Hayward, Maria, Rich Apparel: Clothing and the Law in Henry VIII’s England (Farnham, England: Ashgate, 2009), pp. 29–39Google Scholar

Hunt, Alan, Governance of the Consuming Passions: A History of Sumptuary Law (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1996), p. 143CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hindle, Steve, “Dependency, Shame and Belonging: Badging the Deserving Poor, c. 1550–1750,” Cultural and Social History 1 (2004), 6–35Google Scholar

Marx, Karl, Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Vol. 1, edited by Friedrich Engels; translated by Samuel Moore and Edward Aveling (Charles H. Kerr & Co., 1906) (1867)Google Scholar

Chambliss, William T., “A Sociological Analysis of the Law of Vagrancy,” Social Problems 12.1 (1964), 67–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, C. S. L., “Slavery and Protector Somerset: The Vagrancy Act of 1547,” Economic History Review 19.3 (1966), 533–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar

The Records of the Parliaments of Scotland to 1707, Brown, K. M. et al., eds. (St Andrews, 2007–2011)

Adair, E. R., “The Statute of Proclamations,” English Historical Review 32.125 (Jan., 1917), 34–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bush, M. L., “The Act of Proclamations: A Reinterpretation,” American Journal of Legal History 27.1 (Jan., 1983), 33–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elton, G. R., “Henry VIII’s Act of Proclamations,” English Historical Review 75.295 (Apr., 1960), 208–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tudor Royal Proclamations, Vol. II, edited by Hughes, Paul L. and Larkin, James F. (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1969), pp. 136–138

Tudor Royal Proclamations, Vol. III, edited by Hughes, Paul L. and Larkin, James F. (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1969), pp. 174–179

Harte, N. B., “State Control of Dress and Social Change in Pre-Industrial England,” in Trade, Government, and Economy in Pre-Industrial England: Essays presented to F.J. Fisher, edited by Coleman, D. C. and Henry, A. H. (London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson, 1976), pp. 132–165, 148Google Scholar

Phillips, Kim M., “Masculinities and the Medieval Sumptuary Laws,” Gender & History 19.1 (2007), 22–42, 28CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jaster, Margaret Rose, “Breeding Dissoluteness and Disobedience: Clothing Laws as Tudor Colonist Discourse,” Critical Survey 13.3 (2001), 61–77, 65CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hawthorne, Nathaniel, The Scarlet Letter (Boston: Ticknor, Reed & Fields, 1850)Google Scholar

Hawthorne, Nathaniel, Vol. 1, The Scarlet Letter, edited by Fredson Bowers (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1962)Google Scholar

Ryscamp, Charles, “The New England Sources of The Scarlet Letter,” American Literature 31.3 (1959), 257–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whitmore, William, ed., Colonial Laws of Massachusetts, Vol. I (Boston: Rockwell and Churchill, 1889)

McIlwaine, H. R., ed., Journals of the House of Burgesses, 1619–1658/59, (Richmond, VA: Colonial Press, 1905Google Scholar

Cross, Arthur Lyon, “The English Criminal Law and Benefit of Clergy during the Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Century,” American Historical Review 22.3 (1917), 544–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Firth, C. B., “Benefit of Clergy in the Time of Edward IV,” English Historical Review 32.126 (1917), 175–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamburger, Philip, Law and Judicial Duty (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008), pp. 266–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lichtenstein, Alex, “‘That Disposition to Theft, With Which They Have Been Branded’: Moral Economy, Slave Management, and the Law,” Journal of Social History 21.3 (1998), 413–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Breen, T. H., The Marketplace of Revolution: How Consumer Politics Shaped American Independence (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004)Google Scholar

Tomlins, Christopher, Freedom Bound: Law, Labor, and Civic Identity in Colonizing British America, 1580–1865 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), pp. 349–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franklin, Benjamin, in A third volume of interesting tracts, on the subject of taxing the British colonies in America (London: printed for J. Almon, opposite Burlington-House, in Piccadilly, 1767)Google Scholar

Brekke, Linzy, “The ‘Scourge of Fashion’: Political Economy and the Politics of Consumption in the Early Republic,” Early American Studies 3.1 (2005), 111–139, 123CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, John, “Thoughts on Government,” in The Works of John Adams, Second President of the United States: with a Life of the Author, Notes and Illustrations, by his Grandson Charles Francis Adams, 10 Vol. (Boston: Little, Brown, 1856), Vol. 4, pp. 193–200, 199Google Scholar

Broadwater, Jeff, George Mason: Forgotten Founder (Chapel Hill: North Caorlina University Press, 2006), pp. 44–45Google Scholar

Paine, Thomas, Common Sense; addressed to the inhabitants of America, on the following interesting subjects (London: H.D. Symonds, 1792), p. 3Google Scholar

Liptak, Adam. “No Crime, but an Arrest and Two Strip-Searches,” New York Times, March 7, 2011Google Scholar

Hyman, Irwin and Perone, Donna C., “The Other Side of School Violence: Educator Policies and Practices that May Contribute to Student Misbehavior,” Journal of School Psychology 36 (1998), 7, 13CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taylor, Gary, “Exotic Dancers Win $195,000 Judgment in Strip-Search Case,” Orlando Sentinel, July 7, 2011Google Scholar

