Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-qks25 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T20:40:24.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - The Transformation of Constitutional Discourse and the Judicialization of Politics in Latin America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2010

Javier Couso
Affiliation:
Diego Portales University, Santiago, Chile
Alexandra Huneeus
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, School of Law
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Implicit in the assertion of a connection between legal culture and the judicialization of politics in Latin America is the notion that both concepts relate to relevant practices in this area of the world. As it turns out, however, neither is uncontroversial. Some scholars do not recognize the notion of legal culture as a meaningful or useful category, because they reduce social reality to rationally motivated individual actors operating under the constraint of different structures. Others dismiss the idea of a judicialization of politics in Latin America as unsuitable to the region.

Building on the growing body of literature that has documented the emergence of judicialization of politics in Latin America (Ríos-Figueroa and Taylor 2006; Taylor 2006; Sieder et al. 2005; Gloppen et al. 2004; Domingo 2004; Smulovitz 2002; Helmke 2005), this chapter takes legal culture to be a useful analytical category to make sense of the behavior of judges, lawyers, and even society at large. It then proceeds to explore the connection between judicialization and legal culture in the region. Furthermore, it suggests that in addition to structural factors such as the introduction of constitutional courts, the grant of judicial review powers to high courts, or the emergence of support structures, important changes in the internal legal culture of the region have been crucial for the emergence of judicialization of politics in Latin America. Specifically, the chapter traces the role that legal scholarship – in particular, constitutional theory – has played in transforming the region's legal culture.

