Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-7tdvq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-09T03:15:24.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - On the status of the ceratopsids Monoclonius and Centrosaurus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2010

Kenneth Carpenter
Affiliation:
Denver Museum of Natural History
Philip J. Currie
Affiliation:
Tyrrell Museum of Palaeontology, Alberta
Get access

Summary

Abstract

The history of Monoclonius crassus Cope 1876 is reviewed. The type is based on a composite of disarticulated and unassociated individuals from the Judith River Formation exposed along the Missouri River in Montana. The parietal (AMNH 3998) is well preserved and diagnostic, and is herein designated as the neotype of Monoclonius crassus. Cope named three further species in 1889, all based on fragmentary associations, none of which can be shown to be valid. Lambe named Centrosaurus apertus in 1904 on the basis of an isolated parietal from Judith River sediments in southern Alberta. Barnum Brown discovered complete skulls in Alberta, and described them in 1914 and 1917 as new species that he referred to Monoclonius, believing Centrosaurus to be a synonym. Confusion has persisted to the present day.

In this study, the types of all Judithian centrosaurine ceratopsids are subjected to biometric analysis. It is shown that Monoclonius and Centrosaurus are distinct from each other, and that Styracosaurus is closer to the latter than to the former. Sexual dimorphism is inferred for Centrosaurus and Styracosaurus. Morphological differences previously regarded as indicative of species-level differentiation are regarded as sexual dimorphism. It is necessary to recognize only single species of Centrosaurus, Styracosaurus, and Monoclonius. Brachyceratops is not a juvenile of Monoclonius, but is a valid taxon.

Introduction

Horned dinosaurs of the subfamily Centrosaurinae reached the peak of their diversity in the Late Cretaceous Campanian stage, and their remains are well preserved in the Judith River Formation of Montana and particularly of Alberta.

Type
Chapter
Information
Dinosaur Systematics
Approaches and Perspectives
, pp. 231 - 244
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×