Anderson, A. E., Murphy, E. D., Nichols, E. M., Sigman, R. S., and Willimack, D. K. (2004), “Designing Edits for Electronic Economic Surveys and Censuses: Issues and Guidelines.” Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meetings of the American Statistical Association. Alexandria, VA, pp. 4912–4919.Google Scholar

Athale, N., Sturley, A., Skoczen, S., Kavanaugh, A., and Lenert, L. (2004), “A Web-Compatible Instrument for Measuring Self-Reported Disease Activity in Arthritis.” Journal of Rheumatology, 31 (2): 223–228.Google Scholar

Baker, R. P., Bradburn, N. M., and Johnson, R. A. (1995), “Computer-Assisted Personal Interviewing: An Experimental Evaluation of Data Quality and Costs.” Journal of Official Statistics, 11 (4): 415–431.Google Scholar

Baker, R. P., and Couper, M. P. (2007), “The Impact of Screen Size and Background Color on Response in Web Surveys.” Paper presented at the General Online Research Conference (GOR'07), Leipzig, March.

Baker, R. P., Couper, M. P., Conrad, F. G., and Tourangeau, R. (2004), “Don't Know and No Opinion Responses in Web Surveys.” Paper presented at the RC33 International Conference on Social Science Methodology, Amsterdam, August.

Baker, R. P., Crawford, S. D., and Swinehart, J. (2004), “Development and Testing of Web Questionnaires.” In Presser, S., Rothgeb, J., Couper, M. P., Lessler, J., Martin, E. A., Martin, J., and Singer, E., (eds.), Methods for Testing and Evaluating Survey Questionnaires. New YorkWiley, pp. 361–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker-Prewitt, J. (2003), “All Web Surveys are not Created Equal: Your Design Choices Can Impact Results.” Presentation at the SumIT03 Global Market Research Symposium, Montreal, October. www.burke.com.

Bakken, D., and Frazier, C. L. (2006), “Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Consumer Decision Making.” In Grover, R. and Vriens, M. (eds.), The Handbook of Marketing Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 288–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bälter, O., and Bälter, K. A. (2005), “Demands on Web Survey Tools for Epidemiological Research.” European Journal of Epidemiology, 20: 137–139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bartlett, J. (1919), Familiar Quotations (10th ed.). Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Bartram, D. (1982), “The Perception of Semantic Quality in Type: Differences Between Designers and Non-Designers.” Information Design Journal, 3 (1): 38–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bates, N., and Nichols, E. (1998), “The Census Bureau WWW Hiring Questionnaire: A Case Study of Usability Testing.” Paper presented at the Joint Statistical Meetings of the American Statistical Association, Dallas, TX, August.

Bayer, L. R., and Thomas, R. K. (2004), “A Comparison of Sliding Scales with Other Scale Types in Online Surveys.” Paper presented at the RC33 International Conference on Social Science Methodology, Amsterdam, August.

Bell, D. S., Mangione, C. M., and Kahn, C. E. (2001), “Randomized Testing of Alternative Survey Formats Using Anonymous Volunteers on the World Wide Web.” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 8 (6): 616–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bentley, M., and Tancreto, J. G. (2006), “Analysis of Self-Response Options and Respondent-Friendly Design from the 2005 National Census Test.” Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Survey Research Methods Section. Alexandria, VA: ASA, pp. 2755–2762 [CD].

Benway, J. P. (1998), “Banner Blindness: The Irony of Attention Grabbing on the World Wide Web.” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting, pp. 463–467.CrossRef

Benway, J. P., and Lane, D. M. (1998), “Banner Blindness: Web Searchers Often Miss ‘Obvious’ Links.” ITG Newsletter, 1 (3). http://www.internettg.org/newsletter/dec98/banner_blindness.html.Google Scholar

Bergman, L. R., Kristiansson, K.-E., Olofsson, A., and Säfström, M. (1994), “Decentralized CATI versus Paper and Pencil Interviewing: Effects on the Results in the Swedish Labor Force Surveys.” Journal of Official Statistics, 10 (2): 181–195.Google Scholar

Bernard, M., and Mills, M. (2000), “So, What Size and Type of Font Should I Use on My Website?” Usability News, 2.2 http://psychology.wichita.edu/surl/usabilitynews/2S/font.htm.Google Scholar

Bernard, M., Mills, M., Peterson, M., and Storrer, K. (2001), “A Comparison of Popular Online Fonts: Which Is Best and When?” Usability News, 3.2 http://psychology.wichita.edu/surl/usabilitynews/3S/font.htm. Accessed March 14, 2008.Google Scholar

Billiet, J., and Loosveldt, G. (1988), “Improvement of the Quality of Responses to Factual Survey Questions by Interviewer Training.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 52 (2): 190–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birnbaum, M. H. (ed.) (2000a), Psychological Experiments on the Internet. San Diego: Academic Press.

Birnbaum, M. H. (2000b), “SurveyWiz and FactorWiz: JavaScript Web Pages That Make HTML Forms for Research on the Internet.” Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 32 (2): 339–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birnbaum, M. H. (2001), Introduction to Behavioral Research on the Internet. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Birnholtz, J. P., Horn, D. B., Finholt, T. A, and Bae, S. J. (2004), “The Effects of Cash, Electronic, and Paper Gift Certificates as Respondent Incentives for a Web-based Survey of Technologically Sophisticated Respondents.” Social Science Computer Review, 22 (3): 355–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bischoping, K., and Schuman, H. (1992), “Pens and Polls in Nicaragua: An Analysis of the 1990 Preelection Surveys.” American Journal of Political Science, 36 (2): 331–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blackwell, A. F. (2001), “Pictorial Representation and Metaphor in Visual Language Design.” Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 12: 223–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bogen, K. (1996), “The Effect of Questionnaire Length on Response Rates – a Review of the Literature.” Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Survey Research Methods Section. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association, pp. 1020–1025.

Bosnjak, M., Neubarth, W., Couper, M. P., Bandilla, W., and Kaczmirek, L. (in press), “Prenotification in Web Surveys: The Influence of Mobile Text Messaging versus E-Mail on Response Rates and Sample Composition.” Social Science Computer Review.

Bosnjak, M., and Tuten, T. L. (2001), “Classifying Response Behaviors in Web-Based Surveys.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6 (3), http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue3/boznjak.html.Google Scholar

Bosnjak, M., and Tuten, T. L. (2002), “Prepaid and Promised Incentives in Web Surveys – An Experiment.” Social Science Computer Review, 21 (2): 208–217.Google Scholar

Bosnjak, M., and Wenzel, O. (2005), “Effects of Two Innovative Techniques to Apply Incentives in Online Access Panels.” Paper presented at the German Online Research Conference, Zurich, March.

Bowker, D., and Dillman, D. A. (2000), “An Experimental Evaluation of Left and Right Oriented Screens for Web Questionnaires” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Portland, OR, May.

Boyarski, D., Neuwirth, C., Forlizzi, J., and Regli, S. H. (1998), “A Study of Fonts Designed for Screen Display.” Proceedings of CHI 98. New York: ACM, pp. 87–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bradburn, N. M. (1978), “Respondent Burden.” Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Survey Research Methods Section. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association, pp. 35–40.Google Scholar

Brenner, M. (1982), “Response-Effects of ‘Role-Restricted’ Characteristics of the Interviewer.” In Dijkstra, W. and Zouwen, J. (eds.), Response Behaviour in the Survey-Interview. London: Academic Press, pp. 131–165.Google Scholar

Brinck, T., Gergle, D., and Wood, S. D. (2002), Usability for the Web: Designing Web Sites that Work. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar

Brophy, S., Hunniford, T., Taylor, G., Menon, A., Roussou, T., and Callin, A. (2004), “Assessment of Disease Severity (in Terms of Function) Using the Internet.” Journal of Rheumatology, 31 (9): 1819–1822.Google Scholar

Brosius, H.-B., Donsbach, W., and Birk, M. (1996), “How Do Text-Picture Relations Affect the Informational Effectiveness of Television Newscasts?” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 40: 180–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, C. M. (1988), Human-Computer Interface Design Guidelines. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Burnside, R. (2000), “Towards Best Practice for Design of Electronic Data Capture Instruments (Methodology Advisory Committee).” Belconnen, ACT: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Research Paper 1352.0.55.036.

Burris, J., Chen, J., Graf, I., Johnson, T., and Owens, L. (2001), “An Experiment in Web Survey Design.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Montreal, Quebec, May.

Carney, R. N., and Levin, J. R. (2002), “Pictorial Illustrations Still Improve Students' Learning From Text.” Educational Psychology Review, 14 (1): 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Castro, E. (2003), HTML for the World Wide Web, Fifth Edition, with XHTML and CSS. Berkeley, CA: Peachpit Press.Google Scholar

Chesney, T. (2006), “The Effect of Communication Medium on Research Participation Decisions.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11 (3): article 10 http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue3/chesney.html.Google Scholar

Childers, T. L., and Jass, J. (2002), “All Dressed Up with Something to Say: Effects of Typeface Semantic Associations on Brand Perceptions and Consumer Memory.” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12 (2): 93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christian, L. M. (2003), “The Influence of Visual Layout on Scalar Questions in Web Surveys.” Unpublished Master's Thesis. Pullman: Washington State University.

