Achen, C. H. (1975). “Mass Political Attitudes and the Survey Response.” American Political Science Review 69(4): 1218–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ackerman, B. and Fishkin, J.. (2004). “Righting the Ship of Democracy.” Legal Affairs January/February: 34–9.Google Scholar

Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levison, D. J., and Sanford, R. N.. (1950). The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Altemeyer, R. (1981). Right-Wing Authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.Google Scholar

Althaus, S. L. (2003). Collective Preferences in Democratic Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arrow, K. J. (1951). Social Choice and Individual Values. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Austen-Smith, D. (1990). “Information Transmission in Debate.” American Journal of Political Science 34(1): 124–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austen-Smith, D. and Banks, J. S.. (1996). “Information Aggregation, Rationality, and the Condorcet Jury Theorem.” American Political Science Review 91(1): 34–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austen-Smith, D. and Feddersen, T. J.. (2006). “Deliberation, Preference Uncertainty, and Voting Rules.” American Political Science Review 100(2): 209–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austen-Smith, D. and Feddersen, T. J.. (2008). “In Response to Jurg Steiner's, ‘Concept Stretching: The Case of Deliberation.’” European Political Science 7(2): 191–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austen-Smith, D. and Feddersen, T. J.. (2009). “Information Aggregation and Communication in Committees.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of Biological Sciences 364: 763–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bächtiger, A., Niemeyer, S., Neblo, M. A., Steenbergen, M. R., and Steiner, J.. (2010). “Disentangling Diversity in Deliberative Democracy: Competing Theories, Their Blind Spots and Complementarities.” Journal of Political Philosophy 18(1): 32–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barabas, J. (2004). “How Deliberation Affects Policy Opinions.” American Political Science Review 98(4): 687–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartels, L. M. (1996). “Uninformed Votes: Information Effects in Presidential Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 40(1): 194–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartels, L. M. (2003). “Democracy with Attitudes.” In Electoral Democracy, edited by MacKuen, Michael B. and Rabinowitz, George. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 48–82.Google Scholar

Belzer, M. H. (2000). Sweatshops on Wheels: Winners and Losers in Trucking Deregulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ben-Ner, A., Putterman, L., and Ren, T.. (2010). “Lavish Returns on Cheap Talk: Two-Way Communication in Trust Games.” The Journal of Socio-Economics 40(1): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berelson, B. R. (1952). “Democratic Theory and Public Opinion.” Public Opinion Quarterly 16: 313–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bizer, G. Y., Krosnick, J. A., Holbrook, A. L., Wheeler, S. C., Rucker, D. D., and Petty, R. E.. (2004). “The Impact of Personality on Cognitive Behavioral, and Affective Political Processes: The Effects of Need to Evaluate.” Journal of Personality 72(5): 995–1027.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Blair, J., Mitchell, D. R., and Blair, K.. (2005). The Psychopath: Emotion and the Brain. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Bohman, J. (1996). Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bohman, J. (2007). “Political Communication and the Epistemic Value of Diversity: Deliberation and Legitimation in Media Societies.” Communication Theory 17(4): 348–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brady, D. W. and Volden, C.. (2005). Revolving Gridlock. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Brandom, R. (1994). Making It Explicit. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Brinkley, D. (1996). 11 Presidents, 4 Wars, 22 Political Conventions, 1 Moon Landing, 3 Assassinations, 2,000 Weeks of News and Other Stuff on Television and 18 Years of Growing Up in North Carolina. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar

Burden, C. Hysom, T., Esterling, K. M., Lazer, D., and Neblo, M. A.. (2007). 2007 Gold Mouse Report: Lessons from the Best Web Sites on Capitol Hill. Washington, DC: Congressional Management Foundation.Google Scholar

