Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-sv6ng Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-10T00:07:44.885Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Surgical aspects of infectious conditions of the lung

from Section III - Benign conditions of the lung

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

By
Elaine Teh  and
Elizabeth Belcher
Edited by
Marco Scarci ,
Aman Coonar ,
Tom Routledge  and
Francis Wells
Elaine Teh
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
Elizabeth Belcher
Affiliation:
Oxford University Hospitals NTS Trust
Marco Scarci
Affiliation:
University College London Hospital
Aman Coonar
Affiliation:
Papworth Hospital
Tom Routledge
Affiliation:
Guy’s Hospital
Get access

Summary

Empyema

Background

Pleural empyema is defined as collection of pus in the pleural space. It was first described by an Egyptian physician in 3000 BC, but Hippocrates was more famously credited with its description. The mainstay of early treatment was open drainage; however, associated mortality was high. In 1917–1919, during the influenza epidemic, an Empyema Commission recommended closed chest tube, avoidance of early open drainage, obliteration of pleural space and nutritional support for the patient. These principles remain the basis of treatment today.

Empyema remains a common clinical problem, with an incidence of about 80,000 in the UK and United States. The mortality and morbidity associated with the condition remain high.

Etiology

Empyema may be caused by spread of infection from organs contiguous to the pleural space, direct inoculation of the pleura due to trauma or as a result of haematogenous spread. Contiguous spread is the most common modality and accounts for over half of all cases. Most commonly it arises from the lung or structures such as mediastinum, deep cervical organs, chest wall and spine or organs below the diaphragm. The other major route is secondary to thoracic procedures such as thoracocentesis, post-operatively following thoracic or oesophageal surgery or secondary to trauma. Rarely empyema develops as a result of haematogenous spread from a distant source.

Chronic respiratory diseases, diabetes mellitus, malignancies, immunosuppression, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and alcohol and drug addiction increase the risk of developing empyema.

The incidence of complicated parapneumonic effusion or empyema in patients requiring hospital admission for community-acquired pneumonia is over 7%. Hypoalbuminemia, hyponatremia, thrombophilia, raised C-reactive protein (CRP) and alcohol and intravenous drug abuse were independently associated with the development of complicated parapneumonic effusion or empyema. Interestingly, it appears COPD is protective against the development of empyema.

Over half of patients with community-acquired pneumonia develop pleural effusions; however, the majority are sterile sympathetic effusions destined to resolve. In about 30% of these patients, the condition progresses to complicated parapneumonic effusion (CPPE) or to empyema.

The incidence of empyema following post-traumatic haemothorax is over 25%. Risk factors for its development include rib fractures, (injury severity score) ISS > 25 and the need for additional interventions to evacuate retained haemothorax. The use of prophylactic antibiotics in patients with chest trauma can decrease the incidence of post-traumatic empyema and pneumonia.

