Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T21:47:03.333Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - The micro-political and the socio-structural in applied theatre with homeless youth

from PART III - POETICS AND PARTICIPATION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2016

Kathleen Gallagher
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Jenny Hughes
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Helen Nicholson
Affiliation:
Royal Holloway, University of London
Get access

Summary

Applied theatre projects often find themselves caught between individual versus community interests and micro-political interventions versus socio-structural analyses. The ethical and creative trials of applied theatre projects can become most pronounced when practitioners and researchers carry out their work within particular communities, in full view of the tensions inherent in attending to the micro- and macro-political meanings and possibilities of their work. In this chapter, I explore some applied theatre research from a shelter for homeless youth in Toronto (Canada) in which these points of tension were particularly evident. Socio-economic inequality and socio-spatial polarization are realities in many global Western cities. Our interdisciplinary research (including scholarly, community, national, governmental, and non-governmental organizations) is focused on urban inequality and socio-spatial (i.e., neighbourhood) polarization in six Canadian metropolitan areas: Vancouver, Calgary, Winnipeg, Toronto, Montréal, and Halifax. Applied theatre, I argued to the larger cross-disciplinary team, would be both a fitting research methodology and form of socio-artistic engagement to get inside the locality of such macro socio-economic processes and structures. As the interdisciplinary team considered the growing socio-spatial inequality in Toronto, I felt motivated to make a contribution to the larger project in three distinct ways. First, I wished to strongly inject youth voices into the larger study, and conceivably some of the most marginalized youth voices there are: shelter or homeless youth. Second, I wanted to bring a drama methodology to this mixed methods study for its potential to differently discover and articulate qualitative stories, as well as engage in knowledge mobilization practices that draw from theatre's capacity to communicate variability and nuance. Third, I wanted to work closely with specific community partners (a theatre company and a youth shelter) to benefit from our very different experiences with, and understandings of, young people.

In exploratory discussions with Project: Humanity co-founding member Daniel Chapman, we decided to work with Seeking Shelter, a shelter for homeless youth with whom they had a six-year history of work, offering free programming to their residents. This commitment is something Project: Humanity engages in as part of their mandate to make socially engaged theatre and to be responsive to their local community. Working with Project: Humanity, we used drama techniques to explore issues and experiences of spatialized inequality in young people's neighbourhoods. Methodologically, drama would be employed as a means for the youth to give creative expression to their neighbourhood and the negative attributes of localized poverty.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gallagher, K. 2014. Why Theatre Matters: Urban Youth, Engagement, and a Pedagogy of the Real. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Gallagher, K. and Lortie, P. 2007. ‘Building theories of their lives: Youth engaged in drama research’ in Thiessen, D. and Cook-Sather, A. (eds.) International Handbook of Student Experience in Elementary and Secondary School. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer Publishing, pp. 405–438.
Hamel, S. 2013. ‘When theatre of the oppressed becomes theatre of the oppressor’. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance 18.4: 403–416.Google Scholar
Hughes, J. 2013. ‘Queer choreographies of care: A guided tour of an arts and social welfare initiative in Manchester’. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance 18.2: 144–154.Google Scholar
McCreery, K. 2001. ‘From street to stage with children in Brazil and Ghana’. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 575.1: 122–146.Google Scholar
Neelands, J. 2007. ‘Taming the political: The struggle over recognition in the politics of applied theatre’. Research in Drama Education 12.2: 305–317.Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, C. 2001. ‘The postgraduate short article searching for the Marxist in Boal’. Research in Drama Education 6.1: 85–97.Google Scholar
Prentki, T. 2012. ‘Fooling with applications’ in Prentki, T. (ed.) The Fool in European Theatre Stages of Folly. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 201–225.
Snyder-Young, D. 2011. ‘“Here to Tell Her Story”: Analyzing the autoethnographic performances of others’. Qualitative Inquiry 17.10: 943–951.Google Scholar
Stapleton, J., Murphy, B. and Xing, Y. 2012. ‘The “Working Poor” in the Toronto Region: Who they are, where they live, and how trends are changing’. Toronto: Metcalf Foundation Report. http://metcalffoundation.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Working-Poor-in-Toronto-Region.pdf. Last accessed 8.12.2015
Szeman, I. 2003. ‘Finding a home on stage: A place for Romania in Europe’. Theatre Research International 28.2:193–210.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. 2009. Performance Affects: Applied Theatre and the End of Effect. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wake, C. 2003. ‘Headphone verbatim theatre: Methods, histories, genres, theories’. New Theatre Quarterly 29.4: 321–335.Google Scholar
Wortley, S. and Owusu-Bempah, A. 2011. ‘The usual suspects: Police stop and search practices in Canada’. Policing and Society 21.4: 395–407.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×