Burns, N., Schlozman, K. L., and Verba, S.. (2001). The Private Roots of Public Action: Gender, Equality, and Political Participation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cacioppo, J. T. and Petty, R. E.. (1982). “The Need for Cognition.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42(1): 116–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chambers, S. (2009). “Rhetoric and the Public Sphere: Has Deliberative Democracy Abandoned Mass Democracy.” Political Theory 37(3): 323–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, J. (1999). “Habermas on Democracy.” Ratio Juris 12(4): 385–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Converse, P. E. (1963). “Attitudes and Non-Attitudes: Continuation of a Dialogue.” In The Quantitative Analysis of Social Problems, edited by Tufte, E. R.. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Converse, P. E. (1964). “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, edited by Apter, D. E.. New York: Free Press, 206–61.Google Scholar

Cook, F. L., Carpini, M. X. Delli, and Jacobs, L.. (2007). “Who Deliberates? Discursive Participation in America.” In Deliberation, Participation and Democracy: Can the People Govern?, edited by Rosenberg, Shawn W.. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Dahl, R. A. (1956). A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Dahl, R. A. (1958). “Political Theory: Truth and Consequences.” World Politics 11(1): 89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dahl, R. A. (1961). “The Behavioral Approach in Political Science: Epitaph for a Monument to a Successful Protest.” American Political Science Review 55(4): 763–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dahlberg, L. (2005). “The Habermasian Public Sphere: Taking Difference Seriously?” Theory and Society 34(2): 111–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delli Carpini, M. X. and Keeter, S.. (1996). What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Delli Carpini, M. X., Cook, F. L., and Jacobs, L. R.. (2004). “Public Deliberation, Discursive Participation, and Citizen Engagement: A Review of the Empirical Literature.” Annual Review of Political Science 7: 315–44.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1927). The Public and Its Problems. Chicago, IL: Swallow.Google Scholar

Dickson, E. S., Hafer, C., and Landa, D.. (2008). “Cognition and Strategy: A Deliberation Experiment.” The Journal of Politics 70: 974–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Disch, L. (2011). “Toward a Mobilization Conception of Democratic Representation.” American Political Science Review 105: 100–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Druckman, J. N. (2004). “Political Preference Formation: Competition, Deliberation, and the (Ir)relevance of Framing Effects.” American Political Science Review 98(4): 671–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dryzek, John S. (2005). “Handle with Care: The Deadly Hermeneutics of Deliberative Instrumentation.” Acta Politica 40(2): 197–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dyson, F. (2004). “A Meeting with Enrico Fermi.” Nature 427: 297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Eliasoph, N. (1998). Avoiding Politics: How Americans Produce Apathy in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elster, J. (1983). Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality. Paris: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elster, J. (1986) “The Market and the Forum: Three Varieties of Political Theory.” In Foundations of Social Choice Theory, edited by Elster, J. and Hylland, A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Elster, J., Ed. (1998). Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erickson, R. S. (1979). “The SRC Panel Data and Mass Political Attitudes.” British Journal of Political Science 2: 25–60.Google Scholar

Erickson, R. S., MacKuen, M. B., and Stimson, J. A.. (2002). The Macro Polity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Esterling, K. M., Neblo, M. A., and Lazer, D.. (2011a). “Means, Motive, and Opportunity in Becoming Informed about Politics: A Deliberative Field Experiment with Members of Congress and Their Constituents.” Public Opinion Quarterly 75 (3): 483-503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Esterling, K. M., Lazer, D., and Neblo, M. A.. (2011b). “Representative Communication: Web Site Interactivity and Distributional Path Dependence in the US Congress.” Political Communication 28(4): 409–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Esterling, K. M., Neblo, M. A., and Lazer, D.. (2011c). “Estimating Treatment Effects in the Presence of Noncompliance and Nonresponse: The Generalized Endogenous Treatment Model.” Political Analysis 19(2): 205–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Esterling, K. M., Lazer, D., and Neblo, M. A.. (2013). “Connecting to Constituents: The Diffusion of Representation Practices among Congressional Website.” Political Research Quarterly 66: 102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farrar, C., Fishkin, J., Green, D., List, C., Luskin, R., and Paluck, E.. (2010). “Disaggregating Deliberation's Effects: An Experiment with a Deliberative Poll.” British Journal of Political Science 40: 333–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fehr, E. and Rockenbach, B.. (2003). “Detrimental Effects of Sanctions on Human Altruism.” Nature 422: 137–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ferrell, R. H. (1994). Harry S. Truman: A Life. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press.Google Scholar

