Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T12:27:26.852Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

1 - The EU as a global legal actor

Bart Van Vooren  and
Ramses A. Wessel
Bart Van Vooren
Affiliation:
ALTIUS, Brussels
Ramses A. Wessel
Affiliation:
University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
Get access

Summary

Central issues

  • This chapter points to the fact that the EU is an international actor. We define this notion as an entity which interacts with third countries and international organizations (and even its own Member States), in ways which are legally and politically distinguishable from its constitutive Member States. In the global context, this entity thus has a stand-alone identity composed of values, interests and policies which it seeks to define and promote internationally as its own.

  • This chapter then indicates the importance of legal rules in organizing EU international action, and shows that EU external relations law consists of an internal and an external dimension. In its internal dimension it consists of the set of rules which govern the constitutional and institutional legal organization of this legal entity in pursuit of its interests in the world. The external dimension comprises the rules governing the relationship of the EU with the international legal order in which it is active.

  • In order to study EU external relations law in all its complexity, this chapter provides an overview of the architecture of EU external relations. It outlines the existence of the EU as an international organization with legal personality, which exists legally distinct from its Member States. It also shows that the EU is based on the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and the Treaty on the Functioning of the Union (TFEU), which each contain crucial legal principles constituting the body of EU external relations law.

  • Finally, in order to be an international actor, the EU needs agents to make the decisions and represent the EU on the global stage. These include the EU institutions, but also other key players in the law of EU external relations.

    • An international organization or something else?

    A textbook on EU external relations law is founded on the premise that the EU can have legal relations with third states and other international organizations. Hence, it is an international actor, with a distinct legal existence just like EU Member States, or international organizations such as the United Nations. What does it mean to say that the EU is an international actor?

    Type
    Chapter
    Information
    EU External Relations Law
    Text, Cases and Materials
     , pp. 1 - 33
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press
    Print publication year: 2014