Type
Chapter
Information
Core Topics in Thoracic Surgery , pp. 86 - 104
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Maskell, NA, Davies, CW, Nunn, AJ, et al. First Multicenter Intrapleural Sepsis Trial (MIST1) Group. UK controlled trial of intrapleural streptokinase for pleural infection. N Engl J Med 2005 Mar 3; 352(9):865–74.Google Scholar
Rahman, NM, Maskell, NA, West, A, et al. Intrapleural use of tissue plasminogen activator and DNase in pleural infection. N Engl J Med. 2011 Aug 11; 365(6):518–26.Google Scholar
Molnar, TF. Current surgical treatment of thoracic empyema in adults. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007 Sep; 32(3):422–30.Google Scholar
Moreira, Jda S, Camargo, Jde J, Felicetti, JC, et al. Lung abscess: analysis of 252 consecutive cases diagnosed between 1968 and 2004. J Bras Pneumol 2006 Mar-Apr; 32(2):136–43.Google Scholar
Smith, DT. Experimental aspiration abscess. Surgery 1927; 14:231–9.Google Scholar
Bartlett, JG. Anaerobic bacterial infections of the lung. Chest 1987; 91:901–9.Google Scholar
Schweigert, M, Dubecz, A, Stadlhuber, RJ, Stein, HJ. Modern history of surgical management of lung abscess: from Harold Neuhof to current concepts. Ann Thorac Surg 2011 Dec; 92(6):2293–7.Google Scholar
The Aspergillus website: www.aspergillus.org.uk
Belcher, JR, Plummer, NS. Surgery in bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Br J Dis Chest 2011; 54:335–41.Google Scholar
Lejay, A, Falcoz, PE, Santelmo, N, et al. Surgery for aspergilloma: time trend towards improved results? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2011 Oct; 13(4):392–5.Google Scholar
1 Davies, HE, Davies, RJ, Davies, CW. Management of pleural infection in adults: British Thoracic Society Pleural Disease Guideline 2010. Thorax 2010; 65(Suppl 2):ii41–53.Google Scholar
2 Chalmers, JD, Singanayagam, A, Murray, MP, et al. Risk factors for complicated parapneumonic effusion and empyema on presentation to hospital with community-acquired pneumonia. Thorax 2009; 64:592–7.Google Scholar
3 Porcel, JM. Pleural fluid tests to identify complicated parapneumonic effusions. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2010; 16:357–61.Google Scholar
4 DuBose, J, Inaba, K, Okoye, O, et al. Development of posttraumatic empyema in patients with retained hemothorax: results of a prospective, observational AAST study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2012; 73:752–7.Google Scholar
5 Sanabria, A, Valdivieso, E, Gomez, G, Echeverry, G. Prophylactic antibiotics in chest trauma: a meta-analysis of high-quality studies. World J Surg 2006; 30:1843–7.Google Scholar
6 Park, DR. The microbiology of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Respir Care 2005; 50:742–63; discussion 63–5.Google Scholar
7 Choi, JA, Hong, KT, Oh, YW, et al. CT manifestations of late sequelae in patients with tuberculous pleuritis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176:441–5.Google Scholar
8 Kearney, SE, Davies, CW, Davies, RJ, Gleeson, FV. Computed tomography and ultrasound in parapneumonic effusions and empyema. Clin Radiol 2000; 55:542–7.Google Scholar
9 Maskell, NA, Davies, CW, Nunn, AJ, et al. UK controlled trial of intrapleural streptokinase for pleural infection. N Engl J Med 2005; 352:865–74.Google Scholar
10 Rahman, NM, Maskell, NA, West, A, et al. Intrapleural use of tissue plasminogen activator and DNase in pleural infection. N Engl J Med 2011; 365:518–26.Google Scholar
11 Thourani, VH, Brady, KM, Mansour, KA, et al. Evaluation of treatment modalities for thoracic empyema: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66:1121–7.Google Scholar
12 Athanassiadi, K, Gerazounis, M, Kalantzi, N. Treatment of post-pneumonic empyema thoracis. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 51:338–41.Google Scholar
13 Suchar, AM, Zureikat, AH, Glynn, L, et al. Ready for the frontline: is early thoracoscopic decortication the new standard of care for advanced pneumonia with empyema? Am Surg 2006; 72:688–92; discussion 92–3.Google Scholar
14 Wait, MA, Sharma, S, Hohn, J, Nogare, A Dal. A randomized trial of empyema therapy. Chest 1997; 111:1548–51.Google Scholar
15 Bilgin, M, Akcali, Y, Oguzkaya, F. Benefits of early aggressive management of empyema thoracis. ANZ J Surg 2006; 76:120–2.Google Scholar
16 Landreneau, RJ, Keenan, RJ, Hazelrigg, SR, et al. Thoracoscopy for empyema and hemothorax. Chest 1996; 109:18–24.Google Scholar