Christian, L. M., and Dillman, D. A. (2004), “The Influence of Graphical and Symbolic Language Manipulations on Responses to Self-Administered Questions.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 68 (1): 57–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christian, L. M., Dillman, D. A., and Smyth, J. D. (2007), “Helping Respondents Get It Right the First Time: The Influence of Words, Symbols, and Graphics in Web Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 71 (1): 113–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Church, A. H. (1993), “Estimating the Effect of Incentives on Mail Survey Response Rates: A Meta-Analysis.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 57 (1): 62–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, R. L., and Nyiri, Z. (2001), “Web Survey Design: Comparing a Multi-Screen to a Single Screen Survey.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Montreal, Quebec, May.

Clayton, R. L., and Werking, G. S. (1998), “Business Surveys of the Future: The World Wide Web as a Data Collection Methodology.” In Couper, M. P., Baker, R. P., Bethlehem, J., Clark, C. Z. F., Martin, J., Nicholls, W. L., and O'Reilly, J.. (eds.), Computer Assisted Survey Information Collection. New York: Wiley, pp. 543–562.Google Scholar

Cockburn, A., McKenzie, B., and JasonSmith, M. (2002), “Pushing Back: Evaluating a New Behaviour for the Back and Forward Buttons in Web Browsers.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57: 397–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coles, P., and Foster, J. J. (1975), “Typographic Cues as an Aid to Learning from Typewritten Text.” Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 12: 102–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conrad, F. G., Couper, M. P., Tourangeau, R., and Galesic, M. (2005), “Interactive Feedback Can Improve Quality of Responses in Web Surveys.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Miami Beach, May.

Conrad, F. G., Couper, M. P., Tourangeau, R., and Peytchev, A. (2005), “Impact of Progress Indicators on Task Completion: First Impressions Matter.” Proceedings of CHI (Computer Human Interaction) '05, Portland, OR. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.Google Scholar

Conrad, F. G., Couper, M. P., Tourangeau, R., and Peytchev, A. (2006), “Use and Non-Use of Clarification Features in Web Surveys.” Journal of Official Statistics, 22 (2): 245–269.Google Scholar

Conrad, F. G., and Schober, M. F. (2000), “Clarifying Question Meaning in a Household Telephone Survey.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 64 (1): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conrad, F. G., and Schober, M. F. (2005), “Promoting Uniform Question Understanding in Today's and Tomorrow's Surveys.” Journal of Official Statistics, 21 (2): 215–231.Google Scholar

Conrad, F. G., Schober, M. F., and Coiner, T. (2007), “Bringing Features of Human Dialogue to Web Surveys.” Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21: 165–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cook, C., Heath, F., and Thompson, R. L. (2001), “Score Reliability in Web- or Internet-Based Surveys: Unnumbered Graphic Rating Scales Versus Likert-Type Scales.” Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61 (4): 697–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coon, D. (2002), “Challenges to Creating Accessible Web and Internet Surveys.” Paper presented at the Federal CASIC Workshops, Washington, DC, February.

Cooper, A. (1995), About Face: The Essentials of User Interface Design. Foster City, CA: IDG Books.Google Scholar

Couper, M. P. (1994), “Discussion: What Can CAI Learn from HCI?” In Proceedings of the Seminar on New Directions in Statistical Methodology. Washington, DC: Statistical Policy Office, Office of Management and Budget (Statistical Policy Working Paper No. 23, pp. 363–377. http://www.fcsm.gov/working-papers/spwp23index.html.Google Scholar

Couper, M. P. (1999), “The Application of Cognitive Science to Computer Assisted Interviewing.” In Sirken, M. G., Hermann, D. J., Schechter, S., Schwarz, N., Tanur, J. M., and Tourangeau, R. (eds.), Cognition and Survey Research. New York: Wiley, pp. 277–300.Google Scholar

Couper, M. P. (2000), “Web Surveys: A Review of Issues and Approaches.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 64 (4), 464–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Couper, M. P. (2005), “Technology Trends in Survey Data Collection.” Social Science Computer Review, 23 (4): 486–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Couper, M. P. (2007a), “Whither the Web: Web 2.0 and the Changing World of Web Surveys.” in Trotman, M., et al. (eds.), The Challenges of a Changing World: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of the Association for Survey Computing. Berkeley, UK: ASC, pp.7–16.

Couper, M. P. (2007b), “Technology and the Survey Interview/Questionnaire.” In Schober, M. F. and Conrad, F. G. (eds.), Envisioning the Survey Interview of the Future. New York: Wiley, pp. 58–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Couper, M. P., Blair, J., and Triplett, T. (1999), “A Comparison of Mail and E-Mail for a Survey of Employees in Federal Statistical Agencies.” Journal of Official Statistics, 15 (1): 39–56.Google Scholar

Couper, M. P., Conrad, F. G., and Tourangeau, R. (2003), “The Effect of Images on Web Survey Responses.” In Banks, R. et al. (eds.), Survey and Statistical Computing IV: The Impact of Technology on the Survey Process, pp. 343–350.Google Scholar

Couper, M. P., Conrad, F. G., and Tourangeau, R. (2007), “Visual Context Effects in Web Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 71 (4): 623–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Couper, M. P., Hansen, S. E., and Sadosky, S. A. (1997), “Evaluating Interviewer Performance in a CAPI Survey.” In Lyberg, L., Biemer, P., Collins, M., Leeuw, E., Dippo, C., Schwarz, N., and Trewin, D. (eds.), Survey Measurement and Process Quality. New York: Wiley, pp. 267–285.Google Scholar

Couper, M. P., Horm, J., and Schlegel, J. (1997), “Using Trace Files to Evaluate the National Health Interview Survey CAPI Instrument.” Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, American Statistical Association. Alexandria: ASA, pp. 825–829.

Couper, M. P., Kapteyn, A., Schonlau, M., and Winter, J. (2007), “Noncoverage and Nonresponse in an Internet Survey.” Social Science Research, 36 (1): 131–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Couper, M. P., Kenyon, K., and Tourangeau, R. (2004), “Picture This! An Analysis of Visual Effects in Web Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 68 (2): 255–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Couper, M. P., and Lyberg, L. E. (2005), “The Use of Paradata in Survey Research.” Paper presented at the International Statistical Institute, Sydney, Australia, April.

Couper, M. P., and Nicholls, W. L., II (1998), “The History and Development of Computer Assisted Survey Information Collection.” In Couper, M. P., Baker, R. P., Bethlehem, J., Clark, C. Z. F., Martin, J., Nicholls, W. L., and O'Reilly, J. (eds.), Computer Assisted Survey Information Collection. New York: Wiley, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar

Couper, M. P., Peytchev, A., Little, R. J. A., and Rothert, K. (2005), “Combining Information from Multiple Modes to Evaluate and Reduce Nonresponse Bias.” Alexandria, VA: Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section, American Statistical Association [CD].

Couper, M. P., Peytchev, A., Strecher, V. J., Rothert, K., and Anderson, J. (2007), “Following Up Nonrespondents to an Online Weight Management Intervention: Randomized Trial Comparing Mail versus Telephone.” Journal of Medical Internet Research, 9 (2): e16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Couper, M. P., Singer, E., and Tourangeau, R. (2004), “Does Voice Matter? An Interactive Voice Response (IVR) Experiment.” Journal of Official Statistics, 20 (3): 551–570.Google Scholar

Couper, M. P., Singer, E., Tourangeau, R., and Conrad, F. G. (2006), “Evaluating the Effectiveness of Visual Analog Scales: A Web Experiment.” Social Science Computer Review, 24 (2): 227–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Couper, M. P., and Tourangeau, R. (2006), “Taking the Audio out of Audio-CASI?” Paper presented at the European Conference on Quality in Survey Statistics, Cardiff, Wales, April.

Couper, M. P., Tourangeau, R., and Conrad, F. G. (2007), “How the Shape and Format of Input Fields Affect Answers.” Paper presented at the Internet Survey Methodology workshop, Lillehammer, Norway, September.

Couper, M. P., Tourangeau, R., Conrad, F. G., and Crawford, S. D. (2004), “What They See Is What We Get: Response Options for Web Surveys.” Social Science Computer Review, 22 (1): 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Couper, M. P., Traugott, M., and Lamias, M. (2001), “Web Survey Design and Administration.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 65 (2): 230–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crawford, S. D. (1999), “The Web Survey Choice in a Mixed Mode Data Collection.” Unpublished Paper. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

Crawford, S. D., Couper, M. P., and Lamias, M. (2001), “Web Surveys: Perceptions of Burden.” Social Science Computer Review, 19 (2): 146–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crawford, S. D., McCabe, S. E., and Pope, D. (2003), “Applying Web-Based Survey Design Standards.” Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community, 29 (1/2): 43–66.Google Scholar

Crawford, S. D., McCabe, S. E., Saltz, B., Boyd, C. J., Freisthler, B., and Paschall, M. J. (2004), “Gaining Respondent Cooperation in College Web-Based Alcohol Surveys: Findings from Experiments at Two Universities.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Phoenix, AZ, May.

Curry, J. (2003), “Complementary Capabilities for Conjoint, Choice, and Perceptual Mapping Web Data Collection.” Paper presented at the Tenth Sawtooth Software Conference, April.

