Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 April 2022
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Ephesians , pp. 340 - 350Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Aasgaard, Reidar. “My Beloved Brothers and Sisters!”: Christian Siblinghood in Paul (London: T&T Clark, 2004).Google Scholar
Abbott, Thomas K. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistles to the Ephesians and to the Colossians (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1897).Google Scholar
Allen, Thomas G. “Exaltation and Solidarity with Christ: Ephesians 1.20 and 2.6,” JSNT 28 (1986): 103–20.Google Scholar
Arnold, Clinton E. Power and Magic: The Concept of Power in Ephesians in Light of Its Historical Setting (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Balch, David L. Let Wives Be Submissive: The Domestic Code in 1 Peter (Chico, CA: Scholars Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Balch, David L., and Osiek, Carolyn, eds. Early Christian Families in Context (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2003).Google Scholar
Bales, William. “The Descent of Christ in Ephesians 4:9,” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 72 (2010): 84–100.Google Scholar
Balla, Peter. The Child–Parent Relationship in the New Testament and Its Environment (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 2005).Google Scholar
Barclay, John M. G. “Mirror-Reading a Polemical Letter: Galatians as a Test Case,” JSNT 31 (1987): 73–93.Google Scholar
Barclay, John M. G. “Paul, Philemon, and the Dilemma of Christian Slave-Ownership,” NTS 37 (1991): 161–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barclay, William. The Letters to the Galatians and Ephesians, rev. ed. (Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Bartchy, S. Scott. ΜΑΛΛΟΝ ΧΡΗΣΑΙ: First-Century Slavery and the Interpretation of I Corinthians 7:21 (Missoula, MT: Scholars Press, 1973).Google Scholar
Bartchy, S. Scott. “Undermining Ancient Patriarchy: The Apostle Paul’s Vision of a Society of Siblings,” BTB 29 (1999): 68–78.Google Scholar
Barth, Markus. The Broken Wall: A Study of the Epistle to the Ephesians (Chicago: Judson Press, 1959).Google Scholar
Barth, Markus. Ephesians 4–6. Anchor Bible (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Richard H. “Faith in Christ: Some Exegetical and Theological Reflections on Philippians 3:9 and Ephesians 3:12.” In Bird, Michael F. and Sprinkle, Preston M., eds., The Faith of Jesus Christ (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 2009): 111–25.Google Scholar
Berger, Klaus. “Hellenistische Gattungen im Neuen Testament,” ANRW 2.25.2 (1984): 1049–74.Google Scholar
Berger, Peter, and Luckmann, Thomas. The Social Construction of Reality (New York: Doubleday, 1967).Google Scholar
Best, Ernest. “Who Used Whom? The Relationship of Ephesians and Colossians,” NTS 43 (1997): 72–96.Google Scholar
Best, Ernest. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on Ephesians (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1998).Google Scholar
Betz, Hans Dieter. The Greek Magical Papyri in Translation. vol. 1 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Betz, Hans Dieter. “The Concept of the Inner Human Being (ho esō anthrōpos) in the Anthropology of Paul,” NTS 46 (2000): 315–41.Google Scholar
Bishop, M. C., and Coulston, J. C. N.. Roman Military Equipment from the Punic Wars to the Fall of Rome (London: Batsford, 1993).Google Scholar
Bock, Darrell L. Ephesians: An Introduction and Commentary, Tyndale New Testament Commentaries (Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2019).Google Scholar
Bohak, Gideon. Ancient Jewish Magic: A History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Bousset, Wilhelm. Kyrios Christos, trans. Steely, J. E.. Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press, 1970).Google Scholar
Bradley, Keith R. Slaves and Masters in the Roman Empire (New York: Oxford University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Bradley, Keith R. “Animalizing the Slave: The Truth of Fiction,” Journal of Roman Studies 90 (2000): 110–25.Google Scholar
Brannon, M. Jeff. The Heavenlies in Ephesians: A Lexical, Exegetical, and Conceptual Analysis (London: T&T Clark, 2011).Google Scholar
Bratcher, R. G., and Nida, E. A., A Translator’s Handbook on Paul’s Letter to the Ephesians (New York: United Bible Societies, 1982).Google Scholar
Bray, Gerald, ed. Galatians, Ephesians, Reformation Commentary on Scripture (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Brown, Raymond. An Introduction to New Testament Christology (New York: Paulist Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Bruce, F. F. The Epistles to the Colossians, to Philemon, and to the Ephesians (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1984).Google Scholar