17 Kim, BY, Oh, BS, Jang, WC, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic decortication for management of postpneumonic pleural empyema. Am J Surg 2004; 188:321–4.Google Scholar
18 Solaini, L, Prusciano, F, Bagioni, P, et al. Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) of the lung: analysis of intraoperative and postoperative complications over 15 years and review of the literature. Surg Endosc 2008; 22:298–310.Google Scholar
19 Luh, SP, Chou, MC, Wang, LS, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the treatment of complicated parapneumonic effusions or empyemas: outcome of 234 patients. Chest 2005; 127:1427–32.Google Scholar
20 Angelillo-Mackinlay, T, Lyons, GA, Piedras, MB, Angelillo-Mackinlay, D. Surgical treatment of postpneumonic empyema. World J Surg 1999; 23:1110–3.Google Scholar
21 Striffeler, H, Gugger, M, Hof, V Im, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for fibrinopurulent pleural empyema in 67 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 65:319–23.Google Scholar
22 Lardinois, D, Gock, M, Pezzetta, E, et al. Delayed referral and gram-negative organisms increase the conversion thoracotomy rate in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for empyema. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 79:1851–6.Google Scholar
23 Cassina, PC, Hauser, M, Hillejan, L, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopy in the treatment of pleural empyema: stage-based management and outcome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999; 117:234–8.Google Scholar
24 Waller, DA, Rengarajan, A. Thoracoscopic decortication: a role for video-assisted surgery in chronic postpneumonic pleural empyema. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 71:1813–6.Google Scholar
25 Petrakis, I, Katsamouris, A, Drossitis, I, et al. Usefulness of thoracoscopic surgery in the diagnosis and management of thoracic diseases. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2000; 41:767–71.Google Scholar
26 Wurnig, PN, Wittmer, V, Pridun, NS, Hollaus, PH. Video-assisted thoracic surgery for pleural empyema. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 81:309–13.Google Scholar
27 Chambers, A, Routledge, T, Dunning, J, Scarci, M. Is video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical decortication superior to open surgery in the management of adults with primary empyema? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2010; 11:171–7.Google Scholar
28 Rzyman, W, Skokowski, J, Romanowicz, G, et al. Decortication in chronic pleural empyema – effect on lung function. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002; 21:502–7.Google Scholar
29 Mandal, AK, Thadepalli, H, Chettipally, U. Outcome of primary empyema thoracis: therapeutic and microbiologic aspects. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66:1782–6.Google Scholar
30 Shahin, Y, Duffy, J, Beggs, D, et al. Surgical management of primary empyema of the pleural cavity: outcome of 81 patients. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2010; 10:565–7.Google Scholar
31 Solaini, L, Prusciano, F, Bagioni, P. Video-assisted thoracic surgery in the treatment of pleural empyema. Surg Endosc 2007; 21:280–4.Google Scholar
32 Tong, BC, Hanna, J, Toloza, EM, et al. Outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic decortication. Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 89:220–5.Google Scholar
33 Botianu, PV, Dobrica, AC, Butiurca, A, Botianu, AM. Complex space-filling procedures for intrathoracic infections - personal experience with 76 consecutive cases. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010; 37:478–81.Google Scholar
34 Garcia-Yuste, M, Ramos, G, Duque, JL, et al. Open-window thoracostomy and thoracomyoplasty to manage chronic pleural empyema. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 65:818–22.Google Scholar
35 Icard, P, Rochais, JP Le, Rabut, B, et al. Andrews thoracoplasty as a treatment of post-pneumonectomy empyema: experience in 23 cases. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68:1159–63; discussion 64.Google Scholar
36 Okumura, Y, Takeda, S, Asada, H, et al. Surgical results for chronic empyema using omental pedicled flap: long-term follow-up study. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 79:1857–61.Google Scholar
37 Regnard, JF, Alifano, M, Puyo, P, et al. Open window thoracostomy followed by intrathoracic flap transposition in the treatment of empyema complicating pulmonary resection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000; 120:270–5.Google Scholar
