Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-18T12:27:02.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Species differences in feeding in Milne Edward's sifakas (Propithecus diadema edwardsi), rufus lemurs (Eulemur fulvus rufus), and red-bellied lemurs (Eulemur rubiventer) in southern Madagascar: Implications for predator avoidance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2009

Lynne E. Miller
Affiliation:
MiraCosta College, Oceanside, California
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Despite the difficulty in documenting it, predation pressure has long been acknowledged to play a powerful role in shaping the behavioral ecology of extant primates (Anderson 1986, Cheney and Wrangham 1987, Isbell 1994). Its role as a selection pressure on the lives of prosimian primates, however, has been debated (van Schaik and Kappeler 1996). As research on prosimian social structure in southern and western parts of Madagascar began to flourish in the late 1960s and 1970s, it was believed that predators had little influence on prosimian behavioral ecology (Jolly 1966, Richard 1978). This perspective, however, has been reevaluated with the dramatic increase in research on a wider range of species in a variety of habitats.

It is now clear that a variety of prosimian species exhibit a wide range of antipredatory behaviors. Goodman (1994a,b) has suggested that these behaviors are residual tactics which remain in the repertoire following the recent extinction of a large crowned eagle (Stephanoaetus mahery; but see Csermely 1996). However, recent longterm studies have demonstrated that predation pressure remains a real threat from extant raptors (Goodman et al. 1998, Gould 1996, Sauther 1989, Schwab 1999), mammalian carnivores (Cryptoprocta ferox and Galidia elegans; Overdorff and Strait 1995, Wilson et al. 1989, Wright 1998, Wright and Martin 1995), owls, and boa constrictors (Goodman et al. 1993, Rakotondravony et al. 1998, Wright and Martin 1995).

Very little is known, however, about which behavioral strategies arboreal prosimians implement to avoid predation (but see Macedonia and Pollock 1989, Oda 1998, Sauther 1989, Wright 1998, Wright et al. 1997).

Type
Chapter
Information
Eat or be Eaten
Predator Sensitive Foraging Among Primates
, pp. 126 - 137
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×