Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-lvtdw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-31T12:55:11.055Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2009

David Dyzenhaus
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Constitution of Law
Legality in a Time of Emergency
, pp. 234 - 241
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, Bruce, ‘The Emergency Constitution’ (2004) 113 Yale Law Journal1029–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agamben, Girgio, State of Exception; translated by Kevin Attell (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2005, first published in 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexy, Robert, ‘A Defence of Radbruch's Formula’ in Dyzenhaus, David (ed.), Recrafting the Rule of Law: The Limits of Legal Order (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1999), 15–39Google Scholar
Allan, T. R. S., Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Aronson, Mark, Dyer, Bruce and Groves, Matthew, Judicial Review of Administrative Action (3rd edn, Sydney: Lawbook Co., 2004)Google Scholar
Arthurs, H. W., ‘Rethinking Administrative Law: A Slightly Dicey Business’ (1979) 17 Osgoode Hall Law Journal1–45Google Scholar
Austin, John, Lectures on Jurisprudence (5th edn, London: John Murray, 1885), vol. IIGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Alexander M., The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics (2nd edn, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986)Google Scholar
Blackstone, William, Commentaries on the Laws of England (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977), vol. IGoogle Scholar
Chorley, Lord, ‘Law-Making in White Hall’ (1946) 58 Modern Law Review26–41Google Scholar
Cole, D., ‘Judging the Next Emergency: Judicial Review and Individual Rights in Times of Crisis’ (2002–03) 101 Michigan Law Review2565–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dicey, A. V., An Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution (8th edn, London: MacMillan & Co., 1915)Google Scholar
Dicey, A. V., Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution (10th edn, London: MacMillan, 1959)Google Scholar
Dicey, A. V., Lectures on the Relationship Between Law and Public Opinion in England During the Nineteenth Century (1st edn, London: MacMillan & Co., 1905)Google Scholar
Djwa, Sandra, The Politics of the Imagination: A Life of F. R. Scott (Vancouver: Douglas & MacIntyre, 1987/Toronto, McClelland and Stewart, 1987)Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, Freedom's Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1996)Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, ‘Hard Cases’ in Ronald Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously (London: Duckworth, 1977), 81–130Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, ‘Hart's Postscript and the Character of Political Philosophy’ (2004) 24 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies1–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, Law's Empire (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press, 1986)Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, ‘Model of Rules I’ in Ronald Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously (London: Duckworth, 1977), 14–45Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, ‘A Reply to Critics’ in Cohen, Marshall (ed.), Ronald Dworkin and Contemporary Jurisprudence (London: Duckworth, 1984), 247–300Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, ‘Thirty Years On’ (2002) 115 Harvard Law Review1655–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David, ‘Constituting the Enemy: A Response to Carl Schmitt’ in Sajo, Andras (ed.), Militant Democracy (Utrecht: Eleven International Publishing, 2004), 15–45Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David, ‘Constituting the Rule of Law: Fundamental Values in Administrative Law’ (2001–02) 27 Queen's Law Journal445–509Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David, ‘The Deep Structure of Roncarelli v. Duplessis’ (2004) 53 University of New Brunswick Law Journal111–54Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David, ‘Disobeying Parliament: Privative Clauses and the Rule of Law’ in Kahana, Tsvi (ed.), Legislatures and Constitutionalism: The Role of Legislatures in the Constitutional State (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming)Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David, ‘Form and Substance in the Rule of Law: A Democratic Justification for Judicial Review’ in Forsyth, Christopher (ed.), Judicial Review and the Constitution (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2000), 141–67Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David, ‘The Genealogy of Legal Positivism’ (2004) 24 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies39–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David, Hard Cases in Wicked Legal Systems: South African Law in the Perspective of Legal Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991)Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David, ‘Hobbes and the Legitimacy of Law’ (2001) 20 Law and Philosophy461–98Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David, ‘Holmes and Carl Schmitt: An Unlikely Pair’ (1997) 63 Brooklyn Law Review165–88Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David, Judging the Judges, Judging Ourselves: Truth, Reconciliation and the Apartheid Legal Order (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1999)Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David, Legality and Legitimacy: Carl Schmitt, Hans Kelsen and Hermann Heller in Weimar (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997)Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David, ‘The