Alanen, L. 1990. “Cartesian Ideas and Intentionality,” Acta Philosophica Fennica 49: 344–69.Google Scholar

Alanen, L. 1994. “Sensory Ideas, Objective Reality, and Material Falsity,” in Cottingham, (ed.), pp. 229–50.

Alanen, L. 2003. Descartes's Concept of Mind, Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Alanen, L. 2008. “Omnipotence, Modality, and Conceivability,” in Broughton, and Carriero, (eds.), pp. 353–71.

Alquié, F. 1950. La découverte métaphysique de l'homme chez Descartes, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Alquié, F. (ed.) 1967. Oeuvres philosophiques de Descartes, vol. ii, Paris: Éditions Garnier Frères.

Aquinas, St. Thomas. 1975. Summa Contra Gentiles [1259–1264/54], ed. and trans. Bourke, V. J., Dame, Notre and London: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Ariew, R., and Garber, D. (eds. and trans.) 1989. G. W. Leibniz: Philosophical Essays, Indianapolis and Cambridge, MA: Hackett Publishing Company.

Aristotle, . 1985. Nicomachean Ethics [c. 325 BC], trans. Irwin, T., Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Ayers, M. 1998. “Ideas and Objective Being,” in Garber, and Ayers, (eds.), pp. 1062–107.

Beck, L. J. 1952. The Method of Descartes: A Study of the Regulae, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Beyssade, J.-M. 1992. “Descartes on Material Falsity,” in Cummins, and Zoeller, (eds.), pp. 5–20.

Beyssade, J.-M. 1993. “On the Idea of God: Incomprehensibility or Incompatibilities?,” in Voss, (ed.), pp. 85–94.

Beyssade, M. 1994. “Descartes's Doctrine of Freedom: Differences between the French and Latin Texts of the Fourth Meditation,” in Cottingham, (ed.), pp. 191–206.

Bolton, M. B. 1986. “Confused and Obscure Ideas of Sense,” in Rorty, (ed.), pp. 389–403.

Bordo, S. R. 1987. The Flight to Objectivity: Essays on Cartesianism and Culture, Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Broughton, J. 2002. Descartes's Method of Doubt, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Broughton, J. 2008. “Self-Knowledge,” in Broughton, and Carriero, (eds.), pp. 179–95.

Broughton, J. and Carriero, J. (eds.) 2008. A Companion to Descartes, Malden, MA and Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, D. J. 2006. Descartes and the Passionate Mind, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, D. J. 2008. “Descartes on True and False Ideas,” in Broughton, and Carriero, (eds.), pp. 196–215.

Butler, R. J. (ed.) 1972. Cartesian Studies, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Campbell, J. K. 1999. “Descartes on Spontaneity, Indifference, and Alternatives,” in Gennaro, R. J. and Huenemann, C. (eds.), New Essays on the Rationalists, Oxford University Press, pp. 179–99.Google Scholar

Carriero, J. 2008. “The Cartesian Circle and the Foundations of Knowledge,” in Broughton, and Carriero, (eds.), pp. 302–18.

Caton, H. 1975. “Will and Reason in Descartes's Theory of Error,” Journal of Philosophy 72: 87–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chappell, V. 1986. “The Theory of Ideas,” in Rorty, (ed.), pp. 177–98.

Chappell, V. 1994. “Descartes's Compatibilism,” in Cottingham, (ed.), pp. 177–90.

Chappell, V. 1997. “Descartes's Ontology,” Topoi 16: 111–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, D. M. 1982. Descartes' Philosophy of Science, Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Clarke, D. M. 2003. Descartes's Theory of Mind, Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clatterbaugh, K. C. 1980. “Descartes' Causal Likeness Principle,” Philosophical Review 89: 379–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coolidge, F. P. 1991. “The Insufficiency of Descartes' Provisional Morality,” International Philosophical Quarterly 31: 275–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Costa, M. J. 1983. “What Cartesian Ideas Are Not,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 21: 537–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cottingham, J. 1996. “Cartesian Ethics: Reason and the Passions,” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 50: 193–216.Google Scholar

Cottingham, J. 1997. “Descartes, Sixth Meditation: The External World, ‘Nature’ and Human Experience,” in V. Chappell (ed.), Descartes's Meditations: Critical Essays, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 207–23.Google Scholar

Cottingham, J. 1998. Philosophy and the Good Life: Reason and the Passions in Greek, Cartesian and Psychoanalytic Ethics, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cottingham, J. 2002. “Descartes and the Voluntariness of Belief,” Monist 85: 343–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cottingham, J. 2008a. “The Role of God in Descartes's Philosophy,” in Broughton, and Carriero, (eds.), pp. 288–301.