Bultmann, Rudolf. “New Testament and Mythology.” In Bartsch, Hans Werner, ed. (rev. Reginald H. Fuller), Kerygma and Myth (New York: Harper & Row, 1961): 1–44.Google Scholar
Burkert, Walter. Ancient Mystery Cults (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Caird, G. B. Paul’s Letters from Prison: Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, Philemon, in the Revised Standard Version (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Caird, G. B., and Hurst, L. D.. New Testament Theology (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Calvin, John. The Epistles of Paul the Apostle to the Galatians, Ephesians, Philippians and Colossians, trans. Thomas H. L. Parker; ed. Torrance, David W. and Torrance, Thomas F. (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1996).Google Scholar
Campbell, Constantine R. Paul and Union with Christ: An Exegetical and Theological Study (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2012).Google Scholar
Capasso, Luigi. “Herculaneum Victims of the Volcanic Eruptions of Vesuvius in 79 ad,” The Lancet 356 (2000): 1344–46.Google Scholar
Capasso, Luigi, and Di Domenicantonio, Luisa. “Work-Related Syndesmoses on the Bones of Children Who Died at Herculaneum,” The Lancet 352 (1998): 1634.Google Scholar
Carr, Wesley. Angels and Principalities: The Background, Meaning, and Development of the Pauline Phrase hai archai kai hai exousiai (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Cassidy, Richard J. Paul in Chains: Roman Imprisonment and the Letters of St. Paul (New York: Crossroad Publishing Co., 2001).Google Scholar
Cervin, Richard. “Does Κεφαλή Mean ‘Source’ or ‘Authority Over’ in Greek Literature? A Rebuttal,” TrinJ 10 (1989): 85–112.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, J. H., ed. The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha. 2 vols. (New York: Doubleday, 1983–85).Google Scholar
Chrysostom, John. Homilies on Galatians, Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, Thessalonians, Timothy, Titus, and Philemon, ed. Schaff, Philip. A Select Library of the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers. ser. 1, vol. 13 (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1886).Google Scholar
Cohick, Lynn H. Women in the World of the Earliest Christians: Illuminating Ancient Ways of Life (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2009).Google Scholar
Collins, John J. The Scepter and the Star: The Messiahs of the Dead Sea Scrolls and Other Ancient Literature (New York: Doubleday, 1995).Google Scholar
Coppens, Joseph. “‘Mystery’ in the Theology of Saint Paul and its Parallels at Qumran.” In Murphy-O’Connor, Jerome and Charlesworth, James H., eds., Paul and the Dead Sea Scrolls (New York: Crossroad Publishing Co., 1990): 132–58. (Originally published as Jerome Murphy-O’Connor, ed., Paul and Qumran: Studies in New Testament Exegesis. London: Geoffrey Chapman, 1968.)Google Scholar
Crossan, John D. “Roman Imperial Theology.” In Horsley, Richard A., ed., In the Shadow of Empire (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2008): 59–73.Google Scholar
Dahl, Nils A. “Adresse und Proömium des Epheserbriefes,” Theologische Zeitschrift 7 (1951): 241–64.Google Scholar
Danker, Frederick W. Benefactor: Epigraphic Study of a Graeco-Roman and New Testament Semantic Field (St. Louis, MO: Clayton Publishing House, 1982).Google Scholar
Darko, Daniel K. No Longer Living as the Gentiles: Differentiation and Shared Ethical Values in Ephesians 4.17–6.9 (Edinburgh: Continuum, 2008).Google Scholar
Darko, Daniel K. “Adopted Siblings in the Household of God: Kinship Lexemes in the Social Identity Construction of Ephesians.” In Tucker, J. Brian and Baker, Coleman A., eds., The T&T Clark Handbook to Social Identity in the New Testament (London: T&T Clark, 2014): 333–46.Google Scholar
Deissmann, Adolf. “Ephesia Grammata.” In Frankenberg, W. and Küchler, F., eds., Abhandlung zur Semitischen Religionskunde und Sprachwissenschaft (Giessen: Töpelmann, 1918): 121–24.Google Scholar
deSilva, David A. “The Meaning of the New Testament and the Skandalon of World Constructions,” Evangelical Quarterly 64 (1992): 3–20.Google Scholar
deSilva, David A. Honor, Patronage, Kinship, and Purity: Unlocking New Testament Culture (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2000).Google Scholar
deSilva, David A. The Jewish Teachers of Jesus (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
deSilva, David A. Unholy Allegiances: Heeding Revelation’s Warning (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 2013).Google Scholar
