Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T18:32:30.654Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 9 - Tests of significance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2012

Les Kirkup
Affiliation:
University of Technology, Sydney
Get access

Summary

Introduction

What can reasonably be inferred from data gathered in an experiment? This simple question lies at the heart of experimentation, as an experiment can be judged by how much insight can be drawn from data. An experiment may have a broad or narrow focus, and may be designed to:

  • challenge a relationship that has an established theoretical basis;

  • critically examine a discovery that results from ‘chance’ observations;

  • check for drift in an instrument;

  • compare analysis of materials carried out in two or more laboratories.

Such general goals give way to specific questions that we hope can be answered by careful analysis of data gathered in well designed experiments. Questions that might be asked include:

  • is there a linear relationship between quantities measured in an experiment;

  • could the apparent correlation between variables have occurred ‘by chance’;

  • does a new manufacturing process produce lenses with focal lengths that are less variable than the old manufacturing process;

  • is there agreement between two methods used to determine the concentration of iron in a specimen;

  • has the gain of an instrument changed since it was calibrated?

It is usually not possible to answer these questions with a definite ‘yes’ or definite ‘no’. Though we hope data gathered during an experiment will provide evidence as to which reply to favour, we must be satisfied with answers expressed in terms of probability.

Consider a situation in which a manufacturer supplies an instrument containing an amplifier with a gain specified as 1000. Would it be reasonable to conclude that the instrument is faulty or needs recalibrating if the gain determined by a single measurement is 995? It is possible that random errors inherent in the measurement process, as revealed by making repeat measurements of the gain, would be sufficient to explain the discrepancy between the ‘expected’ value of gain of 1000 and the ‘experimental’ value of 995. What we would really like to know is whether, after taking into account the scatter in the values of the gain obtained through repeat measurements, the difference between the value we have reason to expect will occur and those actually obtained through experiment or observation is ‘significant’.

Type
Chapter
Information
Data Analysis for Physical Scientists
Featuring Excel®
, pp. 382 - 427
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Tests of significance
  • Les Kirkup, University of Technology, Sydney
  • Book: Data Analysis for Physical Scientists
  • Online publication: 05 March 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139005258.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Tests of significance
  • Les Kirkup, University of Technology, Sydney
  • Book: Data Analysis for Physical Scientists
  • Online publication: 05 March 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139005258.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Tests of significance
  • Les Kirkup, University of Technology, Sydney
  • Book: Data Analysis for Physical Scientists
  • Online publication: 05 March 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139005258.011
Available formats
×