CH Working Papers (Computing in the Humanities Working Papers), http://projects.chass.utoronto.ca/chwp/titles.html (latest issue 2009).

DHCommons Journal, http://dhcommons.org/journal (forthcoming).

DHQ: Digital Humanities Quarterly, http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq.

Digital Medievalist, http://www.digitalmedievalist.org/journal (latest issue 2013).

Digital Studies/Le champ numérique, http://www.digitalstudies.org/ojs/index.php/digital_studies.

Electronic Book Review, http://www.electronicbookreview.com.

Journal of Digital Humanities, http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org.

Literary and Linguistic Computing, http://llc.oxfordjournals.org.

TEXT Technology: The Journal of Computer Text Processing, http://texttechnology.mcmaster.ca/home.html (latest issue 2007).

American Council of Learned Societies. “Report of the Commission on the Humanities.” 1964. https://www.acls.org/uploadedFiles/Publications/NEH/1964_Commission_on_the_Humanities.pdf.

American Council of Learned Societies. “Our Cultural Commonwealth: The Report of the ACLS Commission on Cyberinfrastructure for the Humanities and Social Sciences.” 2006. http://www.acls.org/cyberinfrastructure/ourculturalcommonwealth.pdf.

Andersen, Deborah Lines. Digital Scholarship in the Tenure, Promotion, and Review Process: History, Humanities, and New Technology. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 2004.Google Scholar

Apollon, Daniel Claire Bélisle, and Régnier, Philippe, eds. Digital Critical Editions. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Archer, Dawn, ed. What's in a Word-list? Investigating Word Frequency and Keyword Extraction. Farnham, UK: Ashgate, 2009.Google Scholar

Bailey, Chris, and Gardiner, Hazel, eds. Revisualizing Visual Culture. Farnham, UK: Ashgate, 2010.Google Scholar

Baron, Naomi. Words Onscreen: The Fate of Reading in a Digital World. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Bartscherer, Thomas, and Coover, Roderick. Switching Codes: Thinking through Digital Technology in the Humanities and the Arts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benjamin, Walter. “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction.” In Illuminations. Edited by Arendt, Hannah. London: Fontana, 1968, 214–18. https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/ge/benjamin.htm.Google Scholar

Berry, David M., ed. Understanding Digital Humanities. Houndsmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bodard, Gabriel, and Mahony, Simon, eds. Digital Research in the Study of Classical Antiquity. Farnham, UK: Ashgate, 2010.Google Scholar

Bodenhamer, David J., Corrigan, John, and Harris, Trevor M.. The Spatial Humanities: GIS and the Future of Humanities Scholarship. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Bonn, Maria, and Furlough, Mike, eds. Getting the Word Out: Academic Libraries as Scholarly Publishers. Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries, 2015.Google Scholar

Borgman, Christine L.Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure, and the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Borgman, Christine L. “The Digital Future Is Now: A Call to Action for the Humanities.” DHQ: Digital Humanities Quarterly 3.4 (2009). http://digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/3/4/000077/000077.html.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. The Field of Cultural Production. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Bryson, Tim. Digital Humanities. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries, 2011.Google Scholar

Burdick, Anne, Drucker, Johanna, et al. Digital_Humanities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Burnard, Lou, O'Keeffe, Katherine O'Brien, and Unsworth, John. Electronic Textual Editing. New York: Modern Language Association of America, 2006.Google Scholar

Busa, Roberto. “The Annals of Humanities Computing: The Index Thomisticus.” Computers and the Humanities 14 (1980): 83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bush, Vannevar. “As We May Think.” The Atlantic, July 1945. http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1945/07/as-we-may-think/303881.Google Scholar

California, Liaison Committee of the State Board of Education, and The Regents of the University of California, and Arthur Gardiner Coons. “A Master Plan for Higher Education in California, 1960–1975.” 1960. http://content.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/hb9c6008sn.

