Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-pkt8n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-19T02:15:55.827Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Notes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Lawrence A. Cunningham
Lawrence A. Cunningham
Affiliation:
George Washington University Law School
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Contracts in the Real World
Stories of Popular Contracts and Why They Matter
 , pp. 217 - 240
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2007
2011
Wilkensen-Ryan, TessBreach Is for SuckersVanderbilt Law Review 63 2010 1003Google Scholar
Estlund, CynthiaHow Wrong Are Employees about Their Rights, and Why Does It Matter?New York University Law Review 77 2002 6Google Scholar
Kim, Pauline T.Bargaining with Imperfect Information: A Study of Worker Perceptions of Legal Protection in an At-Will WorldCornell Law Review 83 1997 105Google Scholar
Shiffrin, Seana ValentineThe Divergence of Contract and PromiseHarvard Law Review 120 2007 708Google Scholar
Shiffrin, Seana ValentineCould Breach of Contract Be Immoral?Michigan Law Review 107 2009 1551Google Scholar
Barnhizer, Daniel D.Context as Power: Defining the Field of Battle for Advantage in Contractual InteractionsWake Forest Law Review 45 2010 607Google Scholar
Scott, Alan Schwartz & Robert E.Contract Theory and the Limits of Contract LawYale Law Journal 113 2003 541Google Scholar
Scott, Robert E.Rethinking the Default Rule ProjectVirginia Journal 6 2003 84Google Scholar
Fairfield, JoshuaThe Cost of Consent: Optimal Standardization in the Law of ContractEmory Law Journal 58 2009 1401Google Scholar
Langdell, C. C.A Selection of Cases on the Law of ContractsBostonLittle, Brown & Co. 1879Google Scholar
Kerr, OrinHow to Read a Legal OpinionThe Green Bag 2d 11 2007 52Google Scholar
1978
2008
1907
Mueller, JohnCapitalism, Democracy and Ralph’s Pretty Good GroceryPrinceton, NJPrinceton University Press 1999Google Scholar
Isaacs, NathanThe Standardizing of ContractsYale Law Journal 27 1917 665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1927
Konefsky, Alfred S.How to Read, or at Least Not Misread, Cardozo in the Allegheny College CaseBuffalo Law Review 36 1987 645Google Scholar
Boyer, BenjaminPromissory Estoppel: Requirements and Limitations of the DoctrineU. Pennsylvania Law Review 98 1950 459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, Lon L.Perdue, William R.The Reliance Interest in Contract DamagesYale Law Journal 46 1936 52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1928
Fried, CharlesContract as PromiseCambridge, MAHarvard University Press 1982Google Scholar
Barnett, Randy E.A Consent Theory of ContractColumbia Law Review 86 1986 269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, Melvin A.The Bargain Principle and Its LimitsHarvard Law Review 95 1982 741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kronman, Anthony T.Posner, Richard A.The Economics of Contract LawBoston, MALittle Brown & Co. 1979Google Scholar
Posner, Eric A.Economic Analysis of Contract Law after Three Decades: Success or Failure?Yale Law Journal 112 2003 829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oman, Nate B.A Pragmatic Defense of Contract LawGeorgetown Law Journal 98 2009 77Google Scholar
Gilmore, GrantThe Death of ContractNew Haven, CTYale University Press 1970Google Scholar
Macaulay, StewartAn Empirical View of ContractWisconsin Law Review 1985 465Google Scholar
Friedman, LawrenceContract Law in America: A Social and Economic Case StudyPalo Alto, CAStanford University Press 1965Google Scholar
2006
1995
Fried, CharlesContract as PromiseCambridge, MAHarvard University Press, 1982Google Scholar