Rohman, Keith, “Diagnosing and Analyzing Flawed Investigations, Abu Ghraib as a Case Study,” Penn State International Law Review 28 (2009), 1–44Google Scholar

Fishman, Steve, “Bradley Manning’s Army of One,” New York Magazine, July 3, 2011Google Scholar

Fischel, Joseph J., “Transcendent Homosexuals and Dangerous Sex Offenders: Sexual Harm and Freedom in the Judicial Imaginary,” Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy 17 (2010), 277–311Google Scholar

Jacobson, Robert, “‘Megan’s Laws’: Reinforcing Old Patterns of Anti-Gay Police Harassment,” Georgetown Law Journal 87 (1999), 2431–2467.Google Scholar

Douard, John, “Sex Offender as Scapegoat: The Monstrous Other Within,” New York Law School Review 53 (2008/2009), 32–51.Google Scholar

Fineout, Gary, “Jim Morrison Is Pardoned in Indecent Exposure Case,” New York Times, December 9, 2010Google Scholar

Jackson, Janet’s fleeting nudity for further consideration in light of the fleeting expletives opinion inFCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc., 556 U.S. 502 (2009) (Fox I)Google Scholar

Aaronson, Daniel R., Edinger, Gary S., and Benjamin, James S., “The First Amendment in Chaos: How the Law of Secondary Effects Is Applied and Misapplied by the Circuit Courts,” University of Miami Law Review (2009), 63: 741–759Google Scholar

Fee, John, “The Pornographic Secondary Effects Doctrine,” Alabama Law Review (2009), 60: 291–338Google Scholar

Shiffrin, Seana Valentine, “Speech, Death and Double Effect,” N.Y.U. Law Review 78 (2003), 1135–1185, 1148Google Scholar

Cooper, Davina, “Theorising Nudist Equality: An Encounter between Political Fantasy and Public Appearance,” Antipode 43.2 (2011), 326–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dickberry, F., The Storm of London: A Social Rhapsody (London: John Long, 1904)Google Scholar

Lewes, Darby, “Middle-Class Edens: Women’s Nineteenth-century Utopian Fiction and the Bourgeois Ideal,” Utopian Studies 4:1 (1993), 14–25Google Scholar

Benedet, Janine, “On Indecency: R. v. Jacob,” Canadian Criminal Law Review 3 (1998), 17–59.Google Scholar

Gross, Aeyal, “Gender Outlaws Before the Law: The Courts of the Borderland,” Harvard Journal of Law & Gender 32 (2009), 165–231Google Scholar

Valentine, Sarah E., “Traditional Advocacy for Nontraditional Youth: Rethinking Best Interests for the Queer Child,” Michigan State Law Review (2008), 1053–1113Google Scholar

Ben-Asher, Noa, “Paradoxes of Health and Equality: When a Boy Becomes a Girl,” Yale Journal of Law & Feminism 16 (2004), 275–311.Google Scholar

Whisner, Mary, “Gender-Specific Clothing Regulation: A Study in Patriarchy,” Harvard Women’s Law Journal 5 (1982), 73–119.Google Scholar

Pieterse, Marius, “The Right to Be Free from Public or Private Violence after Carmichele,” South African Law Journal 119 (2002), 27–39Google Scholar

Workman, Jane E. and Freeburg, Elizabeth W., “An Examination of Date Rape, Victim Dress, and Perceiver Variables Within the Context of Attribution Theory,” Sex Roles 41 (1999), 261–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heights, Roslyn et al., “The Influence of Victim’s Attire on the Adolescent’s Judgments of Date Rape,” Adolescence 30.18 (1995), 319–324.Google Scholar

Whatley, Mark, “The Effect of Participant Sex, Victim Dress, and Traditional Attitudes on Causal Judgments for Marital Rape Victims,” Journal of Family Violence 20.3 (2005), 191–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennedy, Duncan, “Sexual Abuse, Sexy Dressing and the Eroticization of Domination,” New England Law Review 26 (1992), 1309–1393Google Scholar

Kennedy, Duncan, Sexy Dressing Etc (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1993)Google Scholar

Lennon, Theresa L., Lennon, Sharron J., and Johnson, Kim K. P., “Is Clothing Probative of Attitude or Intent? Implications for Rape and Sexual Harassment Cases,” Law & Inequality 11(1993), 391, 395 and 402Google Scholar

Rossein, Merrick, Employment Discrimination Law and Litigation (Eagan, MN: West 2011)Google Scholar

Caldwell, Paulette M., “A Hair Piece: Perspectives on the Intersection of Race and Gender,” Duke Law Journal (1991), 365–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Onwuachi-Willig, Angela, “Another Hair Piece: Exploring New Strands of Analysis under Title VII,” Georgetown Law Journal 98 (2010), 1079–1130Google Scholar

Greene, D. Wendy, “Title VII: What’s Hair (and Other Race-Based Characteristics) Got to Do with It?”University of Colorado Law Review 79 (2008), 1355–1393, esp. 1390–1391Google Scholar