Carter, Bryan. Digital Humanities: Current Perspective, Practice and Research. Cutting-Edge Technologies in Higher Education series. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2013.Google Scholar

Celentano, A., Cortesi, A., and Mastandrea, P.. “Informatica Umanistica: Una disciplina di confine.” Mondo Digitale 4 (2004): 44–55.Google Scholar

Chatzichristodoulou, Maria, Jefferies, Janis, and Zerihan, Rachel, eds. Interfaces of Performance. Farnham, UK: Ashgate, 2009.Google Scholar

Classen, Christoph, Kinnebrock, Susanne, and Löblich, Maria, eds. “Towards Web History: Sources, Methods, and Challenges in the Digital Age.” Historical Social Research 37.4 (2012): 97–188.Google Scholar

Cohen, Daniel J., and Scheinfeldt, Tom. Hacking the Academy: New Approaches to Scholarship and Teaching from Digital Humanities. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

College Art Association. “Code for Best Practices in Fair Use for the Visual Arts.” 2015. http://www.collegeart.org/pdf/fair-use/best-practices-fair-use-visual-arts.pdf.

Committee on Intellectual Property Rights and the Emerging Information Infrastructure. The Digital Dilemma: Intellectual Property in the Information Age. Washington, DC: National Humanities Press, 2000. http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=9601.

Frances, Condron, Fraser, Michael, and Sutherland, Stuart, eds. Oxford University Computing Services Guide to Digital Resources for the Humanities. Morgantown: West Virginia University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Council on Library and Information Resources. “Working Together or Apart: Promoting the Next Generation of Digital Scholarship.” Report of a Workshop Sponsored by the Council on Library and Information Resources and the National Endowment for the Humanities. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources, 2009. http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub145/pub145.pdf.

Crawford, Tim, and Gibson, Lorna, eds. Modern Methods for Musicology: Prospects, Proposals, and Realities. Farnham, UK: Ashgate, 2009.Google Scholar

Davidson, Cathy N. “Humanities 2.0: Promise, Perils, Predictions.” PMLA 123.3 (2008): 707–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deegan, Marilyn, and McCarty, Willard. Collaborative Research in the Digital Humanities. Farnham, UK: Ashgate, 2011.Google Scholar

Deegan, Marilyn, and Sutherland, Kathryn, eds. Text Editing, Print and the Digital World. Farnham, UK: Ashgate, 2009.Google Scholar

Delve, Janet, and Anderson, David. Preserving Complex Digital Objects. London: Facet, 2014.Google Scholar

Deyrup, Marta M.Digital Scholarship. New York: Routledge, 2009.Google Scholar

Earhart, A., and Jewell, A., eds. The American Literary Scholar in the Digital Age. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Fitzpatrick, Kathleen. Planned Obsolescence: Publishing, Technology, and the Future of the Academy. New York:New York University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Flanagan, Mary. Critical Play: Radical Game Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Gardiner, Eileen, and Musto, Ronald G.. “The 7 Digital Arts: Approaching Electronic Publishing.” Talk presented at the Getty Research Institute and College Art Forum on Art History and the Digital World. Los Angeles, CA, June 8–9, 2006. https://www.getty.edu/research/exhibitions_events/events/digital_world/pdf/egardiner_rmusto.pdf.Google Scholar

Gardiner, Eileen, and Musto, Ronald G. “The Electronic Book.” In The Oxford Companion to the Book. Edited by Michael F. Suarez, SJ and Woudhuysen, H. R.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010, 164–71.Google Scholar

Gladney, Henry M.Preserving Digital Information. Berlin: Springer, 2007.Google Scholar

Gold, Matthew K., ed. Debates in the Digital Humanities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Green, D., and Roy, M.. “Things To Do While Waiting for the Future to Happen: Building Cyberinfrastructure for the Liberal Arts.” Educause Review 43.4 (2008): 35–48.Google Scholar

Greengrass, Mark, and Hughes, Lorna, eds. The Virtual Representation of the Past. Farnham, UK: Ashgate, 2008.Google Scholar

Hancock, B., and Giarlo, M. J.. “Moving to XML: Latin Texts XML Conversion Project at the Center for Electronic Texts in the Humanities.” Library Hi Tech 19.3 (2001): 257–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayles, N. Katherine. My Mother Was a Computer: Digital Subjects and Literary Texts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayles, N. KatherineHow We Think: Digital Media and Contemporary Technogenesis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirsch, Brett D.Digital Humanities Pedagogy: Practices, Principles and Politics. Cambridge: OpenBook Publishers, 2012.Google Scholar

Hockey, Susan. Electronic Texts in the Humanities: Principles and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Honing, Henkjan. “The Role of ICT in Music Research: A Bridge Too Far?” International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing 1.1 (2008): 67–75. http://dare.uva.nl/document/129927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Inman, James, Reed, Cheryl, and Sands, Peter, eds. Electronic Collaboration in the Humanities: Issues and Options. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2003.Google Scholar

Jaschik, Scott. “Tenure in a Digital Era.” Inside Higher Ed (May 26, 2009). http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/05/26/digital.