Fuller, LonConsideration and FormColumbia Law Review 41 1941 799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1989
1974
1990
2000
1957
1988
1933
1934
1863
1954
2000
Hoffman, David A.The Best Puffery Article EverIowa Law Review 91 2006 1395Google Scholar
2000
Rowley, Keith A.You Asked for It, You Got It … Toy Yoda: Practical Jokes, Prizes and Contract LawNevada Law Journal 3 2003 526Google Scholar
Friedman, Jay M.Brill, Stephen R.Is an Advertisement an Offer? Why It Is, and Why It MattersHastings Law Journal 58 2006 61Google Scholar
2010
1893
Simpson, A. W. BrianQuackery and Contract Law: The Case of the Carbolic Smoke AdJournal of Legal Studies 14 1985 345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1985
1976
1971
1989
2010
2002
1864
Simpson, A. W. BrianContracts for Cotton to ArriveCardozo Law Review 11 1989 287Google Scholar
1977
1911
1996
Posner, Eric A.ProCD v. Zeidenberg and Cognitive Overload in Contractual BargainingU. Chicago Law Review 77 2010 1181Google Scholar
1997
2000
Friedman, Stephen E.Improving the Rolling ContractAmerican U. Law Review 56 2006 1Google Scholar
2010
Epstein, Richard A.In Defense of the Contract at WillU. Chicago Law Review 51 1984 947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1991
1983
Hartzog, WoodrowPromises and Privacy: Promissory Estoppel and Confidential Disclosure in Online CommunitiesTemple Law Review 82 2010 891Google Scholar
Haynes, Allyson W.Online Privacy Policies: Contracting Away Control Over Personal Information?Penn State Law Review 111 2007 587Google Scholar
2010
2009
2005
2007
1976
2004
1992
1587
1951
1982
1923
1949
Mazzower, MarkInside Hitler’s Greece: The Experience of Occupation 1941–44New Haven, CTYale University Press, 1993Google Scholar
1879
1904
1861
2005
2007
2009
1999
1997
Kostritsky, Juliet P.Illegal Contracts and Efficient Deterrence: A Study in Modern Contract TheoryIowa Law Review 74 1988 115Google Scholar
1956
1867
1959
Oberman, MichelleSex, Lies, and the Duty to DiscloseArizona Law Review 47 2005 871Google Scholar
2009
1966
1980
Prince, Henry G.Public Policy Limitations in Cohabitation Agreements: Unruly Horse or Circus Pony?Minnesota Law Review 70 1985 163Google Scholar
1930
1987
1995
2009
2010
1988
Sanger, Carol(Baby) M is for Many Things: Why I Start with Baby MSt. Louis University Law Journal 44 2000 1443Google ScholarPubMed
1993
2007
2010
2012
2011
1960
1985
1979
1885
1887
Birmingham, Robert L.A Rose by Any Other Word: Mutual Mistake in Sherwood v. WalkerU.C. Davis Law Review 21 1987 197Google Scholar
1934
1817
Speidel, Richard E.Studies in Contract LawNew YorkFoundation Press 2008Google Scholar
Farnsworth, E. AllanAlleviating Mistake: Reversal and Forgiveness for Flawed PerceptionsNew YorkOxford University Press 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowley, Keith A.To Err is HumanMichigan Law Review 104 2006 1407Google Scholar
Gordley, James A.Mistake in Contract FormationAmerican Journal of Comparative Law 52 2004 433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, Lon L.Mistake and Error in the Law of ContractsEmory Law Review 33 1984 41Google Scholar
2007
1863
Birmingham, Robert L.Why Is There Taylor v. Caldwell? Three Propositions About ImpracticabilityU. San Francisco Law Review 23 1989 379Google Scholar
1903
1985
1944
1972
Sharp, MalcolmPacta Sunt ServandaColumbia Law Review 41 1941 783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1647
1787
1987
2008
2007
1969
1980
1968
2002
1985
Meiklejohn, Alexander M.Contractual and Donative CapacityCase Western Reserve Law Review 39 1988 307Google Scholar
Jacobs, Thomas A.Children and the Law: Rights and ObligationsSt. Paul, MNWest Group 2007Google Scholar
2009
2009
2011
2010
2010