    Access options

    Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

    References

    Bengoetxea, J., ‘The EU as (More Than) an International Organization’, in Klabbers, J. and Wallendahl, Å., Research Handbook on the Law of International Organizations (Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011), pp. 448–465.Google Scholar
    Bretherton, C. and Vogler, J., The European Union as a Global Actor (Abingdon/New York: Routledge, 2006).Google Scholar
    Bull, H., ‘Civilian Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?’ (1982) 21 Journal of Common Market Studies, 2, 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Cannizzaro, E., Palchetti, P. and Wessel, R. A. (eds.), International Law as Law of the European Union (Boston/Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2011).Google Scholar
    Chalmers, D., Davies, G. and Monti, G., European Union Law, 2nd edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
    Cremona, M., ‘The Draft Constitutional Treaty: External Relations and External Action’ (2003) 40 Common Market Law Review 1347–1366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Cremona, M., ‘The Union as a Global Actor: Roles, Models and Identity’ (2004) 42 Common Market Law Review 553–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Curtin, D. M. and Dekker, I. F., ‘The European Union from Maastricht to Lisbon: Institutional and Legal Unity Out of the Shadow’, in Craig, P. and de Búrca, G. (eds.), The Evolution of EU Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), pp. 155–185.Google Scholar
    De Baere, G., Constitutional Principles of EU External Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    De Búrca, G., ‘EU International Relations: The Governance Mode of Foreign Policy’, in Van Vooren, B. et al., The Legal Dimension of Global Governance: What Role for the EU? (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
    De Witte, B., ‘Too Much Constitutional Law in the European Union’s Foreign Relations?’, in Cremona, M. and de Witte, B. (eds.), EU Foreign Relations Law: Constitutional Fundamentals (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2008).Google Scholar
    Eeckhout, P., EU External Relations Law, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Eeckhout, P., ‘Exclusive External Competences: Constructing the EU as an International Actor’, in Rosas, A., Levits, E. and Bot, Y. (eds.), Court of Justice of the European Union – Cour de Justice de l’Union Européene, The Court of Justice and the Construction of Europe: Analyses and Perspectives on Sixty Years of Case-Law – La Cour de Justice et la Construction de l’Europe: Analyses et Perspectives de Soixante Ans de Jurisprudence (The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2013), pp. 613–636.Google Scholar
    Gosalbo Bono, R., ‘The Organization of the External Relations of the European Union in the Treaty of Lisbon’, in Koutrakos, P. (ed.), The European Union’s External Relations a Year after Lisbon (The Hague: CLEER Working Papers 2011/3), pp. 13–38.Google Scholar
    Hillion, C., ‘Tous pour un, un pour tous! Coherence in the External Relations of the European Union’, in Cremona, M. (ed.), Developments in EU External Relations Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 10–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Jacqué, J. P., ‘The Principle of Institutional Balance’ (2004) 41 Common Market Law Review, 2, 383–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Kaddous, C., ‘Role and Position of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy under the Lisbon Treaty’, in Griller, S. and Ziller, J. (eds.), The Lisbon Treaty: Constitutionalism without a Constitutional Treaty? (Vienna: Springer, 2008), pp. 205–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Kochenov, D. (ed.), EU Law of the Overseas: Outermost Regions, Associated Overseas Countries and Territories, Territories Sui Generis (The Hague: Wolters Kluwer, 2011).Google Scholar
    Kuijper, P. J., Wouters, J., Hoffmeister, F., de Baere, G. and Ramopoulos, T., The Law of EU External Relations, Cases, Materials, and Commentary on the EU as an International Legal Actor (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
    Larik, J., ‘Entrenching Global Governance: The EU’s Constitutional Objectives Caught between a Sanguine World View and a Daunting Reality’, in Van Vooren, B. et al., The Legal Dimension of Global Governance, What Role for the EU? (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
    Manners, I., ‘Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?’ (2002) 40 Journal of Common Market Studies, 2, 235–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Nye, J., Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics (New York: Public Affairs Press, 2005).Google Scholar
    Paasivirta, E., ‘The EU’s External Representation after Lisbon: New Rules, a New Era?’, in Koutrakos, P. (ed.), The European Union’s External Relations a Year after Lisbon (The Hague: CLEER Working Papers 2011/3), pp. 39–47.Google Scholar
    Paasivirta, E. and Kuijper, P. J., ‘Does One Size Fit All? The European Community and the Responsibility of International Organisations’ (2005) 36 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 169–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Passos, R., ‘The European Union’s External Relations a Year after Lisbon: A First Evaluation from the European Parliament’, in Koutrakos, P. (ed.), The European Union’s External Relations a Year after Lisbon (The Hague: CLEER Working Papers 2011/3), pp. 49–56.Google Scholar
    Paul, J., ‘EU Foreign Policy after Lisbon: Will the New High Representative and the External Action Service Make a Difference?’ (2008) 2 Centre for Applied Policy Research (CAP) Policy Analysis.Google Scholar
    Schermers, H. G. and Blokker, N. M., International Institutional Law: Unity in Diversity (Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Schroeder, W., ‘Die Europäische Union als Völkerrechtssubject’ (2012) Beiheft 2 Europarecht 9–23.Google Scholar
    Steinbach, A., ‘The Lisbon Judgment of the German Federal Constitutional Court – New Guidance on the Limits of European Integration’ (2010) 11 German Law Journal, 4, 367–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Thym, D., ‘Parliamentary Involvement in European International Relations’, in Cremona, M. and de Witte, B. (eds.), EU Foreign Relations Law: Constitutional Fundamentals (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2008), pp. 201–232.Google Scholar
    Tsagourias, N., ‘Conceptualizing the Autonomy of the European Union’, in Collins, R. and White, N. D. (eds.), International Organizations and the Idea of Autonomy: Institutional Independence in the International Legal Order (London/New York: Routledge, 2011), pp. 339–352.Google Scholar
    Van Vooren, B., ‘A Legal Institutional Perspective on the European External Action Service’ (2011) 48 Common Market Law Review 475–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Van Vooren, B., EU External Relations Law and the European Neighbourhood Policy: A Paradigm for Coherence (Abingdon/New York: Routledge, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Van Vooren, B., ‘The Small Arms Judgment in an Age of Constitutional Turmoil’ (2009) 14 European Foreign Affairs Review, 1, 231–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Van Vooren, B., Blockmans, S. and Wouters, J. (eds.), The EU’s Role in Global Governance: The Legal Dimension (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Wessel, R. A., ‘The Inside Looking Out: Consistency and Delimitation in EU External Relations’ (2000) 37 Common Market Law Review 1135–1171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Wessel, R. A., ‘The International Legal Status of the European Union’ (1997) 2 European Foreign Affairs Review 109–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Bull, H., ‘Civilian Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?’ (1982) 21 Journal of Common Market Studies, 2, 149–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Nye, J., Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics (New York: Public Affairs Press, 2005)Google Scholar
    Manners, I., ‘Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?’ (2002) 40 Journal of Common Market Studies, 2, 235–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Cremona, M., ‘The Union as a Global Actor: Roles, Models and Identity’ (2004) 42 Common Market Law Review 553–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Paasivirta, E. and Kuijper, P. J., ‘Does One Size Fit All? The European Community and the Responsibility of International Organisations’ (2005) 36 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 169–226 at 205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Chalmers, D., Davies, G. and Monti, G., European Union Law, 2nd edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), p. 3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Steinbach, A., ‘The Lisbon Judgment of the German Federal Constitutional Court – New Guidance on the Limits of European Integration’ (2010) 11 German Law Journal, 4, 367 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Tsagourias, N., ‘Conceptualizing the Autonomy of the European Union’, in Collins, R. and White, N. D. (eds.), International Organizations and the Idea of Autonomy: Institutional Independence in the International Legal Order (London/New York: Routledge, 2011), pp. 339–352 at 340Google Scholar
    Curtin, D. M. and Dekker, I. F., ‘The European Union from Maastricht to Lisbon: Institutional and Legal Unity Out of the Shadow’, in Craig, P. and de Búrca, G. (eds.), The Evolution of EU Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), pp. 155–185 at 163Google Scholar
    Schroeder, W., ‘Die Europäische Union als Völkerrechtssubject’ (2012) Beiheft 2 Europarecht 9–23 at 18Google Scholar
    Eeckhout, P., EU External Relations Law, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Schermers, H. G. and Blokker, N. M., International Institutional Law: Unity in Diversity (Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2011), pp. 55 and 57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Bengoetxea, J., ‘The EU as (More Than) an International Organization’, in Klabbers, J. and Wallendahl, Å., Research Handbook on the Law of International Organizations (Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011), pp. 448–465 at 449Google Scholar
    de Baere, G., Constitutional Principles of EU External Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), p. 253 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Jacqué, J.-P., ‘The Principle of Institutional Balance’ (2004) 41 Common Market Law Review, 2, 383 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    De Búrca, G., ‘EU International Relations: The Governance Mode of Foreign Policy’, in Van Vooren, B. et al., The Legal Dimension of Global Governance: What Role for the EU? (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar
    Kochenov, D. (ed.), EU Law of the Overseas: Outermost Regions, Associated Overseas Countries and Territories, Territories Sui Generis (The Hague: Wolters Kluwer, 2011)Google Scholar

    Save book to Kindle

    To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Available formats
    ×

    Save book to Dropbox

    To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

    Available formats
    ×

    Save book to Google Drive

    To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

    Available formats
    ×