Jockers, Matthew Lee. Macroanalysis: Digital Methods and Literary History. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Jones, Steven E.The Emergence of the Digital Humanities. New York: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar

Katz, Stanley N. “Why Technology Matters: The Humanities in the Twenty-First Century.” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 30.2 (2005): 105–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirschenbaum, Matthew G.Image-Based Humanities Computing. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001.Google Scholar

Liu, AlanMechanisms: New Media and the Forensic Imagination. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Klein, Julie T.Humanities, Culture, and Interdisciplinarity: The Changing American Academy. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Knowles, Anne Kelly, and Hillier, Amy. Placing History: How Maps, Spatial Data, and GIS Are Changing Historical Scholarship. Redlands, CA: Esri Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Lancashire, Ian. Teaching Literature and Language Online. New York: Modern Language Association of America, 2009.Google Scholar

Liu, Alan. The Laws of Cool: Knowledge Work and the Culture of Information. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liu, Alan. “The Future of Humanities in the Digital Age.” Pauley Symposium, University of Nebraska, 2006. http://digitalhistory.wordpress.com/2006/10/01/allen-liu-the-future-of-humanities-in-the-digital-age-with-roundtable-discussion.

Manovich, Lev. Software Takes Command. New York: Bloomsbury, 2013.Google Scholar

Marcum, Deanna B., ed. Development of Digital Libraries: An American Perspective. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 2001.Google Scholar

McCarty, Willard. Humanities Computing. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGann, Jerome. “The Future Is Digital.” Journal of Victorian Culture 13.1 (2008): 80–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liu, Alaned. Online Humanities Scholarship: The Shape of Things to Come. Proceedings of the Mellon Foundation Online Humanities Conference at the University of Virginia, March 26–8, 2010. Houston: Rice University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Liu, AlanA New Republic of Letters. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

McSherry, Corynne. Who Owns Academic Work? Battling for Control of Intellectual Property. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Modern Language Association. “Report of the MLA Task Force on Evaluating Scholarship for Tenure and Promotion.” New York: Modern Language Association, 2006. http://www.mla.org/tenure_promotion.

Moretti, Franco. Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for Literary History. New York: Verso, 2007.Google Scholar

Liu, AlanDistant Reading. London: Verso, 2013.Google Scholar

Mosco, Vincent. The Digital Sublime: Myth, Power, and Cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Musto, Ronald G. “Google Books Mutilates the Printed Past.” The Chronicle Review, The Chronicle of Higher Education (June 12, 2009): B4–5. http://chronicle.com/article/Google-Books-Mutilates-the-/44463.

O'Donnell, James J.Avatars of the Word: From Papyrus to Cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

O'Gorman, Marcel. E-Crit: Digital Media, Critical Theory, and the Humanities. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Peer, Willie van, Zyngier, Sonia, and Viana, Vander. Literary Education and Digital Learning Methods and Technologies for Humanities Studies. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Presner, Todd, Shepard, David, and Kawano, Yoh. Hypercities: Thick Mapping in the Digital Humanities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Ramsay, Stephen. Reading Machines: Toward an Algorithmic Criticism. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Rieger, Oya Y. “Framing Digital Humanities: The Role of New Media in Humanities Scholarship.” First Monday 15.10 (2010). http://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3198/2628.Google Scholar

Rooney, Ellen, and Weed, Elizabeth, eds. “In the Shadows of the Digital Humanities.” Special issue, Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 25.1 (2014).Google Scholar

Rosenzweig, Roy. Clio Wired: The Future of the Past in the Digital Age. New York: Columbia University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Rydberg-Cox, Jeffrey A.Digital Libraries and the Challenges of Digital Humanities. Oxford: Chandos, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schreibman, Susan, Siemens, Raymond George, and Unsworth, John, eds. A Companion to Digital Humanities. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004. http://digitalhumanities.org/companion.Google Scholar