Speidel, Richard E.Contracts in Crises: Excuse Doctrine and Retrospective Government ActsDurham, NCCarolina Academic Press, 2007Google Scholar
2009
2009
2008
2004
Edelman, MarcA Primer on Property-Rights Theory in Professional SportsFordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal 18 2008 891Google Scholar
2006
2010
Auerbach, DanielMorals Clauses as Corporate Protection in Athlete Endorsement ContractsDePaul Journal of Sports Law and Contemporary Problems 3 2005 1Google Scholar
2008
2009
1996
2000
1988
1932
1972
Engler, Mitchell L.Heyman, Susan B.Rethinking Contract DamagesTemple Law Review 83 2011 119Google Scholar
2010
Klass, GregoryInsincere PromisesNew Haven, CTYale University Press 2005Google Scholar
1929
Roberts, JorieHawkins Case: A Hair-Raising ExperienceHarvard Law Record 66 1978 1Google Scholar
1988
2011
Sullivan, Timothy J.Punitive Damages in the Law of Contract: The Reality and the Illusion of Legal ChangeMinnesota Law Review 61 1977 207Google Scholar
Whaley, Douglas J.Paying for the Agony: The Recovery of Emotional Distress Damages in Contract ActionsSuffolk U. Law Review 26 1992 935Google Scholar
2009
1929
1972
Pettit, MarkJr., Exercising with Neri v. Retail Marine CorpSt. Louis University Law Journal 44 2000 1487Google Scholar
2007
Matthews, Daniel W.Should the Doctrine of Lost Volume Seller Be Maintained? A Response to Professor BreenU. Miami Law Review 51 1997 1195Google Scholar
Goldberg, VictorAn Economic Analysis of the Lost-Volume Retail SellerS. California Law Review 57 1984 283Google Scholar
1970
Goldberg, VictorFraming Contract LawCambridge, MAHarvard University Press, 2006Google Scholar
Bar-Gill, OrenStone, RebeccaMobile MisperceptionsHarvard Journal of Law and Technology 23 2009 49Google Scholar
1885
1999
2011
1991
1976
1993
1984
2001
1981
1939
1986
1992
1969
1907
1980
1998
1981
1984
Dawson, John P.Negotiorum Gestio: The Altruistic IntermeddlerHarvard Law Review 74 1961 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1945
1935
Watson, Geoffrey R.In the Tribunal of Conscience: Mills v. Wyman ReconsideredTulane Law Review 71 1997 1749Google Scholar
1864
Henderson, StanleyPromises Grounded in the Past: The Idea of Unjust Enrichment and the Law of ContractsVirginia Law Review 57 1971 1115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2007
2005
2004
2004
2007
1993
2007
2007
Stremitzer, AlexanderRemedies On and Off ContractYale Law Journal 120 2011 690Google Scholar
Hillman, Robert A.An Analysis of the Cessation of Contractual RelationsCornell Law Review 68 1983 617Google Scholar
Kull, AndrewRescission and RestitutionBusiness Lawyer 61 2006 569Google Scholar
2011
2011
1968
1990
1993
Farnsworth, E. Allan‘Meaning’ in the Law of ContractsYale Law Journal 76 1967 939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2009
2010
1885
1928
Perillo, Joseph M.A Plea for a Uniform Parol Evidence Rule and Principles of Contract InterpretationIndiana Law Journal 42 1967 333Google Scholar
1990
1957
1991
1978
1968
1987
1912
DiMatteo, Larry A.Reason and Context: A Dual Track Theory of InterpretationPenn State Law Review 109 2004 397Google Scholar
Cunningham, Lawrence A.Toward a Prudential and Credibility-Centered Parol Evidence RuleU. Cincinnati Law Review 68 2000 269Google Scholar
Gergen, Mark P.The Jury’s Role in Deciding Normative Issues in the American Common LawFordham Law Review 68 1999 407Google Scholar
2010
2010
2011
1909
1943
2005
2009
1988
1939
1953
1997
1996
Radin, Margaret JaneOnline Standardization and the Integrating of Text and MachineFordham Law Review 70 2002 1125Google Scholar
Willis, Hugh F.The Statute of Frauds: A Legal AnachronismIndiana Law Journal 3 1928 427Google Scholar
Llewellyn, Karl N.What Price Contract? An Essay in PerspectiveYale Law Journal 40 1931 704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1978