deSilva, David A. Transformation: The Heart of Paul’s Gospel (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2014).Google Scholar
deSilva, David A. “‘We Are Debtors’: Grace and Obligation in Paul and Seneca.” In Dodson, Joseph and Briones, David, eds., Paul and Seneca in Dialogue (Leiden: Brill, 2017): 150–78.Google Scholar
deSilva, David A. Introducing the Apocrypha: Message, Context, and Significance. rev. ed. (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2018).Google Scholar
deSilva, David A. “The Social and Geographical World of Ephesus.” In Beitzel, Barry, ed., Lexham Geographic Commentary on Acts through Revelation (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2019): 537–53.Google Scholar
deSilva, David A. A Week in the Life of Ephesus (Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2020).Google Scholar
Dibelius, Martin, and Greeven, Heinrich. An die Kolosser, Epheser, an Philemon. 3rd ed. (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1953).Google Scholar
Dickie, Matthew W. Magic and Magicians in the Greco-Roman World (New York: Routledge, 2001).Google Scholar
Donaldson, Terence L. Judaism and the Gentiles: Jewish Patterns of Universalism (to 135 ce) (Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Dudrey, Ross. “‘Submit Yourselves to One Another’: A Socio-Historical Look at the Household Code of Ephesians 5:15–6:9,” Restoration Quarterly 41 (1999): 27–44.Google Scholar
Duling, Dennis C. “Matthew 18:15–17: Conflict, Confrontation, and Conflict Resolution in a ‘Fictive Kin’ Association,” BTB 29 (1999): 4–22.Google Scholar
Eadie, John. A Commentary on the Greek Text of the Epistle of Paul to the Ephesians. 2nd ed. (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1883). (Reprinted Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1979.)Google Scholar
Edwards, Mark L., ed. Galatians, Ephesians, Philippians (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Ellicott, C. J. A Critical and Grammatical Commentary on St. Paul’s Epistle to the Ephesians (London: John W. Parker & Son, 1859).Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Troels. “Ephesians 5,12–13: ἐλέγχειν and Conversion in the New Testament,” ZNW 80 (1989): 89–110.Google Scholar
Fairchild, Mark. Christian Origins in Ephesus and Asia Minor (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 2017).Google Scholar
Fee, Gordon D. God’s Empowering Presence: The Holy Spirit in the Letters of Paul (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 1994).Google Scholar
Feldman, Louis H. Jew and Gentile in the Ancient World (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Feldman, Louis H., and Reinhold, Meyer, eds. Jewish Life and Thought Among Greeks and Romans: Primary Readings (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Ferguson, John. The Religions of the Roman Empire (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1970).Google Scholar
Fischer, Karl Martin. Tendenz und Absicht des Epheserbrifes (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1973).Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, John T. “The Stoics and the Early Christians on the Treatment of Slaves.” In Rasimus, Tuomas, Engberg-Pedersen, Troels, and Dunderberg, Ismo, eds., Stoicism in Early Christianity (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2010): 141–75.Google Scholar
Fitzhugh, George. Sociology for the South, or the Failure of Free Society (Richmond, VA: A. Morris, 1854).Google Scholar
Fitzmyer, Joseph A. “Another Look at Κεφαλή in 1 Corinthians 11.3,” NTS 35 (1989): 503–11.Google Scholar
Foster, Paul. “The First Contribution to the Πίστις Χριστοῦ Debate: A Study of Ephesians 3:12,” JSNT 85 (2002): 75–96.Google Scholar
Foster, Robert L. “Reoriented to the Cosmos: Cosmology and Theology in Ephesians through Philemon.” In Pennington, Jonathan T. and McDonough, Sean M., eds., Cosmology and New Testament Theology (London: T&T Clark, 2008): 107–24.Google Scholar
Friesen, Stephen J. Imperial Cults and the Apocalypse of John: Reading Revelation in the Ruins (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glancy, Jennifer A. Slavery in Early Christianity (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Glancy, Jennifer A. Slavery as Moral Problem: In the Early Church and Today (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Gombis, Timothy G. “Ephesians 3:2–13: Pointless Digression, or Epitome of the Triumph of God in Christ?” Westminster Theological Journal 66 (2004): 313–23.Google Scholar
Gombis, Timothy G. The Drama of Ephesians: Participating in the Triumph of God (Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2010).Google Scholar