Fishkin, J. S. (2005). “Defending Deliberation: A Comment on Ian Shapiro's The State of Democratic Theory.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8(1): 71–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fishkin, J. S. (2009). When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fishkin, J. S. and Luskin, R. C.. (2005). “Experimenting With a Democratic Ideal: Deliberative Polling and Public Opinion.” Acta Politica 40(3): 284–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frohlich, N. and Oppenheimer, J.. (2006). “Skating on Thin Ice: Cracks in the Public Choice Foundation.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 18(3): 235–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gastil, J., Deess, E. P., et al. (2002). “Civic Awakening in the Jury Room: A Test of the Connection between Jury Deliberation and Political Participation.” Journal of Politics 64(2): 585–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerardi, D. and Yariv, L. (2007). “Deliberative Voting.” Journal of Economic Theory 134(1): 317–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goeree, J. K. and Yariv, L.. (2011). “An Experimental Study of Collective Deliberation.” Econometrica 79(3): 893–921.Google Scholar

Gibbard, A. (1973). “Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result.” Econometrica 29(1): 33–43.Google Scholar

Goodin, R. E. (2000). “Democratic Deliberation Within.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 29(1): 81–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodin, R. E. (2003). Reflective Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gutmann, A. and Thompson, D.. (1996). Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge: Belknap Press / Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Gutmann, A. and Thompson, D. F.. (2004). Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Habermas, J. (2006). “Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research1.” Communication Theory 16(4): 411–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Habermas, J. (1993). Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (1979). Communication and the Evolution of Society. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (1976). Legitimation Crisis. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (1989b [1962]). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Heath, J. (2001). Communicative Action and Rational Choice. Cambridge: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heath, J. (2008). Following the Rules: Practical Reasoning and Deontic Constraint. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herbst, S. (1998). Reading Public Opinion: How Political Actors View the Democratic Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hibbing, J. R. and Theiss-Morse, E.. (2002). Stealth Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hobbes, T. (1991 [1651]). Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Huckfeldt, R. (2007). “Unanimity, Discord, and the Communication of Public Opinion.” American Journal of Political Science 51(4): 978–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacobs, L. R. and Shapiro, R. Y.. (2000). Politicians Don't Pander: Political Manipulation and the Loss of Democratic Responsiveness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Jacobs, L. R., Cook, F. L., and Delli Carpini, M. X.. (2009). Talking Together: Public Deliberation and Political Participation in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacquette, D. (2007). “Two Sides of Any Issue.” Argumentation 21(2): 115–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jensen, J. L. (2003). “Public Spheres on the Internet: Anarchic or Government-Sponsored: A Comparison.” Scandinavian Political Studies 26(4): 349–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., et al., Eds. (1982). Judgement Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. (1979) [1798]. The Conflict of the Faculties. New York: Abaris Books.Google Scholar