Politics of Deference: Judicial Review and Democracy’ in Taggart, Michael (ed.), The Province of Administrative Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1997), 279–307Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David, ‘The State of Emergency in Legal Theory’ in Ramraj, Victor, Hor, Michael and Roach, K. (eds.), Global Anti-terrorism Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), 66–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David, ‘The Unwritten Constitution and the Rule of Law’ in Huscroft, Grant and Brodie, Ian (eds.), Constitutionalism in the Charter Era (Markham, Ontario: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2004), 383–412Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David, ‘With the Benefit of Hindsight’: Dilemmas of Legality in the Face of Injustice' in Christodoulidis, Emilios and Veitch, Scott (eds.), Lethe's Law: Justice, Law and Ethics in Reconciliation (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001), 65–90Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David (ed.), The Unity of Public Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004)Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David and Fox-Decent, Evan, ‘Rethinking the Process/Substance Distinction: Baker v. Canada’ (2001) 51 University of Toronto Law Journal193–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaves, John Jr, Emergency Powers and the Parliamentary Watchdog: Parliament and the Executive in Great Britain, 1939–1951 (London: The Hansard Society for Parliamentary Government, 1957)Google Scholar
Elliott, Mark, The Constitutional Foundations of Judicial Review (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001)Google Scholar
Ewing, K. D. and Gearty, C. A., The Struggle for Civil Liberties: Political Freedom and the Rule of Law in Britain, 1914–45 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Feldman, David, ‘The Impact of Human Rights on the UK Legislative Process’ (2004) 25 Statute Law Review91–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferejohn, John and Pasquino, Pasquale, ‘The Law of the Exception: A Typology of Emergency Powers’ (2004) 2 International Journal of Constitutional Law210–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, John, Natural Law and Natural Rights (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980)Google Scholar
Forsyth, C. F., In Danger for Their Talents: A Study of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of South Africa from 1950–80 (Cape Town: Juta, 1985)Google Scholar
Forsyth, C. F. (ed.), Judicial Review and the Constitution (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2000)Google Scholar
Foxton, David, ‘R v. Halliday ex Parte Zadig in Retrospect’ (2003) 119 Law Quarterly Review445–94Google Scholar
Fraenkel, Ernest, The Dual State: A Contribution to the Theory of Dictatorship (New York: Octagon Books, 1969)Google Scholar
Friedman, Bernard, Smuts: A Reappraisal (London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd, 1975)Google Scholar
Friedrich, Carl J., Constitutional Reason of State: The Survival of the Constitutional Order (Providence: Brown University Press, 1957)Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L., The Morality of Law (rev. edn, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1969)Google Scholar
Gadamer, H. G., Truth and Method (London: Sheed & Ward, 1979)Google Scholar
Galligan, Brian, Politics of the High Court (Brisbane: Queensland University Press, 1967)Google Scholar
Gardbaum, Stephen, ‘The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism’ (2001) 49 American Journal of Comparative Law707–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gearty, Conor, Principles of Human Rights Adjudication (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Gordon, D. M., ‘The Relation of Facts to Jurisdiction’ (1929) 45 Law Quarterly Review459–93Google Scholar
Gordon, D. M., ‘What Did the Anisminic Case Decide?’ (1971) 34 Modern Law Review1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, J. A. G., The Politics of the Judiciary (5th edn, London: Fontana, 1997)Google Scholar
Gross, Oren, ‘Chaos and Rules: Should Responses to Violent Crises Always be Constitutional?’ (2003) 112 Yale Law Journal1011–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, Oren, ‘Stability and Flexibility: A Dicey Business’ in Ramraj, Victor, Hor, Michael and Roach, Kent (eds.), Global Anti-terrorism Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), 90–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gudridge, Patrick O., ‘Remember Endo?’ (2003) 116 Harvard Law Review1933–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A, The Concept of Law (2nd edn, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994)Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A., ‘Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals’ in Hart, H. L. A., Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983), 49–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, F. A., The Road to Serfdom (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994)Google Scholar
Hazell, Robert, ‘Who is the Guardian of Legal Values in the Legislative Process: Parliament or the Executive?’ [2004] Public Law495–500Google Scholar
Hewart, Lord, The New Despotism (London: Ernest Benn Ltd, 1929)Google Scholar
Hickman, Tom R., ‘Between Human Rights and the Rule of Law: Indefinite Detention and the Derogation Model of Constitutionalism’ (2005) 68 Modern Law Review655–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan; edited by Richard Tuck (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991)Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan; edited by Richard Tuck (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996)Google Scholar