Czikszentmihalyi, M. (1990), Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Dahan, E., and Hauser, J. R. (2002), “The Virtual Customer.” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19: 332–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dahan, E., and Srinivasan, V. (2000), “The Predictive Power of Internet-Based Product Concept Testing Using Visual Depiction and Animation.” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17: 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

David, P. (1998), “News Concreteness and Visual-Verbal Association: Do News Pictures Narrow the Recall Gap Between Concrete and Abstract News?” Human Communication Research, 25 (2): 180–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leeuw, E. D. (2001), “Reducing Missing Data in Surveys: an Overview of Methods.” Quality & Quantity, 35: 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leeuw, E. D. (2005), “To Mix or Not to Mix Data Collection Modes in Surveys.” Journal of Official Statistics, 21 (2): 233–255.Google Scholar

Leeuw, E. D., Callegaro, M., Hox, J. J., Korendijk, E., and Lensvelt-Mulders, G. (2007), “The Influence of Advance Letters on Response in Telephone Surveys: A Meta-Analysis.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 71 (3): 413–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeMay, C. C., Kurlander, J. L., Lundby, K. M., and Fenlason, K. J. (2002), “Web Survey Comments: Does Length Impact ‘Quality’?” Paper presented at the International Conference on Questionnaire Development, Evaluation and Testing Method, Charleston, SC, November.

Dennis, M., deRouvray, C., and Couper, M. P. (2000), “Questionnaire Design for Probability-Based Web Surveys.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Portland, OR, May.

DeRouvray, C., and Couper, M. P. (2002), “Designing a Strategy for Capturing ‘Respondent Uncertainty’ in Web-Based Surveys.” Social Science Computer Review, 20 (1): 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deutskens, E., Ruyter, K., Wetzels, M., and Oosterveld, P. (2004), “Response Rate and Response Quality of Internet-Based Surveys: An Experimental Study.” Marketing Letters, 15 (1): 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeVoto, J. A. E. (1998), “Seven Mortal Sins of Professional Web Designers.” http://www.jaedworks.com/shoebox/no-cookie/mortal-sins.html.

Dillman, D. A. (1978), Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Dillman, D. A. (2000), Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Dillman, D. A., and Christian, L. M. (2005), “Survey Mode as a Source of Instability in Responses across Surveys.” Field Methods, 17 (1): 30–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dillman, D. A., Redline, C. D., and Carley-Baxter, L. R. (1999), “Influence of Type of Question on Skip Pattern Compliance in Self-Administered Questionnaires.” Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Survey Research Methods Section. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association, pp. 979–984.Google Scholar

Dillman, D. A., and Smyth, J. D. (2007), “Design Effects in the Transition to Web-Based Surveys.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 32 (5S): S90–S96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., Christian, L. M., and Stern, M. J. (2003), “Multiple Answer Questions in Self-Administered Surveys: the Use of Check-All-That-Apply and Forced-Choice Question Formats.” Paper presented at the Joint Statistical Meetings of the American Statistical Association, San Francisco, August.

Dondis, D. A. (1973), A Primer of Visual Literacy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Downes-Le Guin, T., Mechling, J., and Baker, R. P. (2006), “Great Results from Ambiguous Sources.” Paper presented at the ESOMAR Conference on Panel Research '06, Barcelona, Spain.

Duchastel, P. C. (1978), “Illustrating Instructional Texts.” Educational Technology, 18 (11): 36–39.Google Scholar

Duchastel, P. C. (1980), “Research on Illustrations in Text: Issues and Perspectives.” Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 28 (4): 283–287.Google Scholar

Duchastel, P. C., and Waller, R. (1979), “Pictorial Illustration in Instructional Texts.” Educational Technology, 19 (11): 20–25.Google Scholar

Dyson, M. C. (2004), “How Physical Text Layout Affects Reading from Screen.” Behaviour and information technology, 23 (6): 377–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, P., Cooper, R., Roberts, I., and Frost, C. (2005), “Meta-Analysis of Randomised Trials of Monetary Incentives and Response to Mailed Questionnaires.” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59 (11): 987–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ekman, A., Dickman, P. W., Klint, A., Weiderpass, E., and Litton, J.-E. (2006), “Feasibility of Using Web-Based Questionnaires in Large Population-Based Epidemiological Studies.” European Journal of Epidemiology, 21: 103–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Elig, T., and Waller, V. (2001), “Internet versus Paper Survey Administration: Impact on Qualitative Responses.” Unpublished Paper. Arlington, VA: Defense Manpower Data Center.

,ESOMAR (2005), ESOMAR Guideline on Conducting Market and Opinion Research Using the Internet, updated August 2005, http://www.esomar.org.

Etter, J.-F., Cucherat, M., and Perneger, T. V. (2002), “Questionnaire Color and Response Rates to Mailed Surveys: A Randomized Trial and a Meta-Analysis.” Evaluation and the Health Professions, 25 (2): 185–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fagerlin, A., Wang, C., and Ubel, P. A. (2005), “Reducing the Influence of Anecdotal Reasoning on People's Health Care Decisions: Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Statistics?Medical Decision Making, 25 (4): 398–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farmer, T. (2000), “Using the Internet for Primary Research Data Collection.” InfoTek Research Group, Inc. http://www.researchinfo.com/library/infotek/index.shtml.

Faubert, J. (1994), “Seeing Depth in Color – More than Just what Meets the Eyes.” Vision Research, 34 (9): 1165–1186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fitts, P. M. (1954), “The Information Capacity of the Human Motor System in Controlling the Amplitude of Movement.” Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47: 381–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forsman, G., and Varedian, M. (2002), “Mail and Web Surveys: A Cost and Response Rate Comparison in a Study of Students Housing Conditions.” Paper presented at the International Conference on Improving Surveys, Copenhagen, August.

Fox, J. E., Mockovak, W., Fisher, S., and Rho, C. (2003), “Usability Issues Associated with Converting Establishment Surveys to Web-Based Data Collection.” Paper presented at the FCSM Conference, Arlington, VA, November.

Fox, S. (2005), Digital Divisions. Washington, D.C.: Pew Internet and American Life Project. http://www.pewinternet.org.Google Scholar

Freyd, M. (1923), “The Graphic Rating Scale.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 14: 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fricker, R. D., and Schonlau, M. (2002), “Advantages and Disadvantages of Internet Research Surveys: Evidence from the Literature.” Field Methods, 14 (4): 347–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fuchs, M. (2007), “Asking for Numbers and Quantities: Visual Design Effects in Web Surveys and Paper & Pencil Surveys.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Anaheim, CA, May.

Fuchs, M., and Couper, M. P. (2001), “Length of Input Field and the Responses Provided in a Self-Administered Survey: A Comparison of Paper and Pencil and a Web Survey.” Paper presented at the International Conference on Methodology and Statistics, Ljubljana, Slovenia, September.

Funke, F. (2005), “Visual Analogue Scales in Online Surveys.” Paper presented at the General Online Research (GOR '05) conference, Zurich, March.

Funke, F., and Reips, U.-D. (2007), “Dynamic Forms: Online Surveys 2.0.” Paper presented at the General Online Research Conference (GOR'07), Leipzig, March.

Gadeib, A., and Kunath, J. (2006), “Virtual Research Worlds – Simulate the Difference! Efficient Concept Testing with in Virtual Market Simulations Online.” Paper presented at the General Online Research Conference (GOR '06), Bielefeld, Germany, March.

Galesic, M. (2006), “Dropouts on the Web: Effects of Interest and Burden Experienced During an Online Survey.” Journal of Official Statistics, 22 (2): 313–328.Google Scholar

Galesic, M., Tourangeau, R., Couper, M. P., and Conrad, F. G. (in press), “Eye-Tracking Data: New Insights on Response Order Effects and Other Signs of Cognitive Shortcuts in Survey Responding.” Public Opinion Quarterly.

Galesic, M., Tourangeau, R., Couper, M. P., and Conrad, F. G. (2007), “Using Change to Improve Navigation in Grid Questions.” Paper presented at the General Online Research Conference (GOR'07), Leipzig, March.

Galitz, W. O. (1993), User-Interface Screen Design. Boston: QED.Google Scholar

Garrett, J. J. (2005), “Ajax: A New Approach to Web Applications.” http://www.adaptivepath.com/publications/essays/archives/00385.php.

Gaskell, G. D., O'Muircheartaigh, C. A., and Wright, D. B. (1994), “Survey Questions about the Frequency of Vaguely Defined Events: the Effects of Response Alternatives.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 58 (2): 241–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gillbride, T. J., and Allenby, G. M. (2004), “A Choice Model with Conjunctive, Disjunctive, and Compensatory Screening Rules.” Marketing Science, 23 (3): 391–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giner-Sorolla, R., Garcia, M. T., and Bargh, J. A. (1999), “The Automatic Evaluation of Pictures.” Social Cognition, 17 (1): 76–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glauer, R., and Schneider, D. (2004), “Online-Surveys: Effects of Different Display Formats, Response Orders as Well as Progress Indicators in a Non-Experimental Environment.” Paper presented at the 6th German Online Research Conference, Duisburg-Essen, Germany, March.

Godar, S. H. (2000), “Use of Color and Responses to Computer-Based Surveys.” Perceptual and Motor Skills, 91: 767–770.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Göritz, A. S. (2004), “The Impact of Material Incentives on Response Quantity, Response Quality, Sample Composition, Survey Outcome, and Cost in Online Access Panels.” International Journal of Market Research, 46 (3): 327–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Göritz, A. S. (2005), “Incentives in Web-Based Studies: What to Consider and How to Decide.” WebSM Guide No. 2. www.websm.org.