Turner, Michelle L., “The Braided Uproar: A Defense of My Sister’s Hair and a Contemporary Indictment of Rogers v. American Airlines,” Cardozo Women’s Law Journal 7 (2001), 115–162Google Scholar

Caldwell, Paulette M., “Intersectional Bias and the Courts: The Story of Rogers v. American Airlines,” in Race Law Stories, edited by Devon W. Carbado and Rachel F. Moran (New York: Foundation Press, 2008), pp. 571–600Google Scholar

Greene, D. Wendy, “Black Women Can’t Have Blonde Hair … In The Workplace,” Journal of Gender Race & Justice 14 (2011), 405–430.Google Scholar

Avery, Dianne and Crain, Marion, “Branded: Corporate Image, Sexual Stereotyping, and the New Face of Capitalism,” Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy 14.1 (2007), 13–123Google Scholar

Fallon, Richard H. Jr., “Constitutional Precedent Viewed through the Lens of Hartian Positivist Jurisprudence,” North Carolina Law Review 86 (2008), 1107–1163, 1157Google Scholar

Boudreaux, Paul, “Federalism and the Contrivances of Public Law,”St. John’s Law Review 77 (2003), 564Google Scholar

Bork, Robert, “Civil Rights – A Challenge,” The New Republic, August 31, 1963Google Scholar

Mersky, Roy M. and Jacobstein, J. Myron, The Supreme Court of the United States: Hearings and Reports on Successful and Unsuccessful Nominations, Volume 14-F (Buffalo, NY: William S. Hein 1991), pp. 7401–7405Google Scholar

Volokh, Eugene, “Freedom of Speech and Appellate Review in Workplace Harassment Cases,” Northwestern University Law Review 90 (1996), 1029–1030.Google Scholar

Bernstein, David, You Can’t Say That: The Growing Threat to Civil Liberties from Antidiscrimination Laws (Washington, D.C.: Cato Institute, 2003), p. 198Google Scholar

Epstein, Richard A., Forbidden Grounds: The Case against Employment Discrimination Laws (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992)Google Scholar

Primus, Richard, “The Future of Disparate Impact,” Michigan Law Review 108 (2010), 1342–1387.Google Scholar

Middlekauff, Robert, The Glorious Cause: The American Revolution, 1763–1789 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1982, 2005), pp. 522–525Google Scholar

Montross, Lynn, Rag, Tag and Bobtail: The Story of the Continental Army, 1775–1783 (New York: Harper & Bros., 1952)Google Scholar

Reid, Stuart and Zlatich, Marko, Soldiers of the Revolutionary War (Oxford: Osprey, 2002), pp. 15, 46, 89Google Scholar

Mathis, Doyle, “Chisholm v. Georgia: Background and Settlement,” Journal of American History, 54:1 (1967), 19–29, 21CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacobs, Clyde E., The Eleventh Amendment and Sovereign Immunity (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1972)Google Scholar

Barnett, Randy E., “The People or the State? Chisholm v. Georgia and Popular Sovereignty,” Virginia Law Review, 93 (2007), 1729–1758Google ScholarPubMed

Sullivan, Dwight, “The Congressional Response to Goldman v. Weinberger,” Military Law Review 121 (1988), 125–152Google Scholar

Brodie, Laura Fairchild, Breaking Out: VMI and the Coming of Women (New York: Random House, 2000)Google Scholar

Cox, Noel, “Tudor Sumptuary Laws and Academical Dress: An Act against Wearing of Costly Apparel 1509 and an Act for Reformation of Excess in Apparel 1533,” Transactions of the Burgon Society, 6 (2006), 15–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McQueen, Rob, “Of Wigs and Gowns: A Short History of Legal and Judicial Dress in Australia,” in Misplaced Traditions: British Lawyers, Colonial Peoples, Law in Context 16:1 (1998), 31–58Google Scholar

Frank, Jerome, Courts on Trial: Myth and Reality in American Justice (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1949)Google Scholar

Zagel, James and Winkler, Adam, “The Independence of Judges,” Mercer Law Review, 46 (1995), 795–834Google Scholar

Rehnquist, William, “The Cult of the Robe,” Judges Journal 15 (1976), 74.Google Scholar

Reske, Henry J., “Showing His Stripes: Operetta Inspires Chief Justice to Alter his Robe,” American Bar Association Journal, 81.3 (1995), 35Google Scholar

Ginsburg, Ruth Bader, “In Memoriam: William H. Rehnquist,” Harvard Law Review 119 (1995), 6–10.Google Scholar

McNamara, Bethanne Walz, “All Dressed Up with No Place to Go: Gender Bias in Oklahoma Federal Court Dress Codes,” Tulsa Law Journal 30 (1994–1995), 395–420Google Scholar

Coughenour, John C. et al., “The Effects of Gender in the Federal Courts; The Final Report of the Ninth Circuit Gender Bias Task Force,” Southern California Law Review 67 (1994), 852–854.Google Scholar

Howard, Maureen, “Beyond a Reasonable Doubt: One Size Does Not Fit All When It Comes to Courtroom Attire for Women,” Gonzaga Law Review 45 (2009–2010), 209–224Google Scholar

Patrick, Wendy, “Well Suited to the Courtroom: Women in Legal Advocacy,” Practical Litigation 21:5 (2010), 7–10Google Scholar

