Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-21T18:22:41.034Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - The Basic State: Vertical and Horizontal Equilibrium of the Disk

from PART III - Spiral Galaxies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Giuseppe Bertin
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Milano
Get access

Summary

As described in Chapter 9, the concept of the basic state is a key step in the modeling process. As in other contexts, for galaxy disks, identification of an appropriate basic state is done for several purposes. One interesting aspect is that by studying the internal structure of the basic state, we can clarify the overall constraints imposed by self-consistency; in this respect, the two examples that follow, dealing with the vertical and horizontal equilibrium of a rotation-supported disk, are rather simple (in collisionless stellar dynamics, self-consistency imposes much stronger and less intuitive constraints in pressure-supported systems) but very instructive. The models that are set up can then be used to fit the data and thus derive information on the structure of galaxies. Furthermore, a broad choice of equilibrium models can form the basis for systematic stability analyses. In this case, the basic state is meant to be a tool to study evolution, but it should not be assumed to represent necessarily the actual conditions of the galaxy in the distant past.

From the point of view of stellar dynamics, the case of axisymmetric galaxy disks is relatively simple, because for realistic models most orbits are quasi-circular and the disk is rather thin. The related description can then be decoupled at two different levels: (1) the vertical dynamics can be treated separately from the horizontal dynamics; and (2) for the horizontal structure, because the angular momentum essentially identifies the radial coordinate, the problem of self-consistency can be worked out in two separate steps: (2.1) choose a density-potential pair, and (2.2) find a (quasi-Maxwellian) distribution function that supports the assumed density. In contrast, this procedure of going from ρ to f would generally lead to nonphysical models in the spherical case.

Type
Chapter
Information
Dynamics of Galaxies , pp. 162 - 183
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×