Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-c654p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T15:26:19.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Sub-Saharan Africa and WTO dispute settlement: the case of Kenya

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2011

Gregory C. Shaffer
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Ricardo Meléndez-Ortiz
Affiliation:
ICTSD, Geneva, Switzerland
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) governing the dispute settlement system (DSS) of the World Trade Organization (WTO) is one of the cornerstones of the multilateral trading system. A credible dispute settlement system is crucial to ensure certainty and predictability in global trade. The DSU has indeed enabled countries to resolve trade disputes with other WTO Members without acrimony. However, more than a decade after the adoption of the DSU, the number of countries that have utilised the DSS is limited primarily to developed countries, with sporadic engagement by economically stronger developing countries. Whereas most African countries participate in trade negotiations under the WTO, their use of the WTO DSS has been almost non-existent. As African countries strive to pursue their development objectives through enhanced international trade, it is thought that they would also use the system to defend their trade interests and further their development agenda.

Much has been written about developing countries, especially African countries, on their conspicuous absence and non-utilisation of the WTO DSS. This chapter focuses on Kenya and explores factors that influence its decision to use the DSS. Among the issues examined is Kenya's preparedness for handling disputes before the WTO, including its human, logistical and financial capacity to engage in the process and overcome the challenges associated with the use of the DSS.

The authors faced limitations arising from the sensitive nature of the subject matter discussed in this chapter.

Type
Chapter
Information
Dispute Settlement at the WTO
The Developing Country Experience
, pp. 301 - 341
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abila, Richard O. ‘Four Decades of the Nile Perch Fishery in Lake Victoria: Technological Development, Impacts and Policy Options for Sustainable Utilization’, in Howard, Geoffrey W. and Matindi, Susan (eds.), Water Hyacinth, Nile Perch and Pollution: Issues for Ecosystem Management in Lake Victoria. Nairobi, Kenya: World Conservation Union, 1998.Google Scholar
Abila, Richard O. and Werimo, Kenneth. ‘The Cost of Implementing EU Sanitary Standards on Fish and Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points (HACCP) System’. Study commissioned by The Kenya–European Union Post Lome Trade Programme. Nairobi, Kenya: Keplotrade, 2005.Google Scholar
Abila, Richard O. and Jansen, E.G. ‘From Local to Global Markets: The Fish Processing and Exporting Industry on the Kenyan Part of Lake Victoria – its Structure, Strategies and Socio-economic Impacts', Working Paper No. 8, Center for Development and Environment (SUM), University of Oslo, Norway, 1997.Google Scholar
Alavi, Amin. ‘African Countries and the WTO's Dispute Settlement Mechanism’, Development Policy Review 25 (2007): 25–42, available at www.worldtradelaw.net/articles/alaviafrica.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bokea, Crispin and Ikiara, Moses. ‘The Macroeconomy of the Export Fishing Industry in Lake Victoria (Kenya)’, Socio-economics of the Lake Victoria Fisheries Project Technical Report No. 7. Nairobi, Kenya: IUCN Eastern Africa Regional Program, 2000.Google Scholar
Karenge, Gacuru Wa, KEPLOTRADE Study.
Gitonga, N. K., Okal, L. and Mutegi, E., ‘The effects of the EU ban and Lake Victoria fish exports on Kenyan fisheries’, Rome: UN Food & Agriculture Organization, 2001.
Gujadhr, Shyam K ‘Influencing the Market Standards: A Voice for Developing Countries’, International Trade Forum, 2003 at www.tradeforum.org/news/fullstory.php/aid/553/Influencing_Market_Standards:_A_Voice_for_Developing_Countries.html.
Henson, Spencer. ‘Standards and Trade: An Overview’. University of Guelph, Canada, 2005, available at http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTRANETTRADE/Resources/Topics/Accession/Standards&TradeOverview_Eng.doc.Google Scholar
Henson, Spencer and Mitullah, Winnie. Kenyan Exports of Nile Perch: Impact of Food Safety Standards on an Export-Oriented Supply Chain. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Horticultural Crop Development Authority (HCDA), Kenya, Export Market Statistics, 1999.
,ITDP's Case Studies Index, ‘Egypt–Kenya Dispute over Toilet Paper Standards’, available at www.commercialdiplomacy.org/case_study/egyption_kenya.htm.
Lacarte-Muró, J. and Gappah, Petina‘Developing Countries and the WTO Legal and Dispute Settlement System: A View from the Bench’, Journal of International Economic Law 3 (2000): 395–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessie, Edwini and Addo, Kofi. ‘African Countries and the WTO Negotiations on the Dispute Settlement Understanding’, unpublished paper, available at www.trapca.org/pdf/AFRICAN COUNTRIES AND THE WTO NEGOTIATIONS ON THE DISPUTE SETTLEMENT UNDERSTANDING.doc.pdf.
Mavroidis, Petroset al. ‘Is the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism Responsive to the Needs of Traders? Would a System of Direct Action by Private Parties Yield Better Results?’, Journal of World Trade 32 (1998): 147–65.Google Scholar
,Ministry of Planning and National Development, Kenya, Statistical Abstract 2003.
Mosoti, Victor.‘Does Africa Need the WTO Dispute Settlement System?’, ICTSD Resource Paper No. 5 (Geneva, Switzerland: ICTSD, 2003), pp. 67–88.Google Scholar
Mosoti, Victor.‘Africa in the First Decade of WTO Dispute Settlement’, Journal of International Economic Law 9 (2005): 427–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosoti, Victor.New Age Business, 16 March 2005. (Dakar: Reuters.)Google Scholar
Noor, Halima. ‘Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures and Their Impact on Kenya’, EcoNews Africa. UNCTAD, 2000 available at http://r0.unctad.org/trade_env/test1/meetings/standards/kenya3.doc.Google Scholar
Odhiambo, Walter. ‘Analysis of Standards and Certification Related Non-tariff Measures in the EU: Implications for Kenyan Exports’. Kenya Institute for Public Policy Research and Analysis and Institute of Development Studies, University of Nairobi, November 2004.Google Scholar
Shaffer, G., Sanchez, M. Ratton and Rosenberg, B.The Trials of Winning at the WTO: What Lies Behind Brazil's Success?, Cornell International Law Journal 41 (2008); 383–501.Google Scholar
,World Trade Organization. A Handbook on the WTO Dispute Settlement System. Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×