2008
2001
2003
2004
2005
2007
1917
2003
2010
1995
1995
2010
Andersen, Eric G.Contractual Good Faith: Formation, Performance, Breach, EnforcementBostonLittle, Brown & Co. 1995Google Scholar
Dobbins, Teri J.Losing Faith: Extracting the Implied Covenant of Good Faith from (Some) ContractsOregon Law Review 84 2005 227Google Scholar
Dubroff, HaroldThe Implied Covenant of Good Faith in Contract Interpretation and Gap-Filling: Reviling a Revered RelicSt. John’s Law Review 80 2006 559Google Scholar
Alstine, Michael P. VanOf Textualism, Party Autonomy and Good FaithWilliam & Mary Law Review 40 1999 1223Google Scholar
2011
2010
2011
1978
1955
1902
2000
Hillman, RobertContract Modification under the Restatement (Second) of ContractsCornell Law Review 67 1982 680Google Scholar
Mather, HenryContract Modification under DuressSouth Carolina Law Review 33 1982 615Google Scholar
2010
2010
1985
1966
Sharma, Bryan D. Hull & AalokSatisfaction Not Guaranteed: California’s Conflicting Law on the Use of Accord and Satisfaction ChecksLoyola L.A. Law Review 33 1999 1Google Scholar
Floyd, Michael D.How Much Satisfaction Should You Expect from an Accord?Loyola U. Chicago Law Journal 26 1994 1Google Scholar
2010
1917
2010
2011
1626
1841
1984
1976
2011
1615
1669
1500
1773
Taylor, Celia R.Self-Help in Contract Law: An Exploration and ProposalWake Forest Law Review 33 1998 839Google Scholar
1896
1917
1960
1983
1926
Patterson, EdwinConstructive Conditions in ContractsColumbia Law Review 42 1942 903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1982
Garvin, Larry T.Adequate Assurance of Due Performance: Of Risk, Duress, and CognitionColorado Law Review 69 1998 71Google Scholar
Gergen, Mark P.A Theory of Self-Help Remedies in ContractBoston University Law Review 89 2009 1397Google Scholar
Anderson, Eric G.A New Look at Material Breach in the Law of ContractsU.C. Davis Law Review 21 1988 1073Google Scholar
1960
2011
1908
2009
2004
2004
2004
2004
1824
1834
1983
1921
Cohen, Amy B.Reviving Jacob & Youngs, Inc. v. Kent: Material Breach Doctrine ReconsideredVillanova Law Review 42 1997 65Google Scholar
1960
1962
Maute, Judith L.Peevyhouse v. Garland Coal & Mining Co. Revisited: The Ballad of Willie and LucilleNorthwestern U. Law Review 89 1995 1341Google Scholar
1939
Wirtz, Richard S.Cost of Performance or Difference in Value?Case Western Reserve Law Review 59 2008 61Google Scholar
1985
2006
1977
2009
2009
1859
Waters, Anthony JonThe Property in the Promise: A Study of the Third Party Beneficiary RuleHarvard Law Review 98 1985 109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1918
1928
2002
Eisenberg, Melvin A.Third Party BeneficiariesColumbia Law Review 92 1992 1358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S. A.Contracts for the Benefit of Third Parties: In Defense of the Third-Party RuleOxford Journal of Legal Studies 17 1997 643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2010
2010
1986
1986
2009
1929
2000
2007
1963
1994
1979
Crespi, Gregory S.The Influence of Two Decades of Contract Law Scholarship on Judicial Rulings: An Empirical AnalysisSMU Law Review 57 2004 105Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Notes
  • Lawrence A. Cunningham
  • Book: Contracts in the Real World
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139096676.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Notes
  • Lawrence A. Cunningham
  • Book: Contracts in the Real World
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139096676.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Notes
  • Lawrence A. Cunningham
  • Book: Contracts in the Real World
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139096676.013
Available formats
×