Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T23:25:29.856Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

20 - The Crystal Palace

from iii - SPACE AND PLACE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2015

Sarah J. Young
Affiliation:
University College London
Deborah A. Martinsen
Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York
Olga Maiorova
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Get access

Summary

From the moment of its construction, London's Crystal Palace (Fig. 4), the iron and glass structure designed by Joseph Paxton for the 1851 Great Exhibition in Hyde Park and subsequently moved to Sydenham Hill in South London, where it stood until its destruction by fire in 1936, was subject to intense international interest and viewed as a symbol of modernity. It also became the central image of Dostoevsky's critique of western rationalism, particularly of the radicals and their utopian aspirations. His appropriation of this symbol incorporated ideas about the Crystal Palace's all-encompassing and contradictory nature that characterized its history and reception.

From the original idea for the Great Exhibition in 1851 to its subsequent interpretation by historians, the meaning and use of the Crystal Palace has seen significant changes. The project, for the first world's fair, showcasing industry, manufactures, and applied arts from Britain and the rest of the world, was initially conceived as a means of shaping the image of Britain and the British Empire for the Victorian era (and, equally, of defining the image of the non-Western “other”); of promoting free trade and internationalism (and, therefore, global peace); of proclaiming the superiority of British manufactures; of defining, celebrating, and educating people about industry, manufacturing processes and products; and of bringing together different classes and cultures. Beyond the immediate designs of the royal commission that established the Great Exhibition, the palace led to material changes in Britain's infrastructure and cultural life, as the success of the Great Exhibition resulted in the establishment in London of the Science, Natural History, and Victoria and Albert Museums, Imperial College, and the Royal Albert Hall. The palace also played a crucial role not simply in representing, but in defining the very meaning of modernity, both in terms of its aesthetic form, and in relation to the changes in knowledge and behavior that modernity introduced. In particular, the Crystal Palace has been associated with concepts of the “general public” and of consumerism as spectacle.

The function and aims of the reconstructed palace, which opened in Sydenham in 1854, were somewhat different. The educational focus switched from industry to the cultures of different civilizations, as visitors walked through architectural courts that took them on a trip around the world and through the ages.

Type
Chapter
Information
Dostoevsky in Context , pp. 176 - 184
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Auerbach, Jeffrey A. The Great Exhibition of 1851: A Nation on Display. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press, 1999.
Beaver, Patrick. The Crystal Palace: A Portrait of Victorian Enterprise, . Chichester: Phillimore, 1986.
Bennett, Tony. “The Exhibitionary Complex.” New Formations 4 (1988), 73–102.Google Scholar
Berman, Marshall. All That Is Solid Melts Into Air: The Experience of Modernity. New York: Verso, 1982.
Buzard, James, Childers, Joseph W., and Gillooly, Eileen, eds. Victorian Prism: Refractions of the Crystal Palace. Charlottesville, VA and London: University of Virginia Press, 2007.
Richards, Thomas. The Commodity Culture of Victorian England: Advertising and Spectacle, 1851–1914. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1990.
Sloterdijk, Peter. In the World Interior of Capital: Towards a Philosophical Theory of Globalization. Trans. Hoban, Wieland. Cambridge, UK and Malden, MA: Polity Press, 2014.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×