Göritz, A. S. (2006), “Incentives in Web Studies: Methodological Issues and a Review.” International Journal of Internet Science, 1 (1): 58–70.Google Scholar

Gorn, G. J., Chattopadhyay, A., Sengupta, J., and Tripathi, S. (2004), “Waiting for the Web: How Screen Color Affects Time Perception.” Journal of Marketing Research, XLI (May): 215–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gorn, G. J., Chattopadhyay, A., Yi, T., and Dahl, D. W. (1997), “Effects of Color as an Executional Cue in Advertising: They're in the Shade.” Management Science, 43 (10): 1387–1400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Graber, D. A. (1996), “Say it with Pictures.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 546: 85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grabinger, R. S., and Osman-Jouchoux, R. (1996), “Designing Screens for Learning.” In Oostendorp, H. and Mul, S. (eds.), Cognitive Aspects of Electronic Text Processing. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 181–212.Google Scholar

Gräf, L. (2002), “Optimierung von WWW-Umfragen: Three Years After.” Paper presented at the German Online Research conference, Göttingen, May.

Gräf, L. (2005), “Befragung mit neuer Kommunikationstechnik: Online-Umfragen.” Unpublished Paper. Köln, Germany: GlobalPark.

Grandjean, E. (1987), Ergonomics in Computerized Offices. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

Green, P. E., and Rao, V. (1971), “Conjoint measurement: A New Approach to Quantify Judgmental Data.” Journal of Marketing Research, 8 (3): 355–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grice, P. (1967), “Utterer's Meaning and Intentions.” In Grice, P. (ed.), Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989, pp. 86–116.Google Scholar

Groves, R. M. (1989), Survey Errors and Survey Costs. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Groves, R. M. (2006), “Nonresponse Rates and Nonresponse Error in Household Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 70 (5): 646–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Groves, R. M., and Couper, M. P. (1998), Nonresponse in Household Interview Surveys. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guéguen, N., and Jacob, C. (2002a), “Social Presence Reinforcement and Computer-Mediated Communication: The Effect of the Solicitor's Photograph on Compliance to a Survey Request Made by E-Mail.” CyberPsychology and Behavior, 5 (2): 139–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guéguen, N., and Jacob, C. (2002b), “Solicitations by E-Mail and Solicitor's Status: A Field Study of Social Influence on the Web.” CyberPsychology and Behavior, 5 (4): 377–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hagenaars, J. A., and Heinen, T. G. (1982), “Effects of Role-Independent Interviewer Characteristics on Responses.” In Dijkstra, W. and Zouwen, J. (eds.), Response Behaviour in the Survey-Interview. London: Academic Press, pp. 91–130.Google Scholar

Hall, R. H., and Hanna, P. (2004), “The Impact of Web Page Text-Background Colour Combinations on Readability, Retention, Aesthetics, and Behavioural Intent.” Behaviour and Information Technology, 23 (3): 183–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansen, S. E., and Couper, M. P. (2004), “Usability Testing as a Means of Evaluating Computer Assisted Survey Instruments.” In Presser, S., Rothgeb, J., Couper, M. P., Lessler, J., Martin, E. A., Martin, J., and Singer, E. (eds.), Methods for Testing and Evaluating Survey Questionnaires. New York: Wiley, pp. 337–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansen, S. E., Couper, M. P., and Fuchs, M. (1998), “Usability Evaluation of the NHIS Instrument.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, St. Louis, May.

Haraldsen, G. (2004), “Identifying and Reducing Response Burdens in Internet Business Surveys.” Journal of Official Statistics, 20 (2): 393–410.Google Scholar

Haraldsen, G., Dale, T., Dalheim, E., and Strømme, H. (2002), “Mode Effects in a Mail plus Internet Designed Census.” Paper presented at the International Conference on Improving Surveys, Copenhagen, August.

Haraldsen, G., Kleven, Ø., and Stålnacke, M. (2006), “Paradata Indications of Problems in Web Surveys.” Paper presented at the European Conference on Quality in Survey Statistics, Cardiff, Wales, April.

Harmon, M. A., Westin, E. C., and Levin, K. Y. (2005), “Does Type of Pre-Notification Affect Web Survey Response Rates?” Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Miami Beach, May.

Harrell, L., Rosen, R., Gomes, A., Chute, J., and Yu, H. (2006), “Web Versus Email Data Collection: Experience in the Current Employment Statistics Program.” Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meetings of the American Statistical Association, Seattle, August. Alexandria, VA: ASA, pp. 3104–3108 [CD].

Harris, D. R. (2002), “In the Eye of the Beholder: Observed Race and Observer Characteristics.” Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Population Studies Center Research Report 02-522.

Hartley, J., Davies, L., and Burnhill, P. (1977), “Alternatives in the Typographic Design of Questionnaires.” Journal of Occupational Psychology, 50: 299–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayes, M. H., and Patterson, D. G. (1921), “Experimental Development of the Graphic Rating Method.” Psychological Bulletin, 18: 98–99.Google Scholar

Heerwegh, D. (2003), “Explaining Response Latencies and Changing Answers Using Client-Side Paradata from a Web Survey.” Social Science Computer Review, 21 (3): 360–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heerwegh, D. (2005a), Web Surveys: Explaining and Reducing Unit Nonresponse, Item Nonresponse and Partial Nonresponse. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Leuven, Belgium: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Faculteit Sociale Wetenschappen.Google Scholar

Heerwegh, D. (2005b), “Effects of Personal Salutations in E-Mail Invitations to Participate in a Web Survey.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 69 (1): 588–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heerwegh, D., and Loosveldt, G. (2002a), “Web Surveys: The Effect of Controlling Survey Access Using PIN Numbers.” Social Science Computer Review, 20 (1): 10–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heerwegh, D., and Loosveldt, G. (2002b), “An Evaluation of the Effect of Response Formats on Data Quality in Web Surveys.” Social Science Computer Review, 20 (4): 471–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heerwegh, D., and Loosveldt, G. (2003), “An Evaluation of the Semiautomatic Login Procedure to Control Web Survey Access.” Social Science Computer Review, 21 (2): 223–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heerwegh, D., and Loosveldt, G. (2006), “An Experimental Study on the Effects of Personalization, Survey Length Statements, Progress Indicators, and Survey Sponsor Logos in Web Surveys” Journal of Official Statistics, 22 (2): 191–210.Google Scholar

Heerwegh, D., Vanhove, T., Matthijs, K., and Loosveldt, G. (2005), “The Effect of Personalization on Response Rates and Data Quality in Web Surveys.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8 (2): 85–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hembroff, L. A., Rusz, D., Rafferty, A., McGee, H., and Ehrlich, N. (2005), “The Cost-Effectiveness of Alternative Advance Mailings in a Telephone Survey.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 69 (2): 232–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hemsing, W., and Hellwig, J. O. (2006), “The Impact of Visualization of Question Types and Screen Pages on the Answering Behavior in Online Surveys.” Paper presented at the General Online Research Conference (GOR '06), Bielefeld, Germany, March.

Hennessy, D. G. (2002), “An Evaluation of Methods for Testing Internet Survey Questions.” Unpublished Honors Thesis. Wollongong, Australia: University of Wollongong, Department of Psychology.

Hill, D. H. (1994), “The Relative Empirical Validity of Dependent and Independent Data Collection in a Panel Survey.” Journal of Official Statistics, 10: 359–380.Google Scholar

Hogg, A., and Masztal, J. J. (2002), “Drop-Down Boxes, Radio Buttons or Fill-in-the-Blank?” CASRO Journal 2002, pp. 53–55.Google Scholar

Hogg, A., and Miller, J. (2003), “Watch out for Dropouts: Study Shows Impact of Online Survey Length on Research Findings.” Quirk's Marketing Research Review, July/August, article 1137. www.quirks.com.Google Scholar

Hoogendoorn, A. (2001), “Some Techniques for Internet Interviewing.” Proceedings of the Seventh International Blaise Users Conference, Washington D.C., September.

Hoogendoorn, A. (2004), “A Questionnaire Design for Dependent Interviewing that Addresses the Problem of Cognitive Satisficing.” Journal of Official Statistics, 20 (2): 219–232.Google Scholar

Hoogendoorn, A., and Sikkel, D. (2002), “Feedback in Web Surveys.” Paper presented at the International Conference on Improving Surveys, Copenhagen, August.

Horn, R. E. (1998), Visual Language: Global Communication for the 21st Century. Bainbridge Island, WA: MacroVU.Google Scholar

Horrigan, J. B. (2006), Home Broadband Adoption 2006. Washington, D.C.: Pew Internet and American Life Project. http://www.pewinternet.org.Google Scholar

Horrigan, J. B., and Smith, A. (2007), Home Broadband Adoption 2007. Washington, D.C.: Pew, press release June 3, 2007. http://www.pewinternet.org.Google Scholar

Horton, S. (2006), Access by Design: A Guide to Universal Usability for Web Designers. Berkeley, CA: New Riders.Google Scholar

Horton, W. (1991), “Overcoming Chromophobia: A Guide to the Confident and Appropriate Use of Color.” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 34 (3): 160–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

House, C. C. (1985), “Questionnaire Design with Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing.” Journal of Official Statistics, 1 (2): 209–219.Google Scholar

House, C. C., and Nicholls, W. L., II (1988), “Questionnaire Design for CATI: Design Objectives and Methods.” In Groves, R. M., Biemer, P. P., Lyberg, L. E., Massey, J. T., Nicholls, W. L., and Waksberg, J. (eds.), Telephone Survey Methodology. New York: Wiley, pp. 421–436.Google Scholar

Howlett, V. (1996), Visual Interface Design for Windows. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Iglesias, C. P., Birks, Y. F., and Torgerson, D. J. (2001), “Improving the Measurement of Quality of Life in Older People: The York SF-12.” Quarterly Journal of Medicine, 94: 695–698.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

,Inside Research (2007), “U.S. Online MR Continues Strong.” January. www.MarketResearch.com.