Shaw, Deborah, and Davis, Charles H.. “The Modern Language Association: Electronic and Paper Surveys of Computer-Based Tool Use.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 47.12 (1996): 932–40. https://scholarworks.iu.edu/dspace/handle/2022/13384.3.0.CO;2-3>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Siemens, Raymond George, and Moorman, David. Mind Technologies: Humanities Computing and the Canadian Academic Community. Calgary: University of Calgary Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Siemens, Raymond George, and Schreibman, Susan. A Companion to Digital Literary Studies. Oxford: Blackwell, 2008. http://www.digitalhumanities.org/companionDLS.Google Scholar

Suber, Peter. Open Access. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2012. http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/open-access.Google ScholarPubMed

Sutherland, Kathryn, ed. Electronic Text: Investigations in Method and Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Terras, Melissa M., Nyhan, Julianne, and Vanhoutte, Edward. Defining Digital Humanities: A Reader. Farnham, UK: Ashgate, 2013.Google Scholar

Thaller, Manfred, ed. “Controversies around the Digital Humanities.” Special issue, Historical Social Research 37.3 (2012): 7–229.Google Scholar

Thompson, John B.Books in the Digital Age: The Transformation of Academic and Higher Education Publishing in Britain and the United States. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Turkel, William J. “Interchange: The Promise of Digital History.” Journal of American History 95.2 (2008). http://www.journalofamericanhistory.org/issues/952/interchange/index.html.Google Scholar

Unsworth, John. “Scholarly Primitives: What Methods Do Humanities Researchers Have in Common, and How Might Our Tools Reflect This?” Paper presented at Humanities Computing: Formal Methods, Experimental Practice. King's College, London, May 13, 2000. http://people.brandeis.edu/~unsworth/Kings.5-00/primitives.html.

Unsworth, John. “New Research Methods for the Humanities.” Lecture presented at the National Humanities Center, Research Triangle Park, NC. November 11, 2005. http://people.brandeis.edu/~unsworth/lyman.htm.

Vaidhyanathan, Siva. Copyrights and Copywrongs: The Rise of Intellectual Property and How It Threatens Creativity. New York: New York University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Vaidhyanathan, SivaThe Googlization of Everything: (And Why We Should Worry). Berkeley: University of California Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Vandendorpe, Christian. From Papyrus to Hypertext: Toward the Universal Digital Library. Trans. by Aronoff, Phyllis and Scott, Howard. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Warwick, Claire, Terras, Melissa M., and Nyhan, Julianne. Digital Humanities in Practice. London: Facet Publishing in association with UCL Centre for Digital Humanities, 2012.Google Scholar

Williford, Christa, and Henry, Charles. One Culture: Computationally Intensive Research in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources, 2012.Google Scholar

Alliance of Digital Humanities Organizations, http://adho.org.

Creative Commons, http://creativecommons.org.

CUNY Digital Humanities Resource Guide, http://commons.gc.cuny.edu/wiki/index.php/The_CUNY_Digital_Humanities_Resource_Guide.

Digital Humanities and the Library, http://miriamposner.com/blog/digital-humanities-and-the-library.

Digital Humanities Bibliography, http://www.craigcarey.net/dhbibliography.

Digital Humanities Manifesto 2.0, http://manifesto.humanities.ucla.edu/2009/05/29/the-digital-humanities-manifesto-20.

Digital Research Tools (DiRT), http://dirtdirectory.org.

HASTAC: Humanities, Arts, Science, and Technology Alliance and Collaboratory, http://www.hastac.org.

Library of Congress, Office of Digital Preservation News Archive, http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/news/index.html.

Ninch Guide to Good Practice in the Digital Representation and Management of Cultural Heritage Materials, http://www.nyu.edu/its/humanities//ninchguide.

Office for Humanities Communication Publications, Kings College London, http://www.ohc.kcl.ac.uk/books.html.

Scholarly Kitchen, http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org.

Stanford Copyright Overview, http://fairuse.stanford.edu/Copyright_and_Fair_Use_Overview.

University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Center for Digital Research in the Humanities, http://cdrh.unl.edu/articles-resources.