Bowman, Kristi L., “The Civil Rights Roots of Tinker’s Disruption Tests,” American University Law Review 58 (2009), 1129–1165.Google Scholar

Cogan, Neil H., editor, The Complete Bills of Rights: The Drafts, Debates, Sources, and Origins (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997), pp. 143–145

Brant, Irving, The Bill of Rights: Its Origin and Meaning (New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1965), pp. 55–56Google Scholar

Penn, William, The Political Writings of William Penn, edited by Murphy, Andrew R. (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2002), pp. 3–21Google Scholar

Mead, William, at the Old Bailey, for Tumultuous Assembly: 22 Charles II. 1670,” in Howell, T. B., A Complete Collection of State Trials, Vol. 6 (London: T.C. Hansard, 1816), pp. 951–998Google Scholar

Inazu, John D., “The Forgotten Freedom of Assembly,” Tulane Law Review 84 (2010), 565, 575–577Google Scholar

Wilson, John S., The Importance of a Hat (Chicago: Chicago Literary Club, 1999/2001)Google Scholar

Kesselring, Krista J., “Gender, the Hat, and Quaker Universalism in the Wake of the English Revolution,” The Seventeenth Century 26.2 (2011), 299–322Google Scholar

Howell, T. B., A Complete Collection of State Trials 999 – 1026, Vol. 6 (London: T. C. Hansard, 1816)Google Scholar

Stern, Simon, “Between Local Knowledge and National Politics: Debating Rationales for Jury Nullification after Bushell’s Case,” Yale Law Journal 111 (2002), 1815–1859CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conaway, Teresa L., Mutzaa1, Carol L., and Ross, Joann M., “Jury Nullification: A Selective, Annotated Bibliography,” Valparaiso University Law Review 39 (2004), 393–443Google Scholar

Inazu, John D., “The Forgotten Freedom of Assembly,” Tulane Law Review 84 (2010), 565–612.Google Scholar

Lahav, Pnina, “The Chicago Conspiracy Trial: Character and Judicial Discretion,” University of Colorado Law Review 71 (2000), 1327–1364Google Scholar

Lahav, Pnina, “Theater in the Courtroom: The Chicago Conspiracy Trial,” Law & Literature 16 (2004), 381–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldsschmidt, Jona, “‘Order in the Court!’ Constitutional Issues in the Law of Courtroom Decorum,” Hamline Law Review 31 (2008), 1–102Google Scholar

Kitner, Scott, “The Need and Means to Restrict Spectators from Wearing Buttons at Criminal Trials,” Review of Litigation 27 (2008), 733–768Google Scholar

Elizabeth, Sierra, “The Newest Spectator Sport: Why Extending Victims’ Rights to the Spectators’ Gallery Erodes the Presumption of Innocence,” Duke Law Journal 58 (2008), 275–309Google Scholar

Lind, Meghan E., “Hearts on Their Sleeves: Symbolic Displays of Emotion by Spectators in Criminal Trials,” Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 98 (2008), 1147–1170Google Scholar

Lyon, Elizabeth, “A Picture Is Worth a Thousand Words: The Effect of Spectators’ Display of Victim Photographs during a Criminal Jury Trial on a Criminal Defendant’s Fair Trial Rights,” Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly 36 (2009), 517–544.Google Scholar

Calvert, Clay, “Revisiting the Right to Offend Forty Years after Cohen v. California: One Case’s Legacy on First Amendment Jurisprudence, First Amendment Law Review 10 (2011), 1–56Google Scholar

Cohen, William S., “A Look Back at Cohen v. California,” UCLA Law Review 34 (1987), 1595–1614.Google Scholar

Heckler, Nuriel A., “That’s What the Shovel’s For: Atlanta’s Sagging Baggy Pants Bill in a Liberal Society,” Guild Practice 64 (2007), 216–224Google Scholar

Sinopole, Angelica M., “‘No Saggy Pants’: A Review of the First Amendment Issues Presented by the State’s Regulation of Fashion in Public Streets,” Penn State Law Review 113 (2008), 329–380Google Scholar

Vandivort, William C., “The Constitutional Challenge to ‘Saggy’ Pants Laws,” Brooklyn Law Review 75 (2009), 667–705Google Scholar

Williams, Onika K., “The Suppression of a Saggin’ Expression: Exploring the ‘Saggy Pants’ Style within a First Amendment Context,” Indiana Law Journal 85 (2010), 1169–1195.Google Scholar

Kleinberg, Eliot, “Judge Releases Teen, Criticizes Riviera Beach’s Saggy Pants Law,” Palm Beach Post, September 16, 2008Google Scholar

Spencer-Wendel, Susan, “Let ’em Sag, Judge Says,” Palm Beach Post, April 23, 2009, at 1AGoogle Scholar

Walthall, Howard P. Sr., “A Doubtful Mind: Understanding Alabama’s State Constitution,” Cumberland Law Review 35 (2005), 74–80Google Scholar

“Still Afraid of ‘Negro Domination?’ Why County Home Rule Limitations in the Alabama Constitution of 1901 Are Unconstitutional,” Alabama Law Review 57 (2005), 545–563