Itten, J. (2003), The Elements of Color. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Jäckle, A. (2004), “Does Dependent Interviewing Really Increase Efficiency and Reduce Respondent Burden?” Colchester: University of Essex (Working Papers of the Institute for Social and Economic Research, paper 2005–11).

Jansen, B. J., Spink, A., and Saracevic, T. (2000), “Real Life, Real Users, and Real Needs: A Study and Analysis of User Queries on the Web.” Information Processing and Management, 36: 207–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jeavons, A. (1998), “Ethology and the Web: Observing Respondent Behaviour in Web Surveys.” Proceedings of the Worldwide Internet Conference, London, February. ESOMAR.

Jenkins, C. R., and Dillman, D. A. (1997), “Towards a Theory of Self-Administered Questionnaire Design.” In Lyberg, L., Biemer, P., Collins, M., Leeuw, E., Dippo, C., Schwarz, N., and Trewin, D. (eds.), Survey Measurement and Process Quality. New York: Wiley, pp. 165–196.Google Scholar

Johnson, R. M. (1987), “Adaptive Conjoint Analysis.” Sawtooth Software Conference on Perceptual Mapping, Conjoint Analysis, and Computer Interviewing. Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software, pp. 253–265. http://www.sawtoothsoftware.com.

Johnson, R. M. (2000), “Understanding HB: An Intuitive Approach.” Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference. Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software, pp. 195–205. http://www.sawtoothsoftware.com.

Joinson, A. N. (2005), “Audience Power, Personalized Salutation and Responses to Web Surveys.” Paper presented at the ESF Workshop on Internet Survey Methodology, Dubrovnik, Croatia, September.

Joinson, A. N., and Reips, U.-D. (2007), “Personalized Salutation, Power of Sender and Response Rates to Web-Based Surveys.” Computers in Human Behavior, 23 (3): 1372–1383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joinson, A. N., Woodley, A., and Reips, U.-D. (2007), “Personalization, Authentication and Self-Disclosure in Self-Administered Internet Surveys.” Computers in Human Behavior, 23: 275–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Juran, J. M. (1979), ‘Basic Concepts’, in Juran, J. M., Gryna, F. M., and Bingham, R. S., (eds.), Quality Control Handbook, third edition. McGraw-Hill: New York, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar

Kaczmirek, L., Neubarth, W., Bosnjak, M., and Bandilla, W. (2004), “Progress Indicators in Filter Based Surveys: Computing Methods and their Impact on Drop Out.” Paper presented at the RC33 International Conference on Social Science Methodology, Amsterdam, August.

Kaczmirek, L., Neubarth, W., Bosnjak, M., and Bandilla, W. (2005), “Progress Indicators in Filter Based Surveys: Individual and Dynamic Calculation Methods.” Paper presented at the General Online Research Conference (GOR05), Zurich, March.

Kaczmirek, L., and Thiele, O. (2006), “Flash, JavaScript, or PHP? Comparing the Availability of Technical Equipment among University Applicants.” Paper presented at the 8th International General Online Research Conference (GOR06), Bielefeld, Germany, March.

Kalbach, J. (2001), “The Myth of 800x600.” Dr. Dobbs Journal, March 16, 2001. http://www.ddj.com/documents/s=2684/nam1012432092/index.html.Google Scholar

Kane, E. W., and Macauley, L. J. (1993), “Interviewer Gender and Gender Attitudes.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 57 (1): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaplowitz, M. D., Hadlock, T. D., and Levine, R. (2004), “A Comparison of Web and Mail Survey Response Rates.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 68 (1): 94–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karlgren, J., and Franzén, K. (1997), “Verbosity and Interface Design in Information Retrieval.” SICS Technical Report T2000:04. Swedish Institute for Computer Science, Stockholm. http://www.sics.se/~jussi/Artiklar/2000_TR_irinterface/irinterface.html.

Kent, R., and Brandal, H. (2003), “Improving Email Response in a Permission Marketing Context.” International Journal of Market Research, 45 (1): 489–506.Google Scholar

Kenyon, K., Couper, M. P., and Tourangeau, R. (2001), “Picture This! An Analysis of Visual Effects in Web Surveys.” Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Montreal, Canada, May.

Kerwin, J., Levin, K., Shipp, S., Wang, A., and Campbell, S. (2006), “A Comparison of Strategies for Reducing Item Nonresponse in Web Surveys.” Paper presented at the Joint Statistical Meetings of the American Statistical Association, Seattle, August.

Kiesler, S., and Sproull, L. S. (1986), “Response Effects in the Electronic Survey.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 50: 402–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kiousis, S. (2002), “Interactivity: A Concept Explication.” New Media and Society, 4 (3): 355–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kjellström, O., and Bälter, O. (2003), “Design of Follow-up Questions in Web Surveys.” Paper presented at the 25th International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces, Cavtat, Croatia, June.

Koffka, K. (1935), Principles of Gestalt Psychology. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.Google Scholar

Kostelnick, C., and Roberts, D. D. (1998), Designing Visual Language. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar

Kraut, R. M., Olson, J., Banaji, M., Bruckman, A., Cohen, J., and Couper, M. P. (2004), “Psychological Research Online: Report of Board of Scientific Affairs' Advisory Group on the Conduct of Research on the Internet.” American Psychologist, 59 (2): 106–117.Google Scholar

Krosnick, J. A. (1991), “Response Strategies for Coping with the Cognitive Demands of Attitude Measures in Surveys.” Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5: 213–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krosnick, J. A., and Alwin, D. F. (1987), “An Evaluation of a Cognitive Theory of Response-Order Effects in Survey Measurement.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 51 (2): 201–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krosnick, J. A., and Fabrigar, L. R. (1997), “Designing Rating Scales for Effective Measurement in Surveys.” In Lyberg, L., Biemer, P., Collins, M., Leeuw, E., Dippo, C., Schwarz, N., and Trewin, D. (eds.), Survey Measurement and Process Quality. New York: Wiley, pp. 141–164.Google Scholar

Krysan, M., and Couper, M. P. (2003), “Race in the Live and Virtual Interview: Racial Deference, Social Desirability, and Activation Effects in Attitude Surveys.” Social Psychology Quarterly, 66 (4): 364–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krysan, M., and Couper, M. P. (2005), “Race-of-Interviewer Effects: What Happens on the Web?” International Journal of Internet Science, 1 (1): 5–16.Google Scholar

Květon, P., Jelínek, M., Vobořil, , and Klimusová, H. (2007), “Computer-Based Tests: the Impact of Test Design and Problem of Equivalency.” Computers in Human Behavior, 23 (1): 32–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kypri, K., and Gallagher, S. J. (2003), “Incentives to Increase Participation in an Internet Survey of Alcohol Use: A Controlled Experiment.” Alcohol & Alcoholism, 38 (5): 437–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kypri, K., Gallagher, S. J., and Cashell-Smith, M. L. (2004), “An Internet-Based Survey Method for College Student Drinking Research.” Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 76 (1): 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lenert, L. A., Sturley, A., and Watson, M. E. (2002), “iMPACT3: Internet-Based Development and Administration of Utility Elicitation Protocols.” Medical Decision Making, November–December: 464–474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lie, H. W., and Bos, B. (2005), Cascading Style Sheets: Designing for the Web, Third Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Link, M. W., and Mokdad, A. (2005), “Advance Letters as a Means of Improving Respondent Cooperation in Random Digit Dial Studies: A Multistate Experiment.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 69 (4): 572–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Little, R. J. A., and Rubin, D. A. (2002), Statistical Analysis with Missing Data (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lowney, G. (1998), “But Can They Read It?” MDSN News, July/August. http://www.microsoft.com/mdsn/news/julaug98/access7.htm.

Lozar Manfreda, K., and Vehovar, V. (2002), “Design of Web Survey Questionnaires: Three Basic Experiments.” Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 7 (3). http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol7/issue3/vehovar.html.Google Scholar

Lütters, H., Westphal, D., and Heublein, F. (2007), “SniperScale: Graphical Scaling in Data Collection and its Effect on the Response Behaviour of Participants in Online Studies.” Paper presented at the General Online Research Conference (GOR '07), Leipzig, March.

Lynch, P. J., and Horton, S. (1997), Yale Center for Advanced Media WWW Style Manual, 1st ed. http://info.med.yale.edu/caim/manual/.

Lynch, P. J., and Horton, S. (2001), Web Style Guide: Basic Design Principles for Creating Web Sites (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Lynn, P., Jäckle, A., Jenkins, S. P., and Sala, E. (2006), “The Effects of Dependent Interviewing on Responses to Questions on Income Sources.” Journal of Official Statistics, 22 (3): 357–384.Google Scholar

MacElroy, B. (2000), “Variables Influencing Dropout Rates in Web-Based Surveys.” Quirk's Marketing Research Review, July/August. www.modalis.com.Google Scholar

MacElroy, B., Mikucki, J., and McDowell, P. (2002), “A Comparison of Quality in Open-Ended Responses and Response Rates Between Web-Based and Paper and Pencil Survey Modes.” Journal of Online Research, 1 (1). http://www.ijor.org/.Google Scholar

Magee, C. G., Straight, R. L., and Schwartz, L. (2001), “Conducting Web-Based Surveys: Keys to Success.” The Public Manager, Summer: 47–50.Google Scholar

Marsh, E. E., and White, M. D. (2003), “A Taxonomy of Relationships between Images and Text.” Journal of Documentation, 59 (6): 647–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marshall, P., and Bradlow, E. T. (2002), “A Unified Approach to Conjoint Analysis Methods.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97 (459): 674–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, E. A., Childs, J. H., DeMaio, T., Hill, J., Reiser, C., Gerber, E., Styles, K., and Dillman, D. A. (2007), Guidelines for Designing Questionnaires for Administration in Different Modes. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar

May, V. A. (1999), “Survey 2000: Charting Communities and Change.” National Geographic, 196 (6): 130–133.Google Scholar

Maynard, D. W., Houtkoop-Steenstra, H., Schaeffer, N. C., and Zouwen, J. (eds.) (2002), Standardization and Tacit Knowledge: Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview. New York: Wiley.