Goodspeed, Edgar J. The Key to Ephesians (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956).Google Scholar
Gorman, Michael J. Cruciformity: Paul’s Narrative Spirituality of the Cross (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2001).Google Scholar
Gorman, Michael J. Becoming the Gospel: Paul, Participation, and Mission (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2015).Google Scholar
Gosnell, Peter W. “Honor and Shame Rhetoric as a Unifying Motif in Ephesians,” BBR 16.1 (2006): 105–28.Google Scholar
Grossman, Maxine, “Ephesians.” In Levine, Amy-Jill and Brettler, Marc Zvi, eds., Jewish Annotated New Testament (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011): 345–53.Google Scholar
Grudem, Wayne. “Does Kephalē (‘Head’) Mean ‘Source’ or ‘Authority Over’ in Greek Literature? A Survey of 2,336 Examples,” Trinity Journal 6 (1985): 38–59.Google Scholar
Grudem, Wayne. “The Meaning of Kephalē (‘Head’): A Response to Recent Studies.” In Piper, John and Grudem, Wayne, eds., Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood (Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 1991): 425–68.Google Scholar
Grudem, Wayne. “The Meaning of Kephalē (‘Head’): An Evaluation of New Evidence, Real and Alleged,” Journal of the Evangelical Theology Study 44 (2001): 25–65.Google Scholar
Harland, P. A. “Familial Dimensions of Group Identity: ‘Brothers’ (Adelphoi) in Associations of the Greek East,” JBL 124 (2005): 491–513.Google Scholar
Harrill, J. Albert. Slaves in the New Testament: Literary, Social, and Moral Dimensions (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Harris, W. Hall, III. The Descent of Christ: Ephesians 4:7–11 and Traditional Hebrew Imagery. Arbeiten zur Geschichte des antiken Judentums und des Urchristentums 32 (Leiden: Brill, 1996).Google Scholar
Harrison, James R. Paul’s Language of Grace in Its Graeco-Roman Context (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2003).Google Scholar
Hay, David M. Glory at the Right Hand: Psalm 110 in Early Christianity (Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press, 1973).Google Scholar
Heil, John Paul. “Ephesians 5:18b: ‘But Be Filled in the Spirit,’” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 69 (2007): 506–16.Google Scholar
Heil, John Paul. Ephesians: Empowerment to Walk in Love for the Unity of All in Christ (Atlanta, GA: Studies in Biblical Literature, 2007).Google Scholar
Heim, Erin M. Adoption in Galatians and Romans: Contemporary Metaphor Theories and the Pauline Huiothesia Metaphors (Leiden: Brill, 2017).Google Scholar
Heine, Ronald E., ed. The Commentaries of Origen and Jerome on St. Paul’s Epistle to the Ephesians, trans. Ronald E. Heine (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Hellerman, Joseph H. Reconstructing Honor in Roman Philippi: Carmen Christi as Cursus Pudorum (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Hengel, Martin. The Son of God, trans. John Bowden (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Hering, James P. The Colossian and Ephesian Haustafeln in Theological Contexts: An Analysis of Their Origins, Relationships, and Message (New York: Peter Lang, 2007).Google Scholar
Hodge, Charles. “The Fugitive Slave Law.” In Cotton Is King and Pro-Slavery Arguments Comprising the Writings of Hammond, Harper, Christy, Stringfellow, Hodge, Bledsoe, and Cartwright on This Important Subject (Augusta, GA: Pritchard, Abbott and Loomis, 1860): 809–40.Google Scholar
Hoehner, Harold W. Ephesians: An Exegetical Commentary (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2002).Google Scholar
Holtzmann, Heinrich J. Kritik der Epheser- und Kolosserbriefe: Auf Grund Einer Analyse Ihres Verwandtschaftsverhältnisses (Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann, 1872).Google Scholar
Horrell, David. “From ἀδελφοί to οἶκος θεοῦ: Social Transformation in Pauline Christianity,” JBL 120 (2001): 293–311.Google Scholar
Houlden, J. L., Paul’s Letters from Prison: Philippians, Colossians, Philemon, and Ephesians (Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Hurtado, Larry W. Lord Jesus Christ: Devotion to Jesus in Earliest Christianity (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2003).Google Scholar
Jeal, Roy R. “A Strange Style of Expression: Ephesians 1:23,” Filologia Neotestamentaria 10 (1997): 129–38.Google Scholar
Jeal, Roy R. Integrating Theology and Ethics in Ephesians: The Ethos of Communication (Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Jeal, Roy R. “Rhetorical Argumentation in the Letter to the Ephesians.” In Eriksson, Anders, Olbricht, Thomas H., and Übelacker, Walter, eds., Rhetorical Argumentation in Biblical Texts (Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press International, 2002): 310–24.Google Scholar