Cottingham, J. 2008b. Cartesian Reflections: Essays on Descartes's Philosophy, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cottingham, J. (ed.) 1992. The Cambridge Companion to Descartes, Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Cottingham, J. 1994. Reason, Will, and Sensation: Studies in Descartes's Metaphysics, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Cottingham, J. (trans. with Introduction and Commentary) 1976. Descartes' Conversation with Burman, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Cover, J. A., and Kulstad, M. (eds.) 1990. Central Themes in Early Modern Philosophy, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

Cress, D. 1994. “Truth, Error, and the Order of Reason: Descartes' Puzzling Synopsis of the Fourth Meditation,” in Cottingham, (ed.), pp. 141–55.

Cronin, T. J. 1966. Objective Being in Descartes and Suárez, Rome: Gregorian University Press.Google Scholar

Cumming, R. 1955. “Descartes' Provisional Morality,” Review of Metaphysics 9: 207–235.Google Scholar

Cummins, P. D., and Zoeller, G. (eds.) 1992. Minds, Ideas and Objects: Essays on the Theory of Representation in Modern Philosophy, Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Press.Google Scholar

Cunning, D. 2003. “True and Immutable Natures and Epistemic Progress in Descartes'sMeditations,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 11: 235–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Curley, E. M. 1975. “Descartes, Spinoza and the Ethics of Belief,” in Mandelbaum, M. and Freeman, E. (eds.), Spinoza, Essays in Interpretation, LaSalle, IL: Open Court, pp. 159–89.Google Scholar

Curley, E. M. 1978. Descartes against the Skeptics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Curley, E. M. 1986. “Analysis in the Meditations: The Quest for Clear and Distinct Ideas,” in Rorty, (ed.), pp. 153–76.

Curley, E. M. 1993. “Certainty: Psychological, Moral, and Metaphysical,” in Voss, (ed.), pp. 11–30.

Curley, E. M. (ed. and trans.) 1985. The Collected Works of Spinoza, Princeton University Press.

Danto, A. 1978. “The Representational Character of Ideas and the Problem of the External World,” in Hooker, (ed.), pp. 287–98.

Davies, R. 2001. Descartes: Belief, Scepticism and Virtue, London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Della Rocca, M. 2005. “Descartes, the Cartesian Circle, and Epistemology without God,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70: 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Della Rocca, M. 2006. “Judgment and Will,” in Gaukroger, (ed.), pp. 142–59.

Della Rocca, M. 2008. “Causation without Intelligibility and Causation without God in Descartes,” in Broughton, and Carriero, (eds.), pp. 235–50.

Doney, W. 2005. “True and Immutable Natures,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 13: 131–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Espinas, A. 1925. Descartes et la morale, Paris: Éditions Brossard.Google Scholar

Evans, J. L. 1963. “Error and the Will,” Philosophy 38: 136–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Field, R. W. 1993. “Descartes on the Material Falsity of Ideas,” Philosophical Review 102: 309–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frankfurt, H. 1970. Demons, Dreamers, and Madmen: The Defense of Reason in Descartes's Meditations, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar

Frankfurt, H. 1977. “Descartes on the Creation of Eternal Truths,” Philosophical Review 86: 36–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frankfurt, H. 1978. “Descartes on the Consistency of Reason,” in Hooker, (ed.), pp. 26–39.

Friedman, M. 2008. “Descartes and Galileo: Copernicanism and the Metaphysical Foundations of Physics,” in Broughton, and Carriero, (eds.), pp. 69–83.

Garber, D. 1992. Descartes' Metaphysical Physics, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Garber, D. 1993. “Descartes and Experiment in the Discourse and Essays,” in Voss, (ed.), pp. 288–310 (repr. in Garber 2001, pp. 85–110).

Garber, D. 2001. Descartes Embodied: Reading Descartes through Cartesian Science, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Garber, D. and Ayers, M. (eds.) 1998. The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, 2 vols., Cambridge University Press.

Garber, D. and Nadler, S. (eds.) 2006. Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, Oxford University Press.

