Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-qxsvm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-08T04:20:05.912Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Rethinking Political Meritocracy: Selection Plus Two

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Sungmoon Kim
Affiliation:
City University of Hong Kong
Get access

Summary

As we have seen in Chapter 3, an increasing number of scholars who study East Asia have recently begun to argue that political meritocracy understood as rule by the wise and virtuous few is not only suitable for East Asian societies where there remains a strong Confucian tradition of respect for meritocratically chosen political elites, but more fundamentally offers a viable alternative to Western liberal democracy, which is often troubled by a variety of social problems that in their view germinate from liberalism’s rights-based individualism. Though these scholars disagree on how to implement political meritocracy, they concur on two points: the shortcomings of liberal representative democracy and the complexity of contemporary public affairs. First, advocates of political meritocracy argue that the policy of “one person, one vote (OPOV),” the political manifestation of rights-based individualism, ferments political irresponsibility and ultimately erodes the common good because of the unavoidable pressure on politicians, who are predominantly concerned with reelection, pandering to myopic popular opinion. Moreover, they assert that representative democracy, as long as it is OPOV based, is largely incapable of representing the interests of future generations and of the people living outside the national boundary. The second argument is independent of the ills or limitations of liberal representative democracy. Given the sheer complexity of public affairs, it is claimed, “a substantial amount of decision-making power must be placed in the hands of an intellectually agile elite, almost as a functional requirement of modern political societies.... [Hence] a pressing need for ‘brains’ in government.”

No doubt, liberal representative democracy is far from perfect, both as a political ideal and as a social practice. Furthermore, from a practical standpoint, it may not be so prudential to transplant any particular mode of Western-style democracy (note: there are multiple modes of Western liberal democracies) in East Asian soil that is still deeply soaked in communitarian, characteristically Confucian, social mores and habits.

Type
Chapter
Information
Confucian Democracy in East Asia
Theory and Practice
, pp. 179 - 202
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bell, Daniel A. and Li, Chenyang (eds.), The East Asian Challenge for Democracy: Political Meritocracy in Comparative Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bai, Tongdong, “A Mencian Version of Limited Democracy,” Res Publica 14 (2008), 19–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Chenyang, “Equality and Inequality in Confucianism,” Dao 11 (2012), 295–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Daniel A., Beyond Liberal Democracy: Political Thinking for an East Asian Context (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuyen, A. T., “Confucianism and the Idea of Equality,” Asian Philosophy 11 (2001), 61–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, Ruiping, Reconstructionist Confucianism: Rethinking Morality after the West (Dordrecht: Springer, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qing, Jiang, Zhengzhi Rujia: Dangdai Rujia de zhuanxiang, tezhi yu fazhan [Political Confucianism: Contemporary Confucianism’s Challenge, Special Quality, and Development] (Beijing: San lian shu dian, 2003)Google Scholar
Qing, Jiang, A Confucian Constitutional Order: How China’s Ancient Past Can Shape Its Political Future, ed. Bell, Daniel A. and Fan, Ruiping, trans. Ryden, Edmund (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiaoguang, Kang, Renzheng: Zhongguo zhengzhi fazhan de disantiao daolu [Humane Government: A Third Road for the Development of Chinese Politics] (Singapore: Global Publishing, 2005)Google Scholar
Barber, Benjamin R., Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age, 20th anniversary ed. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Chan, Joseph, “Democracy and Meritocracy: Toward a Confucian Perspective,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 34 (2007), 179–93, 188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Nannerl O., Thinking about Leadership (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane, “A ‘Selection Model’ of Political Representation,” Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (2009), 386–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane, “Rethinking Representation,” American Political Science Review 97 (2003), 515–28, 515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, Ruth W. and Keohane, Robert O., “Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics,” American Political Science Review 99 (2005), 29–43, 29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krouse, Richard W., “Two Concepts of Democratic Representation: James and John Stuart Mill,” Journal of Politics 44 (1982), 510–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollack, Mark A., “Delegation, Agency and Agenda-Setting in the European Community,” International Organization 51 (1997), 99–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viroli, Maurizio, Republicanism, trans. Shugaar, Antony (New York: Hill and Wang, 2002)Google Scholar
Miller, David, On Nationality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995)Google Scholar
Tamir, Yael, Liberal Nationalism (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993)Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip, Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997), 143–6Google Scholar
Viroli, Maurizio, For Love of Country: An Essay on Patriotism and Nationalism (Oxford: Clarendon, 1995)Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy, The Dignity of Legislation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander, Madison, James, and Jay, John, The Federalist Papers, ed. Wills, Garry (New York: Bantam Books, 1982), 289Google Scholar
Ames, Roger T. and Rosemont, Henry Jr., The Analects of Confucius: A Philosophical Translation (New York: Ballantine Books, 1998)Google Scholar
Hahm, Chaihark, “Ritual and Constitutionalism: Disputing the Ruler’s Legitimacy in a Confucian Polity,” American Journal of Comparative Law 57 (2009), 135–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, Jaeyoon, “The Zhou Li and Constitutionalism: A Southern Song Political Theory,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 36 (2009), 423–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Sungmoon, “Confucian Constitutionalism: Mencius and Xunzi on Virtue, Ritual, and Royal Transmission,” Review of Politics 73 (2011), 371–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mencius, trans. Lau, D. C. (New York: Penguin, 1970)
Galston, William A., “Pluralism and Civic Virtue,” Social Theory and Practice 33 (2007), 625–35, 625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Sungmoon, “Trouble with Korean Confucianism: Scholar-Official between Ideal and Reality,” Dao 8 (2009), 29–48Google Scholar
Angle, Stephen C., Contemporary Confucian Political Philosophy: Toward Progressive Confucianism (Cambridge: Polity, 2012), 37–41Google Scholar
Kim, Sungmoon, “The Secret of Confucian Wuwei Statecraft: Mencius’s Political Theory of Responsibility,” Asian Philosophy 20 (2010), 27–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiwald, Justin, “A Right of Rebellion in the Mengzi?,” Dao 7 (2008), 269–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bary, Theodore de, The Liberal Tradition in China (New York: Columbia University Press, 1983)Google Scholar
Bol, Peter K., Neo-Confucianism in History (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Seung-Hwan, “The Concept of Gong in Traditional Korea and Its Modern Transformations,” Korea Journal 43 (2003), 137–63, esp. 140–49Google Scholar
Fearon, James D., “Electoral Accountability and the Control of Politicians: Selecting Good Types versus Sanctioning Poor Performance,” in Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, ed. Przeworski, Adam, Stokes, Susan C., and Manin, Bernard (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), 55–97, 56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla, Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics (New York: Routledge, 1992)Google Scholar
Barber, Benjamin R., The Conquest of Politics: Liberal Philosophy in Democratic Times (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988)Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane, “Everyday Talk in the Deliberative System,” in Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement, ed. Macedo, Stephen (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999)Google Scholar
Ling, L. H. M. and Shih, Chih-yu, “Confucianism with a Liberal Face: The Meaning of Democratic Politics in Postcolonial Taiwan,” Review of Politics 60 (1998), 55–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dallmayr, Fred, “Exiting Liberal Democracy: Bell and Confucian Thought,” Philosophy East and West 59 (2009), 524–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villa, Dana, Public Freedom (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008)Google Scholar
Pitkin’s, Hannah F. classic, The Concept of Representation (Berkeley: University of California Press, [1967] 1972), 55ffGoogle Scholar
Jenco, Leigh K., “‘Rule by Man’ and ‘Rule by Law’ in Early Republican China: Contributions to a Theoretical Debate,” Journal of Asian Studies 69 (2010), 181–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×