Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T08:29:30.895Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

7 - Legislative Powers: Competences and Procedures

from Part II - Governmental Powers

Robert Schütze
Affiliation:
University of Durham
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Each society needs common rules and mechanisms for their production. The concept of legislation is central to all modern societies. Legislation refers to the making of laws (legis).

But what is ‘legislation’? Two competing conceptions of legislation have emerged in the modern era. The formal or procedural conception of legislation is tied to our modern understanding of who should be in charge of the legislative function. Legislation is formally defined as every legal act adopted according to the (parliamentary) legislative procedure. This procedural conception of legislation has traditionally shaped British constitutional thought. By contrast, a second conception defines what legislation should be, that is: legal rules with general application. This material or functional conception of legislation has shaped continental constitutional thought. A material definition of legislation underpins phrases like ‘external legislation’ through international agreements, and ‘delegated legislation’ adopted by the executive.

Which of these traditions has informed European constitutionalism? The Union has traditionally followed a material definition. However, with the Lisbon Treaty, a formal definition of legislative power has been adopted. The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union now constitutionally defines: ‘Legal acts adopted by legislative procedure shall constitute legislative acts.’

But what are the ‘legislative’ powers of the European Union? And what types of power can it enjoy? This chapter answers these questions in four sections. Section 1 analyses the scope of the Union's legislative competences. This scope is limited, as the Union is not a sovereign State. Section 2 analyses the different categories of Union competences. Depending on what competence category is involved, the Union will enjoy distinct degrees of legislative power. Section 3 analyses the identity of the Union legislator. Various legislative procedures thereby determine how the Union must exercise its ‘legislative’ competences. Section 4 finally scrutinises the principle of subsidiarity as a constitutional principle that controls the exercise of the Union's shared legislative powers.

The Scope of Union Competences

When the British Parliament legislates, it need not ‘justify’ its acts. It is considered to enjoy a competence to do all things. This ‘omnipotence’ is inherent in the idea of a sovereign parliament in a sovereign state. The European Union is neither ‘sovereign’ nor a ‘state’. Its powers are not inherent powers. They must be conferred by its foundational charter: the European Treaties.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Azoulai, L. (ed.), The Question of Competence in the European Union (Oxford University Press, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buonanno, L. and Nugent, N., Policies and Policy Processes of the European Union (Palgrave, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estella, A., The EU Principle of Subsidiarity and its Critique (Oxford University Press, 2002)Google Scholar
Hix, S. and Høyland, B., The Political System of the European Union (Palgrave, 2005)Google Scholar
Kohler-Koch, B. and Rittberger, B., Debating the Democratic Legitimacy of the European Union (Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2007)Google Scholar
Cooper, I., ‘The Watchdogs of Subsidiarity: National Parliaments and the Logic of Arguing in the EU’ (2006) 44 Journal of Common Market Studies 281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, P., ‘Competence: Clarity, Conferral, Containment and Consideration’ (2004) 29 EL Rev 323Google Scholar
Dashwood, A., ‘The Limits of European Community Powers’ (1996) 21 EL Rev 113Google Scholar
Davies, G., ‘Subsidiarity: The Wrong Idea, in the Wrong Place, at the Wrong Time’ (2006) 43 CML Rev 63Google Scholar
Fabbrini, F. and Grant, K., ‘“Yellow Card, but no Foul”: The Role of the National Parliaments under the Subsidiary Protocol and the Commission Proposal for an EU Regulation on the Right to Strike’ (2013) 50 CML Rev 115Google Scholar
Konstadinides, T., ‘Drawing the Line between Circumvention and Gap-filling: An Exploration of the Conceptual Limits of the Treaty's Flexibility Clause’ (2012) 31 YEL 227Google Scholar
Reh, C. et al., ‘The Informal Politics of Legislation: Explaining Secluded Decision Making in the European Union’ (2013) 49 Comparative Political Studies 1112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruiter, R. de and Neuhold, C., ‘Why Is Fast Track the Way to Go? Justification for Early Agreement in the Co-decision Procedure and their Effects’ (2012) 18 ELJ 536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schütze, R., 'Organized Change towards an “Ever Closer Union”: Article 308 EC and the Limits to the Community's Legislative Competence (2003) 22 YEL 79Google Scholar
Schütze, R., ‘Lisbon and the Federal Order of Competences: A Prospective Analysis’ (2008) 33 EL Rev 709Google Scholar
Tizzano, A., ‘The Powers of the Community’, in Commission (ed.), Thirty Years of Community Law (Office for Official Publications of the EC, 1981) 43Google Scholar
Weatherill, S., ‘Competence Creep and Competence Control’ (2004) 23 YEL 1Google Scholar
Wyatt, D., ‘Community Competence to Regulate the Internal Market’ (Oxford University Faculty of Law Research Paper 9/2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×