Type
Chapter
Information
Cultures of Legality
Judicialization and Political Activism in Latin America
, pp. 141 - 160
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Eduardo, Aldunate. 2009. “Neoconstitucionalismo: aproximación a una etiqueta y discusión de contenidos”. Unpublished manuscript on file with the author.
Robert, Alexi. 1993. Teoría de los Derechos Fundamentales. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales.Google Scholar
Carl, Bauer. 1998. “Derecho y economía en la Constitución de 1980.” Perspectivas en Política, Economía y Gestión, 1(2): 23–47.Google Scholar
Albano, Carrasco, Manuel. 1858. Comentarios Sobre la Constitución Política de 1833. Valparaíso: Imprenta y Librería del Mercurio.Google Scholar
Mauro, Cappelletti, Merryman, John H., and Perillo, Joseph M.. 1967. The Italian Legal System: An Introduction. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Renato, Cristi and Ruiz-Tagle, Pablo. 2006. La República en Chile: Teoría y Práctica del Constitucionalismo Republicano. Santiago: LOM.Google Scholar
Javier, Couso. 2007. “The Seduction of Judicially Triggered Social Transformation: The Impact of the ‘Warren Court’ in Latin America.” In The Global Impact of the Warren Court. Sheiber, Harry, ed. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Andrés, Cuneo. 1980. “La Corte Suprema de Chile, sus percepciones acerca del Derecho, su rol en el sistema legal y la relación de éste con el sistema político” In Universidad de Costa Rica, La administración de justicia en América Latina. San José, Costa Rica: Universidad de Costa Rica. 71–83.Google Scholar
Ives, Dezaley and Garth, Bryant. 2003. “Patterns of Foreign Legal Investment and State Transformation in Latin America.” In Legal Culture in the Age of Globalization. Friedman, Lawrence and Pérez-Perdomo, Rogelio, eds. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Pilar, Domingo. 2004. “Judicialization of Politics or Politization of the Judiciary: Recent Trends in Latin America.” Democratization, 11(1): 104–26.Google Scholar
Ronald, Dworkin. 1977. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Edelman. 1994. “The Judicialization of Politics in Israel.” International Political Science Review, 15: 177–86.Google Scholar
Charles, Epp. 1998. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Friedman. 1975. The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Friedman and Pérez-Perdomo, Rogelio (ed.). 2002. Legal Culture in the Age of Globalization. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
García Figueroa, Alfonso. 2003. “La Teoría del Derecho en Tiempos del Constitucionalismo,” in Neoconstitutcionalismo(s). Carbonell, Miguel, ed. Mexico: UNAM and Editorial Trotta.Google Scholar
Howard, Gillman. 1993. The Constitution Besieged: The Rise and Demise of Lochner Era Police Powers Jurisprudence. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Ginsburg. 1999. Growing Constitutions: Judicial Review in the New Democracies (Korea, Taiwan, China, Mongolia), Ph.D. Dissertation. University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
Siri, Gloppen, Gargarella, Roberto, and Skaar, Elin, eds. 2004. Democratization and the Judiciary: The Accountability Function of Courts in New Democracies. London: Frank Cass Publishers.
González, Felipe. 2003. “Cultura Judicial y Enseñanza del Derecho en Chile,” Clínicas de Interés Público y Enseñanza del Derecho. Argentina, Chile, Colombia, México y Perú. Cuadernos de Análisis Jurídico, Facultad de Derecho, Universidad Diego Portales. 145–85.Google Scholar
Gretchen, Helmke. 2005. Courts Under Constraints: Judges, Generals, and Presidents in Argentina. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kenneth, Holland. 1991. Judicial Activism in Comparative Perspective. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Jorge, Huneeus. 1880. La Constitución ante el Congreso. Santiago: Imprenta de Los Tiempos.Google Scholar
Iván, Jaksic. 2001. Andrés Bello: La pasión por el orden. Chile: Editorial Universitaria.Google Scholar
Diana, Kapiszewski and Taylor, Matthew. 2008. “Doing Courts Justice? Studying Judicial Politics in Latin America,” Perspectives on Politics, 6: 741–67.Google Scholar
Hans, Kelsen. 1945. General Theory of Law and State. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
David, Landau. 2005. “The Two Discourses in Colombian Constitutional Jurisprudence: A New Approach to Modeling Judicial Behavior in Latin America,” George Washington International Law Review, 37: 687–744.Google Scholar
Victorino, Lastarria, José. 1865. Elementos de Derecho Público Constitucional, teórico, positivo i político. Berlin: Eng. Vanderhaeghum.Google Scholar
López Medina, Diego. 2004. Teoría impura del Derecho: La transformación de la cultura jurídica latinoamericana. Bogotá: Legis.Google Scholar
William, Nelson. 2000. Marbury v. Madison. The Origins and Legacy of Judicial Review. Kansas: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Carlos, Nino. 1992. Fundamentos de Derecho Constitucional. Análisis filosófico, jurídico y politológico de la práctica constitucional. Buenos Aires: Editorial Astrea.Google Scholar
Carlos, Peña, 1999a. “Sobre la relevancia de la justicia constitucional,” in La Jurisdicción Constitucional Chilena ante la Reforma, Gómez, Gastón, ed., (Cuadernos de Análisis Jurídico, Escuela de Derecho, Universidad Diego Portales). 11–16.Google Scholar
Carlos, Peña. 1999b. Practica Constitucional y Derechos Fundamentales. Colección Estudios No, 5, Corporación Nacional de Reparación y Reconciliación: Santiago.Google Scholar
Rogelio, Pérez-Perdomo. 2004. Los abogados en América Latina. Una introducción histórica. Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia.Google Scholar
Julio, Ríos-Figueroa and Taylor, Matthew. 2006. “Institutional Determinants of the Judicialization of Policy in Brazil and Mexico,” Journal of Latin American Studies, 38(4): 739–66.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Bravo, Joaquín. 1888. Estudios Constitucionales. Santiago: Imprenta Victoria.Google Scholar
Martin, Shapiro and Stone Sweet, Alec. 2002. On Law, Politics, and Judicialization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rachel, Sieder, Schjolden, Line, and Angell, Alan, eds. 2005. The Judicialization of Politics in Latin America. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kathryn, Sikkink. 1996. “The Emergence, Evolution, and Effectiveness of the Latin American Human Rights Network.” In Constructing Democracy: Human Rights, Citizenship and Society in Latin America, Jelin, and Hershberg, , eds. Boulder, Co. and Oxford: Westview Press. 59–84.Google Scholar
Silva Bascuñán, Alejandro. 1963. Tratado de Derecho Constitucional. Tomo I. Principios. Santiago: Editorial Jurídica de Chile.Google Scholar
Roger, Smith. 1990. Liberalism and American Constitutional Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Catalina, Smulovitz. 2002. “The Discovery of the Law. Political Consequences in the Argentine Experience.” In Global Prescriptions. The Production, Exportation, and Importation of a New Legal Orthodoxy, Garth, Bryant and Dezalay, Yves, eds., Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. 249–74.Google Scholar
Alec, Stone. 1992. The Birth of Judicial Politics in France: The Constitutional Council in Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec. 2000. Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neal, Tate and Vallinder, Torbjorn. 1995. The Global Expansion of Judicial Power. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Matthew, Taylor. 2006. “Courts, Policy Contestation, and the Legitimation of Economic Reform Under Cardoso.” In Statecrafting Monetary Authority: Democracy and Financial Order in Brazil, Sola, Lourdes and Whitehead, Lawrence, eds., Oxford: Centre for Brazilian Studies. 205–36.Google Scholar
Keith, Whittington. 2007. Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy: The Presidency, the Supreme Court, and Constitutional Leadership in U.S. History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×