Howell, K. Babe, “Fear Itself: The Impact of Allegations of Gang Affiliation on Pre-Trial Detention,” St. Thomas Law Review 23 (2011), 620–659Google Scholar

Stuart, Megan, “Saying, Wearing, Watching, and Doing: Equal First Amendment Protection for Coming Out, Having Sex, and Possessing Child Pornography,” Florida Coastal Law Review 11 (2010), 341 385Google Scholar

Wright, Joshua D., “The Constitutional Failure of Gang Databases,” Stanford Journal of Civil Rights & Civil Liberties 2 (2005), 115–142.Google Scholar

McGinnis, Christopher, Eisenhart, Sarah, “Interrogation Is Not Ethnography: The Irrational Admission of Gang Cops as Experts in the Field of Sociology,” Hastings Race & Poverty Law Journal 7 (2010), 111–159Google Scholar

Nevin, Hon. Jack, “Conviction, Confrontation, and Crawford: Gang Expert Testimony as Testimonial Hearsay,” Seattle University Law Review 34 (2011), 857–887.Google Scholar

Lawrence, Charles III, “The Id, The Ego, and Equal Protection: Reckoning with Unconscious Racism,” Stanford Law Review 39 (1987), 317–388Google Scholar

Flagg, Barbara, “‘Was Blind But Now I See’: White Race Consciousness and the Requirement of Discriminatory Intent,” Michigan Law Review 91 (1993), 953–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rogers, Pat, “The Waltham Blacks and the Black Act,” Historical Journal 17.3 (1974), 465–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Radzinowicz, L., “The Waltham Black Act: A Study of the Legislative Attitude towards Crime in the Eighteenth Century,” Cambridge Law Journal 9.1 (1945), 56–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Winet, Evan Darwin, “Face-Veil Bans and Anti-Mask Laws: State Interests and the Right to Cover the Face,” Hastings International & Comparative Law Review 35 (2012), 217–251Google Scholar

Simoni, Stephen J., “‘Who Goes There?’ – Proposing a Model Anti-Mask Act,” Fordham Law Review 61(1992), 241–274Google Scholar

Swertfeger, Jack Jr., “Municipal Anti-Mask and Anti-Cross Burning Ordinance: A Model,” Journal of Public Law 1 (1952), 193–197.Google Scholar

Robson, Ruthann, “Assimilation, Marriage, and Lesbian Liberation,” Temple Law Review 75 (2002), 767–777.Google Scholar

Johnson, Melissa R., “Positive Vibration: An Examination of Incarcerated Rastafarian Free Exercise Claims,” New England Journal on Criminal & Civil Confinement 34 (2008), 391–427Google Scholar

Nelson, James D., “Incarceration, Accommodation, and Strict Scrutiny,” Virginia Law Review 95 (2009), 2053–2128.Google Scholar

Stout, Taylor G., “The Costs of Religious Accommodation in Prisons,” Virginia Law Review 96 (2010), 1201–1239Google Scholar

Sisk, Gregory and Heise, Michael, “Muslims and Religious Liberty in the Era of 9/11: Empirical Evidence from the Federal Courts,” Iowa Law Review 98 (2012) 231–289Google Scholar

Abdo, Aliah, “The Legal Status of Hijab in the United States: A Look at the Sociopolitical Influences on the Legal Right to Wear the Muslim Headscarf,” Hastings Race & Poverty Law Journal 5 (2008), 441Google Scholar

Moore, Kathleen M., “Visible through the Veil: The Regulation of Islam in American Law,” Sociology of Religion 68 (2007), 237–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beauchamp, Peter W., “Misinterpreted Justice: Problems with the Use of Islamic Legal Experts in U.S. Trial Courts,” New York Law School Law Review 55 (2011), 1097–1119Google Scholar

Lund, Christopher C., “Religious Liberty after Gonzales: A Look at State RFRAs,” South Dakota Law Review 55 (2010), 466–497Google Scholar

Kahn, Robert A., “The Headscarf as Threat: A Comparison of German and U.S. Legal Discourses,” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 40 (2007), 417–444.Google Scholar

Harris, Lauren N., “You Better Smile When You Say ‘Cheese!’: Whether the Photograph Requirement for Drivers’ Licenses Violates the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment,” Mercer Law Review 61 (2010), 611–641Google Scholar

Schwartzbaum, Adam, “The Niqab in the Courtroom: Protecting Free Exercise of Religion in a Post-Smith World,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 159 (2011), 1533–1576Google Scholar

Williams, Aaron J., “The Veiled Truth: Can the Credibility of Testimony Given by a Niqab-Wearing Witness Be Judged without the Assistance of Facial Expressions?”University of Detroit Mercy Law Review 85 (2008), 273–290Google Scholar

Clerget, Sean, “Timing Is of the Essence: Reviving the Neutral Law of General Applicability Standard and Applying It to Restrictions against Religious Face Coverings Worn While Testifying in Court,” George Mason Law Review 18 (2011), 1013–1043Google Scholar

Crews, Bruce W., “Michigan Rule of Evidence 611(b) and the Niqab: A Violation of Free Exercise of Religion,” Thomas M. Cooley Law Review 27 (2010), 611–645Google Scholar