Jewett, Paul K. Man as Male and Female: A Study in Sexual Relationships from a Theological Point of View (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1974).Google Scholar
Johanson, Bruce C. To All the Brethren: A Text-Linguistic and Rhetorical Approach to 1 Thessalonians (Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1987).Google Scholar
Johnson, Luke T. The Writings of the New Testament. 3rd ed. (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Joshel, Sandra R. Slavery in the Roman World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Karaman, Elif Hilal. Ephesian Women in Greco-Roman and Early Christian Perspective (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2018).Google Scholar
Keener, Craig S. Paul, Women, and Wives: Marriage and Women’s Ministry in the Letters of Paul (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 1992).Google Scholar
Keener, Craig S. Miracles: The Credibility of the New Testament Accounts (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2011).Google Scholar
Kennedy, George A. New Testament Interpretation Through Rhetorical Criticism (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Kennedy, George A. “The Genres of Rhetoric.” In Porter, S. E., ed., Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period 330 b.c.–a.d. 400 (Leiden: Brill, 1997): 43–50.Google Scholar
Kenny, Anthony. A Stylometric Study of the New Testament (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986).Google Scholar
King, Martin Luther Jr.. A Knock at Midnight, ed. Carson, Clayborne and Holloran, Peter (New York: Warner Books, 2000).Google Scholar
Klauck, Hans-Josef. Ancient Letters and the New Testament (Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Koester, Helmut, ed. Ephesos: Metropolis of Asia (Valley Forge, PA: Trinity Press International, 1995).Google Scholar
Kraemer, Ross S., ed. Women’s Religions in the Greco-Roman World: A Sourcebook (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Kreitzer, Larry J. “‘Crude Language’ and ‘Shameful Things Done in Secret’ (Ephesians 5.4, 12): Allusions to the Cult of Demeter/Cybele in Heirapolis?” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 71 (1998): 51–77.Google Scholar
Kroeger, Catherine Clark. “Appendix III: The Classical Concept of Head as ‘Source.’” In Hull, Gretchen Gaebelein, ed., Equal to Serve: Women and Men Working Together Revealing the Gospel (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1998): 267–68.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Karl Georg. “The Epistle to the Ephesians in the Light of the Qumran Texts.” In O’Connor, Jerome Murphy and Charlesworth, James H., eds., Paul and the Dead Sea Scrolls (New York: Crossroad Publishing Co., 1990): 115–31. (Originally published as Jerome Murphy-O’Connor, ed., Paul and Qumran: Studies in New Testament Exegesis. London: Geoffrey Chapman, 1968.)Google Scholar
Kümmel, W. G. Introduction to the New Testament (Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press, 1964).Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Johnson, Mark. Metaphors We Live By (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Larkin, William J. Ephesians: A Handbook on the Greek Text (Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Lau, Te-Li. The Politics of Peace: Ephesians, Dio Chrysostom, and the Confucian Four Books (Leiden: Brill, 2010).Google Scholar
Lee, Michelle V. Paul, the Stoics, and the Body of Christ (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Lee-Barnewall, Michelle. “Turning ΚΕΦΑΛΗ on Its Head: The Rhetoric of Reversal in Ephesians 5:21–33.” In Porter, Stanley E. and Pitts, Andrew W., eds., Christian Origins and Greco-Roman Culture: Social and Literary Contexts for the New Testament (Leiden: Brill, 2013): 599–614.Google Scholar
Lincoln, Andrew T. “A Re-examination of ‘the Heavenlies’ in Ephesians,” NTS 19 (1973): 468–83.Google Scholar
Lincoln, Andrew T. “‘Stand, Therefore . . .’: Ephesians 6:10–20 as Peroratio,” Biblical Interpretation 3 (1995): 99–114.Google Scholar
Lindemann, Andreas. Die Aufhebung der Zeit: Geschichtsverständnis und Eschatologie im Epheserbrief (Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus Gerd Mohn, 1975).Google Scholar
Long, Frederick J. “Ephesians: Paul’s Political Theology in Greco-Roman Political Context.” In Porter, S. E. and Pitts, A. W., eds., Christian Origins and Classical Culture: Social and Literary Contexts for the New Testament (Leiden: Brill, 2013): 255–309.Google Scholar
