Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-2l2gl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T14:27:49.347Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Appendix A - Overview of the Federal Argentine Judiciary and the Argentine Supreme Court

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2009

Gretchen Helmke
Affiliation:
University of Rochester, New York
Get access

Summary

Organization

The Argentine Supreme Court (Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación) stands at the head of a federal judiciary currently composed of a total of 343 first-instance courts (juzgados), 42 oral tribunals (tribunales orales), and 24 appeals courts (cámaras). Article 94 of the 1853 Constitution establishes that the number of lower courts shall be determined by Congress. The organization of the federal courts is regulated by decree law 1285/58, which specifies the areas of specialization for each of the various tribunals. Currently, the lower federal courts are divided into separate tribunals for administrative law (Fuero Contensiosa Administrativa and Fuero Federal de la Seguridad Social), criminal law (Fuero Criminal y Correccional Federal, Fuero Penal Oral Federal de la Capital Federal, Fuero Penal Oral Federal del Interior), civil and commercial law (Fuero Civil y Comercial Federal), and electoral law (Fuero Electoral). The twenty-four Federal Courts of Appeals are located in fifteen of the country's twenty-three provinces.

Jurisdiction and Precedent

The jurisdiction and powers of the federal courts are determined by the Constitution of 1853 – recently reformed in 1994 – the Congress, and through the Supreme Court's own jurisprudence. The Constitution's Articles 94, 100, 101, and 67, section 11, regulate the jurisdiction of the federal judiciary. As in the United States, the main task of the Argentine federal courts is to resolve all “federal questions,” which includes all questions of interpretation that emerge from laws passed by the Congress and cases whereby a right of the Constitution has been allegedly violated (Miller et al. et al. 1995: 411; Molinelli et al. 1999).

Type
Chapter
Information
Courts under Constraints
Judges, Generals, and Presidents in Argentina
, pp. 175 - 181
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×