Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T15:49:21.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - ODR and access

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 November 2009

Julia Hörnle
Affiliation:
Queen Mary University of London
Get access

Summary

I have a spelling checker

It came with my PC;

It plainly marks for my revue

Mistakes I cannot sea.

I've run this poem threw it,

I'm sure your pleased too no,

Its letter perfect in it's weigh,

My checker tolled me sew.

(Janet Minor, US poet)

Introduction

This chapter looks at online forms of mediation and arbitration and variants of the main forms of ADR and how they have been transformed by ODR. This chapter essentially focuses on the online dimension of extra-judicial dispute resolution, defining the meaning of the phrase ‘online dispute resolution’ and its significance for the fair resolution of Internet disputes. This chapter explains the different forms of ODR and the technology currently being used or developed for dispute resolution. Its main argument is that ODR is more than mere online ADR. The technology has a transforming effect – it makes dispute resolution for Internet disputes more effective and hence more accessible, thus contributing to fairness.

Definition of ODR

The adjective ‘online’ refers to the use of computer and Internet technology, best described by the phrase ‘information and communications technology’ (ICT). ODR is therefore dispute resolution carried out by combining the information processing powers of computers with the networked communication facilities of the Internet. For the purposes of this book, the following simple and short definition is proposed: ‘ODR is a collective noun for dispute resolution techniques outside the courts using ICT and, in particular, Internet applications.’

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Katsh, E. and Rifkin, J., Online Dispute Resolution (San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass, 2001), 93Google Scholar
Teitz, L.-E., ‘Providing Legal Services for the Middle Class in Cyberspace: The Promise and Challenge of Online Dispute Resolution’ (2001) 70 Fordham Law Review985–1016, 991Google Scholar
Schiavetta, S., ‘The Relationship between e-ADR and Article 6 of the European Convention of Human Rights Pursuant to the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights’ [2004] (1) Journal of Information Law and TechnologyGoogle Scholar
Ponte, L. and Cavenagh, T., Cyberjustice (New Jersey, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2005), 63Google Scholar
Gibbons, L., Kennedy, R. and Gibbs, J., ‘Cyber-Mediation: Computer-Mediated Communications Medium Massaging the Message’ (2002) 32 New Mexico Law Review27–72, 43Google Scholar
‘Unscharfe Kommunikation und verzerrte Entscheidungen in der Online Mediation’, in Märker, O. and Trénel, M., Online Mediation (Berlin: Edition Sigma, 2003), 82–104, 89–90Google Scholar
Gordon, R., ‘The Electronic Personality and Digital Self’ [February/April 2001] Dispute Resolution Journal8–19Google Scholar
Thiessen, E. and J. McMahon, ‘Beyond Win-Win in Cyberspace’ (2000) 15 Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution643–67, 666Google Scholar
Philippe, M., ‘NetCase: A New ICC Arbitration Facility’ [2004] (Special Supplement) ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin53–61, 54Google Scholar
Protopsaltou, D., Schultz, T. and Magnenat-Thalmann, N., ‘Taking the Fourth Party Further? Considering a Shared Virtual Workspace for Arbitration’ (2006) 15(2) Information & Communications Technology Law157–73, 160–2 and 165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philippe, M., ‘Where is Everyone Going with Online Dispute Resolution?’ (2002) 2 International Business Law Journal167–210, 168Google Scholar
Saxer, S. Ross, ‘One Professor's Approach to Increasing Technology Use in Legal Education’ (1999–2000) 6 Richmond Journal of Law and Technology21–57, 35Google Scholar
Lodder, A. and Zeleznikov, J., ‘Developing an Online Dispute Resolution Environment: Dialogue Tools and Negotiation Support Systems in a Three Step Model’ (2005) 10 Harvard Negotiation Law Review287–337, 291Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • ODR and access
  • Julia Hörnle, Queen Mary University of London
  • Book: Cross-border Internet Dispute Resolution
  • Online publication: 30 November 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511576102.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • ODR and access
  • Julia Hörnle, Queen Mary University of London
  • Book: Cross-border Internet Dispute Resolution
  • Online publication: 30 November 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511576102.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • ODR and access
  • Julia Hörnle, Queen Mary University of London
  • Book: Cross-border Internet Dispute Resolution
  • Online publication: 30 November 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511576102.005
Available formats
×