Lyons, George. “Church and Holiness in Ephesians.” In Brower, Kent E. and Johnson, Andy, eds., Holiness and Ecclesiology in the New Testament (Grand Rapids, MI, Eerdmans, 2007): 238–56.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Margaret Y. The Pauline Churches: A Sociohistorical Study of Institutionalization in Pauline and Deutero-Pauline Writings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
MacDonald, Margaret Y. Colossians and Ephesians (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 2000).Google Scholar
MacDonald, Margaret Y. The Power of Children: The Construction of Families in the Greco-Roman World (Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Maier, Harry O. Picturing Paul in Empire: Imperial Image, Text, and Persuasion in Colossians, Ephesians and the Pastoral Epistles (London: T&T Clark, 2013).Google Scholar
Martin, Clarice J. “The Haustafeln (Household Codes) in African American Biblical Interpretation: ‘Free Slaves’ and ‘Subordinate Women.’” In Felder, Cain Hope, ed., Stony the Road We Trod: African American Biblical Interpretation (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1991): 206–31.Google Scholar
Martin, Ralph P. Ephesians, Colossians and Philemon (Atlanta, GA: John Knox Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Merkle, Benjamin L. Ephesians. Exegetical Guide to the Greek New Testament (Nashville, TN: B&H Academic, 2016).Google Scholar
Metzger, Bruce M. “Literary Forgeries and Canonical Pseudepigrapha,” JBL 91 (1972): 3–24.Google Scholar
Metzger, Bruce M. A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament. 2nd ed. (Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 1994).Google Scholar
Meyer, H. A. W. Critical and Exegetical Handbook to the Epistle to the Ephesians and the Epistle to Philemon (Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1880).Google Scholar
Miletic, S. F. “One Flesh”: Eph. 5.22–24, 5.31: Marriage and the New Creation (Rome: Pontifical Biblical Institute, 1988).Google Scholar
Mitton, C. Leslie. The Epistle to the Ephesians: Its Authorship, Origin, and Purpose (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1951). (Reprinted Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2002.)Google Scholar
Moritz, Thorsten. A Profound Mystery: The Use of the Old Testament in Ephesians (Leiden: Brill, 1996).Google Scholar
Moxnes, Halvor, ed. Constructing Early Christian Families: Family as Social Reality and Metaphor (London: Routledge, 1997).Google Scholar
Muddiman, John. The Epistle to the Ephesians (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 2004).Google Scholar
Murphy-O’Connor, Jerome. “Truth: Paul and Qumran.” In O’Connor, Jerome Murphy and Charlesworth, James H., eds., Paul and the Dead Sea Scrolls (New York: Crossroad Publishing Co., 1990): 179–230. (Originally published as Jerome Murphy-O’Connor, ed., Paul and Qumran: Studies in New Testament Exegesis. London: Geoffrey Chapman, 1968.)Google Scholar
Murphy-O’Connor, Jerome. Paul the Letter-Writer: His World, His Options, His Skills (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Murphy-O’Connor, Jerome. St. Paul’s Ephesus: Texts and Archaeology (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Mussner, Franz. “Contributions Made by Qumran to the Understanding of the Epistle to the Ephesians.” In O’Connor, Jerome Murphy and Charlesworth, James H., eds., Paul and the Dead Sea Scrolls (New York: Crossroad Publishing Co., 1990): 159–78. (Originally published as Jerome Murphy-O’Connor, ed., Paul and Qumran: Studies in New Testament Exegesis. London: Geoffrey Chapman, 1968.Google Scholar
Neumann, Kenneth. The Authenticity of the Pauline Epistles in the Light of Stylostatistical Analysis (Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Novenson, Matthew V. The Grammar of Messianism: An Ancient Jewish Political Idiom and Its Users (New York: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
O’Brien, Peter T. “Ephesians 1: An Unusual Introduction to a Pauline Letter,” NTS 25 (1979): 504–16.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Peter T. “Principalities and Powers: Opponents of the Church.” In Carson, D. A., ed., Biblical Interpretation and the Church: The Problem of Contextualization (Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, 1984): 110–50.Google Scholar
Ophir, Adi, and Rosen-Zvi, Ishay. Goy: Israel’s Multiple Others and the Birth of the Gentile (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Osiek, Carolyn. “The Bride of Christ (Ephesians 5:22–33): A Problematic Wedding,” BTB 32 (2002): 29–39.Google Scholar