Hogg, Peter W., Constitutional Law of Canada (3rd edn, Toronto: Carswell, 1992)Google Scholar
Hunt, Murray, ‘Sovereignty's Blight: Why Contemporary Public Law Needs the Concept of “Due Deference”’ in Bamforth, Nicholas and Leyland, Peter (eds.), Public Law in a Multi-Layered Constitution (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2003), 337–70Google Scholar
Hunt, Murray, Using Human Rights Law in English Courts (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1997)Google Scholar
Issacharoff, Samuel and Pildes, Richard H., ‘Emergency Contexts Without Emergency Powers: The United States’ Constitutional Approach During Wartime' (2004) 2 International Journal of Constitutional Law296–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, William, State and Salvation: The Jehovah's Witnesses and Their Fight for Civil Rights (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1989)Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory. A Translation of the First Edition of the Reine Rechtslehre or Pure Theory of Law; translated by Stanley L. Paulson and Bonnie Litschewski-Paulson (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992)Google Scholar
Kilroy, Charlotte, ‘R. (on the application of Abbasi) v. Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs: Reviewing the Prerogative’ (2003) 2 European Human Rights Law Review222–9Google Scholar
Lajoie, Andrée, ‘The Implied Bill of Rights, the Charter and the Role of the Judiciary’ (1995) 44 University of New Brunswick Law Journal337–54Google Scholar
Laskin, B., ‘An Inquiry into the Diefenbaker Bill of Rights’ (1959) 37 Canadian Bar Review77–134Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch, The Function of Law in the International Community (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1933)Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch, ‘Is International Law a Part of the Law of England?’ (1939) 25 Transactions of the Grotius Society51–88Google Scholar
Locke, John, Two Treatises on Government; edited by Laslett, P. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988)Google Scholar
Loughlin, Martin, Public Law and Political Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992)Google Scholar
Macklin, Audrey, ‘Borderline Security’ in Daniels, Ronald J., Macklem, Patrick and Roach, Kent (eds.), The Security of Freedom: Essays on Canada's Anti-Terrorism Bill (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2001), 383–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maitland, F. W., The Constitutional History of England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1950)Google Scholar
Maravall, José María and Przeworski, Adam (eds.), Democracy and the Rule of Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, Anthony, ‘The Foundations and Limitations of Judicial Review’ (2002) 31 Australian Institute of Administrative Law Quarterly Forum1Google Scholar
Mason, Anthony, ‘Judicial Review: A View From Constitutional and Other Perspectives’ (2000) 28 Federal Law Review331–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masur, Jonathan, ‘A Hard Look or a Blind Eye: Administrative Law or Military Deference’ (2005) 56 Hastings Law Journal441–521Google Scholar
Mathews, A. S. and Albino, R. C., ‘The Permanence of the Temporary: An Examination of the 90- and 180-Day Detention Laws’ (1966) 83 South African Law Journal16–43Google Scholar
Moncrieff, Scott-Lucy, ‘Detention Without Trial’ (2004) 26 London Review of Books22Google Scholar
Mullan, David, ‘Mr Justice Rand: Defining the Limits of Court Control of the Administrative and Executive Process’ (1979–80) 18 University of Western Ontario Law Review65–114Google Scholar
Mullan, David, ‘The Role for Underlying Constitutional Principles in a Bill of Rights World’ (2004) New Zealand Law Review9–38Google Scholar
Mullan, DavidNotes and Comments, The Bounds of Legislative Specification: A Suggested Approach to the Bill of Attainder Clause’ (1962) 72 Yale Law Journal330–67Google Scholar
Postema, Gerald, Bentham and the Common Law Tradition (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986)Google Scholar
Pritt, D. N., The Autobiography of D. N. Pritt: Part One; From Right to Left (London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1965)Google Scholar
Rawlings, Richard, ‘Review, Revenge and Retreat’ (2005) 68 Modern Law Review378–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John, Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993)Google Scholar
Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980)Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph, ‘Authority, Law, and Morality’ in Joseph Raz, Ethics in the Public Domain: Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994), 194–221Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph, ‘The Inner Logic of the Law’ in Joseph Raz, Ethics in the Public Domain: Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994), 222–37Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph, ‘The Obligation to Obey: Revision and Tradition’ in Raz, Joseph, Ethics in the Public Domain: Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994), 325–38Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph, ‘The Politics of the Rule of Law’ in Joseph Raz, Ethics in the Public Domain: Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994), 354–62Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph, ‘The Rule of Law and Its Virtue’ in Raz, Joseph, The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979), 210–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roach, Kent, ‘The Administrative Law Scholarship of D. M. Gordon’ (1989) 34 McGill Law Journal1–38Google Scholar