Tucker, Joseph W., “No Hats in Court: Michigan’s Justifications for Free Exercise Indifference,” University of Toledo Law Review 41 (2010), 1039–1062Google Scholar

Murray, Brian M., “Confronting Religion: Veiled Muslim Witnesses and the Confrontation Clause,” Notre Dame Law Review 85 (2010), 1727–1757Google Scholar

Houchin, Steven R., “Confronting the Shadow: Is Forcing a Muslim Witness to Unveil in a Criminal Trial a Constitutional Right, or an Unreasonable Intrusion?”Pepperdine Law Review 36 (2009), 823–877.Google Scholar

Vojdik, Valorie K., “Politics of the Headscarf in Turkey: Masculinities, Feminism, and the Construction of Collective Identities,” Harvard Journal of Law & Gender 33 (2010), 661–685Google Scholar

Lombardi, Clark B. and Brown, Nathan J., “Do Constitutions Requiring Adherence to Shari’a Threaten Human Rights? How Egypt’s Constitutional Court Reconciles Islamic Law with the Liberal Rule of Law,” American University International Law Review 21 (2006), 379–435Google Scholar

Brown, Nathan J. and Lombardi, Clark B., “The Supreme Constitutional Court of Egypt on Islamic Law, Veiling and Civil Rights: An Annotated Translation of Supreme Constitutional Court of Egypt Case No. 8 of Judicial Year 17 (May 18, 1996),” American University International Law Review 21 (2006), 437–460Google Scholar

Laycock, Douglas, “Conference Introduction: American Religious Liberty, French Laïcité, and the Veil,” Journal of Catholic Legal Studies 49 (2010), 21–54Google Scholar

Tourkochoriti, Ioanna, “The Burka Ban: Divergent Approaches to Freedom of Religion in France and in the U.S.A.,” William & Mary Bill Rights Journal 20 (2012), 791–852Google Scholar

Droubi, Luna, “The Constitutionality of the Niqab Ban in Egypt: A Symbol of Egypt’s Struggle for a Legal Identity,” New York Law School Law Review 56 (2012), 687–709Google Scholar

Kahn, Robert A., “The Headscarf as Threat: A Comparison of German and U.S. Legal Discourses,” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 40 (2007), 417–444Google Scholar

Mazza, Oriana, “The Right to Wear Headscarves and Other Religious Symbols in French, Turkish, and American Schools: How the Government Draws a Veil on Free Expression of Faith,” Journal of Catholic Legal Studies 48 (2009), 303–343Google Scholar

Eaton, R. Vance, “Thinly Veiled: Institutional Messages in the Language of Secularism in Public Schools in France and the United States,” South Carolina Journal of International Law & Business 6 (2010), 299–333Google Scholar

Hashmi, Hera, “Too Much to Bare? A Comparative Analysis of the Headscarf in France, Turkey, and the United States,” University of Maryland Law Journal Race, Religion, Gender & Class 10 (2010), 409–445.Google Scholar

Bastian, Holly M., “Religious Garb Statutes and Title VII: An Uneasy Coexistence,” Georgetown Law Journal 80 (1991), 211–232Google Scholar

Kerr, Caitlin S., “Teachers’ Religious Garb as an Instrument for Globalization in Education,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 18 (2011), 539–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grathwohl, Linda, “The North Dakota Anti-Garb Law: Constitutional Conflict and Religious Strife,” Great Plains Quarterly 13 (1993), 187–202Google Scholar

Reutter, Edmund, “Religious Dress: A Century of Litigation,” Education Law Reporter 70 (1992), 747–761.Google Scholar

Devins, Neal, “Reagan Redux: Civil Rights under Bush,” Notre Dame Law Review 68 (1993), 955–1001Google Scholar

Aslam, Sadia, “Hijab in the Workplace: Why Title VII Does Not Adequately Protect Employees from Discrimination on the Basis of Religious Dress and Appearance,” University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review 80 (2011), 221–238Google Scholar

Bader, Nathan K., “Hats Off to Them: Muslim Women Stand against Workplace Religious Discrimination in Geo Group,” St. Louis University Law Journal 56 (2011), 261–300Google Scholar

Hasan, Sami, “Veiling Religion in the Force: The Validity of ‘Religion-Neutral Appearance’ as an Employer Interest,” UCLA Journal of Islamic & Near East Law 9 (2010), 87–110Google Scholar

Ramones, Richard J., “Religious Discrimination or Legitimate Uniform Policy? A Critique and Analysis of the Third Circuit’s Decision to Uphold a Private Prison’s Ban on Employees Wearing Khimars: EEOC v. The GEO Group, Inc.,” Rutgers Journal of Law & Religion 12 (2010), 184–201.Google Scholar

Beard, Charles, An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States (New York: Macmillan, 1913)Google Scholar

Symposium, , “The Constitution as an Economic Document: A Symposium Commemorating the Bicentennial of the United States Constitution,” George Washington Law Review, 56 (1987) 1–186Google Scholar

Burger, Warren E., “Foreword: The Constitution as an Economic Document: A Symposium Commemorating the Bicentennial of the United States Constitution,” George Washington Law Review 56 (1987), 2Google Scholar

Dattel, Gene, Cotton and Race in the Making of America: The Human Costs of Economic Power (Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 2009), pp. 5–23Google Scholar

Finkelman, Paul, Slavery and the Founders (New York: M. E. Sharpe, 1996)Google Scholar

Van Cleve, George William, A Slaveholders’ Union: Slavery, Politics, and the Constitution in the Early American Republic (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McColley, Robert, Slavery and Jeffersonian Virginia (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1964)Google Scholar

Chaplin, Joyce E., “Creating a Cotton South in Georgia and South Carolina, 1760–1815,” Journal of Southern History, 57:2 (1991), 171–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aoki, Keith, “Distributive and Syncretic Motives in Intellectual Property Law (with Special Reference to Coercion, Agency, and Development),” U.C. Davis Law Review 40 (2007), 745–747Google Scholar

Lemley, Mark A., “The Myth of the Sole Inventor,” Michigan Law Review 110 (2012), 718–19Google Scholar

Lakwete, Angela, Inventing the Cotton Gin: Machine and Myth in Antebellum America (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2004), pp. 58–61Google Scholar

Walterscheid, Edward, “‘Within the Limits of the Constitutional Grant’: Constitutional Limitations on the Patent Power,” Journal of Intellectual Property Law 9 (2002), 291–357.Google Scholar

Mossoff, Adam, “Rethinking the Development of Patents: An Intellectual History, 1550–1800,” Hastings Law Journal, 52 (2001), 1255–1321Google Scholar

Mossoff, Adam, “Who Cares What Thomas Jefferson Thought about Patents? Reevaluating the Patent ‘Privilege’ in Historical Context,” Cornell Law Review 92 (2007), 953–1012Google Scholar

Walterscheid, Edward C., “The Use and Abuse of History: The Supreme Court’s Interpretation of Thomas Jefferson’s Influence on the Patent Law,” Idea 39 (1999), 195–224Google Scholar

Walterscheid, Edward C., “Patents and the Jeffersonian Mythology,” John Marshall Law Review 29 (1995), 269–314.Google Scholar

Mirsky, Jeanette and Nevins, Allen, The World of Eli Whitney (New York: Macmillan, 1952)Google Scholar

Krawiec, Kimberly D., “Privatizing Outsider Trading,” Virginia Journal of International Law 41 (2001), 702–703Google Scholar

Hirshleifer, Jack, “The Private and Social Value of Information and the Reward to Inventive Activity,” American Economic Review 61 (1971), 561, 571Google Scholar

Knowles, Robert, “The Balance of Forces and the Empire of Liberty: States’ Rights and the Louisiana Purchase,” Iowa Law Review 88 (2003), 343–418.Google Scholar

Robson, Ruthann, “Judicial Review and Sexual Freedom,” University of Hawaii Law Review 30 (2007), 1–46, esp. 6–7Google Scholar

Levinson, Sanford, “Why I Do Not Teach Marbury (Except to Eastern Europeans) and Why You Shouldn’t Either,” Wake Forest Law Review 38 (2003), 553–578Google Scholar

Resnik, Judith, “The Mythic Meaning of Article III Courts,” University of Colorado Law Review 56 (1985), 581–617, 590Google Scholar

Tua, Uilisone Falemanu, “A Native’s Call for Justice: The Call for the Establishment of a Federal District Court in American Samoa,” Asian-Pacific Law & Policy Journal 11 (2010), 246–292Google Scholar

Lawson, Gary, “Territorial Governments and the Limits of Formalism,” California Law Review 78 (1990), 853–911CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, Eric, “The Price of Admission: Causes, Effects, and Patterns of Conditions Imposed on States Entering the Union,” American Journal of Legal History 46 (2004), 119–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finkelman, Paul, “Slavery and the Northwest Ordinance, a Study in Ambiguity,” Journal of the Early Republic 6.4 (1986), 343–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amar, Akhil Reed, America’s Constitution (New York: Random House, 2005), pp. 359–380Google Scholar

Harrison, John, “The Lawfulness of the Reconstruction Amendments,” University Chicago Law Review 68 (2001), 375–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oshinsky, David M., “Convict Labor in the Post–Civil War South: Involuntary Servitude after the Thirteenth Amendment,” in The Promises of Liberty: The History and Contemporary Relevance of the Thirteenth Amendment (New York: Columbia University Press, 2010), pp. 100–116, esp. 109–110Google Scholar

Armstrong, Andrea C., “Slavery Revisited in Penal Plantation Labor,” Seattle University Law Review 35 (2012), 835nGoogle Scholar

Cohen, William, “Negro Involuntary Servitude in the South, 1865–1940: A Preliminary Analysis,” Journal of Southern History 42.1 (1976), 31–60, esp. 50CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mossoff, Adam, “The Rise and Fall of the First American Patent Thicket: The Sewing Machine War of the 1850s,” Arizona Law Review 53 (2011), 202Google Scholar

Pope, James Gray, “The Thirteenth Amendment versus the Commerce Clause: Labor and the Shaping of American Constitutional Law, 1921–1957,” Columbia Law Review 102 (2002), 1–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drehle, David Von, Triangle: The Fire That Changed America (New York: Grove Press, 2003), esp. 6–86Google Scholar