Osiek, Carolyn, and Balch, David L.. Families in the New Testament World (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Osiek, Carolyn, and MacDonald, Margaret Y. with Tulloch, Janet H.. A Woman’s Place: House Churches in Earliest Christianity (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Patzia, Arthur. Ephesians, Colossians, Philemon (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 1990).Google Scholar
Peppard, Michael. The Son of God in the Roman World (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Perelman, Chaim. The Realm of Rhetoric (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Perkins, Pheme. “Ephesians,” New Interpreter’s Bible. vol. 11 (Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Pokorný, Petr. Der Epheserbrief und die Gnosis: Die Bedeutung des Haupt-Glieder-Gedankens in der entstehenden Kirche (Berlin: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt, 1965).Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. “In Ephesians 5,5: Does Chiasm Solve a Problem?” Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 81 (1990): 270–76.Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. Idioms of the Greek New Testament (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. “Paul, Virtues, Vices, and Household Codes.” In Sampley, J. Paul, ed., Paul in the Greco-Roman World: A Handbook. vol. 2, rev. ed. (London: T&T Clark, 2016): 369–90.Google Scholar
Preisendanz, Karl. Papyri Graecae magicae: Die griechischen Zauberpapyri. 3 vols, 2nd rev. ed. (Stuttgart: Heinrichs, 1973–74 [1928–42]).Google Scholar
Price, S. R. F. Rituals and Power: The Roman Imperial Cult in Asia Minor (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Rabens, Volker. The Holy Spirit and Ethics in Paul. 2nd ed. (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. Hierocles the Stoic: Elements of Ethics, Fragments, and Excerpts (Atlanta, GA: Society of Biblical Literature, 2009).Google Scholar
Rapske, P. The Book of Acts and Paul in Roman Custody (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1994).Google Scholar
Reicke, Bo. “The Historical Setting of Colossians,” Review and Expositor 70 (1973): 429–38.Google Scholar
Richards, E. Randolph. Paul and First-Century Letter Writing: Secretaries, Composition and Collection (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Rogers, Guy MacLean. The Mysteries of Artemis of Ephesos: Cult, Polis, and Change in the Graeco-Roman World (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Roon, Α. van. The Authenticity of Ephesians, trans. S. Prescod-Jokel (Leiden: Brill, 1974).Google Scholar
Rosner, Brian S. Greed as Idolatry: The Origin and Meaning of a Pauline Metaphor (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2007).Google Scholar
Runge, Steven. Discourse Grammar of the Greek New Testament (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 2010).Google Scholar
Sampley, J. Paul. And the Two Shall Become One Flesh: A Study of Traditions in Ephesians 5:21–33 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Sampley, J. Paul. “Ephesians.” In Krodel, Gerhard, ed., The Deutero-Pauline Letters (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Schlier, Heinrich. Christus und die Kirche im Epheserbrief. (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1930).Google Scholar
Schlier, Heinrich. Der Brief an die Epheser: Ein Kommentar (Düsseldorf: Patmos, 1957).Google Scholar
Schnackenburg, Rudolf. The Epistle to the Ephesians, trans. Helen Heron (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1991).Google Scholar
Schoeps, H. J. Paul: The Theology of the Apostle (Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1961).Google Scholar
Schubert, Paul. Form and Function of the Pauline Thanksgivings (Berlin: Töpelmann, 1939).Google Scholar
Schweizer, Eduard. “Traditional Ethical Patterns in the Pauline and Post-Pauline Letters and Their Development.” In Best, Ernest and Wilson, R. McL., eds., Text and Interpretation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979): 195–209.Google Scholar
Scott, E. F. The Epistles to Colossians, Philemon and Ephesians (London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1952).Google Scholar
Sherwood, Aaron. “Paul’s Imprisonment as the Glory of the Ethnē: A Discourse Analysis of Ephesians 3:1–13,” Bulletin for Biblical Research 22.1 (2012): 97–111.Google Scholar
Skeat, T. C. “Especially the Parchments: A Note on 2 Timothy IV.13,” JTS n.s. 30 (1979): 172–77.Google Scholar
Smith, Julien. Christ the Ideal King: Cultural Context, Rhetorical Strategy, and the Power of Divine Monarchy in Ephesians (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2011).Google Scholar
Smith, Mitzi J. “Ephesians.” In Blount, Brian K., et al., eds., True to Our Native Land: An African American New Testament Commentary (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2007): 348–62.Google Scholar