Kelly, J. (2012). Framing Democracy: A Behavioral Approach to Democratic Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Key, V. O. J. (1966). The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting, 1936–1960. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knoke, D., Pappi, F. U., Broadbent, J., and Tsujinaka, Y.. (1996). Comparing Policy Networks: Labor Politics in the U.S., Germany, and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kohlberg, L. (1971). From Is to Ought: How to Commit the Naturalistic Fallacy and Get Away With it in the Study of Moral Development. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Krehbiel, K. (1998). Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kühberger, A. (1998). “The Influence of Framing on Risky Decisions: A Meta-Analysis.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 75(1): 23–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kuga, K. and Nagatani, H.. (1974). “Voter Antagonism and the Paradox of Voting.” Econometrica 42: 1045–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lacy, D. (2001). “A Theory of Nonseparable Preferences in Survey Responses.” American Journal of Political Science 45(2): 239–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landa, D. and Meirowitz, A.. (2009). “Game Theory, Information, and Deliberative Democracy.” American Journal of Political Science 53(2): 427–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lau, R. R. and Redlawsk, D. P.. (1997). ““Voting Correctly”.” American Political Science Review 91(3): 585–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lazer, D., Sohkey, A., Neblo, M. A., Kennedy, R., and Esterling, K.. (2015). “Expanding the Conversation: Multiplier Effects from a Deliberative Field Experiment.” Forthcoming, Political Communication.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lazer, D., Neblo, M. A., and Esterling, K.. (2011). “The Internet and the Madisonian Cycle: Possibilities and Prospects for Consultative Representation”. Connecting Democracy: Online Consultation and the Flow of Political Communication, pp. 265–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lazer, D., Mergel, I., Ziniel, C., Esterling, K. M., and Neblo, M. A.. (2011). “The Multiple Institutional Logics of Innovation.” International Public Management Journal 14(3): 311–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lazer, D., Neblo, M. A., Esterling, K., Goldschmidt, K.. (2009). “Online Town Hall Meetings: Exploring Democracy in the 21st Century.” Congressional Management Foundation.Google Scholar

Lind, E. A. and Tyler, T. R. (1988). The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lippmann, W. (1922). Public Opinion. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar

Lodge, M., McGraw, K. M., and Stroh, P.. (1989). “An Impression-Driven Model of Candidate Evaluation.” American Political Science Review 87: 399–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lupia, A. and McCubbins, M. D.. (1998). The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Luskin, R. C. and Fishkin, J. S.. (2002) “Deliberation and ‘Better Citizens’.” Paper presented at the Joint Sessions of Workshops of the ECPR, Turin, Italy, 3/2002.Google Scholar

Mackie, G. (2003). Democracy Defended. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Madar, D. (2000). Heavy Traffic: Deregulation, Trade, and Transformation in North American Trucking. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar

Mansbridge, J. (1980). Beyond Adversary Democracy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Mansbridge, J. (1999). “On the Idea that Participation Makes Better Citizens.” In Citizen Competence and Democratic Institutions, edited by Elkin, and Soltan, . University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Mansbridge, J. (2003). “Rethinking Representation.” American Political Science Review 97(4): 515–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansbridge, J. (2007). “Self-Interest in Deliberation.” Kettering Review 25(1): 62–72.Google Scholar

Mansbridge, J., Amengual, M., Hartz-Karp, J., and Gastil, J.. (2006). “Norms of Deliberation: An Inductive Study.” Journal of Public Deliberation 2(1): 1–47.Google Scholar

Mansbridge, J., Bohman, J., Chambers, S., Estlund, D., Follesdal, A., Fung, A., Lafont, C., Manin, B., and Marti, J. L.. (2010). “The Place of Self-Interest in Deliberative Democracy.” Journal of Political Philosophy 18(1): 64–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marcus, G. and MacKuen, M. (1993). “Anxiety, Enthusiasm, and the Vote: The Emotional Underpinnings of Learning and Involvement during Presidential Campaigns.” American Political Science Review 87: 672–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Margolis, H. (2007). Cognition and Extended Rational Choice. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKelvey, R. D. (1979). “General Conditions for Global Intransitivities in Formal Voting Models.” Econometrica 47: 1085–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKelvey, R. D. and Ordershook, P. C.. (1986). “Information, Electoral Equilibria, and the Democratic Ideal.” The Journal of Politics 48: 909–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McManus, J. (2009). Cowboys Full: The Story of Poker. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar

Meirowitz, A. (2006). “Designing Institutions to Aggregate Preferences and Information.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 1: 373–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meirowitz, A. (2007). “In Defense of Exclusionary Deliberation: Communication and Voting with Private Beliefs and Values.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 19(3): 301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mendelberg, T. (2002). “The Deliberative Citizen: Theory and Evidence.” Research in Micropolitics 6: 151–93.Google Scholar