Stein, Leon, The Triangle Fire (New York: J. B. Lippincott, 1962)Google Scholar

McEvoy, Arthur F., “The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire of 1911: Social Change, Industrial Accidents, and the Evolution of Common-Sense Causality,” Law and Social Inquiry 20 (1995), 621–651, esp. 631–632Google Scholar

Behrens, Eric G., “The Triangle Shirtwaist Company Fire of 1911: A Lesson in Legislative Manipulation,” Texas Law Review 62 (1983), 361–387Google Scholar

McCormick, Marcia L., “Consensus, Dissensus, and Enforcement: Legal Protection of Working Women from the Time of the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire to Today,” N.Y.U. Journal of Legislation & Public Policy 14 (2011), 645–695Google Scholar

Bernstein, David E., “Lochner, Parity, and the Chinese Laundry Cases,” William & Mary Law Review 41 (1999), 211–294Google Scholar

Kosman, Joel, “Toward an Inclusionary Jurisprudence: A Reconceptualization of Zoning,” Catholic University Law Review 43 (1993), 59–108, esp. 63–70Google Scholar

Burrell, Thomas H., “Justice Stephen Field’s Expansion of the Fourteenth Amendment: From the Safeguards of Federalism to a State of Judicial Hegemony,” Gonzaga Law Review 43 (2008), 77–168.Google Scholar

Moskowitz, Seymour, “Dickens Redux: How American Child Labor Law Became a Con Game,” Whittier Journal of Child & Family Advocacy 10 (2010), 101Google Scholar

Wood, Stephen B., Constitutional Politics in the Progressive Era: Child Labor and the Law (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1968), p. 84Google Scholar

Lung, Shirley, “Exploiting the Joint Employer Doctrine: Providing a Break for Sweatshop Garment Workers,” Loyola University Chicago Law Journal 34 (2003), 291–358.Google Scholar

Lung, Shirley, “Overwork and Overtime,” Indiana Law Review 39 (2005), 51–85.Google Scholar

Bartow, Ann, “Counterfeits, Copying, and Class,” Houston Law Review 48 (2012), 707–749.Google Scholar

Zahniser, David, “Thousands of Phony Christian Louboutins Seized by Customs Agents,” Los Angeles Times, August 16, 2012Google Scholar

Bar-Siman-Tov, Ittai, “Legislative Supremacy in the United States? Rethinking the ‘Enrolled Bill’ Doctrine,” Georgetown Law Journal (2009), 323–390Google Scholar

Ackerman, Bruce and Golove, David, “Is NAFTA Constitutional?” Harvard Law Review 108 (1995), 799–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tribe, Laurence H., “Taking Text and Structure Seriously: Reflections on Free-Form Method in Constitutional Interpretation,” Harvard Law Review 108 (1995), 1221–1303CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Varellas, James J., “The Constitutional Political Economy of Free Trade: Reexamining NAFTA-Style Congressional-Executive Agreements,” Santa Clara Law Review 49 (2009), 717–792.Google Scholar

Thomas, Chantal, “Constitutional Change and International Government,” Hastings Law Journal 52 (2000), 1–45.Google Scholar

Cummings, Scott L., “Hemmed In: Legal Mobilization in the Los Angeles Anti-Sweatshop Movement,” Berkeley Journal of Employment & Labor Law 30 (2009), 1–84.Google Scholar

Halem, Samantha C., “Slaves to Fashion: A Thirteenth Amendment Litigation Strategy to Abolish Sweatshops in the Garment Industry,” San Diego Law Review 36 (1999), 397–453.Google Scholar

Rios-Martinez, Marie, “Congressional Colonialism in the Pacific: The Case of the Northern Mariana Islands and Its Covenant with the United States,” Scholar 3 (2000), 41–69Google Scholar

Herald, Marybeth, “The Northern Mariana Islands: A Change in Course under Its Covenant with the United States,” Oregon Law Review 71 (1992), 127–204.Google Scholar

Short, Farrah-Marisa Chua, “An Experiment in Protecting Workers’ Rights: The Garment Industry of the U.S. Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands,” University of Pennsylvania Journal of Labor & Employment Law 7 (2005), 971–89Google Scholar

Florke, Robert S., “Castaways on Gilligan’s Island: The Plight of the Alien Worker in the Northern Mariana Islands,” Temple International and Comparative Law Journal 13 (1999), 381–410Google Scholar

Karet, Deborah J., “Privatizing Law on the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands: Is Litigation the Best Channel for Reforming the Garment Industry?”Buffalo Law Review 48 (2000), 1047–1097Google Scholar

Cuison, Rose Cruz, “The Construction of Labor Abuse in the Mariana Islands as Anti-American,” Asian Pacific American Law Journal 6 (2000), 61–85.Google Scholar

Adair, Robert L., “Closing a Loophole in the Pacific: Applying the Immigration and Nationality Act to the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands,” Asian Pacific American Law Journal 16 (2011), 74–99Google Scholar

Barnes, Adrian, “Do They Have to Buy from Burma? A Preemption Analysis of Local Anti-sweatshop Procurement Laws,” Columbia Law Review 107 (2007), 426–456.Google Scholar