Son, Sang-Won. “The Church as ‘One New Man’: Ecclesiology and Anthropology in Ephesians,” Southwestern Journal of Theology 52.1 (2009): 18–31.Google Scholar
Stevens, Gerald. Divine Wrath in Paul: An Exegetical Study (Eugene, OR: Pickwick Publications, 2020).Google Scholar
Stringfellow, William. An Ethic for Christians and Other Aliens in a Strange Land (Waco, TX: Word Books, 1973).Google Scholar
Talbert, Charles H. Ephesians and Colossians (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2007).Google Scholar
Tellbe, Mikael. Christ-Believers in Ephesus: A Textual Analysis of Early Christian Identity Formation in Local Perspective (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2009).Google Scholar
Thate, Michael J., Vanhoozer, Kevin J., and Campbell, Constantine R., eds. “In Christ” in Paul: Explorations in Paul’s Theology of Union and Participation (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2014). (Reprinted Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2018.)Google Scholar
Theissen, Gerd. The Social Setting of Pauline Christianity: Essays on Corinth (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Thompson, James W. The Church according to Paul: Rediscovering the Community Conformed to Christ (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2014).Google Scholar
Thompson, James W. Apostle of Persuasion: Rhetoric and Theology in the Letters of Paul (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2020).Google Scholar
Thornhill, A. Chadwick. The Chosen People: Election, Paul and Second Temple Judaism (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Tobin, Thomas H. Paul’s Rhetoric in Its Contexts: The Argument of Romans (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 2004).Google Scholar
Trebilco, Paul R. The Early Christians in Ephesus from Paul to Ignatius (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2007).Google Scholar
Veyne, Paul, ed. A History of Private Life: From Pagan Rome to Byzantium (Cambridge, MA: Belnap Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Wansink, Craig S. Chained in Christ: The Experience and Rhetoric of Paul’s Imprisonments (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 1996).Google Scholar
Weima, Jeffrey A. D. Neglected Endings: The Significance of the Pauline Letter Closings (Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Weima, Jeffrey A. D. Paul the Ancient Letter Writer (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2016).Google Scholar
Westcott, Brooke Foss. Saint Paul’s Epistle to the Ephesians: The Greek Text, with Notes and Addenda (London: Macmillan, 1906).Google Scholar
Westfall, Cynthia Long. “‘This Is a Great Metaphor!’ Reciprocity in the Ephesians Household Code.” In Porter, Stanley E. and Pitts, Andrew W., eds., Christian Origins and Greco-Roman Culture: Social and Literary Contexts for the New Testament (Leiden: Brill, 2013): 561–98.Google Scholar
Westfall, Cynthia Long. Paul and Gender: Reclaiming the Apostle’s Vision for Men and Women in Christ (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2016).Google Scholar
White, C. Dale. Making a Just Peace: Human Rights & Domination Systems (Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Wink, Walter. Naming the Powers: The Language of Power in the New Testament (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Wink, Walter. Unmasking the Powers: The Invisible Powers That Determine Human Existence (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Wink, Walter. Engaging the Powers: Discernment and Resistance in a World of Domination (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Witherington, Ben, III. Women in the Earliest Churches (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Witherington, Ben, “Christ.” In Hawthorne, Gerald F., Martin, Ralph P., and Reid, Daniel G., eds., Dictionary of Paul and His Letters (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1993): 95–100.Google Scholar
Witherington, Ben, The Letters to Philemon, the Colossians, and the Ephesians: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary on the Captivity Epistles (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2007).Google Scholar
Yee, Tet-Lim N. Jews, Gentiles and Ethnic Reconciliation: Paul’s Jewish Identity and Ephesians (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Yoder Neufeld, Thomas R. Put on the Armour of God: The Divine Warrior from Isaiah to Ephesians (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Zanker, Paul. The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1990).Google Scholar