Gaukroger, S. 1995. Descartes: An Intellectual Biography, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Gaukroger, S. (ed.) 1998. The Soft Underbelly of Reason: The Passions in the Seventeenth Century, London and New York: Routledge.CrossRef

Gewirth, A. 2006. The Blackwell Guide to Descartes' Meditations, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Gebhardt, C. (ed.) 1925. Spinoza Opera, 4 vols., Heidelberg: Carl Winter.

Gewirth, A. 1941. “The Cartesian Circle,” Philosophical Review 50: 368–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gewirth, A. 1943. “Clearness and Distinctness in Descartes,” Philosophy 18: 17–36. Page numbers refer to reprinting in W. Doney (ed.) 1967. Descartes: A Collection of Critical Essays, New York: Doubleday, pp. 250–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gewirth, A. 1970. “The Cartesian Circle Reconsidered,” Journal of Philosophy 67: 668–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibson, A. B. 1987. The Philosophy of Descartes, New York and London: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar

Gilbert, C. 2005. “Grades of Freedom: Augustine and Descartes,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86: 201–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilson, É. 1913. La liberté chez Descartes et la théologie, Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar

Gilson, É. 1967. Études sur le rôle de la pensée médiévale dans la formation du système cartésien, Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Gilson, É. (ed.) 1947. Discours de la Méthode: texte et commentaire, Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Grene, M. 1985. Descartes, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Gueroult, M. 1984. Descartes' Philosophy Interpreted according to the Order of Reasons, 2 vols., trans. Ariew, R., Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Hatfield, G. 1986. “The Sense and the Fleshless eye: The Meditations as Cognitive Exercise,” in Rorty, (ed.), pp. 45–80.

Hobbes, Thomas. 1840. “Of Liberty and Necessity” [1654], in W. Molesworth (ed.), The English Works of Thomas Hobbes, vol. iv, London: John Bohn, pp. 229–78.Google Scholar

Hoffman, P. 1996. “Descartes on Misrepresentation,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 34: 357–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoffman, P. 2002. “Direct Realism, Intentionality, and the Objective Being of Ideas,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 83: 163–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoffman, P. 2003. “The Passions and Freedom of Will,” in Williston, and Gombay, (eds.), pp. 261–99.

Hoffman, P. 2009. Essays on Descartes, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hooker, M. (ed.) 1978. Descartes: Critical and Interpretative Essays, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Imlay, R. A. 1982. “Descartes and Indifference,” Studia Leibnitiana 14: 87–97.Google Scholar

James, S. 1997. Passion and Action: The Emotions in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

James, S. 1998. “Explaining the Passions: Passions, Desires, and the Explanation of Action,” in Gaukroger, (ed.), pp. 17–33.

Jolley, N. 1990. The Light of the Soul: Theories of Ideas in Leibniz, Malebranche, and Descartes, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kaufman, D. 2000. “Descartes on the Objective Reality of Materially False Ideas,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 81: 385–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufman, D. 2003a. “Infimus gradus libertatis? Descartes on Indifference and Divine Freedom,” Religious Studies 39: 391–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufman, D. 2003b. “Divine Simplicity and the Eternal Truths in Descartes,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 11: 553–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufman, D. 2005. “God's Immutability and the Necessity of Descartes's Eternal Truths,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 43: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keefe, T. 1972. “Descartes's ‘Morale Provisoire’: A Reconsideration,” French Studies 26: 129–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kenny, A. 1968. Descartes: A Study of His Philosophy, New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Kenny, A. 1970. “The Cartesian Circle and the Eternal Truths,” Journal of Philosophy 57: 685–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kenny, A. 1972. “Descartes on the Will,” in Butler, (ed.), pp. 1–31.

Larmore, C. 1984. “Descartes' Psychologistic Theory of Assent,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 1: 61–74.Google Scholar

Dœuff, M. 1989. The Philosophical Imaginary, trans. Gordon, C., London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar

Locke, John. 1995. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding [1689], New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar

Loeb, L. E. 1990. “The Priority of Reason in Descartes,” Philosophical Review 99: 3–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Loeb, L. E. 1992. “The Cartesian Circle,” in Cottingham, (ed.), pp. 200–35.

Loemker, L. E. 1969. G. W. Leibniz: Philosophical Papers and Letters, 2nd edn., Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. 1996. Stoic Studies, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

MacKenzie, A. W. 1994. “The Recognition of Sensory Experience,” in Cottingham, (ed.), pp. 251–72.