McCabe, S., Boyd, C., Couper, M. P., Crawford, S. D., d'Arcy, E., Boyd, C., Couper, M. P., Crawford, S. D., and d'Arcy, H. (2002), “Mode Effects for Collecting Alcohol and Other Drug Use Data: Web and US Mail.” Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 63 (6): 755–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCabe, S. E., Diez, A., Boyd, C. J., Nelson, T. F., and Weitzman, E. R. (2006), “Comparing Web and Mail Responses in a Mixed Mode Survey in College Alcohol Use Research.” Addictive Behaviors, 31: 1619–1627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCarthy, M. S., and Mothersbaugh, D. L. (2002), “Effects of Typographic Factors in Advertising-Based Persuasion: A General Model and Initial Empirical Tests.” Psychology & Marketing, 19 (7–8): 663–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCloud, S. (1993), Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar

McMillan, S. J., and Hwang, J.-S. (2002), “Measures of Perceived Interactivity: An Exploration of the Role of Direction of Communication, User Control, and Time in Shaping Perceptions of Interactivity.” Journal of Advertising, 31 (3): 29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meadows, K. A., Greene, T., Foster, L., and Beer, S. (2000), “The Impact of Different Response Alternatives on Responders' Reporting of Health-Related Behaviour in a Postal Survey.” Quality of Life Research, 9: 385–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mehta, R., and Sivadas, E. (1995), “Comparing Response Rates and Response Content in Mail Versus Electronic Mail Surveys.” Journal of the Market Research Society, 37 (4): 429–439.Google Scholar

Miller, J. M., and Krosnick, J. A. (1998), “The Impact of Candidate Name Order on Election Outcomes.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 62 (3): 291–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, S., and Jarrett, C. (2001), “Should I Use a Drop-down? Four Steps for Choosing Form Elements on the Web.” Unpublished Paper. Leighton Buzzard, England: Effortmark.

Mockovak, W. (2005), “An Evaluation of Different Design Options for Presenting Edit Messages in Web Forms.” Paper presented at the FedCASIC Workshop, Washington, D.C., March.

Mooney, G. M., Rogers, B., and Trunzo, D. (2003), “Examining the Effect of Error Prompting on Item Nonresponse and Survey Nonresponse in Web Surveys.” Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Nashville, TN, May.

Moore, P., and Fitz, C. (1993a), “Gestalt Theory and Instructional Design.” Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 23 (2): 137–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moore, P., and Fitz, C. (1993b), “Using Gestalt Theory to Teach Document Design and Graphics.” Technical Communication Quarterly, 2 (4): 389–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moreno, R., and Mayer, R. E. (1999), “Cognitive Principles of Multimedia Learning: The Role of Modality and Contiguity.” Journal of Experimental Psychology, 91 (2): 358–368.Google Scholar

Murphy, E., and Ciochetto, S. (2006), “Usability Testing of Alternative Design Features for Web-Based Data Collection: Selected Issues, Results, and Recommendations.” Paper presented at FedCASIC, Washington, D.C., March.

Nass, C., Isbister, K., and Lee, E.-J. (2001), “Truth Is Beauty: Researching Embodied Conversational Agents.” In Cassell, J., Sullivan, J., Prevost, S., and Churchill, E. (eds.), Embodied Conversational Agents. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 374–402.Google Scholar

Nass, C., Moon, Y., and Carney, P. (1999), “Are People Polite to Computers? Responses to Computer-Based Interviewing Systems.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29 (5): 1093–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nass, C., Moon, Y., and Green, N. (1997), “Are Machines Gender Neutral? Gender-Stereotypic Responses to Computers with Voices.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27 (10): 864–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nass, C., Robles, E., Bienenstock, H., Treinen, M., and Heenan, C. (2003), “Speech-Based Disclosure Systems: Effects of Modality, Gender of Prompt, and Gender of User.” International Journal of Speech Technology, 6: 113–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neubarth, W. (2006), “Ranking vs. Rating in an Online Environment.” Paper presented at the General Online Research Conference (GOR '06), Bielefeld, Germany, March.

Nielsen, J. (2000), Designing Web Usability. Berkeley, CA: New Riders.Google Scholar

Nielsen, J., and Loranger, H. (2005), Fundamental Guidelines for Web Usability. London: Nielsen Norman Group (Usability Week Tutorial Materials).Google Scholar

Norman, D. A. (1988), The Design of Everyday Things. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Norman, D. A. (2004), Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Norman, K. L. (2001), “Implementation of Conditional Branching in Computerized Self-Administered Questionnaires.” Unpublished Report. College Park: University of Maryland, Institute for Advanced Computer Studies.

Norman, K. L., Friedman, Z., Norman, K., and Stevenson, R. (2001), “Navigational Issues in the Design of Online Self-Administered Questionnaires.” Behaviour and Information Technology, 20 (1): 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norman, K. L., and Pleskac, T. (2002), “Conditional Branching in Computerized Self-Administered Questionnaires: An Empirical Study.” Unpublished Paper. College Park: University of Maryland, Institute for Advanced Computer Studies.

Novemsky, N., Dhar, R., Schwarz, N., and Simonson, I. (2007), “Preference Fluency in Choice.” Journal of Marketing Research, 44 (3): 347–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nugent, G. C. (1992), “Pictures, Audio, and Print: Symbolic Representation and Effect on Learning.” Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 30: 163–174.Google Scholar

Nyiri, Z., and Clark, R. L. (2003), “Web Survey Design: Comparing Static and Dynamic Survey Instruments.” Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Nashville, TN, May.

Olsen, R. J. (1992), “The Effects of Computer-Assisted Interviewing on Data Quality.” Working Papers of the European Scientific Network on Household Panel Studies, Paper 36. Colchester, England: University of Essex.

O'Muircheartaigh, C. A. (1997), “Measurement Error in Surveys: A Historical Perspective.” In Lyberg, L., Biemer, P., Collins, M., Leeuw, E., Dippo, C., Schwarz, N., and Trewin, D. (eds.), Survey Measurement and Process Quality. New York: Wiley, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar

Pagendarm, M., and Schaumburg, H. (2001), “Why Are Users Banner-Blind? The Impact of Navigation Style on the Perception of Web Banners.” Journal of Digital Information, 2 (1). http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/article/view/jodi-37/38.Google Scholar

Paivio, A. (1979), Imagery and Verbal Processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Pearson, J., and Levine, R. A. (2003), “Salutations and Response Rates to Online Surveys.” Paper presented at the Association for Survey Computing Fourth International Conference on the Impact of Technology on the Survey Process, Warwick, England, September.

Peytchev, A. (2005), “How Questionnaire Layout Induces Measurement Error.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Miami Beach, FL, May.

Peytchev, A. (2006), “Participation Decisions and Measurement Error in Web Surveys.” Unpublished PhD Dissertation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

Peytchev, A., Couper, M. P., McCabe, S. E., and Crawford, S. (2006), “Web Survey Design: Paging Versus Scrolling.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 70 (4): 596–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peytchev, A., and Crawford, S. (2005), “A Typology of Real-Time Validations in Web-Based Surveys.” Social Science Computer Review, 23 (2): 235–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Piazza, T., and Sniderman, P. M. (1998), “Incorporating Experiments into Computer Assisted Surveys.” In Couper, M. P., Baker, R. P., Bethlehem, J., Clark, C. Z. F., Martin, J., Nicholls, W. L., and O'Reilly, J., (eds.), Computer Assisted Survey Information Collection. New York: Wiley, pp. 167–184.Google Scholar

Pope, D., and Baker, R. P. (2005), “Experiments in Color for Web-Based Surveys.” Paper presented at the FedCASIC Workshops, Washington, D.C., March.

Porter, S. R., and Whitcomb, M. E. (2003), “The Impact of Lottery Incentives on Student Survey Response Rates.” Research in Higher Education, 44 (4): 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Porter, S. R., and Whitcomb, M. E. (2005), “E-Mail Subject Lines and Their Effect on Web Survey Viewing and Response.” Social Science Computer Review, 23 (3): 380–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poynter, R. (2001), “A Guide to Best Practice in Online Quantitative Research.” In Westlake, A., Sykes, W., Manners, T., and Rigg, M. (eds.), The Challenge of the Internet: Proceedings of the ASC International Conference on Survey Research Methods. London: Association for Survey Computing, pp. 3–19.Google Scholar

Presser, S., Rothgeb, J., Couper, M. P., Lessler, J., Martin, E. A., Martin, J., and Singer, E. (eds.) (2004), Methods for Testing and Evaluating Survey Questionnaires. New York: Wiley.CrossRef

Prior, M. (2002), “More Than a Thousand Words? Visual Cues and Visual Knowledge.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, August.

Raghunathan, T. E., and Grizzle, J. E. (1995), “A Split Questionnaire Survey Design.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90 (429): 54–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ramirez, C., Sharp, K., and Foster, L. (2000), “Mode Effects in an Internet/Paper Survey of Employees.” Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Portland, OR, May.