Mendelberg, T. and Oleske, J.. (2000). “Race and Public Deliberation.” Political Communication 17: 169–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mercier, H. and Sperber, D.. (2011a). “Argumentation: It's Adaptiveness and Efficacy.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34: 94–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mercier, H. and Sperber, D.. (2011b). “Why do Humans Reason? Arguments for an Argumentative Theory.” Brain Sciences 34(2): 94–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Miller, D. (1992). “Deliberative Democracy and Social Choice.” Political Studies 40(s1): 54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Minozzi, W. (2011) “A Jamming Theory of Politics.” Journal of Politics 73(2): 301-15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Minozzi, W. (2013). “Endogenous Beliefs in Models of Politics.” American Journal of Political Science 57(3): 566–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Minozzi, W., Neblo, M. A., and Siegel, D. A.. (2012). “A Theory of Deliberation as Interactive Reasoning.” APSA Annual Meeting.Google Scholar

Minozzi, W., Neblo, M. A., Esterling, K. M., and Lazer, D. M.. (2015). “Field experiment evidence of substantive, attributional, and behavioral persuasion by members of Congress in online town halls.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112(13): 3937-42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Muhlberger, P. (n.d.)“Stealth Democracy: Authoritarianism, Parochial Citizens and Deliberation.”Google Scholar

Mutz, D. (2006). Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mutz, D. C. (2002). “The Consequences of Crosscutting Networks for Political Participation.” American Journal of Political Science 46: 838–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mutz, D. C. (2008). “Is Deliberative Democracy a Falsifiable Theory?” Annual Review of Political Science 11(1): 521–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neblo, M. A. (2000). Thinking Through Democracy: Deliberative Politics in Theory and Practice. Dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar

Neblo, M. A. (2003). Impassioned Democracy: The Role of Emotion in Deliberative Theory. In Democracy Collaborative Affiliates Conference.Google Scholar

Neblo, M. A. (2004). “Giving Hands and Feet to Morality.” Perspectives on Politics 2(01): 99–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neblo, M. A. (2005a). “Thinking Through Democracy: Between the Theory and Practice of Deliberative Politics.” Acta Politica 40(2): 169–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neblo, M. A. (2005b). “The Weight of Passion.” In Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar

Neblo, M. A. (2007a). “Family Disputes: Diversity in Defining and Measuring Deliberation.” Swiss Political Science Review 13(4): 527–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neblo, M. A. (2007b). “Change for the Better? Linking the Mechanisms of Deliberative Opinion Change to Normative Theory.” Paper presented to the Midwest Political Science Association Annual Meeting, ChicagoGoogle Scholar

Neblo, M. A. (2007c). “Philosophical Psychology with Political Intent.” The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior, pp.25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neblo, M. A. (2009a). “Three-Fifths a Racist: A Typology for Analyzing Public Opinion About Race.” Political Behavior 31(1): 31–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neblo, M. A. (2009b). “Meaning and Measurement: Reorienting the Race Politics Debate.” Political Research Quarterly 62(3): 474–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neblo, M. A. (2011a). “The Virtue of Deliberation: Sophrosyne and Epistemic Democracy.” Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Google Scholar

Neblo, M. A. (2011b). “Deliberation's Legitmation Crisis.” Critical Review 23(3): 405–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neblo, M. A., Esterling, K., Kennedy, R., Lazer, D., and Sokhey, A.. (2010). “Who Wants to Deliberate – and Why?” American Political Science Review 104(3): 566–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neumann, J. von and Morgenstern, O.. (1944). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Page, B. I. (1996). Who Deliberates?: Mass Media in Modern Democracy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Page, B. I. and Shapiro, R. Y.. (1992). The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parkinson, J. (2003). “Legitimacy Problems in Deliberative Democracy.” Political Studies 51(1): 180–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parkinson, J., and Mansbridge, J., Eds. (2012). Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Patty, J. W. (2008). “Arguments-Based Collective Choice.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 20(4): 379–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Patty, J. W. and Penn, E. M.. (2010). “A Social Choice Theory of Legitimacy.” Social Choice and Welfare 36(3): 365–82.Google Scholar