Marion, J.-L. 1991. Sur la théologie blanche de Descartes, 2nd edn., Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Marion, J.-L. 1993. “Generosity and Phenomenology: Remarks on Michel Henry's Interpretation of the Cartesian Cogito,” in Voss, (ed.), pp. 52–74 (repr. in Marion, J.-L. 1999. Cartesian Questions: Method and Metaphysics, University of Chicago Press, pp. 96–117).Google Scholar

Markie, P. 1986. Descartes's Gambit, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Marshall, J. 1998. Descartes' Moral Theory, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Marshall, J. 2003. “Descartes' Morale par Provision,” in Williston, and Gombay, (eds.), pp. 191–238.

McRae, R. 1972. “Descartes' Definition of Thought,” in Butler, (ed.), pp. 55–70.

Menn, S. 1998. Descartes and Augustine, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgan, V. 1994. Foundations of Cartesian Ethics, Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar

Moyal, G. J. D. 1987. “The Unity of Descartes' Conception of Freedom,” International Studies in Philosophy 19: 33–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mullin, A. 2000. “Descartes and the Community of Inquirers,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 17: 1–27.Google Scholar

Naaman-Zauderer, N. 2000. “Descartes: Error without Falsity,” in Senderowicz, Y. and Wahl, Y. (eds.), Descartes: Reception and Disenchantment, Tel Aviv: University Publishing Projects, pp. 173–93.Google Scholar

Naaman-Zauderer, N. 2004. “The Loneliness of the Cartesian Thinker,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 21: 43–62.Google Scholar

Naaman-Zauderer, N. 2007. Descartes: The Loneliness of a Philosopher, Tel Aviv University Press [in Hebrew].Google Scholar

Naaman-Zauderer, N. 2008. “The Place of the Other in Leibniz's Rationalism,” in M Dascal (ed.) Leibniz: What Kind of Rationalist?Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 315–27.Google Scholar

Nadler, S. 1989. Arnauld and the Cartesian Philosophy of Ideas, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Nadler, S. 2006. “The Doctrine of Ideas,” in Gaukroger, (ed.), pp. 86–103.

Nelson, A. 1996. “The Falsity in Sensory Ideas: Descartes and Arnauld,” in Kremer, E. J. (ed.), Interpreting Arnauld, University of Toronto Press, pp. 13–32.Google Scholar

Nelson, A. 1997. “Descartes' Ontology of Thought,” Topoi 16: 163–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nelson, A. 2008. “Cartesian Innateness,” in Broughton, and Carriero, (eds.), pp. 319–33.

Newman, L. 1999. “The Fourth Meditation,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59: 559–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newman, L. 2008. “Descartes on the Will in Judgment,” in Broughton, and Carriero, (eds.), pp. 334–52.

Nolan, L. 1997. “The Ontological Status of Cartesian Natures,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78: 169–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Normore, C. 1986. “Meaning and Objective Being: Descartes and His Sources,” in Rorty, (ed.), pp. 223–41.

Patterson, S. 2008. “Clear and Distinct Perception,” in Broughton, and Carriero, (eds.), pp. 216–34.

Perin, C. 2008. “Descartes and the Legacy of Ancient Skepticism,” in Broughton, and Carriero, (eds.), pp. 52–65.

Ragland, C. P. 2006a. “Descartes on the Principle of Alternative Possibilities,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 44: 377–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ragland, C. P. 2006b. “Alternative Possibilities in Descartes's Fourth Meditation,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 14: 379–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ragland, C. P. 2006c. “Is Descartes a Libertarian?,” in Garber, and Nadler, (eds.), pp. 57–90.

Rodis-Lewis, G. 1970. La morale de Descartes, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Rodis-Lewis, G. 1987. “Le dernier fruit de la métaphysique cartésienne: la générosité,” Etudes Philosophiques 1: 43–54.Google Scholar

Rodis-Lewis, G. 1989. “Introduction,” in Voss, (ed. and trans.), pp. xv–xxv.

Rodis-Lewis, G. 1990. “Liberté et égalité chez Descartes,” Archives de Philosophie 53: 421–30.Google Scholar

Rodis-Lewis, G. 1998. Descartes: His Life and Thought, trans. Todd, J. M., Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Rorty, A. O. (ed.) 1986. Essays on Descartes' Meditations, Berkeley: University of California Press.

Rosenthal, D. M. 1986. “Will and the Theory of Judgment,” in Rorty, (ed.), pp. 405–34.

Rubin, R. 1977. “Descartes's Validation of Clear and Distinct Apprehension,” Philosophical Review 86: 197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rutherford, D. 2004. “On the Happy Life: Descartes vis-à-vis Seneca,” in Strange, S. K. and Zupko, J. (eds.), Stoicism: Traditions and Transformations, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 177–97.Google Scholar

Schmaltz, T. M. 1991. “Platonism and Descartes' View of Immutable Essences,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 73: 129–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmaltz, T. M. 1994. “Human Freedom and Divine Creation in Malebranche, Descartes and the Cartesians,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 2: 3–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmaltz, T. M. 2000. “The Disappearance of Analogy in Descartes, Spinoza, and Regis,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 30: 85–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Secada, J. 2000. Cartesian Metaphysics: The Late Scholastic Origins of Modern Philosophy, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shapiro, L. 1999. “Cartesian Generosity,” in T. Aho and M. Yrjonsuuri (eds.), Norms and Modes of Thinking in Descartes, Acta Philosophica Fennica 64: 249–75.Google Scholar

Spinoza, Benedictus 2008. “Descartes's Ethics,” in Broughton, and Carriero, (eds.), pp. 445–63.

Shapiro, L. (ed. and trans.) 2007. The Correspondence between Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia and René Descartes, University of Chicago Press.

Simmons, A. 1999. “Are Cartesian Sensations Representational?,” Nous 33: 347–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, K. 2001. “A General Theory of Cartesian Clarity and Distinctness Based on the Theory of Enumeration in theRules,” Dialogue 40: 279–309.Google Scholar

Suárez, Francisco. 1965. Disputationes metaphysicae [1597], Hildesheim: Olms (repr. from Opera omnia, vols. xxv–xxvi, Paris: Louis Vivès, 1856–59).Google Scholar

Sutton, J. 1998. “Controlling the Passions: Passions, Memory, and the Moral Physiology of Self in Seventeenth-Century Neurophilosophy,” in Gaukroger, (ed.), pp. 115–46.

Taylor, C. 1989. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Tierno, J. T. 1997. Descartes on God and Human Error, Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar

Pitte, F. 1988. “Intuition and Judgment in Descartes's Theory of Truth,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 26: 453–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vinci, T. C. 1998. Cartesian Truth, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Voss, S. (ed.) 1993. Essays on the Philosophy and Science of René Descartes, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef

Voss, S. (ed. and trans.), 1989. René Descartes: The Passions of the Soul, Indianapolis and Cambridge, MA: Hackett Publishing Company.

Wee, C. 2006a. Material Falsity and Error in Descartes's Meditations, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Wee, C. 2006b. “Descartes and Leibniz on Human Free Will and the Ability to Do Otherwise,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 36: 387–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wells, N. J. 1984. “Material Falsity in Descartes, Arnauld, and Suárez,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 22: 25–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wells, N. J. 1990. “Objective Reality of Ideas in Descartes, Caterus and Suárez,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 28: 33–61.Google Scholar

Williams, B. 1973. Problems of the Self, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, B. 1978. Descartes: The Project of Pure Inquiry, New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Williston, B. 1997. “Descartes on Love and/as Error,” Journal of the History of Ideas 58: 429–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Williston, B. 1999. “Akrasia and the Passions in Descartes”, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 7: 33–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williston, B. and Gombay, A. (eds.) 2003. Passion and Virtue in Descartes, Amherst, NY: Humanity Books.

Wilson, C. 2008. “Descartes and Augustine,” in Broughton, and Carriero, (eds.), pp. 33–51.

Wilson, M. D. 1978. Descartes, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, M. D. 1990. “Descartes on the Representationality of Sensation,” in Cover, and Kulstad, (eds.), pp. 1–22.

Wilson, M. D. 1993. “Descartes on the Perception of Primary Qualities,” in Voss, (ed.), pp. 162–76.

Wilson, M. D. 1994. “Descartes on Sense and ‘Resemblance’,” in Cottingham, (ed.), pp. 209–28.

Yolton, J. W. 1984. Perceptual Acquaintance from Descartes to Reid, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar