Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T16:45:57.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 1 - Economic perspective

from Part I - Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2009

Get access

Summary

To everything there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven.

– Ecclesiastes

Extending this famous verse, we can also say that there is a time for work and a time for play. There is a time for leisure.

An important distinction, however, is to be made between the precise concept of a time for leisure and the semantically different and much fuzzier notion of leisure time, our initial topic. In the course of exploring this subject, the fundamental economic forces that affect spending on all forms of entertainment will be revealed, and our understanding of what motivates expenditures for such goods and services will be enhanced. Moreover, the perspectives provided by this approach will enable us to see how entertainment is defined and how it fits into the larger economic picture.

Time concepts

Leisure and work

Philosophers and sociologists have long wrestled with the problem of defining leisure – the English word derived from the Latin licere, which means “to be permitted” or “to be free.” In fact, as Kraus (1978, p. 38) and Neulinger (1981, pp. 17–33) have noted, leisure has usually been described in terms of its sociological and psychological (state-of-mind) characteristics.

The classical attitude was epitomized in the work of Aristotle, for whom the term leisure implied both availability of time and absence of the necessity of being occupied (De Grazia 1962, p. 19).

Type
Chapter
Information
Entertainment Industry Economics
A Guide for Financial Analysis
, pp. 3 - 38
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albarran, A. (1996). Media Economics: Understanding Markets, Industries and Concepts. Ames, IO: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, A., Owers, J., Carveth, R., et al., eds. (2004). Media Economics: Theory and Practice, 3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ, and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Aron, C. S. (1999). Working at Play: A History of Vacations in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crossroads for Planet Earth,” Scientific American, September, 2005.
Cutler, B. (1990). “Where Does the Free Time Go?,” American Demographics, 12(11)(November).Google Scholar
The Determinants of Working Hours,” OECD Employment Outlook, September 1983.
The Entertainment Economy,” BusinessWeek, No. 3362 (March 14, 1994).
Epstein, G. (1995). “Myth: Americans Are Working More. Fact: More Women Are Working,” Barron's, April 3.Google Scholar
Filer, R. K., Hamermesh, D. S., and Rees, A. E. (1996). The Economics of Work and Play, 6th ed. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Fuchsberg, G. (1994). “Four-Day Workweek Has Become a Stretch for Some Employees,” Wall Street Journal, August 3.Google Scholar
Gabriel, T. (1995). “A Generation's Heritage: After the Boom, a Boomlet,” New York Times, February 12.Google Scholar
Gray, M. B. (1992). “Consumer Spending on Durables and Services in the 1980s,” Monthly Labor Review, 115(5)(May).Google Scholar
Hedges, J. N. (1980). “The Workweek in 1979: Fewer but Longer Workdays,” Monthly Labor Review, 103(8)(August).Google Scholar
Hedges, J. N. (1973). “New Patterns for Working Time,” Monthly Labor Review, 96(2)(February).Google Scholar
Hunnicutt, B. K. (1988). Work without End: Abandoning Shorter Hours for the Right to Work. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Jablonski, M., Kunze, K., and Otto, P. (1990). “Hours at Work: A New Base for BLS Productivity Statistics,” Monthly Labor Review, 113(2)(February).Google Scholar
Kilborn, P. T. (1996). “Factories That Never Close Are Scrapping 5-Day Week,” New York Times, June 4.Google Scholar
Malabre, A. L. Jr., and Clark, L. H. Jr. (1992). “Productivity Statistics for the Service Sector May Understate Gains,” Wall Street Journal, August 12.Google Scholar
Marano, H. E. (1999). “The Power of Play,” Psychology Today, 32(4)(August).Google Scholar
Meyersohn, R., and Larrabee, E. (1958). “A Comprehensive Bibliography on Leisure, 1900–1958,” in Mass Leisure. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press. Also in American Journal of Sociology, 62(6)(May 1957): 602–615.
Moore, G. H., and Hedges, J. N. (1971). “Trends in Labor and Leisure,” Monthly Labor Review, 94(2)(February).Google Scholar
Oi, W. (1971). “A Disneyland Dilemma: Two-Part Tariffs for a Mickey Mouse Monopoly,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 85(February).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, J. D. (1971). “The Demand for Leisure,” Journal of Political Economy, 79(1)(January/February): 56–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollak, R. A., and Wachter, M. L. (1975). “The Relevance of the Household Production Function and Its Implications for the Allocation of Time,” Journal of Political Economy, 83(2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Productivity Paradox,” BusinessWeek, No. 3055 (June 6, 1988).
The Revival of Productivity,” BusinessWeek, No. 2828 (February 13, 1984).
Rhoads, C. (2002). “Short Work Hours Undercut Europe in Economic Drive,” Wall Street Journal, August 8.Google Scholar
Riding High: The Productivity Bonanza,” BusinessWeek, No. 3445 (October 9, 1995).
Rifkin, J. (1995). The End of Work. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
Robbins, L. (1930). “On the Elasticity of Income in Terms of Effort,” Economica, 10 (June).Google Scholar
Robinson, J. P., and Godbey, G. (1996). “The Great American Slowdown,” American Demographics, June.Google Scholar
Rosen, S., and Rosenfield, A. (1997). “Ticket Pricing,” Journal of Law & Economics, XⅬ(2)(October).Google Scholar
Scott, J. (1999). “Working Hard, More or Less,” New York Times, July 10.Google Scholar
Staines, G. L., and Connor, O' P. (1980). “Conflicts among Work, Leisure, and Family Roles,” Monthly Labor Review, 103(8)(August).Google Scholar
Wheel of Fortune: A Survey of Technology and Entertainment,” The Economist, November 21, 1998.
Yoon, L. (2006). “More Play, Less Toil Is a Stressful Shift for Some Koreans,” Wall Street Journal, August 10.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×