![](http://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:book:9789048517213/resource/name/9789048517213i.jpg)
Appendix A - Appendix to Chapter 4 (United Kingdom)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 February 2021
Summary
Data sources
BES 1992, study no. 2981
BES 1997, study no. 3887
BES 2001, study no. 4619
BES 2005, study no. 5494
BES 2010, study no. not yet assigned
Description of variables used in analysis
Items and their wording for measurement of perception that the Labour Party looks after the interests of social groups in Tables 4.5, 4.6 and 4.7:
For 1997 election study, items labintwc and labintun have been used: How closely do you think that the Labour Party looks after the interests of …
[working class people], [unemployed people]
1 very closely
2 fairly closely
3 not very closely
4 not at all closely
8 don't know
9 not answered
For 2001 election study and 2005 election study, the following items have been used:
2001: items cq9a and cq9c
2005: items cq2a and cq2c
Some people say that political parties look after the interests of some groups and are not so concerned about others. How well do you think that the Labour Party looks after the interests of the following groups? [a) working class people] [c) People who are unemployed or on benefits]
1 Very well
2 Fairly well
3 Not very well
4 Not at all well
8 Don't know
The categories 1 and 2 have been coded as Labour represents the interests of these groups (1); the categories 3 and 4 have been coded as Labour does not represent the interests of these groups (0); the categories 8 and 9 had been excluded from the analysis. The index was derived from the two dummy variables and coded as described in Section 4.5 of the text.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Electoral Consequences of Third Way Welfare State ReformsSocial Democracy's Transformation and Its Political Costs, pp. 215 - 219Publisher: Amsterdam University PressPrint publication year: 2013