Pettit, P. (2001). “Deliberative Democracy and the Discursive Dilemma.” Philosophical Issues 11: 268–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pettit, P. (2003). “Discourse Theory and Republican Liberty.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6: 72–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J., and Podsakoff, N. P.. (2003). “Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies.” Journal of Applied Psychology. 88 (5): 879–903.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Posner, R. (2003). Law, Pragmatism, and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Posner, R. (2004). “Smooth Sailing.” Legal Affairs January/February: 41–42.Google Scholar

Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Raskinski, K. A. (1989). “The Effect of Question Wording on Public Support for Government Spending.” Public Opinion Quarterly 53: 388–94.Google Scholar

Riker, W. H. (1980). “Implications from the Disequilibrium of Majority Rule for the Study of Institutions.” American Political Science Review 74(2): 432–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Riker, W. H. (1982). Liberalism Against Populism: A Confrontation between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar

Rokeach, M. (1960). The Open and Closed Mind. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Rorty, R. (1982). Consequences of Pragmatism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Sanders, L. M. (1997). “Against Deliberation.” Political Theory 25(3): 347–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sanders, L. M. (1999). “Democratic Politics and Survey Research.” Philosophy and the Social Sciences 29 (2): 248–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Satterthwaite, M. A. (1975). “Strategy-Proofness and Arrow's Conditions: Existence and Correspondence Theorems for Voting Procedures and Social Welfare Functions.” Journal of Economic Theory 10(April): 187–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scargle, J. D. (2000). “Publication Bias: The ‘File-Drawer Problem’ in Scientific Inference.” Journal of Scientific Exploration 14(2): 94–106.Google Scholar

Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The Semisovereign Public: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Schelling, T. (1960/2006). The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A. (2000). “Overlapping Talk and the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language in Society 29: 1–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schuman, H. and Presser, S. (1996). Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Question Form, Wording and Context. New York: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Schumpeter, J. (1942/2008). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics.Google Scholar

Searing, D. D., Solt, F., et al. (2007). “Public Discussion in the Deliberative System: Does It Make Better Citizens?” British Journal of Political Science 37(4): 587–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shepsle, K. A. and Weingast, B. R.. (1984). “Uncovered Sets and Sophisticated Voting Outcomes with Implications for Agenda Institutions.” American Journal of Political Science, 28: 49–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skinner, Q. (1974). “Some Problems in the Analysis of Political Thought and Action.” Political Theory 2: 277–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sniderman, P. M., Brody, R. A., and Tetlock, P. E.. (1991). Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steenbergen, M. R., Bächtiger, A., Spörndli, M., and Steiner, J.. (2003). “Measuring Political Deliberation: A Discourse Quality Index.” Comparative European Politics 1(1): 21–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steiner, J. (2008). “Concept Stretching: The Case of Deliberation.” European Political Science 7: 186–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steiner, J., Bächtiger, A., Spörndli, M., Steenbergen, M. R.. (2004). Deliberative Politics in Action: Analyzing Parliamentary Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sunstein, C. (2009). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, Q. P. (2002). “Public Deliberation and Popular Government in Aristotle's ‘Politics’.” Interpretation – A Journal of Political Philosophy 29(3): 241–60.Google Scholar

Thompson, D. F. (2008). “Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 11(1): 497–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tocqueville, A. D. ([1835/1840] 1969). Democracy in America. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., and Moll, H.. (2005). “Understanding and Sharing Intentions: The Origins of Cultural Cognition.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28: 675–735.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D.. (1981). “The Faming of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice.” Science 211(4481): 453–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., and Brady, H.. (1995). Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O.. (1944). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Walzer, M. (1999). “Deliberation and What Else?”In Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement, edited by Macedo, Stephen. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wanderer, J. (2008). Robert Brandom. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar

Warren, M. (2007). “Institutionalizing Deliberative Democracy.” In Deliberation, Participation, and Democracy: Can the People Govern? edited by Rosenberg, S.. Baskingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Warren, R. P. (1946). All the King's Men. New York: Harcourt Brace and Company.Google Scholar

Zaller, J. (1992). The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar