray, T, Berglass, J, et al. Clinical correlates in an experimental model of repetitive mild brain injury. Ann Neurol 2013; 74(1):65–75.Google Scholar

Mannix, RC, Zhang, J, Berglass, J, Qui, J, Whalen, MJ. Beneficial effect of amyloid beta after controlled cortical impact. Brain Inj 2013; 27(6):743–748.Google Scholar

Smith, C, Graham, DI, Murray, LS, Stewart, J, Nicoll, JA. Association of APOE e4 and cerebrovascular pathology in traumatic brain injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2006; 77(3):363–366.Google Scholar

Robertson, CS, Gopinath, SP, Valadka, AB, Van, M, Swank, PR, Goodman, JC. Variants of the endothelial nitric oxide gene and cerebral blood flow after severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2011; 28(5):727–737.Google Scholar

Hadjigeorgiou, GM, Paterakis, K, Dardiotis, E, Dardioti, M, Aggelakis, K, Tasiou, A, et al. IL-1RN and IL-1B gene polymorphisms and cerebral hemorrhagic events after traumatic brain injury. Neurology 2005; 65(7):1077–1082.Google Scholar

Tierney, RT, Mansell, JL, Higgins, M, McDevitt, JK, Toone, N, Gaughan, JP, et al. Apolipoprotein E genotype and concussion in college athletes. Clin J Sport Med 2010; 20(6):464–468.Google Scholar

Bush, WS, Moore, JH. Genome-wide association studies. PLoS Comput Biol 2012; 8(12):e1002822.Google Scholar

Hulshoff Pol, HE, Posthuma, D, Baare, WF, De Geus, EJ, Schnack, HG, van Haren, NE, et al. Twin–singleton differences in brain structure using structural equation modelling. Brain 2002; 125(2):384–390.Google Scholar

Capello, AE, Markus, CR. Differential influence of the 5-HTTLPR genotype, neuroticism and real-life acute stress exposure on appetite and energy intake. Appetite 2014; 77:83–93.Google Scholar

Elmore, AL, Nigg, JT, Friderici, KH, Jernigan, K, Nikolas, MA. Does 5HTTLPR genotype moderate the association of family environment with child attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder symptomatology? J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 2016; 45(3):348–360.Google Scholar

Grimm, S, Gartner, M, Fuge, P, Fan, Y, Weigand, A, Feeser, M, et al. Variation in the corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor 1 (CRHR1) gene modulates age effects on working memory. J Psychiatr Res 2015; 61:57–63.Google Scholar

Hsu, DT, Mickey, BJ, Langenecker, SA, Heitzeg, MM, Love, TM, Wang, H, et al. Variation in the corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor 1 (CRHR1) gene influences fMRI signal responses during emotional stimulus processing. J Neurosci 2012; 32(9):3253–3260.Google Scholar

Labermaier, C, Kohl, C, Hartmann, J, Devigny, C, Altmann, A, Weber, P, et al. A polymorphism in the CRHR1 gene determines stress vulnerability in male mice. Endocrinology 2014; 155(7):2500–2510.Google Scholar

Razzoli, M, Domenici, E, Carboni, L, Rantamaki, T, Lindholm, J, Castren, E, et al. A role for BDNF/TrkB signaling in behavioral and physiological consequences of social defeat stress. Genes Brain Behav 2011; 10(4):424–433.Google Scholar

Yu, H, Wang, DD, Wang, Y, Liu, T, Lee, FS, Chen, ZY. Variant brain-derived neurotrophic factor Val66Met polymorphism alters vulnerability to stress and response to antidepressants. J Neurosci 2012; 32(12):4092–4101.Google Scholar

Joeyen-Waldorf, J, Nikolova, YS, Edgar, N, Walsh, C, Kota, R, Lewis, DA, et al. Adenylate cyclase 7 is implicated in the biology of depression and modulation of affective neural circuitry. Biol Psychiatry 2012; 71(7):627–632.Google Scholar

Wagner, KV, Marinescu, D, Hartmann, J, Wang, XD, Labermaier, C, Scharf, SH, et al. Differences in FKBP51 regulation following chronic social defeat stress correlate with individual stress sensitivity: influence of paroxetine treatment. Neuropsychopharmacology 2012; 37(13):2797–2808.Google Scholar

Nievergelt, CM, Maihofer, AX, Mustapic, M, Yurgil, KA, Schork, NJ, Miller, MW, et al. Genomic predictors of combat stress vulnerability and resilience in U.S. marines: a genome-wide association study across multiple ancestries implicates PRTFDC1 as a potential PTSD gene. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2015; 51:459–471.Google Scholar

Santarelli, S, Wagner, KV, Labermaier, C, Uribe, A, Dournes, C, Balsevich, G, et al. SLC6A15, a novel stress vulnerability candidate, modulates anxiety and depressive-like behavior: involvement of the glutamatergic system. Stress 2016; 19(1):83–90.Google Scholar

Hariri, AR, Drabant, EM, Munoz, KE, Kolachana, BS, Mattay, VS, Egan, MF, et al. A susceptibility gene for affective disorders and the response of the human amygdala. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005; 62(2):146–152.Google Scholar

Lesch, KP, Mossner, R. Inactivation of 5HT transport in mice: modeling altered 5HT homeostasis implicated in emotional dysfunction, affective disorders, and somatic syndromes. Handb Exp Pharmacol 2006; (175):417–456.Google Scholar

Pezawas, L, Meyer-Lindenberg, A, Drabant, EM, Verchinski, BA, Munoz, KE, Kolachana, BS, et al. 5-HTTLPR polymorphism impacts human cingulate-amygdala interactions: a genetic susceptibility mechanism for depression. Nat Neurosci 2005; 8(6):828–834.Google Scholar

Mickey, BJ, Zhou, Z, Heitzeg, MM, Heinz, E, Hodgkinson, CA, Hsu, DT, et al. Emotion processing, major depression, and functional genetic variation of neuropeptide Y. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011; 68(2):158–166.Google Scholar

Du, L, Bakish, D, Hrdina, PD. Gender differences in association between serotonin transporter gene polymorphism and personality traits. Psychiatr Genet 2000; 10(4):159–164.Google Scholar

Rujescu, D, Giegling, I, Sato, T, Hartmann, AM, Moller, HJ. Genetic variations in tryptophan hydroxylase in suicidal behavior: analysis and meta-analysis. Biol Psychiatry 2003; 54(4):465–473.Google Scholar

Souery, D, Van Gestel, S, Massat, I, Blairy, S, Adolfsson, R, Blackwood, D, et al. Tryptophan hydroxylase polymorphism and suicidality in unipolar and bipolar affective disorders: a multicenter association study. Biol Psychiatry 2001; 49(5):405–409.Google Scholar

Antypa, N, Souery, D, Tomasini, M, Albani, D, Fusco, F, Mendlewicz, J, et al. Clinical and genetic factors associated with suicide in mood disorder patients. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2016; 266(2):181–193.Google Scholar

Lesch, K-P, Bengel, D, Heils, A, Sabol, SZ, Greenberg, BD, Petri, S, et al. Association of anxiety-related traits with a polymorphism in the serotonin transporter gene regulatory region. Science 1996; 274(5292):1527–1531.Google Scholar

Mazzanti, CM, Lappalainen, J, Long, JC, Bengel, D, Naukkarinen, H, Eggert, M, et al. Role of the serotonin transporter promoter polymorphism in anxiety-related traits. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1998; 55(10):936–940.Google Scholar

Morey, RA, Hariri, AR, Gold, AL, Hauser, MA, Munger, HJ, Dolcos, F, et al. Serotonin transporter gene polymorphisms and brain function during emotional distraction from cognitive processing in posttraumatic stress disorder. BMC Psychiatry 2011; 11:76.Google Scholar

Munafo, MR, Clark, T, Flint, J. Does measurement instrument moderate the association between the serotonin transporter gene and anxiety-related personality traits? A meta-analysis. Mol Psychiatry 2005; 10(4):415–419.Google Scholar