38 Eloesser, L. An operation for tuberculous empyema. Chest 1935; 1:8–23.Google Scholar
39 Ferguson, AD, Prescott, RJ, Selkon, JB, et al. The clinical course and management of thoracic empyema. QJM 1996; 89:285–9.Google Scholar
40 Galea, JL, Souza, A De, Beggs, D, Spyt, T. The surgical management of empyema thoracis. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1997; 42:15–8.Google Scholar
41 Cham, CW, Haq, SM, Rahamim, J. Empyema thoracis: a problem with late referral? Thorax 1993; 48:925–7.Google Scholar
42 Deschamps, C, Pairolero, PC, Allen, MS, Trastek, VF. Management of postpneumonectomy empyema and bronchopleural fistula. Chest Surg Clin N Am 1996; 6:519–27.Google Scholar
43 Kacprzak, G, Marciniak, M, Addae-Boateng, E, et al. Causes and management of postpneumonectomy empyemas: our experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004; 26:498–502.Google Scholar
44 Massera, F, Robustellini, M, Pona, CD, et al. Predictors of successful closure of open window thoracostomy for postpneumonectomy empyema. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 82:288–92.Google Scholar
45 Gossot, D, Stern, JB, Galetta, D, et al. Thoracoscopic management of postpneumonectomy empyema. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 78:273–6.Google Scholar
46 Ng, T, Ryder, BA, Maziak, DE, Shamji, FM. Treatment of postpneumonectomy empyema with debridement followed by continuous antibiotic irrigation. J Am Coll Surg 2008; 206:1178–83.Google Scholar
47 Schneiter, D, Grodzki, T, Lardinois, D, et al. Accelerated treatment of postpneumonectomy empyema: a binational long-term study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008; 136:179–85.Google Scholar
48 Goldstraw, P. Treatment of postpneumonectomy empyema: the case for fenestration. Thorax 1979; 34:740–5.Google Scholar
49 Jadczuk, E. Postpneumonectomy empyema. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1998; 8:123–6.Google Scholar
50 Wong, PS, Goldstraw, P. Post-pneumonectomy empyema. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1994; 8:345–9; discussion 9–50.Google Scholar
51 Gharagozloo, F, Trachiotis, G, Wolfe, A, et al. Pleural space irrigation and modified Clagett procedure for the treatment of early postpneumonectomy empyema. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998; 116:943–8.Google Scholar
52 Zaheer, S, Allen, MS, Cassivi, SD, et al. Postpneumonectomy empyema: results after the Clagett procedure. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 82:279–86; discussion 86–7.Google Scholar
53 Seify, H, Mansour, K, Miller, J, et al. Single-stage muscle flap reconstruction of the postpneumonectomy empyema space: the Emory experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120:1886–91.Google Scholar
54 Zahid, I, Routledge, T, Bille, A, Scarci, M. What is the best treatment of postpneumonectomy empyema? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2011; 12:260–4.Google Scholar
55 Colice, GL, Curtis, A, Deslauriers, J, et al. Medical and surgical treatment of parapneumonic effusions : an evidence-based guideline. Chest 2000; 118:1158–71.Google Scholar
56 Sonnappa, S, Cohen, G, Owens, CM, et al. Comparison of urokinase and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for treatment of childhood empyema. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006; 174:221–7.Google Scholar
57 Peter, SD St, Tsao, K, Spilde, TL, et al. Thoracoscopic decortication vs tube thoracostomy with fibrinolysis for empyema in children: a prospective, randomized trial. J Pediatr Surg 2009; 44:106–11; discussion 11.Google Scholar
58 Kurt, BA, Winterhalter, KM, Connors, RH, et al. Therapy of parapneumonic effusions in children: video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus conventional thoracostomy drainage. Pediatrics 2006; 118:e547–53.Google Scholar
59 Avansino, JR, Goldman, B, Sawin, RS, Flum, DR. Primary operative versus nonoperative therapy for pediatric empyema: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2005; 115:1652–9.Google Scholar
60 Jda, S Moreira, Jde, J Camargo, Felicetti, JC, et al. Lung abscess: analysis of 252 consecutive cases diagnosed between 1968 and 2004. J Bras Pneumol 2006; 32:136–43.Google Scholar
61 Smith, DT. Experimental aspiration abscess. Surgery 1927; 14:231–9.Google Scholar
62 Brock, RC. The Anatomy of the Bronchial Tree. Oxford University Press; 1946.
63 Bartlett, JG. Anaerobic bacterial infections of the lung. Chest 1987; 91:901–9.Google Scholar
64 Hagan, JL, Hardy, JD. Lung abscess revisited: a survey of 184 cases. Ann Surg 1983; 197:755–62.Google Scholar
65 Appelbaum, PC, Spangler, SK, Jacobs, MR. Beta-lactamase production and susceptibilities to amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, ticarcillin, ticarcillin-clavulanate, cefoxitin, imipenem, and metronidazole of 320 non-Bacteroides fragilis Bacteroides isolates and 129 fusobacteria from 28 US centers. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1990; 34:1546–50.Google Scholar
66 Perlino, CA. Metronidazole vs clindamycin treatment of anerobic pulmonary infection. Failure of metronidazole therapy. Arch Intern Med 1981; 141:1424–7.Google Scholar
67 Kelogrigoris, M, Tsagouli, P, Stathopoulos, K, et al. CT-guided percutaneous drainage of lung abscesses: review of 40 cases. JBR-BTR 2011; 94:191–5.Google Scholar
68 Erasmus, JJ, McAdams, HP, Rossi, S, Kelley, MJ. Percutaneous management of intrapulmonary air and fluid collections. Radiol Clin North Am 2000; 38:385–93.Google Scholar
69 Schweigert, M, Dubecz, A, Stadlhuber, RJ, Stein, HJ. Modern history of surgical management of lung abscess: from Harold Neuhof to current concepts. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 92:2293–7.Google Scholar
70 Allen, CI, Blackman, JR. Treatment of lung abscess: with report of 100 consecutive cases. Thorac Surg 1936; 6:156Google Scholar
71 Huang, HC, Chen, HC, Fang, HY, et al. Lung abscess predicts the surgical outcome in patients with pleural empyema. J Cardiothorac Surg 2010; 5:88.Google Scholar
72 Reimel, BA, Krishnadasen, B, Cuschieri, J, et al. Surgical management of acute necrotizing lung infections. Can Respir J 2006; 13:369–73.Google Scholar
73 Delarue, NC, Pearson, FG, Nelems, JM, Cooper, JD. Lung abscess: surgical implications. Can J Surg 1980; 23:297–302.Google Scholar
74 Belcher, JR, Plummer, NS. Surgery in bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Bri J Dis Chest 1960; 54:335–41.Google Scholar
75 Chatzimichalis, A, Massard, G, Kessler, R, et al. Bronchopulmonary aspergilloma: a reappraisal. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 65:927–9.Google Scholar
76 Lejay, A, Falcoz, PE, Santelmo, N, et al. Surgery for aspergilloma: time trend towards improved results? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2011; 13:392–5.Google Scholar
77 Shah, R, Vaideeswar, P, Pandit, SP. Pathology of pulmonary aspergillomas. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2008; 51:342–5.Google Scholar
78 Cesar, JM, Resende, JS, Amaral, NF, et al. Cavernostomy x resection for pulmonary aspergilloma: a 32-year history. J Cardiothorac Surg 2011; 6:129.Google Scholar
79 Igai, H, Kamiyoshihara, M, Nagashima, T, Ohtaki, Y. Pulmonary aspergilloma treated by limited thoracoplasty with simultaneous cavernostomy and muscle transposition flap. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012; 18:472–4.Google Scholar
80 Stather, DR, Tremblay, A, MacEachern, P, et al. Bronchoscopic removal of a large intracavitary pulmonary aspergilloma. Chest 2013; 143:238–41.Google Scholar
81 Massard, G, Roeslin, N, Wihlm, JM, et al. Pleuropulmonary aspergilloma: clinical spectrum and results of surgical treatment. Ann Thorac Surg 1992; 54:1159–64.Google Scholar
82 Ichinose, J, Kohno, T, Fujimori, S. Video-assisted thoracic surgery for pulmonary aspergilloma. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2010; 10:927–30.Google Scholar
83 Zmeili, OS, Soubani, AO. Pulmonary aspergillosis: a clinical update. QJM 2007; 100:317–34.Google Scholar
84 Sagan, D, Gozdziuk, K, Korobowicz, E. Predictive and prognostic value of preoperative symptoms in the surgical treatment of pulmonary aspergilloma. J Surg Res 2010; 163:e35–43.Google Scholar
85 Sagan, D, Gozdziuk, K. Surgery for pulmonary aspergilloma in immunocompetent patients: no benefit from adjuvant antifungal pharmacotherapy. Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 89:1603–10.Google Scholar
86 Aslam, PA, Eastridge, CE, Hughes, FA Jr. Aspergillosis of the lung – an eighteen-year experience. Chest 1971; 59:28–32.Google Scholar
87 Daly, RC, Pairolero, PC, Piehler, JM, et al. Pulmonary aspergilloma. Results of surgical treatment. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1986; 92:981–8.Google Scholar
88 Kilman, JW, Ahn, C, Andrews, NC, Klassen, K. Surgery for pulmonary aspergillosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1969; 57:642–7.Google Scholar
89 Doffman, SR, Agrawal, SG, Brown, JS. Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2005; 3:613–27.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×