Roach, Kent and Trotter, Gary, ‘Miscarriages of Justice in the War Against Terror’ (2005) 109 Penn State Law Review967–1041Google Scholar
Rossiter, Clinton L., Constitutional Dictatorship (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1948)Google Scholar
Scalia, Antonin, ‘Judicial Deference to Administrative Intepretations of Law’ (1989) Duke Law Journal511–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scalia, Antonin, A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997)Google Scholar
Scalia, Antonin, ‘The Rule of Law as a Rule of Rules’ (1989) 56 University of Chicago Law Review1175–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Carl, The Concept of the Political; translated by George Schwab (New Jersey: Rutgers University Press, 1976)Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl, Die Diktatur: Von den Anfängen des modernen Souveränitätsgedankens bis zum proletarischen Klassenkampf (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1989)Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl, Gesetz und Urteil: Eine Untersuchung zum Problem der Rechtspraxis (Munich: CH Beck, 1969)Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl, Der Hüter der Verfassung (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1985)Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl, The Leviathan in the State Theory of Thomas Hobbes: Meaning and Failure of a Political Symbol; translated by George Schwab and Erna Hilfstein (Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1996)Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl, Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Theory of Sovereignty; translated by George Schwab (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1988)Google Scholar
Sedley, Stephen, ‘Everything and Nothing: The Changing UK Constitution’ (2004) 26 London Review of Books10Google Scholar
Simpson, Brian A. W., In the Highest Degree Odious: Detention Without Trial in Wartime Britain (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992)Google Scholar
Stephen, Leslie, Science of Ethics (London: Smith, Elder, 1882)Google Scholar
Steyn, Johan, ‘Deference: A Tangled Story’ [2005] Public Law346–59Google Scholar
Steyn, Johan, ‘Guantanamo Bay: The Legal Black Hole’ (2004) 53 International and Comparative Law Quarterly1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sueur, Andrew, ‘Three Strikes and It's Out? The UK Government's Strategy to Oust Judicial Review from Immigration and Asylum Decision-making’ [2004] Public Law225–33Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R., ‘Minimalism at War’ (2004) The Supreme Court Review47–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R., One Case at a Time: Judicial Minimalism on the Supreme Court (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999)Google Scholar
Tomkins, Adam, Our Republican Constitution (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2005)Google Scholar
Tribe, G. and Gudridge, Patrick O., ‘The Anti-Emergency Constitution’ (2004) 113 Yale Law Journal1801–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tushnet, Mark V., ‘Defending Korematsu? Reflections on Civil Liberties in Wartime’ (2003) Wisconsin Law Review273–307Google Scholar
Vinx, Lars, ‘Legality and Legitimacy in Hans Kelsen's Pure Theory of Law’, PhD thesis, University of Toronto (2005)
Wade, William, Constitutional Fundamentals (The Hamlyn Lectures) (London: Stevens & Sons, 1989)Google Scholar
Wade, H. W. R. and Forsyth, C. F., Administrative Law (7th edn, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994)Google Scholar
Williams, George, ‘Reading the Judicial Mind: Appellate Argument in the Communist Party Case’ (1993) 15 Sydney Law Review3–29Google Scholar
Willis, John, ‘Administrative Law and the British North America Act’ (1939–40) Harvard Law Review251–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willis, John, ‘Three Approaches to Administrative Law: The Judicial, the Conceptual, and the Functional’ (1935–6) 1 University of Toronto Law Journal53–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winterton, George, ‘The Communist Party Case’ in Lee, H. P. and Winterton, George (eds.), Australian Constitutional Landmarks (Cambridge University Press, 2003), 108–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winterton, George, ‘The Significance of the Communist Party Case’ (1992) 18 Melbourne Law Review630–58Google Scholar
Woolf, H.Droit Public – English Style’ [1995] Public Law57–71Google Scholar
Woolf, H.The Rule of Law and a Change in the Constitution’ (2004) 63 Cambridge Law Journal317–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zarka, Yves Charles, ‘The Political Subject’ in Sorell, Tom and Foisneau, Luc (eds.), Leviathan After 350 Years (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004), 167–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zines, Leslie, ‘Constitutional Aspects of Judicial Review of Administrative Action’ (1998) 1 Constitutional Law and Policy Review50–4Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • David Dyzenhaus, University of Toronto
  • Book: The Constitution of Law
  • Online publication: 10 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618246.006
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • David Dyzenhaus, University of Toronto
  • Book: The Constitution of Law
  • Online publication: 10 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618246.006
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • David Dyzenhaus, University of Toronto
  • Book: The Constitution of Law
  • Online publication: 10 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618246.006
Available formats
×