Rasinski, K. A., Mingay, D., and Bradburn, N. M. (1994), “Do Respondents Really ‘Mark All That Apply’ on Self-Administered Questions?” Public Opinion Quarterly, 58: 400–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reber, R., and Schwarz, N. (1999), “Effects of Perceptual Fluency on Judgments of Truth.” Consciousness and Cognition, 8: 338–342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Redline, C. D., and Dillman, D. A. (2002), “The Influence of Alternative Visual Designs on Respondents' Performance with Branching Instructions in Self-Administered Questionnaires.” In Groves, R. M., Dillman, D. A., Eltinge, J. A., and Little, R. J. A. (eds.), Survey Nonresponse. New York: Wiley, pp. 179–193.Google Scholar

Redline, C., Dillman, D. A., Dajani, A., and Scaggs, M. A. (2003), “Improving Navigational Performance in U.S. Census 2000 by Altering the Visually Administered Languages of Branching Instructions.” Journal of Official Statistics, 19 (4): 403–419.Google Scholar

Redline, C. D., Dillman, D. A., Carley-Baxter, L., and Creecy, R. (2005), “Factors that Influence Reading and Comprehension of Branching Instructions in Self-Administered Questionnaires.” Allgemeines Statistisches Archiv, 89 (1); 29–38.Google Scholar

Reed, B. D., Crawford, S., Couper, M. P., Cave, C., and Haefner, H. K. (2004), “Pain at the Vulvar Vestibule – A Web-Survey.” Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, 8 (1): 48–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reips, U.-D. (2001), “The Web Experimental Psychology Lab: Five Years of Data Collection on the Internet.” Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 33 (2): 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reips, U.-D. (2002), “Internet-Based Psychological Experimenting; Five Dos and Five Don'ts.” Social Science Computer Review, 20 (3): 241–249.Google Scholar

Reips, U.-D., and Funke, F. (in press), “Interval Level Measurement with Visual Analogue Scales in Internet Based Research: VAS Generator.” Behavior Research Methods.

Reja, U., Lozar Manfreda, K., Hlebec, V., and Vehovar, V. (2002), “Open vs. Closed Questions in Web Surveys.” Paper presented at the International Conference on Methodology and Statistics, Ljubljana, Slovenia, September.

Richman, W. L., Kiesler, S., Weisband, S., and Drasgow, F. (1999), “A Meta-Analytic Study of Social Desirability Distortion in Computer-Administered Questionnaires, Traditional Questionnaires, and Interviews.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 84 (5): 754–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rigden, C. (1999), “‘The Eye of the Beholder’ – Designing for Colour-Blind Users.” British Telecommunications Engineering, 17: 2–6.Google Scholar

Rivers, D. (2000), “Fulfilling the Promise of the Web.” Quirk's Marketing Research Review, February 2000. Online: article 0562. www.quirks.com.Google Scholar

Rivers, D. (2006), “Web Surveys for Health Measurement.” Paper presented at Building Tomorrow's Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: The Inaugural PROMIS Conference, Gaithersburg, MD, September 11–13, 2006.

Robinson, J. P., Neustadtl, A., and Kestnbaum, M. (2002), “Why Public Opinion Polls are Inherently Biased: Public Opinion Differences among Internet Users and Non-Users.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, St. Petersburg, FL, May.

Rossett, B. (2006), “The Basics of Section 508.” Paper presented at the Federal Workshop on Computer Assisted Survey Information Collection (FedCASIC), Washington, DC, March.

Rowe, C. L. (1982), “The Connotative Dimensions of Selected Display Typefaces.” Information Design Journal, 1: 30–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schaefer, D. R., and Dillman, D. A. (1998), “Development of a Standard E-Mail Methodology: Results of an Experiment.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 62 (3): 378–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schafer, J. L., and Graham, J. W. (2002), “Missing Data: Our View of the State of the Art.” Psychological Methods, 7 (2): 147–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schneiderman, B. (1992), Designing the Use Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction, Second Edition. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Schober, M. F., and Conrad, F. G. (eds.) (2007), Envisioning Survey Interviews of the Future. New York: Wiley.

Schober, M. F., Conrad, F. G., Ehlen, P., and Fricker, S. S. (2003), “How Web Surveys Differ from Other Kinds of User Interfaces.” Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meetings of the American Statistical Association. Alexandria: ASA, pp. 190–195 [CD].

Schonlau, M., Asch, B. J., and Du, C. (2003), “Web Surveys as Part of a Mixed-Mode Strategy for Populations That Cannot Be Contacted by E-Mail.” Social Science Computer Review, 21 (2): 218–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schonlau, M., Fricker, R. D., and Elliott, M. N. (2002), Conducting Research Surveys via E-Mail and the Web. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Google Scholar

Schonlau, M., Zapert, K., Simon, L. P., Sanstad, K. H., Marcus, S. M., Adams, J., Spranca, M., Kan, H.-J., Turner, R., and Berry, S. H. (2004), “A Comparison between Responses from a Propensity-Weighted Web Survey and an Identical RDD Survey.” Social Science Computer Review, 22 (1): 128–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schriver, K. A. (1997), Dynamics of Document Design. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Schuman, H., and Presser, S. (1979), “The Open and Closed Question.” American Sociological Review, 44: 692–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schuman, H., and Presser, S. (1981), Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Schwarz, N. (1996), Cognition and Communication: Judgmental Biases, Research Methods and the Logic of Conversation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Schwarz, N., Grayson, C. E., and Knäuper, B. (1998), “Formal Features of Rating Scales and the Interpretation of Question Meaning.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 10 (2): 177–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwarz, N., Knäuper, B., Hippler, H.-J., Noelle-Neumann, E., and Clark, F. (1991), “Rating Scales: Numeric Values May Change the Meaning of Scale Labels.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 55: 618–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwarz, N., and Sudman, S. (Eds.) (1992), Context Effects in Social and Psychological Research. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRef

Schwarz, S., and Reips, U.-D. (2001), “CGI Versus JavaScript: A Web Experiment on the Reversed Hindsight Bias.” In Reips, U.-D. and Bosnjak, M. (eds.), Dimensions of Internet Science. Lengerich, Germany: Pabst Science Publishers, pp. 75–90.Google Scholar

Sethuraman, R., Kerin, R. A., and Cron, W. L. (2005), “A Field Study Comparing Online and Offline Data Collection Methods for Identifying Product Attribute Preferences Using Conjoint Analysis.” Journal of Business Research, 58: 602–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sikkel, D. (1998), “The Individualized Interview.” In Couper, M. P., Baker, R. P., Bethlehem, J., Clark, C. Z. F., Martin, J., Nicholls, W. L., and O'Reilly, J., (eds.), Computer Assisted Survey Information Collection. New York: Wiley, pp. 147–165.Google Scholar

Silverstein, C., Marais, H., Henzinger, M., and Moricz, M. (1999), “Analysis of a Very Large Web Search Engine Query Log.” SIGIR Forum, 33 (1): 6–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Singer, E. (2002), “The Use of Incentives to Reduce Nonresponse in Household Surveys.” In Groves, R. M., Dillman, D. A., Eltinge, J. L., and Little, R. J. A. (eds), Survey Nonresponse. New York: Wiley, pp. 163–177.Google Scholar

Singer, E., Couper, M. P., Conrad, F. G., and Groves, R. M. (in press), “Risk of Disclosure, Perceptions of Risk, and Concerns about Privacy and Confidentiality as Factors in Survey Participation.” Journal of Official Statistics.

Sinibaldi, J., Crawford, S. D., Saltz, R., and Showen, S. (2006), “Using Interactive Web-Based Maps to Collect Geographical Data in a Student Survey.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Montreal, Canada, May.

Smith, R. M., and Kiniorski, K. (2003), “Participation in Online Surveys: Results from a Series of Experiments.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Nashville, TN, May.

Smith, S. M., Smith, J., and Allred, C. R. (2006), “Advanced Techniques and Technologies in Online Research.” In Grover, R. and Vriens, M. (eds.), The Handbook of Marketing Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 132–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smyth, J. D., Dillman, D. A., Christian, L. M., and Stern, M. J. (2004), “How Visual Grouping Influences Answers to Internet Surveys.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Nashville, May.

Smyth, J. D., Dillman, D. A., Christian, L. M., and Stern, M. J. (2005), “Comparing Check-All and Forced-Choice Question Formats in Web Surveys: The Role of Satisficing, Depth of Processing, and Acquiescence in Explaining Differences.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Miami Beach, FL, May.

Sperry, S., Edwards, B., Dulaney, R., and Potter, D. E. B. (1998), “Evaluating Interviewer Use of CAPI Navigation Features.” In Couper, M. P., Baker, R. P., Bethlehem, J., Clark, C. Z. F., Martin, J., W. Nicholls, L., and O'Reilly, J. (eds.), Computer Assisted Survey Information Collection. New York: Wiley, pp. 351–365.Google Scholar

Stanley, N., and Jenkins, S. (2007), “Watch What I Do! Using Graphic Input Controls in Web Surveys.” In Trotman, M. et al. (eds.), The Challenges of a Changing World; Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of the Association for Survey Computing. Berkeley, England: ASC, pp.81–92.Google Scholar

Staples, L. (2000), “Typography and the Screen: A Technical Chronology of Digital Typography, 1984–1997.” Design Issues, 16 (3): 19–34.Google Scholar

,Statistics Netherlands (1996), Blaise Developer's Guide (Blaise III). Heerlen, The Netherlands: Statistics Netherlands, Department of Statistical Informatics.Google Scholar

,Statistics Netherlands (2002), Blaise 4.5 Developer's Guide. Heerlen, The Netherlands: Statistics Netherlands, Methods and Informatics Department.Google Scholar

Stenbjerre, M., and Laugesen, J. N. (2005), “Conducting Representative Online Research.” Proceedings of ESOMAR Conference on Worldwide Panel Research; Developments and Progress, Budapest, Hungary. Amsterdam: ESOMAR, pp. 369–391 [CD].Google Scholar

Sudman, S., and Bradburn, N. M. (1982), Asking Questions: A Practical Guide to Questionnaire Design. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Szabó, Z. G. (2006), “The Distinction between Semantics and Pragmatics.” In Lepore, E. and Smith, B. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tarnai, J., and Allen, T. (2002), “Characteristics of Respondents to a Web Survey of the General Public.” Paper resented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, St. Petersburg Beach, FL, May.