Sen, S, Burmeister, M, Ghosh, D. Meta‐analysis of the association between a serotonin transporter promoter polymorphism (5‐HTTLPR) and anxiety‐related personality traits. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2004; 127(1):85–89.Google Scholar

Greenberg, BD, Li, Q, Lucas, FR, Hu, S, Sirota, LA, Benjamin, J, et al. Association between the serotonin transporter promoter polymorphism and personality traits in a primarily female population sample. Am J Med Genet 2000; 96(2):202–216.Google Scholar

Hu, S, Brody, CL, Fisher, C, Gunzerath, L, Nelson, ML, Sabol, SZ, et al. Interaction between the serotonin transporter gene and neuroticism in cigarette smoking behavior. Mol Psychiatry 2000; 5(2):181–188.Google Scholar

Hennings, A, Zill, P, Rief, W. Serotonin transporter gene promoter polymorphism and somatoform symptoms. J Clin Psychiatry 2009; 70(11):1536–1539.Google Scholar

Genetics of Personality Consortium, de Moor, MH, van den Berg, SM, Verweij, KJ, Krueger, RF, Luciano, M, et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for neuroticism, and the polygenic association with major depressive disorder. JAMA Psychiatry 2015; 72(7):642–650.Google Scholar

Hosang, GM, Shiles, C, Tansey, KE, McGuffin, P, Uher, R. Interaction between stress and the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism in depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med [Internet]. 16 January 2014; [cited 17 August 2017]. Available from: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24433458.Google Scholar

Luciano, M, Huffman, JE, Arias-Vasquez, A, Vinkhuyzen, AA, Middeldorp, CM, Giegling, I, et al. Genome-wide association uncovers shared genetic effects among personality traits and mood states. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2012; 159B(6):684–695.Google Scholar

Okbay, A, Baselmans, BM, De Neve, JE, Turley, P, Nivard, MG, Fontana, MA, et al. Genetic variants associated with subjective well-being, depressive symptoms, and neuroticism identified through genome-wide analyses. Nat Genet 2016; 48(12):1591.Google Scholar

Rietveld, CA, Medland, SE, Derringer, J, Yang, J, Esko, T, Martin, NW, et al. GWAS of 126,559 individuals identifies genetic variants associated with educational attainment. Science 2013; 340(6139):1467–1471.Google Scholar

Ware, EB, Mukherjee, B, Sun, YV, Diez-Roux, AV, Kardia, SL, Smith, JA. Comparative genome-wide association studies of a depressive symptom phenotype in a repeated measures setting by race/ethnicity in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. BMC Genet 2015; 16:118.Google Scholar

Ware, EB, Smith, JA, Mukherjee, B, Lee, S, Kardia, SL, Diez-Roux, AV. Applying novel methods for assessing individual- and neighborhood-level social and psychosocial environment interactions with genetic factors in the prediction of depressive symptoms in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Behav Genet 2016; 46(1):89–99.Google Scholar

Alexander, AL, Lee, JE, Lazar, M, Field, AS. Diffusion tensor imaging of the brain. Neurotherapeutics 2007; 4(3):316–329.Google Scholar

Houlden, H, Greenwood, R. Apolipoprotein E4 and traumatic brain injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2006; 77(10):1106–1107.Google Scholar

Isoniemi, H, Kurki, T, Tenovuo, O, Kairisto, V, Portin, R. Hippocampal volume, brain atrophy, and APOE genotype after traumatic brain injury. Neurology 2006; 67(5):756–760.Google Scholar

Lawrence, DW, Comper, P, Hutchison, MG, Sharma, B. The role of apolipoprotein E episilon (epsilon)-4 allele on outcome following traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Brain Inj 2015; 29(9):1018–1031.Google Scholar

Sundstrom, A, Marklund, P, Nilsson, LG, Cruts, M, Adolfsson, R, Van Broeckhoven, C, et al. APOE influences on neuropsychological function after mild head injury: within-person comparisons. Neurology 2004; 62(11):1963–1966.Google Scholar