Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-2l2gl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T16:38:54.100Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - THE QUASI-LINEAR REGIME

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Andrew R. Liddle
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
David H. Lyth
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
Get access

Summary

Gravitational collapse

Overview

The bulk of this book has concerned the linear regime, and it is fair to say that, ultimately, our main understanding of the parameters describing the Universe as a whole will come via observations of that sort, especially those of microwave background anisotropies. However, we would not exist were it not for structures having entered the nonlinear regime, ultimately collapsing to form gravitationally bound objects, and so, it is interesting to ask about this regime. In fact, at present, one of the most powerful constraints on the spectrum comes from this regime, being the present abundance of galaxy clusters.

The nonlinear regime has been investigated using a variety of techniques. The most popular of all is numerical simulations, particularly simulations of the gravitational force alone, known as N-body simulations, though recently many codes have been developed that also include a range of hydrodynamical gas processes and sometimes even radiative processes such as photoionization. We discuss some of these in this chapter, but not in any depth because this is primarily a book about analytical and semianalytical techniques.

Among this latter class are theories designed to predict the number of collapsed objects of a given mass. We discuss two such theories: the Press–Schechter (1974) theory and the theory of peaks (Bardeen et al. 1986). These are semianalytic (meaning that there usually exist integrals that must be performed numerically to deal with realistic spectra, but that the basic structure of the theory is analytic), though it is fair to say that they are only used with confidence because they have been compared and calibrated using N-body simulations.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×