Terhanian, G. (2000), “How To Produce Credible, Trustworthy Information through Internet-Based Survey Research.” Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Portland, OR, May.

Thomas, R. K., Bayer, L. R., Johnson, A., and Behnke, S. (2005), “A Comparison of an Online Card Sorting Task to a Rating Task.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Miami Beach, FL, May.

Thomas, R. K., and Couper, M. P. (2007), “A Comparison of Visual Analog and Graphic Rating Scales.” Paper presented at the General Online Research Conference (GOR'07), Leipzig, March.

Thomas, R. K., Lafond, R. C., and Behnke, S. (2003), “Can What We Don't' Know (About “Don't Know”) Hurt Us? Effects of Item Non-Response.” Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Nashville, May.

Toepoel, V., Das, M., and Soest, A. (2005), “Design of Web Questionnaires: A Test for Number of Items per Screen.” Tilburg University: CentERdata Discussion Paper No. 2005-114.CrossRef

Toepoel, V., Das, M., and Soest, A. (2006), “Design of Web Questionnaires: The Effect of Layout in Rating Scales.” Tilburg University: CentERdata Discussion Paper No. 2006-30.CrossRef

Tourangeau, R., Couper, M. P., and Conrad, F. G. (2004), “Spacing, Position, and Order: Interpretive Heuristics for Visual Features of Survey Questions.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 68 (3): 368–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tourangeau, R., Couper, M. P., and Conrad, F. G. (2007), “Color, Labels, and Interpretive Heuristics for Response Scales.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 71 (1): 91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tourangeau, R., Couper, M. P., Galesic, M., and Givens, J. (2004), “A Comparison of Two Web-Based Surveys: Static vs Dynamic Versions of the NAMCS Questionnaire.” Paper presented at the RC33 International Conference on Social Science Methodology, Amsterdam, August.

Tourangeau, R., Couper, M. P., and Steiger, D. M. (2003), “Humanizing Self-Administered Surveys: Experiments on Social Presence in Web and IVR Surveys.” Computers in Human Behavior, 19: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tourangeau, R., Rips, L., and Rasinski, K. (2000), The Psychology of Survey Response. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tourangeau, R., and Smith, T. W. (1996), “Asking Sensitive Questions: The Impact of Data Collection Mode, Question Format, and Questions Context.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 60 (2): 275–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trollip, S., and Sales, G. (1986), “Readability of Computer-Generated Fill-Justified Text.” Human Factors, 28: 159–164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Trouteaud, A. R. (2004), “How You Ask Counts: A Test of Internet-Related Components of Response Rates to a Web-Based Survey.” Social Science Computer Review, 22 (3): 385–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tufte, E. R. (1990), Envisioning Information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.Google Scholar

Tufte, E. R. (2001), The Visual Display of Quantitative Information (2nd ed.). Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.Google Scholar

Tullis, T. S. (1983), “The Formatting of Alphanumeric Displays: A Review and Analysis.” Human Factors, 25 (6): 657–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tullis, T. S. (1988), “A System for Evaluating Screen Formats: Research and Application.” In Hartson, H. R. and Hix, D. (eds.), Advances in Human-Computer Interaction (Vol. 2). Norwood: Ablex, pp. 214–286.Google Scholar

Turner, C. F., Forsyth, B. H., O'Reilly, J. M., Cooley, P. C., Smith, T. K., Rogers, S. M., and Miller, H. G. (1998), “Automated Self-Interviewing and the Survey Measurement of Sensitive Behaviors.” In Couper, M. P., Baker, R. P., Bethlehem, J., Clark, C. Z. F., Martin, J., Nicholls, W. L., and O'Reilly, J. (eds.), Computer Assisted Survey Information Collection. New York: Wiley, pp. 455–473.Google Scholar

Tuten, T. L. (2005), “Do Reminders Encourage Response but Affect Response Behaviors? Reminders in Web-Based Surveys.” Paper presented at the ESF Workshop on Internet Survey Methodology, Dubrovnik, Croatia, September.

Tuten, T. L., Galesic, M., and Bosnjak, M. (2004), “Effects of Immediate Versus Delayed Notification of Prize Draw Results on Response Behavior in Web Surveys.” Social Science Computer Review, 22 (3): 377–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) (2006), Research-Based Web Design & Usability Guidelines. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

Valdez, P., and Mehrabian, A. (1994), “Effect of Color on Emotions.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123 (4): 394–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horst, W., Snijders, C., and Matzat, U. (2006), “The Effect of Progress Indicators in Online Survey Compliance.” Paper presented at the General Online Research Conference (GOR '06), Bielefeld, Germany, March.

Linden, W. J., and Glas, C. A. W. (eds.) (2000), Computerized Adaptive Testing: Theory and Practice. Boston: Kluwer Academic.CrossRef

Molen, W. J. H. (2001), “Assessing Text-Picture Correspondence in Television News: The Development of a New Coding Scheme.” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 43 (3): 483–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heesen, B. (2005), “Online Access Panels and Effects on Response Rates with Different Types of Incentives.” Proceedings of ESOMAR Conference on Worldwide Panel Research; Developments and Progress, Budapest, Hungary. Amsterdam: ESOMAR, pp. 393–408 [CD].Google Scholar

Vartabedian, A. G. (1971), “The Effect of Letter Size, Case and Generation Method on CRT Display Search Time.” Human Factors, 13 (4): 363–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vehovar, V., Lozar Manfreda, K., and Batagelj, Z. (1999), “Design Issues in WWW Surveys.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Portland, OR, May.

Vehovar, V., Batagelj, Z., Lozar Manfreda, K., and Zaletel, M. (2002), “Nonresponse in Web Surveys.” In Groves, R. M., Dillman, D. A., Eltinge, J. L., and Little, R. J. A. (eds.), Survey Nonresponse. New York: Wiley, pp. 229–242.Google Scholar

Vehovar, V., Manfreda, K. L., and Batagelj, Z. (2000), “Design Issues in Web Surveys.” Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section of the American Statistical Association, pp. 983–988.

Ahn, L., Blum, M., and Langford, J. (2004), “Telling Humans and Computers Apart Automatically.” Communications of the ACM, 47 (2): 57–60.Google Scholar

Vriens, M., Loosschilder, G. H., Rosbergen, E., and Wittink, D. R. (1998), “Verbal versus Realistic Pictorial Representations in Conjoint Analysis with Design Attributes.” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15 (5): 455–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wainer, H., Dorans, N. J., Flaugher, R., Green, B. F., Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L., and Thissen, D. (2000), Computerized Adaptive Testing; A Primer (2nd ed.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Ware, C. (2000), Information Visualization: Perception for Design. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufman.Google Scholar

Weinman, L. (1996), Designing Web Graphics. Berkeley, CA: New Riders.Google Scholar

Weller, L., and Livingston, R. (1988), “Effects of Color of Questionnaire on Emotional Responses.” Journal of General Psychology, 115 (4): 433–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wertheimer, M. (1938a), “Gestalt Theory.” In Ellis, W. D. (ed.), A Source Book of Gestalt Psychology. New York: Humanities Press, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar

Wertheimer, M. (1938b), “Laws of Organization in Perceptual Forms.” In Ellis, W. D. (ed.), A Source Book of Gestalt Psychology. New York: Humanities Press, pp. 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wertheimer, M. (1958), Principles of Perceptual Organization. New York: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar

Wherrett, J. R. (1999), “Issues in Using the Internet as a Medium for Landscape Preference Research.” Landscape and Urban Planning, 45: 209–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wherrett, J. R. (2000), “Creating Landscape Preference Models Using Internet Survey Techniques.” Landscape Research, 25 (1): 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, J. V. (1990), Color for the Electronic Age. New York: Watson-Guptill Publications.Google Scholar

Williams, J. R. (1988), “The Effects of Case and Spacing on Menu Option Search Time.” Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting, pp. 341–343.CrossRef

Witte, J. C., Amoroso, L. M., and Howard, P. E. N. (2000), “Method and Representation in Internet-Based Survey Tools – Mobility, Community, and Cultural Identity in Survey2000.” Social Science Computer Review, 18 (2): 179–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Witte, J. C., Pargas, R. P., Mobley, C., and Hawdon, J. (2004), “Instrument Effects of Images in Web Surveys: A Research Note.” Social Science Computer Review, 22 (3): 363–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wojtowicz, T. (2001), “Designing Lengthy Internet Questionnaires: Suggestions and Solutions.” In Westlake, A., Sykes, W., Manners, T., and Rigg, M. (eds.), The Challenge of the Internet; Proceedings of the ASC International Conference on Survey Research Methods. London: Association for Survey Computing, pp. 25–32.Google Scholar

Yan, T. (2005a), “What They See Is Not What We Intend – Gricean Effects in Web Surveys.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Miami Beach, FL, May.